Östaki Tüp Disfonksiyonu Anketinin Türkçe versiyonunun değerlendirmesi

Year 2017, Volume: 27 Issue: 1, 25 - 30, 05.03.2017

Selçuk Güneş Zahide Mine Yazıcı Derya Çelik Ayşe Öznur Akidil Mustafa Çelik İbrahim Sayın Fatma Tülin Kayhan

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada östaki tüp disfonksiyonu ÖTD olan ve olmayan Türkçe konuşan bir popülasyonda Östaki Tüp Disfonksiyonu Anketi-7’nin ETDQ-7 doğrulanmış çevirisinin değeri ve ayırıcı gücü belirlendi.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Östaki Tip Disfonksiyonu Anketi-7 38 ÖTD hastası ve 47 sağlıklı birey tarafından tamamlandı. İç tutarlılık Cronbach alfa katsayısı kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Alıcı işletim karakteristik ROC eğrisi, doğruluk ölçütü olarak belirlendi.Bulgular: Türkçe ETDQ-7 versiyonunun Cronbach alfa değeri 0.89 idi. Olgu ve kontrol gruplarının karşılaştırılmasında, total puanlamada anlamlı değişim saptandı. Spearman korelasyon testi ile test ve yeniden test arasında anlamlı pozitif bir ilişki vardı p

Keywords

Östaki tüpü, östaki tüp disfonksiyon testi-7, disfonksiyon, güvenirlik

Evaluation of the Turkish version of the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to determine the value and discriminative power of the validated translation of the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 ETDQ-7 in a Turkish speaking population with and without Eustachian tube dysfunction ETD . Materials and Methods: The ETDQ-7 was completed by 38 patients with ETD and 47 healthy individuals. The internal consistency was evaluated using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The receiver operating characteristic ROC curve was determined as an accuracy measure. Results: The Turkish version of the ETDQ-7’s Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.89. In the comparison of case and control groups, there was a significant change in the total scoring. There was a significant positive correlation between the test and retest using the Spearman’s correlation test p<0.05 . In the discrimination of the ETD and control groups, curve area under 14, the highest cut-off value, was used. Sensitivity was 97.4%, positive predictive value was 88.1%, specificity was 89.4%, and negative predictive value was 97.7%. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the ETDQ-7 demonstrated acceptable levels of reliability and validity to be used for Turkish speaking individuals with ETD. Test-retest reliability for the Turkish version of the ETDQ-7 was also excellent.

Keywords

Eustachian tube, dysfunction, reliability, eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire-7

References

• Schröder S, Lehmann M, Sauzet O, Ebmeyer J, Sudhoff H. A novel diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction-the eustachian tube score. Laryngoscope 2015;125:703-8.
• Doyle WJ, Swarts JD, Banks J, Casselbrant ML, Mandel EM, Alper CM. Sensitivity and specificity of eustachian tube function tests in adults. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;139:719-27.
• McCoul ED, Anand VK, Christos PJ. Validating the clinical assessment of eustachian tube dysfunction: The Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7). Laryngoscope 2012;122:1137-41.
• Schröder S, Lehmann M, Sudhoff H, Ebmeyer J. Assessment of chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction : Evaluation of the German version of the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. HNO 2014;62:160. [Abstract]
• Van Roeyen S, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V. Value and discriminative power of the seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. Laryngoscope 2015;125:2553-6.
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186-91.
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
• Yegin Y, Çelik M, Altintaş A, Çolak C, Kayhan FT. Do the Angle and Length of the Eustachian Tube Affect the Success Rate of Pediatric Cartilage Type 1 Tympanoplasty? J Craniofac Surg 2017 Jan 18.
• Licameli GR. The eustachian tube. Update on anatomy, development, and function. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2002;35:803-9.
• Canali I, Petersen Schmidt Rosito L, Siliprandi B, Giugno C, Selaimen da Costa S. Assessment of Eustachian tube function in patients with tympanic membrane retraction and in normal subjects. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2017;83:50-58.
• Bunne M, Falk B, Hellström S, Magnuson B. Variability of Eustachian tube function in children with secretory otitis media. Evaluations at tube insertion and at follow-up. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2000;52:131-41.
• Teschner M. Evidence and evidence gaps in the treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction and otitis media. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;15:5.
• Wilson AT, Grabowski GM, Mackey WS, Steinbacher DM. Does Type of Cleft Palate Repair Influence Postoperative Eustachian Tube Dysfunction? J Craniofac Surg 2017;28:241-4.
• Choi SH, Han JH, Chung JW. Pre-operative Evaluation of Eustachian Tube Function Using a Modified Pressure Equilibration Test is Predictive of Good Postoperative Hearing and Middle Ear Aeration in Type 1 Tympanoplasty Patients. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2009;2:61-5.
• Vila PM, Thomas T, Liu C, Poe D, Shin JJ. The Burden and Epidemiology of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;156:278-84.
• Schilder AG, Bhutta MF, Butler CC, Holy C, Levine LH, Kvaerner KJ, et al. Eustachian tube dysfunction: consensus statement on definition, types, clinical presentation and diagnosis. Clin Otolaryngol 2015;40:407-11.
• Van Roeyen S, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V. Responsiveness of the 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. J Int Adv Otol 2016;12:106-8.