Talent Selectıon in Sport With Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: TOPSIS and VIKOR Comparison

Year 2023, , 818 - 823, 20.10.2023

Serkan Esen

https://doi.org/10.22282/tojras.1351345

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods refer to a successful system used in various fields. Developed to facilitate the decision-maker's task, this system employs qualitative and quantitative methods by weighting criteria in a setting with a large number of alternatives. Similarly, the talent selection process in sports is based on making a decision by interpreting the different skills of many athletes in accordance with the appropriate discipline. However, during this process, errors can occur in preferences due to overlooked minor details or when athletes cannot have the opportunity to present themselves. MCDM methods provide an opportunity in this regard by blending athletes' quantitative data with their qualitative values in order to minimize errors. Thus, in this study, TOPSIS and VIKOR among MCDM methods were applied to the same athletes’ data by using common criteria weights, and athletes were ranked from the best to the worst option. While TOPSIS method ranking has the score distribution between 0.731 and 0.116, VIKOR method has the score distribution between 0.091 (closest to 0) and 0.488 (closest to 1). While there was a 10% exact match between the two methods, it was observed that three alternatives (B, G, and F) changed places (B,G,F) by 3 ranks and other three alternatives (C, D, and J) by 2 ranks. The results of the ranking revealed differences in the rankings of the two methods, but the most significant discrepancies were observed in the middle ranges.

Keywords

Multi-criteria decision-making, TOPSIS, VIKOR, talent selection

References

• Cengiz, D., (2012). Comparative Analysis on Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods, Master's Thesis, Yıldız Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Chen, C.T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision Making Under Fuzzy Environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1-9.
• Cristóbal, J.R.S. (2012). Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria DecisionMaking Methods, Journal Of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(6), 751-758.
• Dalbudak, E., & Rençber, Ö. F. (2022). Literature Review on Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods, Gaziantep University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 4(1), 1-17.
• Ekin, E., & Cesur, İ. G. (2022). An Application of Entropy-Based TOPSIS and VIKOR Methods to Evaluate Financial Performance of Banks, Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 6(2), 1327-1344.
• Erol, A., Gülsün, B., & Aydın, M. (2014). Determination of ship type to be built in shipyards by fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR methods, Ship and Marine Technology, (203), 95-103.
• Ersöz, F., & Kabak, M. (2010). A literature review of multi-criteria decision making methods in defense industry applications, Journal of Defense Sciences, 9(1), 97-125.
• Ertuğrul, İ., & Özçil, A. (2014). Air conditioner selection with TOPSIS and VIKOR methods in multi-criteria decision making, Journal of Çankırı Karatekin University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 4(1), 267-282.
• Esen, S., Uslu, T., (2020). Evaluation of Talent Selection in Football through Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Method, Turkish Journal of Sports Sciences, 4(2), 111-123.
• Górecka, D. (2020). Selecting the right football club to sponsor: multi-criteria analysis, Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(4), 2867-2874.
• Gülençer, S. (2020). Analysis of Deposit Banks in Turkey with TOPSIS and VIKOR Methods, Kirklareli University Vocational School of Social Sciences Journal, 1(1), 1-22.
• Hwang, C.L. ve Yoon, K. (1981). Multi Attiribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag.
• Karaatlı, M., Ömürbek, N., & Köse, G. (2014). Analytical Hierarchy Process Based Topsis and Vikor Methods for the Evaluation of Footballer Performances, Dokuz Eylul University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 29(1), 25-61.
• Künç, G. Y., & Yaşa, A. A. (2019). Comparison of Budget Indicators of Turkey-OECD Countries with TOPSIS and VIKOR Methods, Bitlis Eren University Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 366-384.
• Lai, Y. J., Liu, T. Y. ve Hwang, C.L. (1994). TOPSIS for MODM, European Journal of Operational Research, 76(3), 486-500.
• Monjezi, M., Dehghani, H., Singh, T. N., Sayadi, A.R. ve Gholinejad, A. (2010). Application of TOPSIS Method for Selecting the Most Appropriate Blast Design, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 5(1), 95-101.
• Opricovic, S. ve Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 445–455
• Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G. H., (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with other outranking methods, European Journal of Operational Research, 178, 514-529.
• Öztel, A. (2016). A New Approach in the Selection of a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method, Gazi University Institute of Science and Technology (PhD Thesis, Ankara).
• Qader, M. A., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., Ali, S. K., Kamaluddin, M. A., & Radzi, W. B. (2017). A methodology for football players selection problem based on multi-measurements criteria analysis, Measurement, 111, 38-50.
• Timor, M., (2011). Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi, 1.Basım, Türkmen Kitapevi, İstanbul
• Tufan, C., & Kılıç, Y. (2019). Evaluation of Financial Performance of Logistics Enterprises Traded in Borsa Istanbul by TOPSIS and VIKOR Methods. Cumhuriyet University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20.
• Turgut, Z. N., Danışan, T., & Tamer, E. (2021). Evaluation and selection of wearable technologies in the world of sport and fashion with CRM methods, Journal of Sport and Recreation for All, 3(1), 1-11.
• Uğur, L.O., (2017). Construction project manager selection with MOORA optimization approach: A multi-criteria decision making application, Polytechnic Journal, 20(3), 717-723.
• Yanık, L., & Eren, T. (2017). Analyzing the financial performance of automotive manufacturing firms traded in Borsa Istanbul with AHP, TOPSIS, ELECTRE and VIKOR methods, Yalova Journal of Social Sciences, 7(13), 165-188.
• Yıldırım, B. F., Önder, E., (2017). Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods in Solving Operational, Managerial and Strategic Problems, Dora Basım Yayın, Bursa.
• Yoon, K. (1987). A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Solutions, Journal of Operational Research Society, 38(3), 272–286
• Wei, J. (2010). TOPSIS Method for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Incomplete Weight Information in Linguistic Setting, Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 5(10), 181-187.