Politik Sosyal Hizmet

Abstract

Sosyal çalışma mesleği ortaya çıktığı ilk yıllardan itibaren politika ile yakından ilgilenmiş, savunmasız nüfus gruplarının savunuculuğu rolünü üstlenmiştir. Mesleğin ilk temsilcileri başta kadın hakları, çalışma saatleri ve çocuk işçiliği gibi konularla ilgili politika değişikliklerine gidilmesini sağlayacak çalışmalar yapmışlardır. Ancak meslek tarihi boyunca sosyal hizmet uzmanlarının politik faaliyetlere dahil olmalarına ilişkin endişeler dile getirilmiştir. Bu endişeler sosyal hizmet uzmanlarının profesyonel statüsünü koruma, belirli gruplara taraf gibi görünmek istememe, hükümet ya da kâr amacı gütmeyen bir çalışan olarak siyasi faaliyette bulunmanın yasal olup olmadığı ile ilgili olmuştur. Ancak günümüzde sosyal çalışma mesleğinin politika yapım süreçlerine katılması neredeyse zorunlu hale gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada politik sosyal hizmetin kapsamı ve Türkiye’de sosyal çalışma ile politika arasındaki ilişki ve uygulama olarak nasıl gerçekleştirilebileceği ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır.

Keywords

• Politika
• politik sosyal hizmet
• savunuculuk
• sosyal çalışma

Political Social Work

Abstract

The social work profession has been closely interested in politics from the first years of its existence and has undertaken the role of advocacy for vulnerable population groups. The first representatives of the profession made efforts to make policy changes on issues such as women's rights, working hours and child labor. However, throughout the history of the profession, concerns have been expressed about the involvement of social workers in political activities. These concerns have been about maintaining the professional status of social workers, not wanting to be seen as a party to certain groups, and whether it is legal to engage in political activity as a government or non-profit employee. Today, however, it has become almost mandatory for the social work profession to participate in policy making processes. In this study, the scope of political social work and the relationship between social work and politics in Turkey and how it can be realized as practice have been tried to be revealed.

Keywords

• Politics
• political social work
• advocacy
• social work

References

1. Adichie, C. N. (2009, Temmuz). Chimamanda Adichie: Single Story. TED Global: https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_ngozi_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story?language=tr adresinden alındı
2. Andrews, K., & Edwars, B. (2004). Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. Political Process. Annual Review of Sociology, 479-506.
3. Başcıllar, M., & Karataş, K. (2021). Orduda Sosyal Hizmet: Terör Gazilerinin Depresyon ve Yaşam Doyumunun Değerlendirilmesi. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 23-40.
4. Bennett, L., Wells, C., & Rank, A. (2009). Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies, 105-120.
5. BM. (1989). Birleşmiş Milletler Çocuk Haklarına Dair Sözleşme.
6. Brouillette, R. (2016, Mart 15). Why Therapists Should Talk Politics. The New York Times: https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/03/15/why-therapists-should-talk-politics/ adresinden alındı
7. Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship Norms and the Expansion Of Political Participation. Political Studies, 76-98.
8. Davis, A. F. (1964). Settlement Workers in Politics, 1890–1914. The Review of Politics, 505-517.

9. Davis, J. (2010). Voting as Empowerment Practice. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 243-257.
10. Dunham, R., & Petersen, N. (2017). Making black lives matter. Criminology & Public Policy, 341-348.
11. Edwards, H., & Hoefer, R. (2010). Are Social Work Advocacy Groups Using Web 2.0 Effectively? Journal of Policy Practice, 220-239.
12. Elmacıoğlu, L. (2020, Eylül 4). Terörle mücadelede yaralandılar, şarapnel parçalarıyla yaşıyorlar ama gazi sayılmıyorlar. Independent Türkçe: https://www.indyturk.com/node/237351/haber/ter%C3%B6rle-m%C3%BCcadelede-yaraland%C4%B1lar-%C5%9Farapnel-par%C3%A7alar%C4%B1yla-ya%C5%9F%C4%B1yorlar-ama-gazi adresinden alındı
13. Fisher, R. (1995). Political Social Work. Journal of Social Work Education , 194-203.
14. Gal, I. W., & Gal, J. (2014). Social Workers as Policy Actors. Journal of Social Policy, 19-36.
15. Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Tweeting Social Change: How Social Media Are Changing Nonprofit Advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 57-79.
16. Hari, J. (2019). Kaybolan Bağlar: Depresyonun Gerçek Nedenleri ve Beklenmedik Çözümler. İstanbul: Metis.
17. Haynes, K., & Mickelson, J. (2009). Affecting Change: Social Workers in the Political Arena. Boston: Pearson.
18. Homan, M. (2015). Promoting Community Change: Making It Happen in the Real World. Boston: Cengage Learning.
19. Huber, L. P., Villanueva, B. P., Guarneros, N., Velez, V., & Solorzano, D. (2014). DACAmented in California: The Impact of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program on Latina/os. . Los Angeles: CSRS.
20. Hunjan, R., & Pettit, J. (2011). Power: A practical guide for facilitating social change. Dunfermline: Carnegie United Kingdom Trust.
21. Jones, C. (2001). Voices From the Front Line: State Social Workers and New Labour. British Journal of Social Work, 547-562.
22. Karger, H. J., & Herndndez, M. T. (2004). The Decline of the Public Intellectual in Social Work . Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 51-68.
23. Kittilson, M., & Tate, K. (2005). Political Parties, Minorities and Elected Office: Comparing Opportunities for Inclusion in the. C. Wolbrecht içinde, Politics of Democratic Inclusion (s. 163-185). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
24. Lane, S. R., & Humphreys, N. A. (2011). Social Workers in Politics: A National Survey of Social Work Candidates and Elected Officials. Journal of Policy Practice, 225-244.
25. Lane, S. R., & Pritzker, S. (2018). Political Social Work Using Power to Create Social Change. Springer.
26. Levy, D., Tien, C., & Aved, R. (2001). Do differences matter? Women members of congress and the Hyde amendment. Journal of Women Politics & Policy , 105-127.
27. Lukes, S. (2005). Power: ARadical View. London: Palgrave.
28. Lyons, K. (2008). Dame Eileen Younghusband (United Kingdom), President 1961-1968. Social Work and Society.
29. Mahaffey, M., & Hanks, J. W. (1982). Practical Politics: Social Work and Political Responsibility. Maryland: Silver Spring.
30. Mellinger, M. S., & Kolomer, S. (2013). Legislative Advocacy and Human Service Nonprofits: What Are We Doing? Journal of Policy Practice , 87-106.
31. Mendes, P. (2003). Social workers and social action: a case study of the Australian Association of Social Workers' Victorian branch. Australian Social Work, 16-27.
32. Meyer, M. (2021, Kasım 29). Political Interventions. Encyclopedia of Social Work: https://oxfordre.com/socialwork/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.001.0001/acrefore-9780199975839-e-293 adresinden alındı
33. NASW. (2014, Haziran 26). NASW Statement on Senate Consideration of Voting Rights Amendment Act. National Association of Social Work: https://www.socialworkers.org/News/News-Releases/ID/223/NASW-Statement-on-Senate-Consideration-of-Voting-Rights-Amendment-Act adresinden alındı
34. NASW. (2016, Aralık 21). NASW CEO McClain sends holiday message, response to Trump Presidency. Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRnlvEP2QAU&ab_channel=NationalAssociationofSocialWorkers adresinden alındı
35. NASW. (2017). Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington: National Association of Social Workers.
36. Ostrander, J. (2016). To participate or not to participate, that is the question: A critical phenomenological study of clinical social workers and their political participation. Connecticut: University of Connecticut.
37. Pace, P. (2021, Kasım 26). NASW, social work students rally for Voting Rights Act outside the Supreme Court. Social Work Blog: http://www.socialworkblog.org/nasw-news-article/2013/04/nasw-social-work-students-rally-for-voter-rights-act-outside-the-supreme-court/ adresinden alındı
38. Pritzker, S., & Lane, S. R. (2017). Political Social Work: History, Forms, and Opportunities for Innovation. Social Work, 80-82.
39. Reisch, M., & Andrews, J. (2001). The Road Not Taken: A History of Radical Social Work in the United States. Philadelphia: Routledge.
40. Rocha, C., Poe, B., & Thomas, V. (2010). Political activities of social workers: addressing perceived barriers to political participation . Social Work, 317-325.
41. Rose, S. (1990). Advocacy/empowerment: An approach to clinical practice for social work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 41-51.
42. Samuels, A. (2015). The Political Psyche. London: Routledge.
43. Shamai, M., & Boehm, A. (2001). Politically Oriented Social Work Intervention. International Social Work, 343-360.
44. SHUDER. (2004). Sosyal Hizmet Mesleğinin Etik İlke ve Sorumlulukları. Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanları Derneği Genel Merkezi Yayınları.
45. Smith, A. (2010). The Election, Incorporation and Policy Impact of Women in City Goverment. Atlanta: Emory University.
46. Swenson, C. (1998). Clinical Social Work's Contribution to a Social Justice Perspective. Social Work, 527-537.
47. TBMM. (2021). İstiklal Madalyası Verilmiş Bulunanlara Vatani Hizmet Tertibinden Şeref Aylığı Bağlanması Hakkında Kanunda ve 6/2/2018 Tarihli ve 7082 Sayılı Olağanüstü Hal Kapsamında Bazı Tedbirler Alınması Hakkında Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamenin Kabul Edilmesine Dair Kanu. Ankara: TBMM.
48. Yanardağ, U. (2020). Siyaset ve Sosyal Çalışma İlişkisini Türkiye İçin Düşünkek. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 261-278.