EVALUATIONS OF YOUTH PROBATIONERS AND PROBATION SPECIALISTS ON PROBATION PRACTICES

Abstract

This research aimed to examine the views of juveniles and probation specialists on the probation system and to put forward some suggestions on effective social work practices in the probation system. In this qualitative study, the phenomenology design was used. The study group of the research determined using the purposive sampling method comprises 30 juvenile justice-involved aged between 19-25 and 20 probation specialists. Five sub-themes were identified as: getting consultancy services, meeting psychosocial needs, developing cognitive and behavioral skills, raising awareness about substance use, changing friend circle. According to data from in-depth interviews, the probation system is considered a system that generally meets some basic psychosocial needs of young people; provides cognitive and behavioral awareness of the effects of substance abuse but cannot fully touch the lives of young people. The education and improvement programs in the probation system should be revised in accordance with the needs of the youth.

Keywords

• Probation practices
• young probationer
• probation specialist
• effectiveness
• social work

References

1. 1. Ada, Ş. and Peker, A. (2012). Examining the effectiveness of treatment and probation practices. Atatürk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 16(2), 425-438. Available from:https://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423871512.pdf. (accessed 8 March 2021).
2. 2. Appleton, C. (2010). Life after life imprisonment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. 3. Applegate, B. K., Smith, H. P., Sitren, A. H., Springer, N. F. (2009). From the inside: The meaning of probation to probationers. Criminal Justice Review, 34: 80-95. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016808325036 (accessed 20 March 2021).
4. 4. Belenko, S., Knight, D., Wasserman, G. A., Dennis, M. L., Wiley, T., Taxman, F. S., ... & Sales, J. (2017). The Juvenile Justice Behavioral Health Services Cascade: A new framework for measuring unmet substance use treatment services needs among adolescent offenders. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 74, 80-91.
5. 5. Bartollas, C. and Schmalleger, F. (2017). Juvenile delinquency. Ankara: Nobel Academic Press.
6. 6. Brinson, A. (2013). Success, defection, and relationships between probation officers and probationers: A social work perspective. Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers. Retrieved Available from: https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/157 (accessed 20 March 2021).
7. 7. Bilici, R., Kültegin, O., Bahadır, G., Maçkan, A., Orhan, N., Tuna, O. (2017). Treatment outcomes of drug users in probation period: three months follow-up. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 28. 1-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/24750573.2017.1391156 (accessed 27 July 2021).
8. 8. Bluthental, N. R., Riehman, K., Jaycox, H. L., Morral, A. (2006). Perspectives on treatment from adolescent probationers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 38: 461- 471. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2006.10400585(accessed 18 June 2021).

9. 9. Coatsworth, J. D., Pantin, H., & Szapocznik, J. (2002). Familias Unidas: A family-centered ecodevelopmental intervention to reduce the risk for problem behavior among Hispanic adolescents. Clinical child and family psychology review, 5(2), 113-132.
10. 10. Canton, R. (2011). Probation: Working with offenders. Routledge.
11. 11. Çınar, A. (2015). Effects of rehabilitation services in the probation system on the re-socialization process of convicts: The example of the Aydın Province. Master Thesis. Social Sciences Institute.
12. 12. Dowden, C. and Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203- 214. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X03257765 (accessed 18 June 2021).
13. 13. Drozdova, D. A. (2021). Here today, gone t, gone tomorrow: Impacts of friendship stability and ow: Impacts of friendship stability and homophily on justice-involved juveniles' offending and substance use. Open Access Theses & Dissertations. Available from: https://scholarworks.utep.edu/open_etd/3242 (accessed 28 April 2021).
14. 14. Dizman, Z. (2019). Qualitative research on family structures and criminal tendencies of young people under probation: The example of Istanbul, Hasanpaşa (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). Maltepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
15. 15. Erdem, G., Tuncer, A.E., Safi, A.O., Cankaya, B., Ergin, M., Aydoğan, R. (2018). The professional experiences and training needs of probation officers in Turkey. Journal of Social Work, 1: 1–23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318768181 (accessed 22 April 2021).
16. 16. Ertan, C. and Demez, G. (2018). The voice inside: probation practices through the eyes of individuals who are dragged into crime. Journal of Sociology Research, 21: 42-70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14225/Joh1277 (accessed 22 April 2021).
17. 17. Fagan, A.A., Van Horn, L.M., Antaramin, S., Hawkins, J.D. (2011). How do families matter? Age and gender differences in family influences on delinquency and drug use. Youth violence & juvenile justice, 9 (2),150-170. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204010377748. (accessed 29 April 2021).
18. 18. Farrington, D.P. (2000). Explaining and preventing crime: the globalization of knowledge the American society of criminology. Criminology, 38: 1-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00881.x (accessed 3 July 2021).
19. 19. Farley, J.A., Feaster, D., Schapmire, J.T., D’ambrosıo, G.J., Bruce, L.E., Oak, C.S., et al (2009). The challenges of implementing evidence based practice: ethical considerations in practice, education, policy and research. Social Work and Society, 7: 2-5.
20. 20. Farrall, S., Bottoms, A., Shapland, J. (2010). Social Structures and Desistance from Crime, European Journal of Criminology, 7(6), 546-570.
21. 21. Fine, A.D., Fountain, E., Vidal, S. (2019). Juveniles’ beliefs about and perceptions of probation predict technical violations and delinquency. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(2), 116–125. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000195 (accessed 7 July 2021).
22. 22. Glesne, C. (2012). Introduction to qualitative research. (Eds.: A. Ersoy and P. Yalçınoğlu). Ankara: Anı Publishing. 23. Henggeler, S.W. and Sheidow, A.J. (2012). Empirically supported family-based treatments for conduct disorder and delinquency in adolescents. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38: 30–58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00244.x (accessed 10 July 2021).
23. 24. Krysik, J.L. and Finn, J. (2015). Social work research for effective practice. Ankara: Nika Publishing.
24. 25. Lee, J.S. and Taxman, F.S. (2020). Using latent class analysis to identify the complex needs of youth on probation. Children and Youth Services Review,115. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105087 (accessed 10 July 2021).
25. 26. Loeber, R. and Farrington, D.P. (2003). Child delinquents: development, intervention, and service needs. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Available from: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/186162.pdf (accessed 12 July 2021).
26. 27. Maschi, T., Hatcher, S.S., Schwalbe, C.S., Rosato, N.S. (2008). Mapping the social service pathways of youth to and through the juvenile justice system: A comprehensive review. Children and Youth Services Review, 30 (12): 1376-1385. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.04.006 (accessed 22 June 2021).
27. 28. Mulvey, E.P. and Schubert, C.A. (2012). Some initial findings and policy implications of the pathways to desistance study. Victims & Offenders, 7 (4):407 427. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2012.713903 (accessed 22 July 2021).
28. 29. Mulvey, E.P., Steinberg, L., Fagan, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A.R., Chassinet, L., et al (2004). Theory and Research on Desistance from Antisocial Activity among Serious Adolescent Offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3):213-236. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204004265864 (accessed 17 October 2021).
29. 30. Nightingale, J.A. (2020). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Second Edition). Retrieved from Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/referencework/9780081022962/international-encyclopedia-of-human-geography#book-info (accessed 11 October 2021).
30. 31. Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (S.B.U). (2016). Evaluation and synthesis of studies using qualitative methods of analysis. Stockholm: Available from: https://www.sbu.se/globalassets/ebm/metodbok/sbuhandbook_qualitativemethodsofanalysis.pdf (accessed 17 October 2021).
31. 32. Schaefer, L. and Williams, G.C. (2018). The impact of probation and parole officers’ attitudes about offenders on professional practices. Corrections: policy, training, and research. Retrieved from Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23774657.2018.1538710 (accessed 21 November 2021).
32. 33. Schwalbe, C.S. and Maschi, T. (2010). Patterns of contact and cooperation between juvenile probation officers and parents of youthful offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49: 398-416. Available from: https://doi.org10.1080/10509674.2010.499055 (accessed 13 October 2021).
33. 34. Schwalbe, C. (2012). Toward an integrated theory of probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39: 185- 201. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811430185 (accessed 21 November 2021).
34. 35. Scott, C.K., Dennis, M. L., Foss, M.A. (2005). Utilizing Recovery Management Checkups to shorten the cycle of relapse, treatment reentry, and recovery. Drug and alcohol dependence, 78(3), 325–338. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.12.005 (accessed 22 November 2021).
35. 36. Shapland, J., Bottoms, A., Farrall, S., McNeill, F., Priede, C., Robinson, G. (2012). The quality of probation supervision: A literature review (Occasional Paper 3). Sheffield, UK: Centre for Criminological Research, University of Sheffield and University of Glasgow.
36. 37. Smith, P., Goggin, C., Gendreau, P. (2002). The effects of prison sentences and intermediate sanctions on recidivism: Age, gender and race. Ottawa, ON: Solicitor General of Canada: Corrections Research Branch. Available from: www.publicsafety.gc.ca. (accessed 22 November 2021).
37. 38. Springer, N.F., Brandon, K., Applegate, H.P., Smith, P.H., Sitren, H.A. (2009). Exploring the determinants of probationers' perceptions of their supervising officers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48: 210-227. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670902766596 (accessed 2 June 2021).
38. 39. Taxman, F. S., Pattavina, A., & Caudy, M. (2014). Justice reinvestment in the United States: An empirical assessment of the potential impact of increased correctional programming on recidivism. Victims & Offenders, 9(1), 50-75.
39. 40. Uluğtekin, S. (2012). Research on Young People Under Probation and Their Families: Needs and Expectations, Özgeder Press.
40. 41. Vidal, S. and Woolard, J. (2017). Youth’s Perceptions of Parental Support and Parental Knowledge as Moderators of the Association between Youth Probation Officer Relationship and Probation Non-Compliance. J Youth Adolesc, 46: 1452–1471. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0368-z (accessed 17 October 2021).
41. 42. Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2013). The methods of the qualitative research. Seçkin Press.
42. 43. Waller, J. and Beall, J. (2003). The effectiveness of probation in west virginia: a study examining the practices and views of probation officers in west virginia the effectiveness of probation in west virginia: a study examining the practices and views of probation officers in west virginia. 10.13140/rg.2.2.27376.76800.