Investigation of Changes of Pre-service Teachers' Opinions about Environmental Education with Drawing Analysis

Year 2013, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 46 - 57, 23.07.2016

Özgül Keleş Funda Varnacı Uzun Naim Uzun

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the project “Nature Education in Ihlara Valley (Aksaray) and Its Surrounding Area III” supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) on the pre-service teachers’ environmental opinions. Drawings were used to collect data in the present study. Two questions were asked pre-service teachers to determine their opinions about environment and environmental education before the project and at the end of the project: The present study is an attempt to seek answers to these questions asked to pre-service teachers “In what kind of environment do you want to live? Please draw it” and “What kind of environmental education do you want to give to your students? Please draw it”. Then, the opinions of the students expressed in their drawings are collected under the suitable categories. The opinions of the pre-service teachers are conceptualized under the emerging categories and tables of frequencies are formed for the concepts

Keywords

drawings, environmental education, pre-service teachers

References

• Ballantyne, R. & Packer, J. (2002). Naturebased excursions: school students‟ perceptions of learning in natural environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(3), 218–236.
• Benedict, F. (Ed.). (1991). Environmental education for our common future: A handbook for teachers in Europe. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian University Press.
• Bogner, F. X. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective. Journal of Environmental Education, 29(4), 17–29.
• Dempsey, B. C., & Betz, B. J. (2001). Biological drawing: A scientific tool for learning. The American Biology Teacher, 63(4), 271-279.
• Dresner, M. & Gill, M. (1994). Environmental Education at Summer Nature Camp. Journal of Environmental Education, 25(3).
• Eaton, D. (2000). Cognitive and affective learning in outdoor education. Dissertation Abstracts International – Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 10-A, 3595.
• Jordon, J. R., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986). Effects of two residential environmental workshops on high school students. Journal of Environmental Education, 18 (1), 15-21.
• Keleş, Ö. (2011). Doğa Eğitimleri. Ed. Laçin Şimşek, C., Fen Öğretiminde Okul Dışı Öğrenme Ortamları, 117-130, Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Keleş, Ö., Uzun, N., & Varnacı Uzun, F. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının çevre bilinci, çevresel tutum, düşünce ve davranışlarının doğa eğitimi projesine bağlı değişimi ve kalıcılığının değerlendirilmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(32), 384-401.
• Korkmaz, H. (2004). Fen ve teknoloji eğitiminde alternatif değerlendirme yaklasımları. Ankara: Yeryuzu Yayıncılık.
• Ozaner F. S. & Yalcin, G. (2000). Milli Parklarda Bilimsel Çevre Eğitimi, V. Uluslararası Ekoloji ve Çevre Sorunları Sempozyumu. (Ed. İlhami Kiziroğlu, Nelka İnanç ve Levent Turan), Ankara Alman Kültür Merkezi, 64–76.
• Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4).
• UNESCO-UNEP. (1985). Environmental Education: Module for Pre-Service Training of Social Science Teachers and Supervisors for Secondary Schools. Environmental Education Series 9, prepared at National Council of Educational Research and Training, New York, USA.
• Varnacı Uzun, F. (2011). Milli Parklar. Ed. Laçin Şimşek, C., Fen Öğretiminde Okul Dışı Öğrenme Ortamları, 117-130, Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Yanık, F. E. (2006). Doğaperest. Ali Demirsoy Kitabı. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, No: 950, İstanbul: 385-388.