Radical Reflections on Social Work Ethics

Abstract

The aim of this article is to reevaluate Kantian, Utilitarian and Common Morality ethical approaches which are influential in social work within the framework of radical, critical and anti-oppressive understandings. 

Because of this, radical, critical and anti-oppressive approaches are discussed with their impacts emphasized in social work ethical evaluation process and their critics to traditional ethical understanding. It is thought that this kind of framework is crucial to understand how “ethical” or “non-ethical” can be shaped with different values in social work practice. This idea is based on the discourse that conception of traditional ethics which focuses on ethical dilemmas encountered within social work practice has slipped to new ethical approaches familiar with radical, critical and reflexive traditions at present.

Keywords

• Ethics of social work,principal based ethical approaches,radical social work

SOSYAL HİZMET ETİĞİNDE RADİKAL YANSIMALAR

Abstract

Bu makalenin amacı, sosyal hizmet etiğinde etkili olan Kantçı, Faydacı ve Ortak Ahlakçı yaklaşımları radikal, eleştirel ve baskı-karşıtı anlayış çerçevesinde yeniden değerlendirmektir. Bu nedenle radikal, eleştirel ve baskı karşıtı yaklaşımların, sosyal hizmet etik değerlendirme sürecinde vurguladığı boyutlar ve geleneksel etik anlayışa getirdiği eleştiriler ele alınmıştır. Böyle bir ele alışın sosyal hizmet uygulamalarında “etik” ya da “etik dışı” kabullerin farklı değerlerle şekillenebileceğini göstermesi açısından önemli olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bu düşünce ise sosyal hizmet uygulamasında karşılaşılan etik ikilemler üzerine odaklanan geleneksel etik anlayışın, artık radikal, eleştirel ve dönüşümsel geleneğe yakın yeni etik yaklaşımlara kaydığı söylemine dayanmaktadır.

Keywords

• Sosyal hizmet etiği,ilke temelli etik yaklaşımlar,radikal sosyal hizmet

References

1. BASW (British Association of Social Workers) (2009). The BASW Code of Ethics for Social Work: Key Principles, internet: http:// www.basw.co.uk/Default.aspx?tabid=64.
2. Beauchamp, T. L. ve Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (4. Basım). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Coughlin, S. (2008). The Nature of Principles, USA: Xlibris Cooperation.
4. Dominelli, L (2002). Values, Ethics and Social Work. R. Adams, L. Dominelli and M. Payne (Eds.), Critical Practice in Social Work (126-136). NY: Mcmillan.
5. Dominelli, L. (2002). Anti-oppressive Prac-tice as a Legitimate Concern of Social Work, In Anti-opressive Social Work Theory and Practice, New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.
6. Doytcheva, M. (2009). Çokkültürlülük. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
7. Garret jan (2008). Ethical Theories Index Page, internet: http://web2.wku.edu/~jan. garrett/350/350ethry.htm Healy, L. M. (2001). Values and Ethics for International Professional Action. in International Social Work: Professional Action in an Independent World, New York: Oxford University Pres.
8. Hugman, R. (2005). New Approaches in Ethics for the Caring Professions. USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

9. Hugman, R. (2008). “Social Work Values: Equity or Equality? A Response to Solas”, Australian Social Work, 61(2).
10. Hursthouse, R. (1991). Virtue Theory and Abortion. Princeton University Press, internet: http://trinity.edu/cbrown/intro/ethi-cal_theories.html IASSW (International Association of Schools of Social Work) (2004). Ethics in Social Work: Statements of Principles, internet: http://www.iassw-aiets.org, 23.06.2009.
11. Ife, J. (1008). Human Rights and Social Work: Towards Right-Based Practice. revised edition, Sidney: Cambridge University Pres.
12. NASW (National Association of Social Workers) (1999). Codes of Ethics. Washington, DC.
13. Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development. UK: Cambridge University Press. Internet: http://web2.wku.edu/~jan. garrett/ethics/nussbaum.htm.
14. Öztürk, A. (2007). Çağdaş Liberal Siyaset Felsefesinde Adalet Sorunu: Rawls, Hayek, Nozick Örneği. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
15. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Juctice. UK: Harvard University Pres.
16. Reamer, F. (2006). Social Work Values and Ethics. NY: Columbia University Press.
17. Sen, A. (2004). Özgürlükle Kalkınma, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
18. Solas, J. (2008). “What Kind of Social Justice Does Social Work Seek?”, International Social Work, 51(6).
19. Thompson, N. (1993). Anti-Discriminatory Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
20. Thompson, N. (2005). Understanding Social Work: Preparing for Practice (2. basım), USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
21. Thiroux, J. (2001). Ethics: Theory and Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Toronto, J. (1993). Moral Baundaries: a Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. New York: Ruthledge.