Farklı Tanımlar ve Araştırma Örnekleri Işığında Güçlendirmenin Anlaşılması

Abstract

Güçlendirme (empowerment), hem bir yaklaşım hem de kapsayıcı bir amaç olarak günümüzde sosyal hizmet kuramı ve uygulamasının en etkili kavramsal çerçevelerinden biri haline gelmiştir. Aynı zamanda sosyal hizmetin uluslararası tanımının da önemli bir bileşenidir. Güçlendirme modellerinin birçoğu farklı müdahale düzeyleriyle ilişkilendirilmiştir; bununla birlikte bazı araştırmacıların çalışmaları bu müdahale düzeylerini, danışan gruplarını ve psikolojik yaklaşımlardan sosyolojik temelli kuramlara kadar uzanan kuramsal arka planları bütünleştiren bir perspektif sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, mesleki-tarihsel ve kavramsal arka planın kısa bir değerlendirmesinin ardından, güçlendirme araştırmalarında kullanılan çeşitli yaklaşımlara ve uygulamalara ilişkin genel bir bakış sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

• sosyal hizmette güçlendirme (empowerment)
• güçlendirme kavramının mesleki tarihi
• güçlendirme araştırmaları

UNDERSTANDING EMPOWERMENT THROUGH DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS AND RESEARCH EXAMPLES

Abstract

Empowerment, both as a perspective and as an overarching objective, has by now become one of the most influential frameworks in the theory and practice of social work. It is also included in the international definition of social work. Numerous models of empowerment are linked to different levels of intervention; however, the work of several scholars integrates these levels, client groups, and theoretical foundations ranging from psychological approaches to sociologically grounded theories. The present study aims, following a brief overview of the professional-historical and conceptual background, to provide an insight into various empowerment research practices.

Keywords

• empowerment in social work
• professional history of concept of empowerment
• research of empowerment

Supporting Institution

University of Szeged

Ethical Statement

All data were collected and processed in a manner that ensured the anonymity and confidentiality of participants. No personal identifying information was recorded or disclosed during the research process or in the presentation of the results. Participants had the right to withdraw from the study at any stage without any negative consequences. The study did not involve any procedures that could cause physical or psychological harm to participants. The research process complied with the ethical principles of academic integrity, respect for persons, and responsible data management.

References

1. Adams, R. (1996). Concept of empowerment in social work and empowerment. In Practical social work (pp. 1–24). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14033-6_1
2. Alinsky, S. (1965). The war on poverty-political pornography. Social Issues, 21(?), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1965.tb00482.x
3. Barcham, R. (2012). Theorising empowerment practice from the Pacific and Indigenous Australia. https://scispace.com/pdf/theorising-empowerment-practice-from-the-pacific-and-xtksl43wrf.pdf
4. Berg, I. K. (1995). Konzultáció sokproblémás családokkal. In Családterápiás olvasókönyv sorozat V. Animula Egyesület.
5. Comer, E. W., & Fraser, M. W. (1998). Evaluation of six family-support programs: Are they effective? Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 79(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.1820
6. Danis, M. Z., Karatas, K., & Sahin, M. C. (2008). Reflections of neo-liberal policies on health-care field and social work practices directed towards the empowerment of person with chronic illness and his/her family in the globalization process. World Applied Sciences Journal, 5(2), 224–235. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353934885_Reflections_of_Neoliberal_Policies_on_HealthCare_Field_and_Social_Work_Practices_Directed_Towards_the_Empowerment_of_Person_with_Chronic_Illness_and_HisHer_Family_in_the_Globalization_Process
7. Garcia-Ramirez, M., Soto-Ponce, B., Albar-Marín, M., Parra-Casado, D., Popova, D., & Tomsa, R. (2020). RoMoMatteR: Empowering Roma girls’ mattering through reproductive justice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228498
8. Global definition of social work. (n.d.). International Federation of Social Workers. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/

9. Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (2008). Áttekintés a családról (3. kötet). Animula.
10. Héderné, E. B. (2011). A cigány - magyar segítőkapcsolat speciális vonatkozásai [Doktori disszertáció, ELTE PPK]. https://edit.elte.hu/xmlui/handle/10831/46267
11. Lee, J. (2001). The empowerment approach to social work practice: Building the beloved community (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press.
12. Maiorano, D., Shrimankar, D., Björkert, T. S., & Blomkvist, H. (2021). Measuring empowerment: Choices, values and norms. World Development, 138, Article 105220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105220
13. McWhirter, E. H. (1998). An empowerment model of counsellor education. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 32(1), 12–26. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ568326.pdf
14. Morse, G., Wolff, N., Helminiak, T. W., Calsyn, R. J., Klinkenberg, D. W., & Trusty, M. (1997). Cost-effectiveness evaluation of three approaches to case management for homeless mentally ill clients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(3), 341–348. http://www.springerlink.com/index/qjk1I2273p24557.pdf
15. Parton, N., & O’Byrne, P. (2000). Constructive social work. Palgrave.
16. Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory (4th ed.). MacMillan – Red Globe Press.
17. Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919275
18. Rappaport, J., & Zimmerman, M. (1998). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 725–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00930023
19. Rogers, C. (1988). Az érzések visszatükrözése. In S. Illyés & M. Ritoókné Ádám (Szerk.), A nevelési és pályaválasztási tanácsadás pszichológiája I–III. Tankönyvkiadó.
20. Sadan, E. (2011). Közösségi tervezés és empowerment. https://dtk.tankonyvtar.hu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/8208/01_kozossegi_tervezes_es_empowerment.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
21. Segal, S. P., Silverman, C., & Temkin, T. (1995). Measuring empowerment in client-run self-help agencies. Community Mental Health Journal, 31(3), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02188748
22. Swenson, C. R. (1998). Clinical social work’s contribution to a social justice perspective. Social Work, 43(6), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/43.6.527
23. Vojtek, I. (2021). Evaluation approaches to empowering interventions. Szociális Szemle, 14(1), ?–?. https://doi.org/10.15170/SocRev.2021.14.01.02
24. Worsley, A., Mann, T., Olsen, A., Mason, E., & Whitehead, J. L. (Szerk.). (2013). Empowerment. In Key concepts in social work practice. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914988.n16
25. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6