Effects on The Students' Personal Competences of the Usage of PBL Methodologies in Professional Reality Simulation Environments: Students, Teachers, Graduates and Employers' perceptions

Year 2012, Volume: 2 Issue: 4, 11 - 18, 23.07.2016

Margarida M. Pinheiro Claudia S. Sarrico Rui A. Santiago

Abstract

Trying to ensure that every student who enters the work market bears a set of personal attributions acknowledged as essential, higher education institutions (HEIs) have been being confronted with the need to activate new ways to produce and disclosure knowledge, compatible with the transition form an educational to a work environment. This research analyses the effects on the development of the students’ personal competences of the PBL methodologies in a simulation environment for the business reality. Setting off from a case study of a vocational HEI, we resorted to the interview technique with teachers and employers and the questionnaire technique with the students and graduates. Students, graduates and teachers support that the PBL methodologies contribute for the further development of personal competences, mainly at the level of resource use (management, planning and work methodology) and at the level of knowledge construction (critical analysis, grounds for decisions and initiative). By the employers, one can easily detect a persistent trend not to acknowledge the PBL methodologies as directly responsible for an improvement of the graduates’ personal competences, with the exception of the valorisation of more consistent grounds and more confident attitudes

Keywords

Students’ personal competence, PBL Methodology

References

• Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 68(1), 52-81.
• Apostolou, B.A., Watson, S.F., Hassell, J.M. e Webber, S.A. (2001). Accounting education literature review (1997 – 1999). Journal of Accounting Education, 19, 1-61.
• Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning. An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.
• Bell, J. (2010). Doing your research project: a guide for the first-time researchers in education, health and social science. Berckshire: Open University Press.
• Fyrenius, A., Wirell, S., & Silén, C. (2007). Student approaches to achieve understanding - approaches to learning revisited. Studies in Higher Education, 32(2), 149-165.
• International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. (1996). Learning: the tresure within. Paris: UNESCO.
• Kirschner, P., Vilsteren, P., Hummel, H., & Wigman, M. (1997). The design of a study environment for acquiring academic and professional competence. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 151-171.
• Kolmos, A. (1996). Reflections on project work and problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 141-148.
• Lessard-Hébert, M., Goyette, G., & Boutin, G. (1997). Recherche qualitative: fondements et pratiques. Montréal: DeBoeck Université.
• Musal, B., Taskiran, C., & Kelson, A. (2003). Opinions of tutors and students about the effectiveness of PBL in Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine. Medical Education Online, 8. Retrieved November 23, 2009, from http://www.meded-online.org/pdf/f0000073.pdf
• Nel, P., Keville, S., Ford, D., McCarney, R., Jeffrey, S., Adams, S., & Uprichard, S. (2008). Close encounters of the uncertain kind: reflections on doing problem-based learning (PBL) for the first time. Reflective Practice, 9(2), 197-206.
• Papinczack, T. (2009). Are deep strategic learners better suited to PBL? A preliminary study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 337-353.
• Radloff, A., de la Harpe, B., Dalton, H., Thomas, J., & Lawson, A. (2008). Assessing graduate attributes: Engaging academic staff and their students. Paper presented at the 2009 ATN Assessment Conference, Adelaid, Australia.
• Rebele, J.E., Apostolou, B.A., Buckless, F.A., Hassell, J.M., Paquette, L.R. & Stout, D.E. (1998). Accounting education literature review (1991 – 1997) part II: students, educational technology, assessment and faculty issues. Journal of Accounting Education, 16(2), 179-245.
• Silén, C., & Juhlin, L. (2008). Self-directed learning - a learning issue for students and faculty. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), 461-475.
• Tate, S. L., & Grein, B. M. (2009). That's the way the cookie crumbles: an attribute sampling application. Accounting Education, 18(2), 159-181.
• Watson, S.F., Apostolou, B.A., Hassell, J.M. e Webber, S.A. (2003). Accounting education literature review (2000-2002). Journal of Accounting Education, 21, 267-325.
• Watson, S.F., Apostolou, B.A., Hassell, J.M. e Webber, S.A. (2007). Accounting education literature review (2003-2005). Journal of Accounting Education, 25, 1-58.
• Xu, Y. e Yang, Y. (2010). Student learning in business simulation: an empirical investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 85(4), 223-228.
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications