BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS ON ADMINISTRATIVE DETENTION IN THE FOCUS ON MIGRATION AND ITS EVALUATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIAL WORK

Abstract

In this research, it is aimed to examine the conceptual closeness between the Social Work profession and Immigration Detention and to understand the connection between them. In line with the purpose of the research, bibliometric analysis method and content analysis method, which are among the qualitative research methods, were used. As the primary analysis in the research, "immigration detention" was searched in the Web of Science database. As a result of the search, 372 articles published in the SSCI citation series between 2003-2023 were obtained. These articles were analyzed bibliometrically. The obtained data were mapped with the help of VOSviewer program. In the secondary analysis of the research, content analyzes of 144 concepts obtained as a result of bibliometric analysis were carried out using the Maxqda2020 program, focusing on "Basic Human Needs", "Social Work Client System" and "Social Work Roles and Functions". Thus, it is aimed to understand the relationship between the concepts and the social work profession. As a result of the research, the conceptual relationship between administrative detention and the profession of social work in the field of migration, to which client groups the social workers in this field provide psycho-social support, which roles and functions of the experts should be used more actively in this context and the importance of the profession of social work in this field have been understood.

Keywords

• Administrative Detention
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Basic Human Rights and Needs
• Immigration Detention
• Social Work

GÖÇ ODAĞINDA İDARİ GÖZETİMİN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ VE SOSYAL HİZMET AÇISINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Araştırmada, sosyal hizmet mesleği ve göç odağında idari gözetim arasındaki kavramsal yakınlığın incelenmesi ve aralarındaki bağlantının anlaşılması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın amacı doğrultusunda nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ve içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada birincil analiz olarak Web of Science veri tabanında “immigration detention” araması yapılmıştır. Arama sonucunda 2003-2023 yılları arasında SSCI atıf dizisinde yayınlanan 372 makale elde edilmiştir. Bu makaleler bibliyometrik açıdan analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler VOSviewer programı yardımıyla haritalandırılmıştır. Araştırmanın ikincil analizinde ise bibliyometrik analiz sonucunda elde edilen 144 kavramın Maxqda2020 programı kullanılarak “Temel İnsan İhtiyaçları”, “Sosyal Hizmet Müracaatçı Sistemi” ve “Sosyal Hizmet Rol ve İşlevleri” odağında içerik analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Böylece kavramların sosyal hizmet mesleği ile ilişkisinin anlaşılması amaçlanmıştır. Yapılan araştırmanın sonucunda göç odağında idari gözetim ve sosyal hizmet mesleğinin kavramsal anlamda ilişkisi, bu alanda bulunan sosyal hizmet uzmanlarının hangi müracaatçı kitlelerine psiko-sosyal destek verdikleri, aynı zamanda uzmanların hangi rol ve işlevlerini daha aktif şekilde kullanmaları gerektikleri ve sosyal hizmet mesleğinin bu alandaki önemi anlaşılmıştır.

Keywords

• İdari gözetim
• bibliyometrik analiz
• temel insan hakları ve ihtiyaçları
• göç odağında idari gözetim
• sosyal hizmet

BIBLIOMETRISCHE ANALYSE ZUR VERWALTUNGSHAFT IM FOKUS MIGRATION UND IHRE BEWERTUNG AUS DER PERSPEKTIVE DER SOZIALARBEIT

Abstract

Ziel dieser Untersuchung ist es, die konzeptionelle Nähe zwischen dem Beruf der Sozialen Arbeit und der Einwanderungshaft zu untersuchen und die Verbindung zwischen beiden zu verstehen. In Übereinstimmung mit dem Forschungsziel wurden die bibliometrische Analysemethode und die Methode der Inhaltsanalyse, die zu den qualitativen Forschungsmethoden gehören, verwendet. Für die primäre Analyse wurde in der Datenbank Web of Science nach "Einwanderungshaft" gesucht. Das Ergebnis der Suche waren 372 Artikel, die zwischen 2003 und 2023 in der SSCI-Zitationsreihe veröffentlicht wurden. Diese Artikel wurden bibliometrisch ausgewertet. Die gewonnenen Daten wurden mit Hilfe des Programms VOSviewer kartiert. In der Sekundäranalyse der Forschung wurden Inhaltsanalysen von 144 Konzepten, die als Ergebnis der bibliometrischen Analyse erhalten wurden, mit Hilfe des Programms Maxqda2020 durchgeführt, wobei der Schwerpunkt auf den "menschlichen Grundbedürfnissen", dem "Klientensystem der Sozialen Arbeit" und den "Rollen und Funktionen der Sozialen Arbeit" lag. Auf diese Weise soll die Beziehung zwischen den Konzepten und dem Beruf der Sozialarbeit verstanden werden. Als Ergebnis der Forschung wurde die konzeptionelle Beziehung zwischen der administrativen Inhaftierung und dem Beruf der Sozialarbeit im Bereich der Migration verstanden, für welche Klientengruppen die Sozialarbeiter in diesem Bereich psychosoziale Unterstützung leisten, welche Rollen und Funktionen der Experten in diesem Kontext aktiver genutzt werden sollten und welche Bedeutung der Beruf der Sozialarbeit in diesem Bereich hat.

Keywords

• Verwaltungshaft
• bibliometrische Analyse
• Grundrechte und Grundbedürfnisse
• Einwanderungshaft
• sozialarbeit

References

1. Aktaş, M. (2019). Evaluation of administrative detention in removal centers from the perspective of Article 5 “right to liberty and security” of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights and Equality Institution of Turkey Academic Journal, (2), 61-78.
2. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
3. Aybay, R. (2003). Deportation as a human rights issue. Journal of Maltepe University Faculty of Law, 2, 141-172.
4. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual review of information science and technology, 37(1), 179-255.
5. Broeders, D. (2010). Return to sender? Administrative detention of irregular migrants in Germany and the Netherlands. Punishment & Society, 12(2), 169-186.
6. Cobo, M. J., López‐Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402.
7. Danış, M. Z. (2009). Loneliness and Poverty Conditions of the Elderly Population in Turkey and Some Inferences about Social Work Interventions. Society and Social Work, 20(1), 67-84.
8. Demir, Y. E., & Gedik, M. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of academic publications on the concept of disability with VOSviewer. Journal of Social Policy, 3(1), 12-25.

9. Duru, S. & Duyan, V. (2017). Gender roles in families with disabled children. KADEM Journal of Women’s Studies, 3 (2), 200-211.
10. Duyan, V. (2010). Social work: Foundations, approaches, intervention methods. Ankara: Social Workers Association.
11. Duyan, V. (2003). Functions and roles of social work. Society and Social Work, 14(2), 1-22.D
12. Ekşi, N. (2014). 6458 Sayılı Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Kanunu’nda İdari Gözetim (Administrative Detention in the Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection). İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım AŞ.
13. Eonomopoulou, A., Pavli, A., Stasinopoulou, P., Giannopoulos, L. A., & Tsiodras, S. (2017). Migrant screening: Lessons learned from the migrant holding level at the Greek–Turkish borders. Journal of infection and public health, 10(2), 177-184.
14. Estévez, I. (2022). A case for community-based alternatives to immigration detention. Arizona Law Review, 64(4).
15. Flynn, M. (2012). Who must be detained? Proportionality as a tool for critiquing immigration detention policy. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 31(3), 40-68.
16. Gallagher, A. M., Ireland, H., & Muchopa, N. (2006). Handbook for Visitors and Social Workers in Detention Centres. Brussels: Jesuit Refugee Service.
17. Glanzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field a course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators.
18. Global Detention Project (2023). Detention Centers, Retrieved from https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/detention-centres/map-view, Accessed 19.04.2023.
19. Directorate of Migration Management (2013). Turkey Migration Report (32) Retrieved from https://www.goc.gov.tr/kurumlar/goc.gov.tr/YillikGocRaporlari/2013_yillik_goc_raporu.pdf  Accessed 11.04.2023
20. Directorate of Migration Management (2018). Employee Support Training was Provided by the Psychosocial Support Working Group, Retrieved from https://www.gam.gov.tr/tr/haber-detay.aspx?Id=52  Accessed 16.04.2023.
21. Directorate of Migration Management (2020). Online Orientation Training for Psychosocial Support Staff Working in Removal Centers, Retrieved from https://www.goc.gov.tr/geri-gonderme-merkezlerinde-calisan-psikososyal-destek-personeline-online-oryantasyon-egitimi-gerceklestirildi, Accessed 17.04.2023
22. Directorate of Migration Management (2021). About Change of Status, Retrieved from https://www.goc.gov.tr/statu-degisikligi-hakkinda2, Accessed 11.04.2023
23. Directorate of Migration Management (2023a). Irregular Migration Statistics, Retrieved from https://www.goc.gov.tr/duzensiz-goc-istatistikler, Accessed 11.04.2023
24. Directorate of Migration Management (2023b). Centers, Retrieved from https://www.goc.gov.tr/geri-gonderme-merkezleri33, Accessed 11.04.2023
25. Green, J. P., & Eagar, K. (2010). The health of people in Australian immigration detention centres. Medical Journal of Australia, 192(2), 65-70.
26. Hamilton, C., Anderson, K., Barnes, R., Dorling, K., & Muzzi, M. E. (2011). Administrative detention of children: a global report.
27. Heeren, G. (2010). Pulling teeth: The state of mandatory immigration detention. Harv. CR-CLL Rev., 45, 601.
28. İçduygu, A., & Aksel, D. B. (2012). Irregular migration in Turkey. International Organization for Migration Turkey.
29. Jacso, P. (2005). As we may search—comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current science, 89(9), 1537-1547.
30. Karagöz, B., & Şeref, İ. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of research on Yunus Emre.
31. Karataş, M. & Barut, B. (2021). Migration and Vulnerable Groups from Social Work Perspective: A Study On IOM Reports. Adnan Menderes University Institute of Social Sciences Journal, 8 (1), 86-109. DOI: 10.30803/adusobed.913915
32. Leerkes, A., & Broeders, D. (2012). Deportable and not so deportable: Formal and informal functions of administrative immigration detention. In The social, political and historical contours of deportation (pp. 79-104). New York, NY: Springer New York.
33. Linton JM, Griffin M, Shapiro AJ, Counc. Community Pediatr. 2017. Detention of immigrant children. American Academy of Pediatrics. 139:1–13
34. Marouf, F. E. (2016). Alternatives to immigration detention. Cardozo L. Rev., 38, 2141.
35. McBurney, M. K., & Novak, P. L. (2002). What is bibliometrics and why should you care?. In Proceedings. IEEE international professional communication conference (pp. 108-114). IEEE.
36. McLeod, S. (2007). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Simply psychology, 1(1-18).
37. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
38. Minn. Lawyers Int. Hum. Rights Comm. 1987. Oakdale Detention Center: The First Year of Operation. Minneapolis: Minn. Lawyers Int. Hum. Rights Comm.
39. Missbach, A. (2017). Accommodating asylum seekers and refugees in Indonesia: From immigration detention to containment in “alternatives to detention”. Refuge, 33(2), 32-44.
40. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228.
41. Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. Journal of informetrics, 1(2), 161-169.
42. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd Ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc. Rabin, N. (2008). Unseen prisoners: Women in immigration detention facilities in Arizona. Geo. Immigr. LJ, 23, 695.
43. Ricciardelli, L., Nackerud, L., Cochrane, K., Crawford, L., & Taylor, D. (2019). A snapshot of immigration court at Stewart Detention Center: How social workers can advocate & advance social justice efforts in the United States. Critical Social Work, 20(1).
44. Ryo, E. (2019). Understanding immigration detention: Causes, conditions, and consequences. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, 97-115.
45. Silove, D., Steel, Z., & Mollica, R. F. (2001). Detention of asylum seekers: assault on health, human rights, and social development. The Lancet, 357(9266), 1436-1437.
46. Steel, Z., Silove, D., Brooks, R., Momartin, S., Alzuhairi, B., & Susljik, I. N. A. (2006). Impact of immigration detention and temporary protection on the mental health of refugees. The british journal of psychiatry, 188(1), 58-64.
47. Tabak, S., & Levitan, R. (2014). LGBTI migrants in immigration detention: A global perspective. Harv. JL & Gender, 37, 1.
48. Terrio, S. J. (2015). Whose child am I?: Unaccompanied, undocumented children in US immigration custody. Univ of California Press.
49. Thompson, D. F. (2018). Bibliometric Analysis of Pharmacology Publications in the United States: A State-Level Evaluation. Journal of Scientometric Research, 7(3), 167-172.
50. Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey (2013). Law on Foreigners and International Protection: 28615, Date: 11.04.2013.
51. Human Rights Institution of Turkey, (2014). Istanbul Removal Center Report, Retrieved from http://madde14.org/images/e/ec/TihkLIstGGMRapor2014.pdf, Accessed 10.04.2023 Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.2058.
52. Von Werthern, M., Robjant, K., Chui, Z., Schon, R., Ottisova, L., Mason, C., & Katona, C. (2018). The impact of immigration detention on mental health: a systematic review. BMC psychiatry, 18(1), 1-19.
53. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472.