İÇ MEKAN TASARIMINDA DOĞA TEMELLİ TASARIM YAKLAŞIMLARI: KAPSAYICI BİR TASARIM ÖNERİSİ

Year 2023, , 953 - 965, 01.10.2023

Dilek Yasar

https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1325003

Abstract

Nature has always been an essential source of inspiration for the architectural design. Based on their observations, architects simulated nature or get inspiration thereof to help guide their designs. Nevertheless, architects started to adopt a different perspective towards the human-nature relationship upon the aggravated global climate crisis in recent decades and the problems associated with natural environment as well as the weakened ties between community and nature. Accordingly, architects introduced nature-based design approaches based on nature and human communication that considered human health and well-being while protecting environmental resources, and taking cognizance of cultural aspects of design as well. The aforementioned approaches with a strong emphasis on human health, well-being, and welfare, proved to be crucial for a healthier, more comfortable, and environmentally friendly interior design in the world today, where sustainability gains importance and nature, culture, and human relations are frequently reinterpreted in different forms. As such, the present study focuses on three nature-based design approaches, i.e., green design, ecological design, and biophilic design, suggested in the relevant literature, and presents a sustainable and inclusive interior design framework based on the similarities and differences among those approaches. In the light thereof, the grounded theory method, a qualitative research method that operates upon an inductive process, was applied and those design approaches and principles were first explained through an in-depth literature review in the context thereof. Subsequently, an inclusive design framework for interior design was suggested based on the similarities and differences among the approaches in question. The present study is important in terms of its emphasis on the potentials offered by nature-based, sustainable interior design approaches for both the interior architects, and users. The study will provide interior architects, who are interested in sustainable design approaches with a new perspective and also contribute to the relevant literature.

Keywords

İç Mimari Tasarım, Yeşil Tasarım, Ekolojik Tasarım, Biyofilik Tasarım, Doğa Temelli Tasarım

NATURE-BASED DESIGN APPROACHES IN INTERIOR DESIGN: AN INCLUSIVE DESIGN FRAMEWORK SUGGESTION

Abstract

Doğa her daim, mimari tasarım için önemli bir ilham kaynağı olmuştur. Doğayı gözlemleyen mimarlar kimi zaman doğada var olanı taklit ederek kimi zaman ondan esinlenerek tasarımlarına yön vermişlerdir. Ancak son on yıllarda artan küresel iklim krizi ve doğal çevreye yönelik sorunlar ve yanı sıra insanların doğayla olan bağlarının zayıflaması sebebi mimarlar, insan ve doğa ilişkisini farklı bir boyutta ele almaya başlamışlardır. Bu anlamda mimarlar, doğa ve insan iletişimini esas alan; çevresel kaynakları korurken insan sağlığını ve refahını da göz önünde bulunduran ve ayrAıca tasarımın kültürel yönlerini de dikkate alan doğa temelli tasarım yaklaşımları ortaya koymuşlardır. Sürdürülebilirliğin önem kazandığı, doğa, kültür ve insan ilişkilerinin yeniden ve farklı biçimlerde sıklıkla gündeme geldiği günümüzde, insan sağlığı, esenliği ve refahında önemli bir yer tutan bu yaklaşımlar daha sağlıklı, konforlu ve çevre dostu iç mekanların tasarımında son derece önemlidir. Bu noktadan hareketle çalışmada, akademik çevrelerce kabul görmüş olan yeşil tasarım, ekolojik tasarım ve biyofilik tasarım olmak üzere üç doğa temelli tasarım yaklaşımına odaklanılmış ve bu yaklaşımların benzerlik ve farklılıklarından yola çıkılarak, sürdürülebilir ve kapsayıcı bir iç mekân tasarım çerçevesi sunulmuştur. Bu doğrultuda nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan ve tümevarımsal bir sürece dayalı olarak işleyen gömülü teori metodu uygulanmış ve bu bağlamda ilk olarak bu tasarım yaklaşımları ve ilkeleri derin literatür taraması yoluyla açıklanmıştır. Ardından bu tasarım yaklaşımlarının benzerlik ve farkları temel alınarak iç mekân tasarımına yönelik kapsayıcı bir tasarım çerçevesi önerisinde bulunulmuştur. Çalışma, doğa temelli, sürdürülebilir özelliklere sahip iç mekân tasarım yaklaşımlarının hem iç mimarlar hem de kullanıcılar için sunduğu potansiyelleri vurgulaması bakımından önemlidir. Çalışmanın sürdürülebilir tasarım yaklaşımları ile ilgilenen iç mimarlara yeni bir bakış açısı sunacağı ve yanı sıra ilgili literatüre katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

Interior Design, Green Design, Ecological Design, Biophilic Design, Nature-based Design Approaches

References

• Abioso, W. S. (2020). Synomorph of behaviour setting in architecture enhance the green design. Materials Science and Engineering, (879), 012159. https://iopscience.iop.org/issue/1757-899X/879/1
• Aktaş, G. (2012). Ecological and Green Design Significances in Interior Spaces. In N. Altawell, K. Volkov, C. Matos, & P. F. Arroyabe (Eds.), Recent researches in environmental and geological sciences (pp. 244-249). WSEAS Press https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/books/2012/Kos/WEGECM.pdf
• Aktas, G. G. (2013). Design parameters and initiatives for ecological and green design in interior architecture. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 9(2), 57-67.
• Allen, J. G., MacNaughton, P., Laurent, J. G., Flanigan, S. S., Eitland, E. S. & Spengler, J. D. (2015). Green buildings and health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 2(3), 250–258. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40572-015-0063-y
• Annerstedt, M. & Währborg, P. (2011). Nature-assisted therapy: systematic review of controlled and observational studies. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(4), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810396400
• Bowler, D., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T. & Pullin, A. S. (2010). The importance of nature for health: Is there a specific benefit of contact with green space? Environmental Evidence, (40), 1-57. www.environmentalevidence.org/SR40.html
• Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 Patterns of biophilic design, ımproving health & well-being in the built environment. Terrapin Bright Green llc. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/reports/14-patterns/
• Collins, P. (1998). Changing ideals in modern architecture, 1750-1950. McGill-Queen's Press.
• Dennis, L. (2010). Green interior design. Allworth Press.
• Downton, P., Jones, D., Zeunert, J. & Roös, P. (2017). Biophilic design applications: Putting theory and patterns into built environment practice. KnE Engineering, 2(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v2i2.596
• Feizi, M., Ahmadi, J. & Ahmadi, M. (2014). Ecological design process, the way toward improve modern sustainable architectural design. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism, 4 (2), 125-130. https://www.ojceu.ir/main/
• Gillis, K. & Gatersleben, B. (2015). A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings, 5(3), 948-963. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5030948
• Gray, T. & Birrell, C. (2014). Are biophilic-designed site office buildings linked to health benefits and high performing occupants? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(12), 12204-12222. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111212204
• Han, X. (2022). Application of green design concept in interior design practice. Journal of World Architecture, 6(3), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.26689/jwa.v6i3.4001
• Hartig, T. & Staats, H. (2005). Linking preference for environments with their restorative quality. In B. Tress, G. Tress, G. Fry, & P. Opdam (Eds.), From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application, (pp. 279-292). Springer.
• Kallipoliti, L. (2018). History of ecological design. Oxford research encyclopedia of environmental science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.144
• Kellert, S. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In S. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis (pp. 42-69). Island Press.
• Kellert, S. (1997). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development. Island Press.
• Kellert, S. (2012). Birthright: People and nature in the modern world. Yale University Press.
• Kellert, S. & Calabrese, E. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. Terrapin Bright llc.
• Korpela, K. M. (1991). Healthy environments: Are favorite places restorative environments. In J. Urbinal-Soria, P. Ortega-Andeane, & R. Bechtel (Eds.), Healthy Environments (pp. 371-377). Environmental Design Research Association.
• Kostic, A., Stankovic, D. & Tanic, M. (2015). Inclusion of ‘green’principles in the design of pre-school buildings. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 12(3), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.12.3.13023
• Liu, X. & Wang, B. (2012). An approach to ınterior ecological design concepts. Advanced Materials Research, (490), 1931–1935. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.490-495.1931
• Marcus, C. M. & Sachs, N.A. (2014). Therapeutic landscapes: An evidence-based approach to designing healing gardens and restorative outdoor spaces. John Wiley.
• Ni, M. (2017). Research on application of green concepts in interior design. In Q. Xia, & H. Zhou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference: Vol. 123. Education, sports, arts and management engineering (pp. 1328–1331). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.490-495.1931
• Nousiainen, M., Lindroos, H., & Heino, P. (2016). Restorative environment design. Kymenlaakso University of Applied Sciences.
• Ojo-Fafore, E., Aigbavboa, C. & Remaru, P. (2018). Benefits of green buildings. In R. M. Anwar (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference. Industrial engineering and operations management (pp. 2289-2297). IEOM Society International. http://ieomsociety.org/ieom2018/papers/581.pdf
• Orr, D. (2007). Architecture, ecological design, and human ecology. In C. Macy, & T. Fisher (Eds.), The Green Braid (pp. 33-51). Routledge.
• Özkaban, F. A., Altun, T. D. A., Tokuç, A., Çakır, Ö. A., Köktürk, G. & Şendemir, A. (2020). Mimarlığın doğa ile ilişkisinde yeni bir boyut: Biyotasarım. Yapı Dergisi, (461), 48-53.
• Rian, I. M. & Sassone, M. (2014). Tree-inspired dendriforms and fractal-like branching structures in architecture: A brief historical overview. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(3), 298-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.03.006
• Ryan, C. O., Browning, W. D., Clancy, J. O., Andrews, S. L. & Kallianpurkar, N. B. (2014). Biophilic design patterns: emerging nature-based parameters for health and well-being in the built environment. International Journal of Architectural Research, 8(2), 62-75. https://www.archnet.org/publications/9767
• Ryan, C.O. & Browning, W.D. (2020). Biophilic design. In V. Loftness (Ed.), Sustainable Built Environments (pp. 1-44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0684-1_1034
• Shu-Yang, F., Freedman, B. & Cote, R. (2004). Principles and practice of ecological design. Environmental Reviews, 12(2), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1139/a04-005
• Stitt, F. A. (1999). Ecological design handbook: Sustainable strategies for architecture. Landscape architecture, interior design, and planning. McGraw-Hill.
• Van der Ryn, S. & Cowan, S. (2013). Ecological design. Island press.
• Wells, N. & Rollings, K. (2012). The natural environment: influences on human health and function. In S. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology (pp. 509–523). Oxford University Press.
• Wilson, E. O. (1986). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Harvard University Press.
• Yasar, D. (2023). Yeşil otel iç mekân tasarımlarının malzeme, renk ve aydınlatma çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi. Online Journal of Art and Design, 11 (5), 590-596. http://www.adjournal.net/
• Zhang, L. (2020). Research on the application of green design concept in interior design. Journal of Architectural Research and Development, 4(4), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.26689/jard.v4i4.1460