Year 2019, Volume 1 , Issue 1, Pages 4 - 14 2019-09-29

A Philosophical Approach to Animal Rights and Welfare in the Tourism Sector

Ebru GÜNLÜ KÜÇÜKALTAN [1] , S. Emre DİLEK [2]


Although studies on animal rights and welfare in the field of tourism have begun to emerge in recent years, the subject is still new. In this context, a philosophical approach to animal rights and welfare in the tourism sector is put forward in this study. Concepts commonly used in animal rights and welfare debates, such as moral status, animal love, animal hatred, speciesism, anthropocentrism, ecocentrism are explained and are then discussed in the context of the tourism sector on the philosophical basis of what tourism means for commodified animals. Various proposals are developed for how changes can be made to grant animals in the tourism sector a moral status, both in theory and in practice.

animal rights, Animal Welfare, Animal Ethics, Tourism
  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S.F. Glaser, Trans.). Michigan, University of Michigan press.
  • Beardsworth, A., & Bryman, A. (2001). The wild animal in late modernity: The case of the Disneyization of zoos. Tourist Studies, 1(1), 83-104.
  • Bertella, G. (2013). Ethical content of pictures of animals in tourism promotion. Tourism Recreation Research, 38(3), 281-294.
  • Bulbeck, C. (1999). The ‘nature dispositions’ of visitors to animal encounter sites in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Sociology, 35(2), 129-148.
  • Burns, G. L., Macbeth, J., & Moore, S. (2011). Should dingoes die? Principles for engaging ecocentric ethics in wildlife tourism management. Journal of Ecotourism, 10(3), 179-196.
  • Butterfield, M. E. (2013). Dangerous dog or dastardly dude? Anthropomorphism, threat, and willingness to approach non-human targets. Texas: Texas Christian University Press.
  • Calık, A. Ö., & Ciftci, G. (2013). Animal ethics in tourism. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 5(1), 160-177.
  • Carr, N. (2009). Animals in the tourism and leisure experience. Current Issues in Tourism, 12(5-6), 409-411.
  • Carr, N. (2014). Dogs in the leisure experience. Boston: CABI.
  • Chandra, R. (2013). Utilizing utilitarianism: Animal rights in tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 38(2), 255-257.
  • Cohen, E. (2009). The wild and the humanized: Animals in Thai tourism. Anatolia, 20(1), 100-118.
  • Cohen, E. (2012). Tiger tourism: from shooting to petting. Tourism Recreation Research, 37(3), 193-204.
  • Cohen, E. (2014). Recreational hunting: Ethics, experiences and commoditization. Tourism Recreation Research, 39(1), 3-17.
  • de Lima, I. B., & Green, R. J. (Eds.) (2017). Wildlife Tourism Environmental Learning and Ethical Encounters. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • DeGrazia, D. (2002). Animal rights: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • DeLeeuw, J. L., Galen, L. W., Aebersold, C., & Stanton, V. (2007). Support for animal rights as a function of belief in evolution, religious fundamentalism, and religious denomination. Society & Animals, 15(4), 353-363.
  • Descartes, R. (1993). Animals and machines. In S.J. Armstrong & R.G. Botzler (Eds.), Environmental ethics: Divergence and convergence (pp. 281-285). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Dobson, J. (2011). Towards a utilitarian ethic for marine wildlife tourism. Tourism in Marine Environments, 7(3-4), 213-222.
  • Fennell, A.D. (2012a). Tourism and animal ethics. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Fennell, D. (2013). Ecotourism, animals and ecocentrism: a re-examination of the billfish debate. Tourism Recreation Research, 38(2), 189-202.
  • Fennell, D. A. & Nowaczek, A. (2010). Moral and empirical dimensions of human–animal interactions in ecotourism: deepening an otherwise shallow pool of debate. Journal of Ecotourism, 9(3), 239-255.
  • Fennell, D. A. (2006). Tourism ethics (Vol. 30). Ontario, CA: Channel View Publications.
  • Fennell, D. A. (2008). Tourism ethics needs more than a surface approach. Tourism Recreation Research, 33(2), 223-224.
  • Fennell, D. A. (2012b). Tourism and animal rights. Tourism Recreation Research, 37(2), 157-166.
  • Fennell, D. A. (2012c). Tourism, animals and utilitarianism. Tourism Recreation Research, 37(3), 239-249.
  • Fennell, D. A. (2013). Contesting the zoo as a setting for ecotourism, and the design of a first principle. Journal of Ecotourism, 12(1), 1-14.
  • Fennell, D. A. (2013). Tourism and animal welfare. Tourism Recreation Research, 38(3), 325-340.
  • Francione, G. L. & Charlton, A. (2015). Animal rights: the abolitionist approach. Newark: Exempla Press.
  • Francione, G.L. (2007). Introduction to animal rights: Your child or the dog? Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Franco, N. H. (2013). Animal experiments in biomedical research: a historical perspective. Animals, 3(1), 238-273.
  • Frost, W. (Ed.). (2011). Zoos and tourism: conservation, education, entertainment? (Vol. 46). Bristol, UK: Channel View Publications.
  • Garrod, B. (2007). 14 Marine Wildlife Tourism and Ethics. In J. Higham & M. Luck (Eds.), Marine wildlife and tourism management: Insights from the natural and social sciences (pp. 257-271). Cambridge, UK: CABI.
  • Gill, J. E. (1969). Theriophily in antiquity: a supplementary account. Journal of the History of Ideas, 30(3), 401-412.
  • Goralnik, L. & Nilson, M.P. (2012). Anthropocentrism. In D. Callahan & P. Singer (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2nd Edition) (pp. 144-155). London, UK: Elsevier Publishing.
  • Griffin, D.R. (2001). Animal minds: Beyond cognition to consciousness (2nd edition). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Gross, A.S. (2017). Religion and animals. Oxford Handbooks Online. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935420.013.10.
  • Hall, D. R., & Brown, F. (2006). Tourism and welfare: Ethics, responsibility and sustained well-being. Cambridge, CABI.
  • Hall, R. E. (1988). Intertemporal substitution in consumption. Journal of Political Economy, 96(2), 339-357.
  • Harrison, P. (1992). Descartes on animals. The Philosophical Quarterly, 42 (167), 219-227.
  • Holden, A. (2005). Tourism studies and the social sciences. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Hughes, P. (2001). Animals, values and tourism—structural shifts in UK dolphin tourism provision. Tourism Management, 22(4), 321-329.
  • Korsgaard, C.M. (2012). A Kantian case for animal rights. In M. Michel, D. Kühne & J. Hänni (Eds.), Animal law: Developments and perspectives in the 21st century (pp. 3-25). St. Gallen: DIKE.
  • Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 261-272.
  • Küçükaltan Günlü, E. & Dilek, S.E. (Eds.) (2016). Metalaşan turizm – metalaştırılan hayvanlar [Commoditized tourism – commoditized animals]. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.
  • Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Leadbeater, C. (1988, October 7). Power to the person. Marxism Today, pp. 14-19. Retrieved from http://banmarchive.org.uk/collections/mt/pdf/88_10_14.pdf
  • Lovelock, B., & Lovelock, K. (2013). The ethics of tourism: Critical and applied perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Macbeth, J. (2005). Towards an ethics platform for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(4), 962-984.
  • Markwell, K. (Ed.). (2015). Animals and tourism: Understanding diverse relationships (Vol. 67). New York, NY: Channel View Publications.
  • Mason, J. (1981). The politics of animal rights: Making the human connection. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 2(3), 124-128.
  • Mason, P. (2000). Zoo tourism: The need for more research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8(4), 333-339.
  • Matt W. Hayward, Somers, M. J., Kerley, G.I.H., Perrin, M.R.,Bester, M.N., Dalerum, F., Do Linh San, E., Hoffman, L.C., Marshal, J.P. & Mills, M.G.L. (2012). Animal ethics and ecotourism. South African Journal of Wildlife Research, 42(2), pg (s) iii.
  • Mill, J.S. (1863). Utilitarianism. London, UK: Parker, Son, and Bourn, West Strand.
  • Mittelstrass, J. (2002). The impact of the new biology on ethics. Journal of Molecular Biology, 319, 901-905.
  • Moore, J. F. (1943). The Originality of Rochester’s Satyr against mankind. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 58(2), 393-401.
  • Moorhouse, T., D’Cruze, N. C., & Macdonald, D. W. (2017). Unethical use of wildlife in tourism: what’s the problem, who is responsible, and what can be done? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(4), 505-516.
  • Neate, R. (2015, November 9). SeaWorld to end killer whale shows in wake of mounting protests, The Guardian, Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/usnews/2015/nov/09/seaworld-end-orca-whale-shows-sandiego.
  • Notzke, C. (2017). Equestrian tourism: animal agency observed. Current Issues in Tourism, 20, 1-19. http://www. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13683500.2017.13490 81.
  • O’Hara, H. (2015, November 10). SeaWorld vs Blackfish: The film that saved the whales, The Telegraph, Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/blackfish/seaworldorca-whales-finding-dory/
  • Poole, R. (1991). Morality and modernity. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Regan, T. (2004). Empty cages: Facing the challenge of animal rights. Oxford, UK: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing.
  • Ritzer, G. (2005). Enchanting a disenchanted world: Revolutionizing the means of consumption (2nd edition). London, UK: Pine Forge Press.
  • Ryder, R. D. (2010). Speciesism again: The original leaflet. Critical Society, 2, 1-2.
  • Sans, E. (2006). Schopenhauer (Ergüden I., Trans.). Ankara: Dost Publishing.
  • Shani, A. (2012). Tourism and animal rights: More than meets the eye. Tourism Recreation Research, 37(3), 276-277.
  • Shani, A., & Pizam, A. (2008). Towards an ethical framework for animal-based attractions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(6), 679-693.
  • Singer, P. (1987). Animal liberation or animal rights? The Monist, 70(1), 3-14.
  • Singer, P. (2002). Animal liberation (3rd edition). New York, NY: HaperCollins Publisher.
  • Sneddon, J., Lee, J., Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2016). Animal welfare values and tourist behaviour. Annals of Tourism Research, 57, 234-236.
  • Sorabji, R. (1993). Animal minds and human morals: The origins of the western debate. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Steiner, G. (2005). Anthropocentrism and its discontents: The moral status of animals in the history of western philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Tam, K. P., Lee, S. L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514-521.
  • Taylor, A. (2009). Animals & ethics: An overview of the philosophical debate (3rd edition). Ontario, CA: Broadview Press.
  • Thomas, N. (2016). Animal ethics and the autonomous animal self. London, UK: Macmillan Publishers.
  • Urquiza-Haas, E. G., & Kotrschal, K. (2015). The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking: attribution of mental states to other species. Animal Behaviour, 109, 167-176.
  • Urry, J. (1995). Consuming places. London, UK: Routledge
  • Vaughan, C. (2015). Rituals of dominionism – An interview with Jim Mason (first published in Vegan Voice), Animal Liberation, Retrieved from http://www.jimmason.website/rituals-of-dominionism/.
  • Watdaul, P. (2000). Religion and other animals: ancient themes, contemporary challenges. Society & Animals, 8 (1), 227-244.
  • Wemmer, C. M., & Christen, C. A. (2008). Elephants and ethics: toward a morality of coexistence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Yudina, O., & Fennell, D. (2013). Ecofeminism in the tourism context: A discussion of the use of other-than-human animals as food in tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 38(1), 55-69.
Primary Language en
Subjects Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism
Published Date Spring
Journal Section Peer-reviewed Research Articles
Authors

Orcid: 0000-0003-2599-0197
Author: Ebru GÜNLÜ KÜÇÜKALTAN (Primary Author)
Institution: DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY
Country: Turkey


Author: S. Emre DİLEK
Institution: BATMAN UNIVERSITY
Country: Turkey


Dates

Application Date : March 25, 2019
Acceptance Date : June 1, 2019
Publication Date : September 29, 2019

APA Günlü Küçükaltan, E , Di̇lek, S . (2019). A Philosophical Approach to Animal Rights and Welfare in the Tourism Sector . Journal of Tourism Leisure and Hospitality , 1 (1) , 4-14 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/toleho/issue/49085/571320