Research Article

Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars

Volume: 4 Number: 2 December 31, 2021
  • Madiha Kassawat *
EN

Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars

Abstract

The rapid technological developments have led to emerging industries and practices, such as the localization of websites, video games, and software. This has been directly associated with the digitization of products, including their textual content. The relatively rapid evolution in turn might be one of the reasons for the confusion of the related terms in Translation Studies (TS). While the industry introduced most of these terms, TS research adopted them in many cases or contributed to proliferating others. This multiplicity of the terms has led to more fuzziness. Given the different and contradictory points of view regarding localization, from the academia and the industry, this paper attempts to pinpoint key arguments in order to help accelerate the pace of integrating research on localization in TS, to refresh the academic perspective with this regard, and to find out where translation and TS can fit in localization. The paper sheds light on the different points of view in terms of the definition of localization, its process, and frequent arguments on its relationship to or independence from translation, on its process, agents, and other concepts compared with translation. The theoretical discussion is an attempt to contribute to previous research with this regard and to bridge the gap between TS and the industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Achkasov, Andrei V. 2016. “If the Mountain Won’t Come… Translation Studies Meets Localization.” Journal of Siberian Federal University 3 (9): 568–578. doi:10.17516/1997-1370-2016-9-3-568-578.
  2. Alshtaiwi, Ma’moun. 2017. “Parlons du localisateur: rôle et profil.” Traduire, no. 237, 38–47. doi:10.4000/traduire.945.
  3. Anastasiou, Dimitra, and Reinhard Schäler. 2010. “Translating Vital Information: Localisation, Internationalisation, and Globalisation.” Syn-thèses, no. 3, 11–25. doi:10.26262/st.v0i3.5150.
  4. Bowker, Lynne. 2004. “What Does It Take to Work in the Translation Profession in Canada in the 21st Century? Exploring a Database of Job Advertisements.” Meta 49 (4): 960–972. doi:10.7202/009804ar.
  5. Cancio Pastor, Carmelo, and Sydney Belmonte. 2010. “De la localisation à la délocalisation: enjeux professionnels.” Meta 55 (4): 661–673. doi:10.7202/045684ar.
  6. Canım Alkan, Sinem. 2017. “Position of the Translator as an Agent in Website Localization: The Case of Turkey.” Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 13 (2): 510–525. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jlls/issue/36120/405625.
  7. Dam, Helle V., and Karen Korning Zethsen. 2019. “Professionals’ Views on the Concepts of Their Trade: What is (not) Translation?” In Moving Boundaries in Translation Studies, edited by Helle V. Dam, Matilde Nisbeth Brøgger, and Karen Korning Zethsen, 200–219. London: Routledge.
  8. Doorslaer, Luc van. 2019. “Bound to Expand: The Paradigm of Change in Translation Studies.” In Moving Boundaries in Translation Studies, edited by Helle V. Dam, Matilde Nisbeth Brøgger, and Karen Korning Zethsen, 220–230. London: Routledge.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Language Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Madiha Kassawat * This is me
0000-0003-3753-9117
France

Publication Date

December 31, 2021

Submission Date

October 16, 2021

Acceptance Date

December 5, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 4 Number: 2

APA
Kassawat, M. (2021). Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars. TransLogos Translation Studies Journal, 4(2), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.29228/transLogos.36
AMA
1.Kassawat M. Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars. transLogos Translation Studies Journal. 2021;4(2):27-44. doi:10.29228/transLogos.36
Chicago
Kassawat, Madiha. 2021. “Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars”. TransLogos Translation Studies Journal 4 (2): 27-44. https://doi.org/10.29228/transLogos.36.
EndNote
Kassawat M (December 1, 2021) Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars. transLogos Translation Studies Journal 4 2 27–44.
IEEE
[1]M. Kassawat, “Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars”, transLogos Translation Studies Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 27–44, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.29228/transLogos.36.
ISNAD
Kassawat, Madiha. “Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars”. transLogos Translation Studies Journal 4/2 (December 1, 2021): 27-44. https://doi.org/10.29228/transLogos.36.
JAMA
1.Kassawat M. Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars. transLogos Translation Studies Journal. 2021;4:27–44.
MLA
Kassawat, Madiha. “Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars”. TransLogos Translation Studies Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, Dec. 2021, pp. 27-44, doi:10.29228/transLogos.36.
Vancouver
1.Madiha Kassawat. Translation and Localization: Frequent Arguments through Asymmetric Binoculars. transLogos Translation Studies Journal. 2021 Dec. 1;4(2):27-44. doi:10.29228/transLogos.36