Bibliometric Analysis of Articles on Organizational Behavior

Abstract

Organizational behavior, a critical field in understanding and improving workplace dynamics, is the focus of this bibliometric analysis. Utilizing statistical and mathematical tools, this study explores academic documents' attributes across various disciplines, including authors, topics, citations, institutions, and countries. Bibliometric mapping, particularly using the SciMAT software, aids in visualizing research structures and knowledge connections. This research, based on the Web of Science database, provides valuable insights into academic literature. The analysis includes term grouping and research period delineation, observing the evolution of organizational behavior literature with 3187 articles. In conclusion, this study showcases the applicability of bibliometric methods in academic research, offering multidisciplinary researchers tool to comprehend resources and track field developments. Open-source analysis methods and software employed contribute significantly to the scholarly community. Key themes within the research highlight prominent and transformative subjects, while thematic maps illustrate the evolution of organizational behavior literature. Analysis of publication distribution by year reveals the field's growth, particularly in 2019 and 2021. Moreover, the study analyzes the top twenty most cited articles and identifies prolific authors. Additionally, it examines frequently used keywords, demonstrating the prevalence of "leadership." This study's thematic development analysis offers valuable insights into the dynamic landscape of organizational behavior research.

Keywords

• Organizationel Behavior
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Science mapping
• Scimat

Örgütsel Davranış Konulu Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Abstract

İşyeri dinamiklerini anlamak ve geliştirmek için kritik bir alan olan örgütsel davranış, bu bibliyometrik analizin odak noktasıdır. İstatistiksel ve matematiksel araçları kullanarak, bu çalışma çeşitli disiplinlerdeki akademik belgelerin özelliklerini, yazarları, konuları, alıntıları, kurumları ve ülkeleri içeren şekilde araştırır. Özellikle SciMAT yazılımını kullanarak bibliyometrik haritalama, araştırma yapılarını ve bilgi bağlantılarını görselleştirmeye yardımcı olur. Web of Science veri tabanına dayalı bu araştırma, akademik literatüre değerli bakış açıları sunar. Analiz, terim gruplandırma ve araştırma dönemi belirleme, örgütsel davranış literatürünün 3187 makale ile evrimini gözlemlemektedir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma bibliyometrik yöntemlerin akademik araştırmada uygulanabilirliğini sergileyerek çok disiplinli araştırmacılara kaynakları anlama ve alanın gelişmelerini izleme aracı sunar. Kullanılan açık kaynak analiz yöntemleri ve yazılımı, akademik topluluğa önemli katkılar sağlar. Araştırmadaki ana temalar, önde gelen ve dönüştürücü konuları vurgularken tematik haritalar örgütsel davranış literatürünün evrimini gösterir. Yıl bazında yayın dağılımının analizi, özellikle 2019 ve 2021'de, alanın büyümesini ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, çalışma en çok alıntılanan yirmi makaleyi analiz eder ve üretken yazarları belirler. Ayrıca, sık kullanılan anahtar kelimeleri inceleyerek "liderlik" kelimesinin yaygınlığını gösterir. Bu çalışmanın tematik gelişim analizi, örgütsel davranış araştırmasının dinamik peyzajı hakkında değerli perspektifler sunar.

Keywords

• Örgütsel davranış
• Bibliyometrik analiz
• Bilim Haritalama
• Scimat

References

1. Acadia, S. (2020). The Organizational Trap-Gap Framework: A conceptual view of library dysfunction.IFLA journal,46(1), 72-87.
2. Akyüz, S., Uğrak, U., & Çelık, Y. (2021). Evolution of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Science Mapping Analysis. Turkiye Klinikleri J Health Sci, 6(2), 350–366.
3. Bibliometrix.org. (n.d.).
4. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
5. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688
6. Drazin, R., & Sandelands, L. (1992). Autogenesis: A perspective on the process of organizing. Organization science, 3(2), 230-249.
7. Gehrisch, M. G., & Süß, S. (2023). Organizational behavior in international strategic alliances and the relation to performance–a literature review and avenues for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 73(3), 1045-1107.
8. Kurutkan, M. N., & Orhan, F. (2018). Kalite Prensiplerinin Görsel Haritalama Tekniğine Göre Bibliyometrik Analizi. SAGE Publications Ltd.

9. Li, J., & Hale, A. (2016). Output distributions and topic maps of safety related journals. Safety Science, 82, 236–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.004
10. Luthans, F., Luthans, B. C., & Luthans, K. W. (2021). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach fourteenth edition. IAP.
11. Manz, C. C. (1992). Self-leading work teams: Moving beyond self-management myths. Human relations, 45(11), 1119-1140.
12. Moagi, M., Mulaudzi, M., & Van Der Wath, A. (2020). Support programs for students at higher education institutions in South Africa: an appreciative inquiry study on managing alcohol abuse. Journal of Substance Use, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2019.16646
13. Nasir, A., Shaukat Dar, K., Hameed, I. A., Luo, S., Mahboob, T., Iqbal, F., Shaukat, K., Hameed, I. A., Luo, S., Alam, T. M., & Iqbal, F. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Corona Pandemic in Social Sciences: A Review of Influential Aspects and Conceptual Structure. IEEE Access, 8, 133377–133402. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008733
14. Nippa, M. C. E., & Schäfer, B. (2023). Organizational Behavior and Leadership in the Digital Age.
15. Oshodi, O. S., Awuzie, B. O., Akotia, J., Ademiloye, A. S., & Ngowi, A. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of recycled concrete research (1978–2019). Built Environment Project and Asset Management.
16. Ristianti, D. H., Jaya, G. P., & Fathurrochman, I. (2020). Organizational behavior management through group counseling discussions as a radicalism preventive effort.
17. Rousseau, D. M. (1997). Organizational behavior in the new organizational era. Annual review of psychology, 48(1), 515-546.
18. Schermerhorn Jr, J. R., Osborn, R. N., Uhl-Bien, M., & Hunt, J. G. (2011). Organizational behavior. john wiley & sons.
19. SciMAT. (n.d.). http://sci2s.ugr.es/scimat
20. Supriadi, Y. N., Ahman, E., Wibowo, L. A., & Furqon, C. (2019). Organizational citizenship behavior model for turnover intention management. Work, 14, 18.
21. Uhl-Bien, M., Piccolo, R. F., & Schermerhorn Jr, J. R. (2020). Organizational behavior. John Wiley & Sons.
22. Van der Pas, M., & Walczuch, R. (2019). Behavior of Organizational Agents on Managing Information Technology. In Intelligent Computing: Proceedings of the 2018 Computing Conference, Volume 2 (pp. 774-788). Springer International Publishing.
23. Wagner III, J. A., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2020). Organizational behavior: Securing competitive advantage. Routledge.
24. Web of science. (n.d.). Retrieved November 1, 2020, from www.webofknowledge.com