BibTex RIS Cite

TRAKYA BÖLGESİ TOPRAKLARININ BİTKİYE YARAYIŞLI FOSFOR DURUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİNDE DEĞİŞİK KİMYASAL EKSTRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2007, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 41 - 47, 05.08.2016

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı; Tekirdağ iline ait farklı kimyasal ve fiziksel özelliklere sahip toprakların fosfor durumunu biyolojik yöntem olarak seçilen Neubauer fide yöntemine göre saptamak ve bu toprakların bitkiye yarayışlı fosfor miktarının belirlenmesinde 3 farklı kimyasal ekstraksiyon yöntemleri ( 1- Suda çözünebilir P, 2- Asit florürde çözünebilir P, 3- Sodyum bikarbonatta çözünebilir P) içerisinden biyolojik yöntemle en yüksek ilişkiyi verebilen yöntemi seçmektir. Bu amaçla Tekirdağ ilinden 0-20 cm derinlikte 26 adet toprak örneği alınmıştır. Sera denemesi, Neubauer fide yöntemine ve tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre 3 tekrarlamalı olarak yürütülmüştür. Deneme bitkisi olarak çavdar (Secale cerale L.) kullanılmıştır. Deneme topraklarının yarayışlı fosfor kapsamlarını belirlemede kullanılan kimyasal yöntemlerden uygun olanının seçilmesinde biyolojik (standart) ölçüt olarak bitki P içeriği, bitki P alımı ve kuru madde üretimi temel alınmıştır. Denemede kullanılan kimyasal ekstraksiyon yöntemlerinin tümü ile çavdar bitkisinin kuru madde miktarları arasında herhangi bir ilişki bulunamamıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, sadece suda çözünebilir fosfor yöntemi ile bitki P içeriği ve bitki P alımı arasında önemli ilişkiler bulunmuştur (sırasıyla r= 0.374*, r= 0.342). Suda Çözünebilir P yönteminin Trakya Bölgesi topraklarının fosfor tayini için en uygun yöntem olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır

References

  • AKMAN, I. and YILDIZ, N. Evaluation of potassium status of Daphan plain soils and suitability of different chemical methods used to determine plant available soil potassium of this soils. Atatürk Univ. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 30 (1): 15-24, 1999.
  • BELLITURK, K., SAGLAM, MT. A Research on the Urea Hydrolysis Rate in the Soils of Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 8 (3): 446-449, 2005.
  • BINGHAM, FT Chemical soil tests for available phosphorus. Soil Sci. 94, 87-95, 1962.
  • BRAY, RH, KURTZ, LT. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 59, 39-45, 1945.
  • EYUPOGLU, F. Fertility States of Turkish Soils. General Directorate of Rural Services. Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute. Technical Publication No: T-67, General Publication No: 220, Ankara, 1999.
  • EYUPOGLU, F. Fertilizer Requirement, Consumption and Future for Turkey. General Directorate of Rural Services. Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute. Technical Publication No: T-2, General Publication No: 2, Ankara, 2002.
  • KACAR, B. Chemical Analysis’ of Plant and Soil: II. Plant Analysis’. Ankara University Agricultural Faculty Publications: 453. Application guide: 155, Ankara, 1972.
  • KACAR, B., AMIN, SM, CELEBI, G, TURAN, C. A research on the phosphorus state of Antalya coast region soils and methods to determine the available phosphorus in these soils. TUBITAK-Research Group of Agricultural and Forestry Serial No: 42, Ankara, pp. 1-100, 1976.
  • KACAR, B. Chemical Analysis’ of Plant and Soil: III, Soil Analysis’. Ankara University, Agricultural Faculty, Education Research and Development Publications No:3, Ankara, pp.706, 1995.
  • OLSEN, SR, COLE, CV, WATANABE, FS, DEAN, LA. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S. Dept. Of Agric. Cric. 939, Washington D.C., USA, 1954.
  • SAGLAM, MT. Methods of Soil and Water Analysis. Trakya University Agricultural Faculty of Tekirdag Publications, Publication No:189, Handbook No: 5, Tekirdag, 2001.
  • SAGLAM, MT. Fertilizers and Fertilization (7th edition). Trakya University Agricultural Faculty of Tekirdag Publications No: 149, Study Book: 74, Tekirdag, 2005.
  • TUZUNER, A. Handbook of Soil and Water Analysis. Ministry of Agriculture and Village Work, General Directorate of Rural Services, Ankara, 1990.
  • US SOIL SURVEY STAFF. Soil survey manual. Agricultural Research Administration. U.S. Dept. Agriculture, Handbook No: 18, U.S. Govt. Print. Office Washington D.C, 1951. VELAYUTHAM, M. The problem of phosphate fixation by minerals and soil colloids. Phosphorus Agric., 77: 1-8, 1980. YILDIZ, N, BILGIN, N, AKSU, E. Evaluation of phosphorus status of Erzurum-Daphan Plain soils. GAP III. Agricultural Congress, 02-03 September, Sanliurfa, pp. 583-586, 2003.
  • YILMAZ, H. Developments in fertilizer production, consumption and foreign trade in Turkey. Turkey’s 3rd National Fertilizer Congress, Agriculture-Industry-Environment, 11-13 September, Tokat, pp.35-46, 2004.
  • YURTSEVER, N. Economic phosphorus fertilizer amounts for wheat plant in Thrace region’s conditions according to the soil analysis’. Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute, No:26, Ankara, 1973

A COMPARISON FOR DIFFERENT CHEMICAL EXTRACTION METHODS IN DETERMINING THE AVAILABLE PHOSPHORUS EXISTENCE FOR PLANTS AT SOILS IN THRACE

Year 2007, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 41 - 47, 05.08.2016

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the phosphorus status of soils of Tekirdag province that have different chemical and physical properties according to the Neubauer seedling method which is selected as a biological index method and to select the method which gives highest relationship from the 3 different chemical extraction methods (1- Water soluble P, 2- Soluble P in acid fluoride, 3- Soluble P in sodium bicarbonate) for determining the available phosphorus amount. For this purpose 26 samples of soil are collected from 0-20 cm depth in Tekirdag. The greenhouse study has been performed in accordance to the Neubauer seedling method and a completely randomized block desing with 3 replications. The rye (Secale cerale L.) has been selected as the test plant. In order to determine the most suitable chemical method, the dry matter yield, phosphorus content and total phosphorus uptake of the test plant has been taken as the biological (standard) criterion. No relationship has been found between any of the chemical extraction methods and dry matter yield of rye plant in this study. According to the research results, significant relationships have been found only with the water soluble phosphorus method and phosphorus content and total phosphorus uptake of the test plant (respectively r= 0.374*, r= 0.342). Method of P soluble in water is found to be the most appropriate method in determining the phosphor in soils of Thrace region

References

  • AKMAN, I. and YILDIZ, N. Evaluation of potassium status of Daphan plain soils and suitability of different chemical methods used to determine plant available soil potassium of this soils. Atatürk Univ. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 30 (1): 15-24, 1999.
  • BELLITURK, K., SAGLAM, MT. A Research on the Urea Hydrolysis Rate in the Soils of Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 8 (3): 446-449, 2005.
  • BINGHAM, FT Chemical soil tests for available phosphorus. Soil Sci. 94, 87-95, 1962.
  • BRAY, RH, KURTZ, LT. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 59, 39-45, 1945.
  • EYUPOGLU, F. Fertility States of Turkish Soils. General Directorate of Rural Services. Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute. Technical Publication No: T-67, General Publication No: 220, Ankara, 1999.
  • EYUPOGLU, F. Fertilizer Requirement, Consumption and Future for Turkey. General Directorate of Rural Services. Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute. Technical Publication No: T-2, General Publication No: 2, Ankara, 2002.
  • KACAR, B. Chemical Analysis’ of Plant and Soil: II. Plant Analysis’. Ankara University Agricultural Faculty Publications: 453. Application guide: 155, Ankara, 1972.
  • KACAR, B., AMIN, SM, CELEBI, G, TURAN, C. A research on the phosphorus state of Antalya coast region soils and methods to determine the available phosphorus in these soils. TUBITAK-Research Group of Agricultural and Forestry Serial No: 42, Ankara, pp. 1-100, 1976.
  • KACAR, B. Chemical Analysis’ of Plant and Soil: III, Soil Analysis’. Ankara University, Agricultural Faculty, Education Research and Development Publications No:3, Ankara, pp.706, 1995.
  • OLSEN, SR, COLE, CV, WATANABE, FS, DEAN, LA. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S. Dept. Of Agric. Cric. 939, Washington D.C., USA, 1954.
  • SAGLAM, MT. Methods of Soil and Water Analysis. Trakya University Agricultural Faculty of Tekirdag Publications, Publication No:189, Handbook No: 5, Tekirdag, 2001.
  • SAGLAM, MT. Fertilizers and Fertilization (7th edition). Trakya University Agricultural Faculty of Tekirdag Publications No: 149, Study Book: 74, Tekirdag, 2005.
  • TUZUNER, A. Handbook of Soil and Water Analysis. Ministry of Agriculture and Village Work, General Directorate of Rural Services, Ankara, 1990.
  • US SOIL SURVEY STAFF. Soil survey manual. Agricultural Research Administration. U.S. Dept. Agriculture, Handbook No: 18, U.S. Govt. Print. Office Washington D.C, 1951. VELAYUTHAM, M. The problem of phosphate fixation by minerals and soil colloids. Phosphorus Agric., 77: 1-8, 1980. YILDIZ, N, BILGIN, N, AKSU, E. Evaluation of phosphorus status of Erzurum-Daphan Plain soils. GAP III. Agricultural Congress, 02-03 September, Sanliurfa, pp. 583-586, 2003.
  • YILMAZ, H. Developments in fertilizer production, consumption and foreign trade in Turkey. Turkey’s 3rd National Fertilizer Congress, Agriculture-Industry-Environment, 11-13 September, Tokat, pp.35-46, 2004.
  • YURTSEVER, N. Economic phosphorus fertilizer amounts for wheat plant in Thrace region’s conditions according to the soil analysis’. Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute, No:26, Ankara, 1973
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA55UE77AG
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Korkmaz Bellıturk This is me

Fatma Danısman This is me

Nazlı Baldan Pakdıl This is me

Fuat Yılmaz This is me

Publication Date August 5, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2007 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bellıturk, K., Danısman, F., Pakdıl, N. B., Yılmaz, F. (2016). TRAKYA BÖLGESİ TOPRAKLARININ BİTKİYE YARAYIŞLI FOSFOR DURUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİNDE DEĞİŞİK KİMYASAL EKSTRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Trakya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 41-47.
AMA Bellıturk K, Danısman F, Pakdıl NB, Yılmaz F. TRAKYA BÖLGESİ TOPRAKLARININ BİTKİYE YARAYIŞLI FOSFOR DURUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİNDE DEĞİŞİK KİMYASAL EKSTRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Trakya Univ J Sci. August 2016;8(1):41-47.
Chicago Bellıturk, Korkmaz, Fatma Danısman, Nazlı Baldan Pakdıl, and Fuat Yılmaz. “TRAKYA BÖLGESİ TOPRAKLARININ BİTKİYE YARAYIŞLI FOSFOR DURUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİNDE DEĞİŞİK KİMYASAL EKSTRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Trakya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 8, no. 1 (August 2016): 41-47.
EndNote Bellıturk K, Danısman F, Pakdıl NB, Yılmaz F (August 1, 2016) TRAKYA BÖLGESİ TOPRAKLARININ BİTKİYE YARAYIŞLI FOSFOR DURUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİNDE DEĞİŞİK KİMYASAL EKSTRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Trakya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 8 1 41–47.
IEEE K. Bellıturk, F. Danısman, N. B. Pakdıl, and F. Yılmaz, “TRAKYA BÖLGESİ TOPRAKLARININ BİTKİYE YARAYIŞLI FOSFOR DURUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİNDE DEĞİŞİK KİMYASAL EKSTRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, Trakya Univ J Sci, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2016.
ISNAD Bellıturk, Korkmaz et al. “TRAKYA BÖLGESİ TOPRAKLARININ BİTKİYE YARAYIŞLI FOSFOR DURUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİNDE DEĞİŞİK KİMYASAL EKSTRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Trakya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 8/1 (August 2016), 41-47.
JAMA Bellıturk K, Danısman F, Pakdıl NB, Yılmaz F. TRAKYA BÖLGESİ TOPRAKLARININ BİTKİYE YARAYIŞLI FOSFOR DURUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİNDE DEĞİŞİK KİMYASAL EKSTRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Trakya Univ J Sci. 2016;8:41–47.
MLA Bellıturk, Korkmaz et al. “TRAKYA BÖLGESİ TOPRAKLARININ BİTKİYE YARAYIŞLI FOSFOR DURUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİNDE DEĞİŞİK KİMYASAL EKSTRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Trakya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 1, 2016, pp. 41-47.
Vancouver Bellıturk K, Danısman F, Pakdıl NB, Yılmaz F. TRAKYA BÖLGESİ TOPRAKLARININ BİTKİYE YARAYIŞLI FOSFOR DURUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİNDE DEĞİŞİK KİMYASAL EKSTRAKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Trakya Univ J Sci. 2016;8(1):41-7.