Evaluation of Distance Education: The Sample of Guidance and Counseling Students (Example of Aksaray University)

Year 2021, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 18 - 25, 01.01.2021

Savaş Karagöz

Abstract

In this study, only the opinions of senior students of the department of guidance and counseling were included in a narrower framework. According to the graduate students of the department of guidance and counseling, it is aimed to examine the positive and negative aspects of distance education from the perspective of psychological counselors and to contribute to the field of distance education suggestions . A qualitative research design was preferred in this study, in which the thoughts and perspectives on distance education were examined. The prediction that it is more possible to examine the participants' perspective and thinking styles towards distance education with a qualitative approach was effective in choosing a qualitative approach. The given data is limited by the views of 47 students. The determined main codes have shown similarities with other studies on distance education. While providing the continuity of the lessons by providing the opportunity to watch again, being an economical practice, allowing effective and efficient use of time, and providing individuals with the opportunity to learn at their own pace, some of the disadvantages are the inexperience of the lecturers.

Keywords

Covid 19 and distance education, advantages and disadvantages of distance education, Distance education and psychological counseling and guidance

Supporting Institution

Yok

Project Number

yok

Thanks

TUARA DERGİ YÖNETİCİLERİNE BAŞARILAR VE KOLAYLIKLAR DİLERİM.

References

• Alpaslan, M. (2020). Öğretim üyelerinin özel yeteneklilerin eğitiminde uzaktan eğitimin kullanımına yönelik görüşleri. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 126-147. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/55639/761315.
• Andoh, R. P. K., Appiah, R., & Agyei, P. M. (2020). Postgraduate distance education in University of Cape Coast, Ghana: Students’ perspectives. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 118-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.4589
• Arat, T.& Bakan, Ö.(2014). Uzaktan eğitim ve uygulamaları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 14 (1-2) , 363-374.
• Çağıltay, K. (2002). Uzaktan eğitim: Başarıya giden yol teknolojide mi yoksa pedagojide mi?. https://ocw.metu.edu.tr/file.php/118/Week10/Cagiltay.pdf (erişim tarihi: 09.01.2021).
• De Paepe, L., Zhu, C. & DePryck, K. (2018). Drop-out, Retention, Satisfaction and Attainment of Online Learners of Dutch in Adult education. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(3), 303-323. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 7, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/174173/.
• Deneuı, D., & Dodge, T. (2006). Asynchronous Learning Networks and Student Outcomes: The Utility of Online Learning Components in Hybrid Courses. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(4), 256-259.
• Eygü, H. & Karaman, S.(2015). Uzaktan Eğitim Öğrencilerinin Memnuniyet Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,3(1),36-59. Retrieved from https:// dergi park.org.tr/tr/pub/kusbd/issue/19375/205547
• Hızal, A. (1983). Uzaktan Öğretim Süreçleri ve Yazılı Gereçler: Eğitim Teknolojisi Açısından Yaklaşım, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları, No:122.
• Horspool, A.,&Lange,C. (2012). Applying the scholarship of teaching and learning: Student perceptions, behaviours and success online and face-to-face. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 73-88. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2010.496532
• İşman, A. (2011). Uzaktan eğitim, 4.Baskı, Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Kaden, U. (2020). COVID-19 school closure-related changes to the professional life of a k–12 teacher. Education Sciences, 10(165), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060165
• Kırık, A. (2016). Uzaktan eğitimin tarihsel gelişimi ve Türkiye’deki durumu. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 0 (21), 73-94 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/maruid/issue/22159/238064
• Koç, E. (2020). An evaluation of distance learning in higher education through the eyes of course ınstructors. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,3(1),25-39. Retrieved from https://dergi park.org.tr/en/pub/akuned/issue/52842/673438
• Özdoğan, A , & Berkant, H . (2020). Covıd-19 pandemi dönemindeki uzaktan eğitime ilişkin paydaş görüşlerinin incelenmesi . Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1),13-43. DOI: 10.37669/milliegitim.788118
• Ramos-Morcillo A.J,& Leal-Costa, C.&Moral-García J.E & Ruzafa-Martínez, M. (2020). Experiences of nursing students during the abrupt change from face-to-face to e-learning education during the first month of confinement due to COVID-19 in Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5519. doi:10.3390/ijerph17155519.
• Tashakkori, A.& Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data tirangulation to mixed method model designs. A. Tashakkori ve C. Teddlie (Editörler), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research içinde (s. 671-701). CA: Thousand Oaks.
• Taşpınar, M &Tuncer,M.(2007). Sanal eğitim-öğretim ve geleceği. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,6 (20),112-132 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/esosder/issue/6134/82261
• Uşun, S. (2006). Uzaktan eğitim. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları,