2021 ve 2022 Büyükler Serbest Güreş Dünya Şampiyonalarında Gerçekleştirilen Teknik ve Taktik Hareketlerin Analizi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, 2021 ve 2022 Büyükler Dünya Güreş Şampiyonaları’nda elit düzeydeki erkek güreşçilerin teknik ve taktiksel yönlerini incelemek için bir notasyon analizi yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Toplamda 598 müsabaka videosu Dartfish Connect Plus 8.0 maç analizi programı kullanılarak incelenmiş ve analiz edilmiştir. Analizler, müsabaka hazırlığı, arama ve etiketleme, veri tabanı oluşturma ve veri kullanımı prosedürlerine göre gerçekleştirilmiştir. Güreş teknikleri, ayakta pozisyonda yapılan teknikler (ayağa dalma ve fırlatmalar) ve parter pozisyonunda yapılan teknikler (çevirmeler ve fırlatmalar) olmak üzere gruplandırılmıştır. 2021 ve 2022 Dünya Şampiyonaları arasında ataklar ve kontra-ataklar açısından 2022 Dünya şampiyonası lehine anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur (p <0.05; χ2=8.318). 2021 Dünya Şampiyonası’nda birinci ve ikinci periyotlardaki ortalama teknik puan (TPort) sırasıyla 5.2 ve 4.4 (p > 0.05, d = 0.071) olarak, güreş hareketleri açısından ortalama değerler (GHort) ise 1.78 ve 1.73 (p > 0.05, d = 0.068) olarak belirlenmiştir. 2022 Dünya Şampiyonası’nda ise TPort sırasıyla 5.1 ve 4.4 (p > 0.05, d = 0.061), GHort ise 1.77 ve 1.76 (p > 0.05, d = 0.001) olarak tespit edilmiştir. Güreş tekniklerinin büyük bir çoğunluğunun ayakta pozisyonda uygulandığı görülmüştür (2021 Dünya Şampiyonası %61,4; 2022 Dünya Şampiyonası %58,6). Bu çalışmanın bulguları, 2021 ve 2022 Dünya Şampiyonaları’nda sergilenen güreşlerin aktif bir mücadele yapısına sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Elit serbest stil güreşte en değerli teknikler arasında ayak dalışı, ayakta indirme, dışarı itme ve ters kilit çevirme olduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

• Güreş
• notasyonel analiz
• teknik-taktik
• elit sporcular

Analysis of Technical and Tactical Movements Performed in the 2021 and 2022 Senior Freestyle World Championships

Abstract

This study aimed to perform a notational analysis to examine the technical and tactical aspects of elite male wrestlers participating in the 2021 and 2022 Senior World Wrestling Championships. A total of 598 bout videos were observed and analyzed using the Dartfish Connect Plus 8.0 match analysis program. The analysis process involved four stages: bout analysis preparation, searching and tagging, database creation, and data utilization procedures. Wrestling techniques were categorized into takedowns and throws (standing position) and flips and throws (parterre position). A significant difference was found between attack and counterattack techniques between the 2021 and 2022 World Championships (p < 0.05; χ2 = 8.318). The mean technical points (TPmean) recorded during the first and second periods were 5.2 and 4.4, respectively, in the 2021 World Championship (p > 0.05, d = 0.071), while the mean number of wrestling actions (WAmean) was 1.78 and 1.73 (p > 0.05, d = 0.068) for the same periods. In the 2022 World Championship, TPmean was recorded as 5.1 and 4.4 (p > 0.05, d = 0.061), and WAmean as 1.77 and 1.76 (p > 0.05, d = 0.001) for the first and second periods, respectively. The majority of wrestling techniques were performed in the standing position (61.4% in 2021 and 58.6% in 2022). The findings of the present study demonstrated the dynamic and active nature of wrestling in the 2021 and 2022 World Championships. Furthermore, leg attacks, takedowns, push-outs, and gut wrenches were identified as the most valuable techniques in elite freestyle wrestling

Keywords

• Wrestling
• notational analyses
• technic-tactic
• elite athlete.

References

1. Arabaci, R., Sahin, S., & Cicioglu, I. (2018). Technical-tactical analysis of wrestling competitions in 2016 Rio olympic games. The Journal of Physical Education Research, 5(1), 8–13.
2. Atan, T., & İmamoğlu, O. (2005). Competition analysis of world greco-roman and world free-style wrestling championships. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 5(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2005.11868313
3. Chaabene, H., Negra, Y., Bouguezzi, R., Mkaouer, B., Franchini, E., Julio, U., & Hachana, Y. (2017). Physical and Physiological Attributes of Wrestlers: An Update. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(5), 1411–1442. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001738
4. Cipriano N. (1993). A technical–tactical analysis of freestyle wrestling. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 7(3), 133–140.
5. Dokmanac, M., Karadzic, P., & Doder, D. (2012). Statistical analysis of the wrestling world championships in Istanbul-2011. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 2(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/21615667.2012.10878945
6. Farwell, R., & Simpson, S. (2013). Analysis of scoring strategies in college wrestling. In PhD Thesis, Department of Physical Education Teaching, University of Wisconsin. USA.
7. García-Pallarés, J., María López-Gullón, J., Muriel, X., Díaz, A., & Izquierdo, M. (2011). Physical fitness factors to predict male olympic wrestling performance. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(8), 1747–1758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1809-8
8. González, D. E. (2013). Wrestler’s performance analysis through notational techniques. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 3(2), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/21615667.2013.10878990

9. González, D. E. (2014). Technical-tactical performance in greco-roman wrestling: Analysis of 2013 senior world championships through multivariate analysis. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 4(1), 95–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/21615667.2014.10879004
10. Hughes M, & Franks I. (2007). The essentials of performance analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938065
11. James N. (2009). Performance Analysis to Improve Sport Performance. Conselleria de Cultura i Espor. 26–28.
12. Latyshev, M., Latyshev, S., Korobeynikov, G., Kvasnytsya, O., Shandrygos, V., & Dutchak, Y. (2020). The analysis of the results of the olympic free-style wrestling champions. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 15(2), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.14198/JHSE.2020.152.14
13. McGarry, Tim., O’Donoghue, Peter., & Sampaio, Jaime. (2015). Routledge handbook of sports performance analysis. Routledge.
14. Miarka, B. (2016). Technical-tactical and physiological demands of wrestling combats. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 11(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.18002/RAMA.V11I1.3309
15. Mykola, L., Sergii, L., Oleh, K., & Alexander, K. (2017). Performance analysis of freestyle wrestling competitions of the last olympic cycle 2013–16. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17(2), 590–594. https://doi.org/10.7752/JPES.2017.02089
16. Podlivaev, B. (2010). The concept of top level wrestlers training. Modern Problems of High-Quality Training in Wrestling/Proceedings,. http://inwr-wrestling.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Conference-Proceedings-2010.pdf#page=63
17. Slacanac, K., Baic, M., & Morio, S. (2017). Competition efficiency analysis of croatian junior wrestlers in european championship. Sport Mont, 15(2), 43–47.
18. Tünnemann, H. (2011). Analysis of the wrestling world championships – Moscow 2010. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 1(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/21615667.2011.10878922
19. Tünnemann, H. (2016). Scoring analysis of the 2015 world wrestling championships. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 6(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/21615667.2016.1197028
20. Tünnemann, H., & Curby, D. G. (2016). Scoring analysis of the wrestling from the 2016 Rio olympic games. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 6(2), 90–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/21615667.2017.1315197
21. Yoon, J. (2002). Physiological profiles of elite senior wrestlers. Sports Medicine, 32(4), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200232040-00002