Türkiye’de Sosyal Hizmet Öğrencilerinin Göçmenlere Yönelik Tutumları: Kesitsel Bir Araştırma

Abstract

Bu araştırma, Türkiye’deki sosyal hizmet lisans öğrencilerinin göçmenlere yönelik tutumlarını incelemeyi ve bu tutumlarla ilişkili algısal faktörleri belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Betimsel tarama modeline dayalı olarak yürütülen bu çalışmada nicel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini, 2024–2025 akademik yılında Türkiye’deki kamu ve vakıf üniversitelerinde sosyal hizmet eğitimi alan 426 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak sosyo-demografik bilgi formu, göçmenlere ilişkin algıları ölçmeye yönelik 20 maddelik tematik soru formu ve Göçmenlere Yönelik Negatif Tutum Ölçeği (NATIS) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, katılımcıların büyük çoğunluğunun göçmenlere yönelik nötr ya da olumsuz tutumlara sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Özellikle göçmenlerin ekonomik etkileri, eğitim sistemi üzerindeki etkileri, sosyo-kültürel çatışmalar ve halk sağlığı riskleri konusunda olumsuz inanışlara sahip öğrencilerin NATIS puanlarının anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu bulgular, Türkiye’deki sosyal hizmet eğitiminin insan hakları, eşitlik ve ayrımcılık karşıtlığı gibi temel mesleki değerleri yeterince güçlendiremediğini göstermektedir. Gelecek araştırmalarda bu önyargıların altında yatan nedenler nitel yöntemlerle daha ayrıntılı biçimde incelenmelidir. Ayrıca sosyal hizmet müfredatı; medya okuryazarlığı, kültürel yetkinlik ve eleştirel düşünmeyi içeren daha bütüncül bir yaklaşımla yeniden yapılandırılmalıdır.

Keywords

• Göçmen tutumları
• kültürel yetkinlik
• sosyal hizmet eğitimi
• sosyal politika
• toplumsal dışlanma

Attitudes Toward Immigrants Among Social Work Students in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

This study aims to examine the attitudes of social work undergraduate students in Türkiye toward immigrants and to identify the perceptual factors associated with these attitudes. Based on a descriptive survey design, the study employed a quantitative research method. The sample consisted of 426 students enrolled in social work programs at public and private universities in Türkiye during the 2024–2025 academic year. Data were collected using a socio-demographic information form, a 20-item thematic questionnaire measuring perceptions toward immigrants, and the Negative Attitudes Toward Immigrants Scale (NATIS). The results revealed that the majority of participants held neutral or negative attitudes toward immigrants. In particular, students who endorsed negative beliefs regarding immigrants’ economic effects, impact on the education system, socio-cultural conflicts, and public health risks reported significantly higher NATIS scores. These results suggest that social work education in Türkiye does not sufficiently strengthen core professional values such as human rights, equality, and anti-discrimination. Future studies should examine the underlying causes of these prejudices in greater depth through qualitative methods. Additionally, social work curricula should be restructured through a more holistic approach that incorporates media literacy, cultural competence, and critical thinking.

Keywords

• Attitudes toward immigrants
• cultural competence
• social work education
• social policy
• social exclusion

References

1. Akyıldız, İ. E. (2022). Evaluation of Turkey's dynamic migration structure in the context of external and internal migrations. İçtimaiyat, 6(Special Issue on Migration and Refugees), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.33709/ictimaiyat.1010076
2. Baş, M., Molu, B., Tuna, H. İ., & Baş, İ. (2017). The effects of the socio-cultural and economic change of emigrant families on the lives of women and children. Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches, 6(3), 1680-1693.
3. Başoğlu, M. Y. (2023). The role of media in society: An investigation on the perception of immigrants. Muhakeme Journal, 6(2), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.33817/muhakeme.1379075
4. Biber, F. U. (2023). Syrian refugees and the influences of the social media in the context of xenophobic perception management; Dom gypsies in Istanbul Tarlabaşı. Bursa Uludağ Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 157-182.
5. Çağırkan, B. (2024). The social coherence process of immigrants in the digital age: The power of new media and the deepening of inequalities. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 22(4), 450-464.
6. Çankaya, S., & Tozlu, B. (2021). Social adaptation and multiculturalism perception of forced migration groups in social and sporting activities: Samsun province sample. Journal of Sports and Performance Researches, 12(3), 264-283. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.903041
7. Çelik, İ. A., & Vural, F. (2018). Second wife dram of Syrian refugee women: Kilis sample. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 8(14), 341-382. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.406308
8. Chatty, D. (2017). The Syrian humanitarian disaster: Understanding perceptions and aspirations in Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey. Global Policy, 8, 25-32.

9. Erdoğan, M. M. (2024). Syrians Barometer 2023: Framework of living in harmony with Syrians. Ankara University SBF Mülkiye Migration Research Center (MÜGAM) with the support of UNHCR Türkiye. https://www.unhcr.org/tr/en/haberler-ve-bilgilendirme/publications
10. Freire-Vidal, Y., & Graells-Garrido, E. (2019, May). Characterization of local attitudes toward immigration using social media. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference (pp. 783-790). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3316455
11. Furman, R., Langer, C. L., Sanchez, T. W., & Negi, N. J. (2007). A qualitative study of immigration policy and practice dilemmas for social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2007.200500532
12. Gonçalves, I., & David, Y. (2024). Threats, victims, or heroes? Media frames about migration in the United Kingdom and Brazil. International Communication Gazette, 87(3), 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485241249007
13. Günay, G., Ersoy, A. F., Boylu, A. A., & Kiliç, C. (2019). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Negative Attitude Toward Immigrants Scale. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 54(4), 1827-1843.
14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
15. Held, M. L., Cuellar, M. J., & Cook Heffron, L. (2018). A study of social work students' knowledge and perceptions of stages of Latino immigration. Journal of Social Work Education, 54(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2017.1307148
16. Karadeniz, O. (2023). Social security status of Syrians under temporary protection in the Turkish labor market and recommendations for transition to registered employment. International Labor Organization (ILO) Türkiye Office.
17. Karasar, N. (2012). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques (23rd ed.). Nobel Publishing.
18. Kurt, G., Ekhtiari, M., Ventevogel, P., Ersahin, M., Ilkkursun, Z., Akbiyik, N., & Acarturk, C. (2023). Socio-cultural integration of Afghan refugees in Türkiye: the role of traumatic events, post-displacement stressors and mental health. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 32, e51, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204579602300063X
19. Kutlu, M. (2019). An evaluation on the impact of the Syrian refugees in Turkey on labor market and employment: Example of Gazgiantep-Adıyaman-Kilis. Dicle University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 9(7), 45-59.
20. Meçik, O., & Koyuncu, T. (2020). The relationship between migration and economic growth in Turkey: Toda-Yamamoto causality test. Journal of the Human and Social Sciences Researches, 9(3), 2618-2635.
21. Ogbanga, M.M. (2024). Migration and transformation: Understanding the impact on destination countries in the age of mobility. Journal for Studies in Management and Planning, 10(8), 1-11.
22. Pandır, M. (2021). The construction of cultural difference in refugee representations and its implications for social acceptance. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 23(2), 348-364.
23. Parlak, İ., Çakın, Ö., & Kaya, S. (2022). Asylum seeker perception in social media: The appearance of Syrian asylum seekers in Turkish Twitter accounts. Gümüşhane University e-journal of Faculty of Communication, 10(2), 948-983.
24. Raosoft. (2004). Raosoft sample size calculator. Raosoft, Inc. http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html
25. Tos, H., & Gökce, D. (2021). Evaluation of the problem of social exclusion of Syrian refugees with an “Inclusive City” approach; The example of Tarsus (Mersin) City. Tarsus University Journal of The Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2(2), 110-141.
26. Tumen, S. (2023). The case of Syrian refugees in Türkiye: Successes, challenges, and lessons learned. World Bank Background Paper to the World Development Report 2023.
27. Varela, J. G., Gonzalez Jr, E., Clark, J. W., Cramer, R. J., & Crosby, J. W. (2013). Development and preliminary validation of the Negative Attitude Toward Immigrants Scale. Journal of Latina/o Psychology, 1(3), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033707
28. World Health Organization [WHO] (WHO). (2018). Health of refugees and migrants: Regional situation analysis, practices, experiences, lessons learned and ways forward. WHO Regional Office for Europe.
29. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean [WHO EMRO] (2023). Strategy to promote the health and well-being of refugees, migrants, internally displaced persons and other displaced groups in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. World Health Organization.
30. Yağcı, H. (2023). Human rights evaluation of the appearance of Syrian forced immigrants in Turkish Written Media. Sinop University Boyabat Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences e-Journal, 3(1), 1-13.
31. Yazıcı, B. (2024). Political and social reactions to the Syrian refugees crisis: The case of Türkiye. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 10(40), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11090843
32. Yılmaz, D., & Günay, M. A. (2022). Turkish society’s perception of Syrian refugees. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 13(1), 117-139.
33. YÖK Atlas (2025). Turkey undergraduate program atlas data for 2024. Presidency of the Council of Higher Education of Turkey.
34. Yücebaş, S. (2022). Themes, definitions, and metaphors about Syrian refugees in the local press: The case of Gaziantep. Journal of Social Sciences of Istanbul Commerce University, 21(Special Issue on Turkey’s Migration Policy), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.1098379
35. Yükseker, D., & Çeler, Z. (2024). Migrant integration in Turkey: Travels of a concept across borders and domains of knowledge production. Migration Studies, 12(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnae009