Yutma güçlüğü olan hastaların tanısında fiberoptik endoskopiyle yutma değerlendirmesi ve modifiye baryumlu yutma testinin etkinlikleri

Year 2005, Volume: 15 Issue: 5, 103 - 111, 03.10.2005

Mustafa Gerek Altan Atalay Engin Çekin Müzeyyen Çiyiltepe Yalçın Özkaptan

Abstract

Amaç: Çeşitli patolojilere bağlı yutma bozukluğu olanhastalarda, fiberoptik endoskopiyle yutma değerlendirmesi FEYD ile modifiye baryumlu yutma testinin MBYT etkinlikleri karşılaştırıldı.Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Yutma bozukluğu olan 80hasta üç gruba ayrıldı. Birinci grup oral, farengeal, larengeal kitleli n=27 , ikinci grup nörojenik disfajili n=26 , üçüncü grup ise belirgin patolojisi bulunmayan n=27 hastalardan oluşmaktaydı. HastalardaFEYD ve MBYT ile yumuşak damak elevasyonu, nazal regürjitasyon, farengeal rezidü, penetrasyon, aspirasyon, priform sinüs ve vallekülada göllenme bulguları arandı.Bulgular: Nörolojik olguların aspirasyon ve vallekülada göllenme bulgusunu tespit etmede MBYT dahaetkili bulundu p

Keywords

Baryum sülfat/tanısal kullanım, kontrast madde, yutma bozuklukları/tanı, endoskopi

The effectiveness of fiberoptic endoscopic swallow study and modified barium swallow study techniques in diagnosis of dysphagia

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evalu- ate the effectiveness of fiberoptic endoscopic evalu- ation of swallowing FEES and the modified barium swallow test MBST in patients with dysphagia.Patients and Methods: Eighty patients with dyspha­ gia were evaluated in three groups consisting of 27 patients with oral, pharyngeal, or esophageal masses; 26 patients with neurogenic dysphagia; and 27 patients with no distinct pathology. Ali the patients undervvent FEES and MBST to examine elevation of the soft palate, nasal regurgitation, pharyngeal residue, penetration, aspiration, and pooling of secre- tions in the pyriform sinüs and vallecula.Results: İn neurogenic dysphagia, MBST was more efficacious in detecting aspiration and pooling in the vallecula p<0.05 . Evaluation of the internal anato- my, visualization of masses, and laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination were only possible with the FEES. On the other hand, evaluation of the elevation of the larynx and the hyoid, the relaxation of the upper esophageal sphincter, and the oral phase of swal- lowing, and the detection of esophageal pathologies were only possible with the MBST.Conclusion: The leading advantages of the two eval­ uation techniques seem to lie in the detection of aspi­ ration for the FEES, and dynamic evaluation of the oral and esophageal phases of swallowing for the MBST.

Keywords

Barium sulfate/diagnostic use, contrast media, deglutition disorders/diagnosis, endoscopy

References

• Perlman AL, Schulze-Delrieu K, (editors). Deglutition and its disorders: anatomy, physiology, clinical diag- nosis and management. 1st ed. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc; 1997. p. 15-99.
• Rebecca L, Kendall K. Dysphagia assessment and treatment planning: a team approach. 1st ed. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc; 1997. p. 7-11.
• Dobie RA. Rehabilitation of swallowing disorders. Am Fam Physician 1978;17:84-95.
• Davidson J, Gilbert R, Irish J, Witterick I, Brown D, Birt D, et al. The role of panendoscopy in the man- agement of mucosal head and neck malignancy-a prospective evaluation. Head Neck 2000;22:449-54; discussion 454-5.
• Aviv JE. Prospective, randomized outcome study of endoscopy versus modified barium swallow in patients with dysphagia. Laryngoscope 2000;110: 563-74.
• Alvarez S, Shell CG, Woolley TW, Berk SL, Smith JK. Nosocomial infections in long-term facilities. J Gerontol 1988;43:M9-17.
• Khawaja IT, Buffa SD, Brandstetter RD. Aspiration pneumonia. A threat when deglutition is compro- mised. Postgrad Med 1992;92:165-8, 173-7, 181.
• Langmore SE, Terpenning MS, Schork A, Chen Y, Murray JT, Lopatin D, et al. Predictors of aspiration pneumonia: how important is dysphagia? Dysphagia 1998;13:69-81.
• Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olson N. Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspi- ration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:678-81.
• Martin-Harris B, Logemann JA, McMahon S, Schleicher M, Sandidge J. Clinical utility of the modi- fied barium swallow. Dysphagia 2000;15:136-41.
• Dodds WJ, Logemann JA, Stewart ET. Radiologic assessment of abnormal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:965-74.
• Aviv JE, Martin JH, Sacco RL, Zagar D, Diamond B, Keen MS, et al. Supraglottic and pharyngeal sensory abnormalities in stroke patients with dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:92-7.
• Kidder TM, Langmore SE, Martin BJ. Indications and techniques of endoscopy in evaluation of cervical dys- phagia: comparison with radiographic techniques. Dysphagia 1994;9:256-61.
• Williams RS, Lancaster J, Karagama Y, Tandon S, Karkanevatos A. A systematic approach to the nasendoscopic examination of the larynx and pharynx. Clin Otolaryngol 2004;29:175-8.
• Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallow- ing disorders. 2nd ed. Austin Texas: Pro-Ed Publishers; 1998.
• Finestone HM, Greene-Finestone LS. Rehabilitation medicine: 2. Diagnosis of dysphagia and its nutrition- al management for stroke patients. CMAJ 2003;169: 1041-4.