THE EFFECT OF PREVENTION FOR PEER BULLYING IN SECONDARY SCHOOL

Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 64 - 68, 01.10.2018

Batuhan Mutlu Şermin Yalın Sapmaz Beyhan Cengiz Özyurt İrem Şenel Elif Metin Melisa Sargut Riyadh Saeed Bengisu Uzel Tanrıverdi Hasan Kandemir Cevval Ulman

Abstract

Aims: Peer bullying is a frequent problem among adolescents. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of complementary prevention for peer bullying in 11-14-year-old adolescents with family, teacher, student collaboration and to assess the effect of peer bullying on the quality of life.

Methods: Seven hundred sixty students registered in school between ages 11-14, and who accepted to participate in the study were included in our investigation. Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory were used as data collection tools in the study. After the pre-test, school teachers and two selected students from each class; a total of 48 students were trained in peer bullying in small group. Interactive awareness activities were organized for the students at the school with all trained students and teachers to raise awareness of peer bullying. Afterwards, information brochures were distributed to the children and parents. 3 weeks after the training post-test was applied. The statistical evaluation of the study was carried out by using Chi-square and Student’s t-tests.

Results: The questions about bullying and victimization were analyzed. In the study, the rate of victim students reduced from 43.2% to 30.4%; the rate of bully students reduced from 23.4% to 21.7%. There was a significant reduction in the rate of people involved in peer bullying. Nevertheless, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory assessment of health-related quality of life in our group showed that the quality of life of students who were not involved in peer bullying was significantly higher. After our training, quality of life significantly increased in students who were not involved in bullying, compared to the ones who are involved in bullying.

Conclusion: In our study group, it was observed that the quality of life of students who were not involved in peer bullying was significantly higher. The number of people involved in peer bullying decreased significantly. The low number of invalid surveys revealed that our research was successful in attracting the attention of the target group.

Keywords

Awareness, bullying, adolescent

References

• 1. Olweus D. Bullying in schools: facts and intervention. Kriminalistik 2010;64(6):351-61.
• 2. Dan Olweus. School bullying: development and some important challenges. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2013;9:751–80.
• 3. Currie C, Gabhainn SN, Godeau E et al. Inequalities in young people’s health. HBSC International Report From the 2005/2006 survey, 2008. WHO, Health Policy Children and Adolescents No:5 Available from URL:http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_ file/0005/53852/E91416.pdf.
• 4. A Wilkins-Shurmer A, O’Callaghan MJ, Najman JM et al. Association of bullying with adolescent health-related quality of life. J Paediatr Child Health 2003;39(6):436–41.
• 5. Tıpırdamaz Sipahi H. İzmir ili Bornova ilçesinde ilköğretim 6. ve 7. sınıf öğrencilerinde akran zorbalığı, etkileyen ve eşlik eden faktörler. İzmir: Ege University. 2008.
• 6. Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. The PedsQL: measurement model for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Med Care 1999;37:126-39.
• 7. Çakın-Memik, N, Ağaoğlu, B, Coşkun et al. Çocuklar için yaşam kalitesi ölçeğinin 13-18 yaş ergen formunun geçerlik ve güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2007;18(4):353-63.
• 8. Vreeman RC, Carroll E. A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161(1):78-88.
• 9. Olwus D, Limber SP. The olweus bullying prevention program implementation and evaluation over two decades. In: Jimerson SR, Swearer SM, Espelage DL, editors. The Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective. New York: Routledge; 2010. p.377-401.