BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of septoplasty patients with health status scale, rhinomanometry, and computed tomography

Year 2008, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 166 - 170, 25.06.2008

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated disease-specific health status prior to and after septoplasty in patients with nasal septal deviation NSD , and sought correlation between diagnosis and laboratory findings anterior rhinomanometry and computed tomography . Patients and Methods: The study included 39 patients 8 females, 31 males; mean age 41 years; range 18 to 59 years with a diagnosis of NSD. Prior to septoplasty, all patients were evaluated by coronal paranasal sinus computed tomography CT , anterior rhinomanometry and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation NOSE scale. Rhinomanometry and the NOSE scale were repeated three months after septoplasty. Results: Compared to the preoperative values, the patients exhibited a significant decrease in NOSE scores, and in rhinomanometry, significantly increased nasal airflow and decreased total nasal airway resistance p<0.05 . No relationship was found between preand postoperative NOSE scores and total nasal airway resistance, and between preoperative NOSE scores and the severity of NSD assessed by CT p>0.05 . Conclusion: The NOSE scale is a reliable test to assess health status of patients with nasal obstruction symptoms. The diagnosis of NSD does not require rhinomanometry or computed tomography.

References

  • Dinis PB, Haider H. Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results. Am J Otolaryngol 2002;23:85-90.
  • Uygur K, Tuz M, Dogru H. The correlation between septal deviation and concha bullosa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:33-6.
  • Mamikoglu B, Houser S, Akbar I, Ng B, Corey JP. Acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography scans for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation, with clinical correlation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123:61-8.
  • Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:157-63.
  • Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Witsell DL, Yueh B, Hannley MT, et al. Outcomes after nasal septo- plasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:283-90.
  • Pirila T, Tikanto J. Unilateral and bilateral effects of nasal septum surgery demonstrated with acoustic rhi- nometry, rhinomanometry, and subjective assessment. Am J Rhinol 2001;15:127-33.
  • McKee GJ, O’Neill G, Roberts C, Lesser TH. Nasal air- flow after septorhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1994;19:254-7.
  • Gilain L, Coste A, Ricolfi F, Dahan E, Marliac D, Peynegre R, et al. Nasal cavity geometry measured by acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:401-5.
  • Dinis PB, Haider H, Gomes A. Rhinomanometry, sinus CT-scan and allergy testing in the diagnostic assessment of chronic nasal obstruction. Rhinology 1997;35:158-60.
  • Siegel NS, Gliklich RE, Taghizadeh F, Chang Y. Outcomes of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:228-32.
  • Bohlin L, Dahlqvist A. Nasal airway resistance and complications following functional septoplasty: a ten- year follow-up study. Rhinology 1994;32:195-7.
  • Sipila J, Suonpaa J. A prospective study using rhino- manometry and patient clinical satisfaction to deter- mine if objective measurements of nasal airway resis- tance can improve the quality of septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997;254:387-90.
  • Yarıktaş M, Karaoğlan İ, Doğru H, Tüz M, Yasan H, Döner F. Septorinoplasti sonrası burun hava akımının değerlendirilmesi. KBB Klinikleri 2004;6:14-7.
  • Broms P, Jonson B, Malm L. Rhinomanometry. IV. A pre- and postoperative evaluation in functional septo- plasty. Acta Otolaryngol 1982;94:523-9.
  • Mertz JS, McCaffrey TV, Kern EB. Objective evaluation of anterior septal surgical reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984;92:308-11.
  • Hardcastle PF, White A, Prescott RJ. Clinical or rhino- metric assessment of the nasal airway - which is bet- ter? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1988;13:381-5.
  • Huizing EH, de Groot JAM, editors. Functional Reconstructive Nasal Surgery. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2003. p. 103-4.
  • Yaniv E, Hadar T, Shvero J, Raveh E. Objective and sub- jective nasal airflow. Am J Otolaryngol 1997;18:29-32.

Septoplasti hastalarının yaşam kalitesi ölçeği, rinomanometri ve bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi

Year 2008, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 166 - 170, 25.06.2008

Abstract

Amaç: Deviye nazal septum DNS tanısı konan hastalarda spesifik yaşam kalitesi septoplasti öncesi ve sonrasında değerlendirildi; ayrıca, tanının laboratuvar bulgularla anterior rinomanometri ve bilgisayarlı tomografi ilişkisi incelendi.Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya DNS tanısı konan 39 hasta alındı. Hastalar septoplasti öncesinde, koronal planda paranazal sinüs tomografisi, anterior rinomanometri ve Burun Tıkanıklığı Şikayet Değerlendirme Formu BTŞDF ile incelendi. Ameliyat sonrası üçüncü ayda anterior rinomanometri ve BTŞDF tekrarlandı.Bulgular: Hastaların BTŞDF puanlarında ameliyat öncesine göre anlamlı azalma p

References

  • Dinis PB, Haider H. Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results. Am J Otolaryngol 2002;23:85-90.
  • Uygur K, Tuz M, Dogru H. The correlation between septal deviation and concha bullosa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:33-6.
  • Mamikoglu B, Houser S, Akbar I, Ng B, Corey JP. Acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography scans for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation, with clinical correlation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123:61-8.
  • Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:157-63.
  • Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Witsell DL, Yueh B, Hannley MT, et al. Outcomes after nasal septo- plasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:283-90.
  • Pirila T, Tikanto J. Unilateral and bilateral effects of nasal septum surgery demonstrated with acoustic rhi- nometry, rhinomanometry, and subjective assessment. Am J Rhinol 2001;15:127-33.
  • McKee GJ, O’Neill G, Roberts C, Lesser TH. Nasal air- flow after septorhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1994;19:254-7.
  • Gilain L, Coste A, Ricolfi F, Dahan E, Marliac D, Peynegre R, et al. Nasal cavity geometry measured by acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:401-5.
  • Dinis PB, Haider H, Gomes A. Rhinomanometry, sinus CT-scan and allergy testing in the diagnostic assessment of chronic nasal obstruction. Rhinology 1997;35:158-60.
  • Siegel NS, Gliklich RE, Taghizadeh F, Chang Y. Outcomes of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:228-32.
  • Bohlin L, Dahlqvist A. Nasal airway resistance and complications following functional septoplasty: a ten- year follow-up study. Rhinology 1994;32:195-7.
  • Sipila J, Suonpaa J. A prospective study using rhino- manometry and patient clinical satisfaction to deter- mine if objective measurements of nasal airway resis- tance can improve the quality of septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997;254:387-90.
  • Yarıktaş M, Karaoğlan İ, Doğru H, Tüz M, Yasan H, Döner F. Septorinoplasti sonrası burun hava akımının değerlendirilmesi. KBB Klinikleri 2004;6:14-7.
  • Broms P, Jonson B, Malm L. Rhinomanometry. IV. A pre- and postoperative evaluation in functional septo- plasty. Acta Otolaryngol 1982;94:523-9.
  • Mertz JS, McCaffrey TV, Kern EB. Objective evaluation of anterior septal surgical reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984;92:308-11.
  • Hardcastle PF, White A, Prescott RJ. Clinical or rhino- metric assessment of the nasal airway - which is bet- ter? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1988;13:381-5.
  • Huizing EH, de Groot JAM, editors. Functional Reconstructive Nasal Surgery. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2003. p. 103-4.
  • Yaniv E, Hadar T, Shvero J, Raveh E. Objective and sub- jective nasal airflow. Am J Otolaryngol 1997;18:29-32.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Şükran Vural This is me

Ebru Taş This is me

A. Okan Gürsel This is me

Publication Date June 25, 2008
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 18 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Vural, Ş., Taş, E., & Gürsel, A. O. (2008). Septoplasti hastalarının yaşam kalitesi ölçeği, rinomanometri ve bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, 18(3), 166-170.
AMA Vural Ş, Taş E, Gürsel AO. Septoplasti hastalarının yaşam kalitesi ölçeği, rinomanometri ve bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi. Tr-ENT. June 2008;18(3):166-170.
Chicago Vural, Şükran, Ebru Taş, and A. Okan Gürsel. “Septoplasti hastalarının yaşam Kalitesi ölçeği, Rinomanometri Ve Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Ile değerlendirilmesi”. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat 18, no. 3 (June 2008): 166-70.
EndNote Vural Ş, Taş E, Gürsel AO (June 1, 2008) Septoplasti hastalarının yaşam kalitesi ölçeği, rinomanometri ve bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat 18 3 166–170.
IEEE Ş. Vural, E. Taş, and A. O. Gürsel, “Septoplasti hastalarının yaşam kalitesi ölçeği, rinomanometri ve bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi”, Tr-ENT, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 166–170, 2008.
ISNAD Vural, Şükran et al. “Septoplasti hastalarının yaşam Kalitesi ölçeği, Rinomanometri Ve Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Ile değerlendirilmesi”. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat 18/3 (June 2008), 166-170.
JAMA Vural Ş, Taş E, Gürsel AO. Septoplasti hastalarının yaşam kalitesi ölçeği, rinomanometri ve bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi. Tr-ENT. 2008;18:166–170.
MLA Vural, Şükran et al. “Septoplasti hastalarının yaşam Kalitesi ölçeği, Rinomanometri Ve Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Ile değerlendirilmesi”. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, vol. 18, no. 3, 2008, pp. 166-70.
Vancouver Vural Ş, Taş E, Gürsel AO. Septoplasti hastalarının yaşam kalitesi ölçeği, rinomanometri ve bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi. Tr-ENT. 2008;18(3):166-70.