Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Olguların Tanı Ve Tedavilerinin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 111 - 117, 29.08.2021
https://doi.org/10.25048/tudod.884914

Abstract

Amaç: Çanakkale ili ve çevresindeki Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellitus (DM) tanılı olguların demografik özelliklerinin, klinik ve laboratuvar bulgularının, başvuru anında diyabetik ketoasidoz (DKA) durumlarının ve aldıkları tedavilerin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Yöntem: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları kliniğine 01.04.2011-01.04.2019 tarihleri arasında en az bir kez başvurmuş 0-18 yaş arası, 165 DM tanılı hasta dosyası retrospektif tarandı. Dosya kayıtları eksik 68 hasta, Tip 2 DM tanılı 4 hasta, Gençlerde Görülen Erişkin Tipi Diyabet (MODY) tanılı 1 hasta olmak üzere 73 hasta çalışma dışı bırakıldı, 92 hasta çalışmaya alındı.
Bulgular: Olgularımızın %54,35’i kız, ortalama tanı yaşı 7,6±3,9 yaş idi. En sık tanı alınan mevsimler sonbahar (%32,6) ve kış (%30,43) oldu. Olgularımızın %52,17’sinin merkeze 0-50 km, %42,39’unun 50-100 km, %3,27’sinin 100-150 km, %2,17’sinin ise 150 km’den daha uzak mesafede olduğunu tespit ettik. Diyabetik ketoasidoz ile başvuran olgularımızı hafif, orta ve ağır DKA olarak sınıflandırarak, tedavilerinde uygulanan protokollere göre DKA’dan çıkış sürelerini kıyasladığımızda, her üç grupta da Uluslararası Çocuk ve Ergen Diyabet Derneği (ISPAD) 2018 protokolü uygulanan olguların DKA’dan daha kısa sürede çıktığını saptadık.
Sonuç: Tip 1 DM tanılı hastalarda DKA, hiperglisemi gibi akut ve retinopati, nefropati, nöropati, ateroskleroz gibi kronik komplikasyonlar görülebildiği için tanı ve takip önemlidir. Hastalığın bölgesel özelliklerinin araştırılması, etiyolojide önemli yer tutan genetik ve çevresel faktörler açısından yol göstericidir. Bizim çalışmamız Güney Marmara bölgesinde çocukluk çağı yaş grubunda Tip 1 DM tanısı ile takip edilen olguların incelendiği ilk çalışmalardan biridir. Tespit ettiğimiz bulgular yapılan benzer çalışmaların sonuçları ve literatürle uyumludur.

Supporting Institution

Yok.

Thanks

Sayın editör ve Hakemlere emekleri için teşekkür ederim.

References

  • 1. Weber DR, Jospe N. Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, St Geme JW, Schor NF, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 21th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2019:11814-22.
  • 2. Weber DR, Jospe N. Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Immune Mediated). Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, St Geme JW, Schor NF, Behrman RE, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 21th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2019:11823-85.
  • 3. International Diabetes Federation. (2019). IDF Diabetes Atlas 9th Edition [Online]. [Çevrimiçi] https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/
  • 4. Mayer‐Davis EJ, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Definition,epidemiology and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2018;19:7-19.
  • 5. Radetti G. Clinical aspects of Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Endocr Dev 2014;26:158-70.
  • 6. Husby S, et al. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012;54(1):136-60.
  • 7. Wolfsdorf JI, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetic ketoacidosis and the hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state. Pediatr Diabetes 2018;19(27):155-177.
  • 8. American Diabetes Association. 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020;43(1):66-76.
  • 9. Xin Y, et al. Clinical features at the onset of childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus in Shenyang, China. J Paediatr Child Health 2010;46(4):171-5.
  • 10. Demir F, et al. Epidemiologic features of type 1 diabetic patients between 0 and 18 years of age in İstanbul city. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2015;7(1):49-56.
  • 11. Yeşilkaya E, et al. First report on the nationwide incidence and prevalence of Type 1 diabetes among children in Turkey. Diabet Med 2017;34(3):405-10.
  • 12. Stipancic G, et al. Clinical characteristics at presentation of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children younger than 15 years in Croatia. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2011;24(9-10):665-70. 13. Aras B, et al. Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Çocuklarda Tanı Anındaki Klinik ve Laboratuvar Bulgularının Değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2019;46(1):11-7.
  • 14. Usher-Smith JA, et al. The pathway to diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children: A questionnaire study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006470.
  • 15. Zhao Z, et al. Rapidly rising incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in Chinese population: Epidemiology in Shanghai during 1997–2011. Acta diabetol 2014;51(6):947-53.
  • 16. Güven A, Aydın M. Beş yaşından önce tip 1 diyabetes mellitus tanısı alan çocuklarda etiyopatogenezde rol alan faktörler. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi 2005;48:295-300.
  • 17. Gamble DR, Taylor KW. Seasonal incidence of diabetes mellitus. Br Med J 1969;3:631-3.
  • 18. Klingensmith GJ, et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis at diabetes onset: Still an all too common threat in youth. J Pediatr 2013;162(2):330-4.
  • 19. Demir K, et al. Tip 1 Diyabetli Çocuklarda Tanıda Diyabetik Ketoasidoz Sıklığı ve İlişkili Faktörler. Güncel Pediatri 2010;8(3):52-5.
  • 20. Dabelea D, et al. Trends in the prevalence of ketoacidosis at diabetes diagnosis: The SEARCH for diabetes in youth study. Pediatrics 2014;133(4):938-45.
  • 21. Wolfsdorf J, et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis in infants, children, and adolescents: A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2006;29(5):1150-9.
  • 22. Neu A, et al. Ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children–frequency and clinical presentation. Pediatr Diabetes 2003;4(2):77-81.
  • 23. Neu A, et al. Varying clinical presentations at onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children-epidemiological evidence for different subtypes of the disease? Pediatr Diabetes 2001;2(4):147-53.
  • 24. Aydın H, et al. Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Hastaların Klinik, Laboratuvar, Sosyokültürel ve Demografik Özellikleri. Turkish J Pediatr 2016;10(2):112-19.
  • 25. İşleyen F, Bolu S. Adıyaman İlindeki Diyabetik Çocukların Epidemiyolojik Özellikleri. Güncel Pediatri 2019;17(1):1-16.
  • 26. Komulainen J, et al. Ketoacidosis at the diagnosis of type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus is related to poor residual beta cell function. Arch Dis Child 1996;75(5):410-15.

Retrospective Evaluation of Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 111 - 117, 29.08.2021
https://doi.org/10.25048/tudod.884914

Abstract

Aim: It was aimed to evaluate the demographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory findings, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) status at the time of admission and the treatments in patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in and around Çanakkale.
Material and Methods: The files of 165 DM patients, aged 0-18 years, who applied to Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Medical Faculty Hospital Pediatrics Clinic between 01.04.2011-01.04.2019 at least once, were retrospectively reviewed. 73 patients, including 68 patients with incomplete file records, 4 patients with Type 2 DM, 1 patient diagnosed with Adult Type Diabetes in the Youth (MODY), were excluded, 92 patients were included in the study.
Results: 54.35% of our cases were girls, mean age at diagnosis was 7.6 ± 3.9 years. The seasons with the most frequent diagnosis were autumn (32.6%) and winter (30.43%). 52.17% of the cases resided within 0-50 km of the city center, 42.39% within 50-100 km, 3.27% within 100-150 km and 2.17% further than 150 km. When we classified our patients who presented with diabetic ketoacidosis as mild, moderate and severe DKA and compared the time to exit from DKA according to the protocols applied in their treatment, we found that the patients who were applied the International Child and Adolescent Diabetes Association (ISPAD) 2018 protocol were removed from DKA in a shorter time.
Conclusion: Since acute complications such as DKA, hyperglycemia and chronic complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, and atherosclerosis can be seen in patients with type 1 DM, diagnosis and follow-up are important. Investigation of the regional characteristics of the disease is guiding in terms of genetic and environmental factors that have an important place in etiology.
Our study is one of the first studies investigating the cases followed up with the diagnosis of Type 1 DM in the childhood age group in the South Marmara region. Our findings are consistent with the results of similar studies and the literature.

References

  • 1. Weber DR, Jospe N. Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, St Geme JW, Schor NF, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 21th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2019:11814-22.
  • 2. Weber DR, Jospe N. Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Immune Mediated). Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, St Geme JW, Schor NF, Behrman RE, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 21th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2019:11823-85.
  • 3. International Diabetes Federation. (2019). IDF Diabetes Atlas 9th Edition [Online]. [Çevrimiçi] https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/
  • 4. Mayer‐Davis EJ, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Definition,epidemiology and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2018;19:7-19.
  • 5. Radetti G. Clinical aspects of Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Endocr Dev 2014;26:158-70.
  • 6. Husby S, et al. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012;54(1):136-60.
  • 7. Wolfsdorf JI, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetic ketoacidosis and the hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state. Pediatr Diabetes 2018;19(27):155-177.
  • 8. American Diabetes Association. 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020;43(1):66-76.
  • 9. Xin Y, et al. Clinical features at the onset of childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus in Shenyang, China. J Paediatr Child Health 2010;46(4):171-5.
  • 10. Demir F, et al. Epidemiologic features of type 1 diabetic patients between 0 and 18 years of age in İstanbul city. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2015;7(1):49-56.
  • 11. Yeşilkaya E, et al. First report on the nationwide incidence and prevalence of Type 1 diabetes among children in Turkey. Diabet Med 2017;34(3):405-10.
  • 12. Stipancic G, et al. Clinical characteristics at presentation of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children younger than 15 years in Croatia. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2011;24(9-10):665-70. 13. Aras B, et al. Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Çocuklarda Tanı Anındaki Klinik ve Laboratuvar Bulgularının Değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2019;46(1):11-7.
  • 14. Usher-Smith JA, et al. The pathway to diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children: A questionnaire study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006470.
  • 15. Zhao Z, et al. Rapidly rising incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in Chinese population: Epidemiology in Shanghai during 1997–2011. Acta diabetol 2014;51(6):947-53.
  • 16. Güven A, Aydın M. Beş yaşından önce tip 1 diyabetes mellitus tanısı alan çocuklarda etiyopatogenezde rol alan faktörler. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi 2005;48:295-300.
  • 17. Gamble DR, Taylor KW. Seasonal incidence of diabetes mellitus. Br Med J 1969;3:631-3.
  • 18. Klingensmith GJ, et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis at diabetes onset: Still an all too common threat in youth. J Pediatr 2013;162(2):330-4.
  • 19. Demir K, et al. Tip 1 Diyabetli Çocuklarda Tanıda Diyabetik Ketoasidoz Sıklığı ve İlişkili Faktörler. Güncel Pediatri 2010;8(3):52-5.
  • 20. Dabelea D, et al. Trends in the prevalence of ketoacidosis at diabetes diagnosis: The SEARCH for diabetes in youth study. Pediatrics 2014;133(4):938-45.
  • 21. Wolfsdorf J, et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis in infants, children, and adolescents: A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2006;29(5):1150-9.
  • 22. Neu A, et al. Ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children–frequency and clinical presentation. Pediatr Diabetes 2003;4(2):77-81.
  • 23. Neu A, et al. Varying clinical presentations at onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children-epidemiological evidence for different subtypes of the disease? Pediatr Diabetes 2001;2(4):147-53.
  • 24. Aydın H, et al. Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Hastaların Klinik, Laboratuvar, Sosyokültürel ve Demografik Özellikleri. Turkish J Pediatr 2016;10(2):112-19.
  • 25. İşleyen F, Bolu S. Adıyaman İlindeki Diyabetik Çocukların Epidemiyolojik Özellikleri. Güncel Pediatri 2019;17(1):1-16.
  • 26. Komulainen J, et al. Ketoacidosis at the diagnosis of type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus is related to poor residual beta cell function. Arch Dis Child 1996;75(5):410-15.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Zeynep Karaca Aydoğan 0000-0002-2894-026X

Fatih Battal 0000-0001-9040-7880

Durmuş Doğan This is me 0000-0001-5369-8797

Publication Date August 29, 2021
Acceptance Date August 10, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karaca Aydoğan, Z., Battal, F., & Doğan, D. (2021). Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Olguların Tanı Ve Tedavilerinin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity, 5(2), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.25048/tudod.884914
AMA Karaca Aydoğan Z, Battal F, Doğan D. Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Olguların Tanı Ve Tedavilerinin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi. Turk J Diab Obes. August 2021;5(2):111-117. doi:10.25048/tudod.884914
Chicago Karaca Aydoğan, Zeynep, Fatih Battal, and Durmuş Doğan. “Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Olguların Tanı Ve Tedavilerinin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi”. Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity 5, no. 2 (August 2021): 111-17. https://doi.org/10.25048/tudod.884914.
EndNote Karaca Aydoğan Z, Battal F, Doğan D (August 1, 2021) Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Olguların Tanı Ve Tedavilerinin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity 5 2 111–117.
IEEE Z. Karaca Aydoğan, F. Battal, and D. Doğan, “Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Olguların Tanı Ve Tedavilerinin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi”, Turk J Diab Obes, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–117, 2021, doi: 10.25048/tudod.884914.
ISNAD Karaca Aydoğan, Zeynep et al. “Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Olguların Tanı Ve Tedavilerinin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi”. Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity 5/2 (August 2021), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.25048/tudod.884914.
JAMA Karaca Aydoğan Z, Battal F, Doğan D. Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Olguların Tanı Ve Tedavilerinin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi. Turk J Diab Obes. 2021;5:111–117.
MLA Karaca Aydoğan, Zeynep et al. “Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Olguların Tanı Ve Tedavilerinin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi”. Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity, vol. 5, no. 2, 2021, pp. 111-7, doi:10.25048/tudod.884914.
Vancouver Karaca Aydoğan Z, Battal F, Doğan D. Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Olguların Tanı Ve Tedavilerinin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi. Turk J Diab Obes. 2021;5(2):111-7.

Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity (Turk J Diab Obes) is a scientific publication of Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University Obesity and Diabetes Research and Application Center.

This is a refereed journal, which is published in printed and electronic forms. It aims at achieving free knowledge to the related national and international organizations and individuals.

This journal is published annually three times (in April, August and December).

The publication language of the journal is Turkish and English.