Pre-service teachers' perceptions about their own learning styles

Year 2013, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 127 - 133, 23.07.2016

Didem Kılıç Necdet Sağlam

https://izlik.org/JA79KM47BC

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate pre-service teachers’ perceptions of their own learning styles. The study was carried out with 144 pre-service teachers. Participants of the study were instructed about learning styles and also the features of the visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles were explained in depth. Pre-service teachers were asked openended questions regarding what might be the most appropriate learning style to them. The data were coded and grouped under relevant categories. The findings indicated that most of the preservice teachers believe that they have visual (49.8%) learning style. 28.9 percent of the preservice teachers perceive themselves as kinesthetic and 23.3 percent of them are of the opinion that they are auditory. Besides, some of the pre-service teachers have also expressed that they have more than one learning style

Keywords

Learning styles , pre-service teachers , learning

References

• Aşkar, P. & Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb öğrenme stili envanteri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 87, 37-47.
• Babadoğan, C. (2000). Öğretim stili odaklı ders tasarımı geliştirme. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 147.
• Babadoğan, C. (2003). Öğrenme stilleri kapsamında öğrencilerin ders çalışma alışkanlıkları. 4. Ulusal Çocuk
• Kültürü Kongresi: Disiplinlerarası Bakışla Türkiye'de Çocuk, 15-17 Ekim 2003, Ankara: A.Ü. Çocuk Kültürü
• Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Yayınları. Başıbüyük, A. (2004). Matematik öğretmenlerinin dikkate alabilecekleri öğrenme stilleri: McCarthy modeli. Milli
• Eğitim Dergisi, 163. http://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/163/peker.htm Biggs, J. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R. J. Sternberg & L. Zhang, (Eds.),
• Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp73-102). Mahway, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Brandt, D. (1983). Overcoming disappointment in an age of diminished expectations. New York: Pocket Books.
• Collison, E. (2000). A survey of elementary students learning style preferences and academic success.
• Contemporary Education, 71 (4), 42-49. Dağhan, G. & Akkoyunlu, B. (2011). Maggie McVay Lynch öğrenme stili envanterinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanma çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 117-126.
• Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3-6. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 7-12. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal
• College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286-290. Given, B. K. (1996). Learning styles: A synthesized model. Journal of Accelerated Learning and Teaching, (1&2), 11-43.
• Grasha, A. (1972). Observations on relating teaching goals to student response style and classroom methods.
• American Psychologist, 27, 144- 147. Gregorc, A. (1982). An adult’s guide to style. Columbia: Gregorc Associates, Inc.
• Hein, T. L. & Budny, D. D. (2000). Styles and types in science and engineering education. International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• McCarthy, B. (1987). The 4mat system: Teaching to leaning styles with right/left mode techniques. Barrington: Excel, Inc.
• Şimşek, N. (2002). BİG 16 öğrenme biçemleri envanteri. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 1 (1), 33-47. http://www.westga.edu/~jdbutler/ClassNotes/learnstyles.html