TR
EN
ACCORDING TO THE PERCEPTIONS OF WRESTLING ATHLETES, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE COACH WITH THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF THE ATHLETE
Abstract
The aim of this research is to determine the relationship of the unethical behavior of the trainer with the mental endurance of the athlete according to the perceptions of wrestling athletes. In the study, the Personal Information Form created by the researchers, the Athlete Perception Scale Related to Unethical Behavior of the Coach developed by Güven ve Öncü (2012) and the Mental Endurance Inventory developed by Sheard, Golby and Van Wersch (2009) and adapted to Turkish by Altıntaş (2015) were used as data collection tools to learn some demographic information of the participants. Descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), tukey multiple comparison, Pearson correlation tests were used in the analysis of the data. As a result of the findings obtained, while there was no significant difference in terms of gender variable of unethical behavior of coaches and mental toughness of athletes according to the perceptions of athletes, there was a meaningful difference in terms of marital status variable of athletes. According to the perceptions of athletes, unethical behavior of coaches; while notable differences were observed when the athlete's age, education level, parents' education level were evaluated in terms of sports year variables, mental toughness of athletes was not remarkably dissimlar when the athlete's age, education level, parents' education level were evaluated in terms of sports year variables. According to the result of the correlation analysis between the Athlete Perception Scale Related to the Unethical Behavior of the Coach and the Mental Toughness Inventory in Sports, it can be explained that there is a midlevel relationship negatively. As a result, it can be stated that the mental toughness of the athlete increases as the unethical behavior of the coaches decreases.
Keywords
References
- Altıntaş, A. (2015). Sporcuların zihinsel dayanıklılıklarının belirlenmesinde optimal performans duygu durumu, güdülenme düzeyi ve hedef yöneliminin rolü. Doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
- Arıkök, M. (2017). Etik liderlik ve tükenmişliğin üretim karşıtı iş davranışları üzerindeki etkileri: ankara üretim sektöründe bir uygulama. Doktora tezi, Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Kocaeli.
- Bahadır, G. & Adiloğulları, İ. (2020). Spor yapan üniversite öğrencilerinde zihinsel dayanıklılık ile duygusal zekâ arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences-IJSETS, 6(4), 117-128.
- Bektaş, M., & Özben, Ş. (2016). Evli bireylerin psikolojik dayanıklılık düzeylerinin bazı sosyo-demografik değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1). 216-240.
- Caz, Ç. (2019). Antrenörlerin sergilemiş olduğu etik dışı davranışların sporcu gözüyle değerlendirilmesi. Gelecek Vizyonlar Dergisi, 3(1), 20-25.
- Certel, Z., Alkış, A., & Gürpınar, B. (2018). Antrenörlerin mesleki etik ilkelere uyma düzeylerinin antrenör ve sporcu gözüyle değerlendirilmesi. Mediterranea Journal Of Humanities, 8(2), 223-231.
- Clough, P. & Strycharczyk, D. (2012). Developing mental toughness: improving performance, wellbeing and positive behaviour in others. Kogan Page Publishers.
- Constandt, B., De Waegeneer, E., & Willem, A. (2018). Coach ethical leadership in soccer clubs: An analysis of its influence on ethical behavior. Journal of Sport Management, 32(3), 185-198.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Exercise and Sports Psychology
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
October 20, 2023
Submission Date
August 1, 2023
Acceptance Date
September 17, 2023
Published in Issue
Year 2023 Volume: 12 Number: 4
APA
Güçlü, M., & Sağ, S. (2023). ACCORDING TO THE PERCEPTIONS OF WRESTLING ATHLETES, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE COACH WITH THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF THE ATHLETE. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports, 12(4), 573-581. https://doi.org/10.22282/tojras.1335956
AMA
1.Güçlü M, Sağ S. ACCORDING TO THE PERCEPTIONS OF WRESTLING ATHLETES, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE COACH WITH THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF THE ATHLETE. TOJRAS. 2023;12(4):573-581. doi:10.22282/tojras.1335956
Chicago
Güçlü, Mehmet, and Samet Sağ. 2023. “ACCORDING TO THE PERCEPTIONS OF WRESTLING ATHLETES, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE COACH WITH THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF THE ATHLETE”. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports 12 (4): 573-81. https://doi.org/10.22282/tojras.1335956.
EndNote
Güçlü M, Sağ S (October 1, 2023) ACCORDING TO THE PERCEPTIONS OF WRESTLING ATHLETES, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE COACH WITH THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF THE ATHLETE. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports 12 4 573–581.
IEEE
[1]M. Güçlü and S. Sağ, “ACCORDING TO THE PERCEPTIONS OF WRESTLING ATHLETES, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE COACH WITH THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF THE ATHLETE”, TOJRAS, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 573–581, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.22282/tojras.1335956.
ISNAD
Güçlü, Mehmet - Sağ, Samet. “ACCORDING TO THE PERCEPTIONS OF WRESTLING ATHLETES, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE COACH WITH THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF THE ATHLETE”. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports 12/4 (October 1, 2023): 573-581. https://doi.org/10.22282/tojras.1335956.
JAMA
1.Güçlü M, Sağ S. ACCORDING TO THE PERCEPTIONS OF WRESTLING ATHLETES, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE COACH WITH THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF THE ATHLETE. TOJRAS. 2023;12:573–581.
MLA
Güçlü, Mehmet, and Samet Sağ. “ACCORDING TO THE PERCEPTIONS OF WRESTLING ATHLETES, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE COACH WITH THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF THE ATHLETE”. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports, vol. 12, no. 4, Oct. 2023, pp. 573-81, doi:10.22282/tojras.1335956.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Güçlü, Samet Sağ. ACCORDING TO THE PERCEPTIONS OF WRESTLING ATHLETES, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE COACH WITH THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF THE ATHLETE. TOJRAS. 2023 Oct. 1;12(4):573-81. doi:10.22282/tojras.1335956