Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 140 - 148, 15.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.861268

Abstract

References

  • Bian Y H & Huang H W (2006). Fuzzy fault tree analysis of failure probability of SMW retaining structures in deep excavations. GeoShanghai International Conference 2006, 312-319. doi: 10.1061/40867(199)38
  • Biot M (1937). Bending of an infinite beam on an elastic foundation. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 203, 1-7.
  • Boone S J (1996). Ground-Movement-Related Building Damage. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122, (11), 886-896, doi: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1996)122:11(886)
  • Bowles J E (1997). Foundation Analysis and Design. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., ISBN: 0-07-912247-7
  • Brinkgreve R B J, Kumarswamy S, Swolfs W M, Zampich L & Manoj N R (2019). PLAXIS 2D Tutorial Manual CONNECT Edition V20. Plaxis.
  • BS EN 1997-1:2004 British Standard. (2004). Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules. In Journal of Constructional Steel Research.
  • Gajan S (2011). Normalized relationships for depth of embedment of sheet pile walls and soldier pile walls in cohesionless soils. Soils and Foundations, 51(3), 559-564. doi:10.3208/sandf.51.559
  • Göksa Mühendislik Yazılım Ltd. Şti. (2020, Aralık 22). istCAD Yeni Deprem Yönetmeliğine Tam Uyumlu Duvar Analiz, Tasarım ve Çizim Programı . www.göksa.com.tr.
  • Laefer D F, Ceribasi S, Long J H & Cording E J (2009). Predicting RC Frame Response to Excavation-Induced Settlement. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(11), 1605-1619. doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000128
  • Leisenring B R (2012). Damage to adjacent building during construction-Expert investigation. Lanchester: Robson Forensic.
  • Meyerhoff G G & Baike L D (1963). Strength of steel culverts sheets bearing against compacted sand backfill. Highway Research Board Proceedings, pp. 1-19
  • Sabatini P J, Pass D G & Bachus R (1999). Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No.4, Federal Highway Administration, Publication No. FWA-IF-99-015
  • Selvadurai, A. P. S., & Gladwell, G. M. L. (1980). Elastic Analysis of Soil-Foundation Interaction. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 47(1), 219 doi:10.1115/1.3153622
  • T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı (2019). 2019 yılı İnşaat ve Tesisat Birim Fiyatları. Ankara, Turkiye: Yüksek Fen Kurulu Başkanlığı.
  • Terzaghi K (1955). Evaluation of coefficients of subgrade reaction. Geotechnique, 5(4), 297-326, doi:10.1680/geot.1955.5.4.297
  • Wang X & Liu Y (2009). Overview of the assessment on the damage from underground excavating on adjacent buildings. Chinese J. Underground Space Eng., 4, 841-847
  • Wang W D & Xu Z H (2010). Simplified analysis method for evaluating excavation-induced damage of adjacent buildings. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 32(1), 32-38.
  • Winkler E (1867). Die Lehre von Elastizat and Festigkeit (on Elasticity and fixity), 182, Prague

Cantilever piles or well foundations in supporting temporary deep excavations: comparison of performance, safety and cost

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 140 - 148, 15.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.861268

Abstract

Due to the increasing population in the metropolitans, the construction of the high-rise buildings and shopping malls etc. has rapidly increased for last three decades. Therefore, especially in the city centers, the area of the construction sites has become very limited. Moreover, the requirements such as high bearing capacity of the soils beneath the skyscrapers and the parking area for the vehicles makes the application of the deep excavations essential. It is well-known that designing both safe and economical retaining structures in cohessionless soils such as sands and gravels or silty-clayey mixtures of them is still a challenging issue in geotechnical engineering discipline. Under that circumstances, the construction of two types of the retaining structures frequently comes into the minds: cantilever piles and well foundations. These retaining systems should be designed not only to be resist against failure but also to meet safety requirements for existing buildings and infrastructures near the site until the active forces, which are induced by the soil mass, are supported by the structural elements of the superstructures. In addition to this, the horizontal deformations along the retaining structures should be less than the limits defined by the specifications and the structural codes. In this study, the performances and costs of the both cantilever piles and well foundations in different excavation heights are compared parametrically. For this purpose, a benchmark sandy soil profile given in the literature and the retaining systems are modeled in 2D by using finite elements method. Furthermore, in order to determine the internal forces based reinforced concrete design and the unit costs; a well-known commercial software is used. The promising results of this study could guide to the design engineers in practice for selecting safer and more economical systems within engineering judgment.

References

  • Bian Y H & Huang H W (2006). Fuzzy fault tree analysis of failure probability of SMW retaining structures in deep excavations. GeoShanghai International Conference 2006, 312-319. doi: 10.1061/40867(199)38
  • Biot M (1937). Bending of an infinite beam on an elastic foundation. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 203, 1-7.
  • Boone S J (1996). Ground-Movement-Related Building Damage. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122, (11), 886-896, doi: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1996)122:11(886)
  • Bowles J E (1997). Foundation Analysis and Design. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., ISBN: 0-07-912247-7
  • Brinkgreve R B J, Kumarswamy S, Swolfs W M, Zampich L & Manoj N R (2019). PLAXIS 2D Tutorial Manual CONNECT Edition V20. Plaxis.
  • BS EN 1997-1:2004 British Standard. (2004). Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules. In Journal of Constructional Steel Research.
  • Gajan S (2011). Normalized relationships for depth of embedment of sheet pile walls and soldier pile walls in cohesionless soils. Soils and Foundations, 51(3), 559-564. doi:10.3208/sandf.51.559
  • Göksa Mühendislik Yazılım Ltd. Şti. (2020, Aralık 22). istCAD Yeni Deprem Yönetmeliğine Tam Uyumlu Duvar Analiz, Tasarım ve Çizim Programı . www.göksa.com.tr.
  • Laefer D F, Ceribasi S, Long J H & Cording E J (2009). Predicting RC Frame Response to Excavation-Induced Settlement. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(11), 1605-1619. doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000128
  • Leisenring B R (2012). Damage to adjacent building during construction-Expert investigation. Lanchester: Robson Forensic.
  • Meyerhoff G G & Baike L D (1963). Strength of steel culverts sheets bearing against compacted sand backfill. Highway Research Board Proceedings, pp. 1-19
  • Sabatini P J, Pass D G & Bachus R (1999). Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No.4, Federal Highway Administration, Publication No. FWA-IF-99-015
  • Selvadurai, A. P. S., & Gladwell, G. M. L. (1980). Elastic Analysis of Soil-Foundation Interaction. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 47(1), 219 doi:10.1115/1.3153622
  • T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı (2019). 2019 yılı İnşaat ve Tesisat Birim Fiyatları. Ankara, Turkiye: Yüksek Fen Kurulu Başkanlığı.
  • Terzaghi K (1955). Evaluation of coefficients of subgrade reaction. Geotechnique, 5(4), 297-326, doi:10.1680/geot.1955.5.4.297
  • Wang X & Liu Y (2009). Overview of the assessment on the damage from underground excavating on adjacent buildings. Chinese J. Underground Space Eng., 4, 841-847
  • Wang W D & Xu Z H (2010). Simplified analysis method for evaluating excavation-induced damage of adjacent buildings. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 32(1), 32-38.
  • Winkler E (1867). Die Lehre von Elastizat and Festigkeit (on Elasticity and fixity), 182, Prague
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Cihan Öser 0000-0002-5057-0920

Sinan Sarğın This is me 0000-0001-9275-6531

Publication Date April 15, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Öser, C., & Sarğın, S. (2022). Cantilever piles or well foundations in supporting temporary deep excavations: comparison of performance, safety and cost. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 6(2), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.861268
AMA Öser C, Sarğın S. Cantilever piles or well foundations in supporting temporary deep excavations: comparison of performance, safety and cost. TUJE. April 2022;6(2):140-148. doi:10.31127/tuje.861268
Chicago Öser, Cihan, and Sinan Sarğın. “Cantilever Piles or Well Foundations in Supporting Temporary Deep Excavations: Comparison of Performance, Safety and Cost”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 6, no. 2 (April 2022): 140-48. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.861268.
EndNote Öser C, Sarğın S (April 1, 2022) Cantilever piles or well foundations in supporting temporary deep excavations: comparison of performance, safety and cost. Turkish Journal of Engineering 6 2 140–148.
IEEE C. Öser and S. Sarğın, “Cantilever piles or well foundations in supporting temporary deep excavations: comparison of performance, safety and cost”, TUJE, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 140–148, 2022, doi: 10.31127/tuje.861268.
ISNAD Öser, Cihan - Sarğın, Sinan. “Cantilever Piles or Well Foundations in Supporting Temporary Deep Excavations: Comparison of Performance, Safety and Cost”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 6/2 (April 2022), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.861268.
JAMA Öser C, Sarğın S. Cantilever piles or well foundations in supporting temporary deep excavations: comparison of performance, safety and cost. TUJE. 2022;6:140–148.
MLA Öser, Cihan and Sinan Sarğın. “Cantilever Piles or Well Foundations in Supporting Temporary Deep Excavations: Comparison of Performance, Safety and Cost”. Turkish Journal of Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, 2022, pp. 140-8, doi:10.31127/tuje.861268.
Vancouver Öser C, Sarğın S. Cantilever piles or well foundations in supporting temporary deep excavations: comparison of performance, safety and cost. TUJE. 2022;6(2):140-8.
Flag Counter