Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Konut ve Site Alanlarında Otopark Tasarımı: Edirne Toki Hadımağa Konutları

Year 2020, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 75 - 85, 30.12.2020

Abstract

Günümüzde kentsel nüfusun hızla artması ve ortaya çıkan teknolojik gelişmeler araç sayısının süratle çoğalması ve otopark alanlarına olan ihtiyacı meydana getirmektedir. Artan bu otopark ihtiyacı ile birlikte kent merkezlerinde yüksek değere sahip alanların en verimli şekilde kullanılması gerekliliği ön plana çıkmaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma Edirne Toki Hadımağa Konutları Sitesi otoparkını teknik ve tasarım yönünden irdelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu kapsamda otopark ile ilgili yönetmelikler ve ilgili standartlar ele alınarak uygun materyal seçimi ve gereksinimler doğrultusunda site yönetimi için çizilen proje ve projenin alana uygulanması analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma sonunda yapılan peyzaj tasarımı ile birlikte nitelikleri yönünden seçilen yapısal malzemenin oluşturacağı uygulamanın benzer özellik gösteren otoparkların oluşturulması için yol göstereceği düşünülmektedir.

References

  • Abustan, I., Hamzah, M. O., & Rashid, M. A. (2012). Review of permeable pavement systems in Malaysia conditions. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(02), 27-36.
  • Akbari, H. (2009). Cooling our communities. A guidebook on tree planting and light-colored surfacing.
  • Anderson, L., & Schroeder, H. W. (1983). Application of wildland scenic assessment methods to the urban landscape. Landscape Planning, 10(3), 219-237.
  • Anderson, L., & Stokes, G. S. (1989). Planting in parking lots to improve perceived attractiveness and security. Journal of Arboriculture, 15(1), 7-10.
  • Aşılıoğlu, F. (2017). Permeable Pavements for Pedestrian Use. In M. Özyavuz (Ed.), Sustainable Landscape Planning and Design (pp. 19-32): Peter Lang GmbH.
  • Barnes, K. B., Morgan, J., & Roberge, M. (2001). Impervious surfaces and the quality of natural and built environments. Baltimore: Department of Geography and Environmental Planning, Towson University.
  • Buhyoff, G. J., Gauthier, L. J., & Wellman, J. D. (1984). Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements. Forest Science, 30(1), 71-82.
  • Carp, F. M., & Carp, A. (1982). Perceived environmental quality of neighborhoods: Development of assessment scales and their relation to age and gender. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2(4), 295-312.
  • Crilly, M. (1999). Novocastrian urbanism. Urban Design Quarterly, 10-10.
  • Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı. (2018). Otopark Yönetmeliği. Retrieved from https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/02/20180222-7.htm
  • Dönmez, Y., Özyavuz, M., & Gökyer, E. (2015). Safranbolu Kentinin Konut ve Site Alanlarının Yeşil Alan Durumlarının Saptanması. İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 5(11), 1-12.
  • Drake, J. A., Bradford, A., & Marsalek, J. (2013). Review of environmental performance of permeable pavement systems: state of the knowledge. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 48(3), 203-222.
  • EPA, B. D. Ç. K. D. (2005). Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies, Cool Pavements. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-05/documents/reducing_urban_heat_islands_ch_5.pdf
  • Ferguson, B. (2005). Porous pavements: CRC Press.
  • Ferguson, B. K., & Suckling, P. W. (1990). Changing Rainfall‐Runoff Relationships in The Urbanizing Peachtree Creek Watershed, Atlanta, Georgia JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 26(2), 313-322.
  • Hajimohammadipour, O. (2016). Açık Otoparklar Üzerıne Bir İnceleme Ve Tasarım Stratejilerinin Gelıştırılmesı. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,
  • Haldenbilen, S., Murat, Y. Ş., Baykan, N., & Meriç, N. (1999). Kentlerde otopark sorunu: Denizli örneği. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 1099-1108.
  • Hill, J., Rhodes, G., Vollar, S., & Whapples, C. (2005). Car park designers' handbook: Thomas Telford London; Reston, VA.
  • Kaplan, H., & Yıldız, D. (2001). Ankara kent merkezi otopark alanları ile yaya alanları ilişkisinin Kızılay çekirdeği örneğinde yol ve trafik güvenliği açısından irdelenmesi. Trafik ve Yol Güvenliği Kongresi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Kayhanian, M., Weiss, P. T., Gulliver, J. S., & Khazanovich, L. (2015). The application of permeable pavement with emphasis on successful design, water quality benefits, and identification of knowledge and data gaps.
  • Kutlu, K. (1993). Trafik Tekniği, İTÜ. İnşaat Fak. Matbaası, İstanbul.
  • Llewelyn-Davies. (1994). Providing more homes in urban areas: School for Advanced Urban Studies.
  • Marchioni, M., & Becciu, G. (2015). Experimental results on permeable pavements in urban areas: a synthetic review. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 10(6), 806-817.
  • Morris, W., & James, A. (1998). The New Urbanism: an introduction to the movement and its potential impact on travel demand with an outline of its application in Western Australia. Urban Design International, 3(4), 207-221.
  • Mullaney, J., & Lucke, T. (2014). Practical review of pervious pavement designs. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water, 42(2), 111-124.
  • Özyavuz, M., & Dönmez, Y. (2016). Konut ve Site Alanlarında Uygulanan Peyzaj Tasarımlarının Yeterliliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Tekirdağ Kenti. Düzce Üniversitesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 12(2), 108-122.
  • Rushton, B. T. (2001). Low-impact parking lot design reduces runoff and pollutant loads. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(3), 172-179.
  • Scholz, M., & Grabowiecki, P. (2007). Review of permeable pavement systems. Building and environment, 42(11), 3830-3836.
  • Schroeder, H. W., & Anderson, L. M. (1984). Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of leisure research, 16(2), 178-194.
  • Schuler, H. J. (1981). Grocery shopping choices: Individual preferences based on store attractiveness and distance. Environment and Behavior, 13(3), 331-347.
  • Shackel, B. (2010). The design, construction and evaluation of permeable pavements in Australia. Paper presented at the Arrb Conference, 24th, 2010, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Shaver, E., Maxted, J., Curtis, G., & Carter, D. (1995). Watershed protection using an integrated approach. Paper presented at the Stormwater NPDES related monitoring needs.
  • Stubbs, M. (2002). Car parking and residential development: sustainability, design and planning policy, and public perceptions of parking provision. Journal of Urban Design, 7(2), 213-237.
  • Suripin, S., Sangkawati, S. S., Pranoto, S. A., Sutarto, E., Hary, B., & Dwi, K. (2018). Reducing stormwater runoff from parking lot with permeable pavement. Paper presented at the E3S Web of Conferences.
  • Tetlow, R., Hinsley, S., & Auchincloss, M. (1998). Car Park and Social Housing-National Planning And Housing Policy-A Report For The Housing Corporation And The Guiness Trust.
  • Türk Standartları Enstitüsü. (1992). Şehir içi yollar - Otolar için otopark tasarım kuralları. In (Vol. TS 10551 ). Wang, D.-C., Wang, L.-C., Cheng, K.-Y., & Lin, J.-D. (2010). Benefit Analysis of Permeable Pavement on Sidewalks. International Journal of Pavement Research & Technology, 3(4).
  • Yıldırım, H. (2019a). Otopark Alanlarının Tasarım İlkeleri ve Kullanıcı Talepleri: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yerleşkesi Örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(2), 176-188.
  • Yıldırım, H. (2019b). Otopark Alanlarının Tasarımı ve Kullanıcı Taleplerinin Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yerleşkesi Örneğinde İrdelenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Peyzaj Mimarlığı ABD Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Isparta.
  • Yücedağ, C., Kaya, L. G., & Altunay, U. (2017). Burdur Kenti Toplu Konut ve Site Alanlarının Peyzaj Tasarım Yeterliliğinin İncelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(2), 114-122.

Parking Lot Design in Residence and Site Areas: Edirne Toki Hadımağa Houses

Year 2020, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 75 - 85, 30.12.2020

Abstract

Today, the density of the urban population and the technological developments that have arisen cause the rapid increase in the number of vehicles and the need for parking areas. With this increasing need for parking, the most efficient use of high-value areas in city centers comes to the fore. For this reason, this study was carried out to examine the Edirne Toki Hadımağa Housing Estate car park in terms of technical and design. In this context, by considering the regulations and standards related to the parking lot, the design and the implementation of the project on the site were analyzed in line with the selection of appropriate materials and requirements. At the end of the study, it is thought that the application to be formed by the structural material selected in terms of qualifications together with the landscape design will guide the creation of parking lots with similar characteristics.

References

  • Abustan, I., Hamzah, M. O., & Rashid, M. A. (2012). Review of permeable pavement systems in Malaysia conditions. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(02), 27-36.
  • Akbari, H. (2009). Cooling our communities. A guidebook on tree planting and light-colored surfacing.
  • Anderson, L., & Schroeder, H. W. (1983). Application of wildland scenic assessment methods to the urban landscape. Landscape Planning, 10(3), 219-237.
  • Anderson, L., & Stokes, G. S. (1989). Planting in parking lots to improve perceived attractiveness and security. Journal of Arboriculture, 15(1), 7-10.
  • Aşılıoğlu, F. (2017). Permeable Pavements for Pedestrian Use. In M. Özyavuz (Ed.), Sustainable Landscape Planning and Design (pp. 19-32): Peter Lang GmbH.
  • Barnes, K. B., Morgan, J., & Roberge, M. (2001). Impervious surfaces and the quality of natural and built environments. Baltimore: Department of Geography and Environmental Planning, Towson University.
  • Buhyoff, G. J., Gauthier, L. J., & Wellman, J. D. (1984). Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements. Forest Science, 30(1), 71-82.
  • Carp, F. M., & Carp, A. (1982). Perceived environmental quality of neighborhoods: Development of assessment scales and their relation to age and gender. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2(4), 295-312.
  • Crilly, M. (1999). Novocastrian urbanism. Urban Design Quarterly, 10-10.
  • Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı. (2018). Otopark Yönetmeliği. Retrieved from https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/02/20180222-7.htm
  • Dönmez, Y., Özyavuz, M., & Gökyer, E. (2015). Safranbolu Kentinin Konut ve Site Alanlarının Yeşil Alan Durumlarının Saptanması. İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 5(11), 1-12.
  • Drake, J. A., Bradford, A., & Marsalek, J. (2013). Review of environmental performance of permeable pavement systems: state of the knowledge. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 48(3), 203-222.
  • EPA, B. D. Ç. K. D. (2005). Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies, Cool Pavements. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-05/documents/reducing_urban_heat_islands_ch_5.pdf
  • Ferguson, B. (2005). Porous pavements: CRC Press.
  • Ferguson, B. K., & Suckling, P. W. (1990). Changing Rainfall‐Runoff Relationships in The Urbanizing Peachtree Creek Watershed, Atlanta, Georgia JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 26(2), 313-322.
  • Hajimohammadipour, O. (2016). Açık Otoparklar Üzerıne Bir İnceleme Ve Tasarım Stratejilerinin Gelıştırılmesı. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,
  • Haldenbilen, S., Murat, Y. Ş., Baykan, N., & Meriç, N. (1999). Kentlerde otopark sorunu: Denizli örneği. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 1099-1108.
  • Hill, J., Rhodes, G., Vollar, S., & Whapples, C. (2005). Car park designers' handbook: Thomas Telford London; Reston, VA.
  • Kaplan, H., & Yıldız, D. (2001). Ankara kent merkezi otopark alanları ile yaya alanları ilişkisinin Kızılay çekirdeği örneğinde yol ve trafik güvenliği açısından irdelenmesi. Trafik ve Yol Güvenliği Kongresi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Kayhanian, M., Weiss, P. T., Gulliver, J. S., & Khazanovich, L. (2015). The application of permeable pavement with emphasis on successful design, water quality benefits, and identification of knowledge and data gaps.
  • Kutlu, K. (1993). Trafik Tekniği, İTÜ. İnşaat Fak. Matbaası, İstanbul.
  • Llewelyn-Davies. (1994). Providing more homes in urban areas: School for Advanced Urban Studies.
  • Marchioni, M., & Becciu, G. (2015). Experimental results on permeable pavements in urban areas: a synthetic review. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 10(6), 806-817.
  • Morris, W., & James, A. (1998). The New Urbanism: an introduction to the movement and its potential impact on travel demand with an outline of its application in Western Australia. Urban Design International, 3(4), 207-221.
  • Mullaney, J., & Lucke, T. (2014). Practical review of pervious pavement designs. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water, 42(2), 111-124.
  • Özyavuz, M., & Dönmez, Y. (2016). Konut ve Site Alanlarında Uygulanan Peyzaj Tasarımlarının Yeterliliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Tekirdağ Kenti. Düzce Üniversitesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 12(2), 108-122.
  • Rushton, B. T. (2001). Low-impact parking lot design reduces runoff and pollutant loads. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(3), 172-179.
  • Scholz, M., & Grabowiecki, P. (2007). Review of permeable pavement systems. Building and environment, 42(11), 3830-3836.
  • Schroeder, H. W., & Anderson, L. M. (1984). Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of leisure research, 16(2), 178-194.
  • Schuler, H. J. (1981). Grocery shopping choices: Individual preferences based on store attractiveness and distance. Environment and Behavior, 13(3), 331-347.
  • Shackel, B. (2010). The design, construction and evaluation of permeable pavements in Australia. Paper presented at the Arrb Conference, 24th, 2010, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Shaver, E., Maxted, J., Curtis, G., & Carter, D. (1995). Watershed protection using an integrated approach. Paper presented at the Stormwater NPDES related monitoring needs.
  • Stubbs, M. (2002). Car parking and residential development: sustainability, design and planning policy, and public perceptions of parking provision. Journal of Urban Design, 7(2), 213-237.
  • Suripin, S., Sangkawati, S. S., Pranoto, S. A., Sutarto, E., Hary, B., & Dwi, K. (2018). Reducing stormwater runoff from parking lot with permeable pavement. Paper presented at the E3S Web of Conferences.
  • Tetlow, R., Hinsley, S., & Auchincloss, M. (1998). Car Park and Social Housing-National Planning And Housing Policy-A Report For The Housing Corporation And The Guiness Trust.
  • Türk Standartları Enstitüsü. (1992). Şehir içi yollar - Otolar için otopark tasarım kuralları. In (Vol. TS 10551 ). Wang, D.-C., Wang, L.-C., Cheng, K.-Y., & Lin, J.-D. (2010). Benefit Analysis of Permeable Pavement on Sidewalks. International Journal of Pavement Research & Technology, 3(4).
  • Yıldırım, H. (2019a). Otopark Alanlarının Tasarım İlkeleri ve Kullanıcı Talepleri: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yerleşkesi Örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(2), 176-188.
  • Yıldırım, H. (2019b). Otopark Alanlarının Tasarımı ve Kullanıcı Taleplerinin Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yerleşkesi Örneğinde İrdelenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Peyzaj Mimarlığı ABD Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Isparta.
  • Yücedağ, C., Kaya, L. G., & Altunay, U. (2017). Burdur Kenti Toplu Konut ve Site Alanlarının Peyzaj Tasarım Yeterliliğinin İncelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(2), 114-122.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Rukiye Duygu Çay 0000-0001-9359-4028

Publication Date December 30, 2020
Acceptance Date December 5, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 21 Issue: 2

Cite

IEEE R. D. Çay, “Konut ve Site Alanlarında Otopark Tasarımı: Edirne Toki Hadımağa Konutları”, TUJES, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 75–85, 2020.