Sürücülerin Algısal Motor ve Güvenlik Becerilerinin İşitsel ve Görsel İkincil Görev Sırasında Sergilenen Şerit Koruma Performansındaki Rolü

Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 48 - 61, 25.10.2018

Seda Özbozdağlı Mine Mısırlısoy Türker Özkan Nart Bedin Atalay

https://doi.org/10.38002/tuad.419934

Abstract

Mevcut çalışmanın
amacı, sürücülerin algısal motor ve güvenlik becerileri hakkındaki
değerlendirmelerinin işitsel ve görsel ikincil görevler sırasında sergilenen
şerit pozisyonundaki değişkenliği yordama güçlerini araştırmaktır. Araç
simülatörünün kullanıldığı deneylere toplamda 66 sürücü katılımda bulunmuştur.
Görsel ve işitsel ikincil görev gruplarına eşit şekilde atanan katılımcılardan
Sürücülük Becerisi Ölçeğini doldurmaları istenmiştir. Çoklu doğrusal regresyon
analizlerinden elde edilen bulgulara göre, işitsel ikincil görev sürüşe eşlik
ettiğinde, algısal motor ve güvenlik becerilerinin şeritten sapma miktarını
yordamadaki katkıları anlamlı değildir. İşitsel görev grubundaki katılımcılar
sadece sürüş ile ilgilendiklerinde, algısal motor becerilerin şerit pozisyonundaki
değişkenlik ile negatif yönde ilişkili olduğu bulunmuştur. İkincil görevin
görsel olduğu durumda ve aynı grubun sadece sürüşe odaklandığı durumda algısal
motor beceriler ile şerit pozisyonundaki değişkenlik arasında negatif bir
ilişki saptanmıştır. Hem işitsel hem görsel ikincil görev gruplarındaki tüm
deney koşullarında, güvenlik becerileri ile şerit pozisyonundaki değişkenlik
arasında anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir. İlgili alanyazın temel alınarak çalışmadan elde edilen
bulgular tartışılmıştır.

Keywords

güvenlik becerileri, araç kullanma, işitsel ikincil görev, görsel ikincil görev, algısal motor beceriler, görsel ikincil görev

The Role of Drivers’ Perceptual Motor and Safety Skills in Lane Maintenance During Auditory and Visual Secondary Tasks

Abstract

The objective of this work was to investigate the
predictive power of drivers’ assessments about their perceptual motor and
safety skills for the variability in lane position during auditory and visual
secondary tasks. A total of 66 drivers participated in the experiments and
drove a simulated vehicle. Participants equally assigned to auditory and visual
secondary task conditions were asked to fill out the Driver Skill Inventory.
Results of the multiple linear regression analyses showed that when the
auditory secondary task accompanied driving, perceptual motor and safety skills
did not significantly predict the variability in lane position. When the
drivers who were in the auditory task group only engaged in driving, perceptual
motor skills and variability in lane position were found to be negatively
related. There was also a negative relationship between perceptual motor skills
and variability in lane position in both visual secondary task and driving-only
conditions. In none of the experimental conditions of auditory and visual
secondary task groups, a significant relationship between safety skills and
variability in lane position was found. Findings were discussed based on the
relevant literature.

Keywords

perceptual motor skills, safety skills, driving, auditory secondary task, visual secondary task

References

• Beede, K. E. ve Kass, S. J. (2006). Engrossed in conversation: The impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 415-421. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.015
• Caird, J. K., Willness, C. R., Steel, P. ve Scialfa, C. (2008). A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(4), 1282-1293. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.009
• Drews, F. A., Pasupathi, M. ve Strayer, D. L. (2008). Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(4), 392-400. doi:10.1037/a0013119
• Eensoo, D., Paaver, M. ve Harro, J. (2010). Factors Associated with Speeding Penalties in Novice Drivers. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine / Annual Scientific Conference, 54, 287–294.
• Engström, J., Johansson, E. ve Östlund, J. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, 97-120. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.012
• Haque, M. M. ve Washington, S. (2014). A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 62, 42-53. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.010
• He, J., Choi, W., McCarley, J. S., Chaparro, B. S. ve Wang, C. (2015). Texting while driving using Google Glass: Promising but not distraction-free. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 81, 218–229. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.033
• Jamson, A. H. ve Merat, N. (2005). Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: Effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, 79-96. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.002
• Kircher, K. ve Ahlstrom, C. (2017). Minimum required attention: A human-centered approach to driver inattention. Human Factors, 59(3), 471-484. doi:10.1177/0018720816672756
• Kubose, T. T., Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Garnsey, S. M., Kramer, A. F. ve Mayhugh, J. (2006). The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 43-63. doi: 10.1002/acp.1164
• Lajunen, T., Corry, A., Summala, H. ve Hartley, L. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in drivers' self-assessments of their perceptual-motor and safety skills: Australians and Finns. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(4), 539-550.
• Lajunen, T. ve Özkan, T. (2004). Kültür, güvenlik kültürü, Türkiye ve Avrupa'da trafik güvenliği. Tübitak.
• Lajunen, T., Parker, D. ve Stradling, S. G. (1998). Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1(2), 107-121. doi:10.1016/s1369-8478(98)00009-6
• Lajunen, T. ve Summala, H. (1995). Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers' self-assessments. Personality & Individual Differences, 19(3), 307-318
• Liang, Y. ve Lee, J. D. (2010). Combining cognitive and visual distraction: Less than the sum of its parts. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 881-890. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.05.001
• Logan, G. D. ve Crump, M. J. (2009). The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1296-1300.
• Medeiros-Ward, N., Cooper, J. M. ve Strayer, D. L. (2014). Hierarchical control and driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 953–958. doi: 10.1037/a0035097
• Mehler, B., Reimer, B. ve Dusek, J. A. (2011). MIT AgeLab delayed digit recall cask (n-back) [White paper]. http://dosen.narotama.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/MIT-AgeLab-delayed-digit-recall-task-n-back.pdf
• Metz, B., Schoch, S., Just, M. ve Kuhn, F. (2014). How do drivers interact with navigation systems in real life conditions? Results of a field-operational-test on navigation systems. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 146-157. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.011
• Michon, J. A. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know, what should we do? Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, 485-524. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_19
• National Highway Traffic Safety (2017). Distracted Driving 2015. Washington, Birleşik Devletler.
• Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R. ve Bullmore, E. (2005). N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 46-59. doi:10.1002/hbm.20131
• Oppenheim, L. ve Shinar, D. (2011). Human factors and ergonomics. B. E. Porter (Ed.), Handbook of traffic psychology içinde (s.193-211). London: Academic Press.
• Özbozdağlı, S. (2015). The effects of auditory and visuo-spatial secondary tasks on lane maintenance in predictable and unpredictable driving conditions. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Özbozdağlı, S., Misirlisoy, M., Özkan, T. ve Atalay, N. B. (2017). Effects of primary task predictability and secondary task modality on lane maintenance. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.10.005.
• Parkes, A. M. ve Coleman, N. (1990). Route guidance systems: A comparison of methods of presenting directional information to the driver. E. J. Lovesey (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics 1990 içinde (s. 480-485). Londra: Taylor & Francis.
• Schömig, N., Metz, B. ve Krüger, H. P. (2011). Anticipatory and control processes in the interaction with secondary tasks while driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14, 525-538. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.06.006
• Schroeder, P., Meyers, M. ve Kostyniuk, L. (2013, Nisan). National survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors – 2012. (Report No. DOT HS 811 729). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
• Strayer, D. L. ve Drews, F. A. (2004). Profiles in driver distraction: Effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Human Factors, 46(4), 640-649.
• Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A. ve Crouch, D. J. (2006). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors, 48(2), 381-391.
• Sümer, N., Lajunen, T. ve Özkan, T. (2002). Sürücü davranışlarının kaza riskindeki rolleri: İhlaller ve hatalar. Uluslararası Trafik ve Yol Güvenliği Kongresi ve Fuarı. 8-12 Mayıs, 2002, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Sümer, N., Özkan, T. ve Lajunen, T. (2006). Asymmetric relationship between driving and safety skills. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 703-711.
• Tapp, K. M. ve Logan, G. D. (2011). Attention to the hands disrupts skilled typewriting: The role of vision in producing the disruption. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2379–2383.
• Thapa, R., Codjoe, J., Ishak, S. ve McCarter, K. S. (2015). Post and during event effect of cell phone talking and texting on driving performance: A driving simulator study. Traffic Injury Prevention, 16, 461-467. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.969803
• Treisman, A. ve Davies, A. (1973). Divided attention to ear and eye. S. Kornblum (Ed.) Attention and performance IV içinde (s. 101-117). New York, NY: Academic Press.
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (2017). Karayolu Trafik Kaza İstatistikleri, 2016. Ankara, Türkiye. Erişim Tarihi: 03.04.2018, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24606