Promoting effective teaching and learning in adult education: a model-based approach

Year 2016, Volume: 5 Issue: 4, 184 - 192, 31.10.2016

David Addae

https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.267909

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This paper presents a model for promoting effective teaching and learning in adult education. The model, a combination of both teacher-centered and learner-centered approaches to teaching, is premised on the belief that adult learners are different in many respects from young learners. As such, the approaches, methods, and techniques employed in the teaching and learning encounter should differ significantly from those that have traditionally been used for young learners. The model gives a prescription of how the various aspects of the teaching and learning encounter should be undertaken. The thesis of this paper is that effective teaching and learning in adult education is a dialogic process where both the teacher and learners are equally involved in a series of decision-making and activities geared towards helping the latter to construct meaning for themselves.

Keywords

Model, teaching, learning, assessment, feedback

References

• Amborse, S. A., Bridges, M. W., Lovett, M. C., DiPietro, M. & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: 7 research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Beder, H., & Medina, P. (2001). Classroom dynamics in adult literacy education. (Reports #18). NCSALL.
• Benseman, J. (2013). Research-informed teaching of adults: A worthy alternative to old habits and hearsay? Unitec ePress Occasional and Discussion Paper Series (2): Unitec ePress
• Brockett, R. G. & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.
• Caffrey, E. D. (2009). Assessment in elementary and secondary education: A primer. Washington D.C: Congressional Research Service.
• Ceprano, M. (1995). Strategies and practices of individuals who tutor adult illiterates voluntarily. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39(1), 56-65.
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
• Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall, S. (2009). Understanding student learning. In Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S. (Eds.). A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice (3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
• Illeris, K. (2002). Three dimensions of learning. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University Press/Leicester, UK: NIACE.
• Jarvis, P. (1987). Adult learning in the social context. London: Croom Helm.
• Knowles, M.S. (1980). The Modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. New York: Cambridge.
• Larsen, L. L. (2012, May). Pedagogical Approaches: Insights for teachers of adults. Paper presented at the Norwegian National Graduate School for Teacher Education Network (NAFOL) Conference: “Teacher education research between national identity and global trends”. Trondheim, Norway.
• McClusky, H. Y. (1963). The course of the adult life span. In W. C. Hallenbeck (Ed.), Psychology of adults (pp. 10-19). Washington, DC: Adult Education Association.
• Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating educational technology into teaching (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Rogers, J. (2001). Adults learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Taber, K. S. (2006). Constructivism's new clothes: the trivial, the contingent, and a progressive research programme into the learning of science. Foundations of Chemistry, 8(2), pp. 189-219.
• Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43-58.