Characterization and Classification of Soil on Varying Lithology in Okigwe Imo Southern Eastern, Nigeria

Year 2022, , 64 - 77, 30.06.2022

Christopher Obineche , Patricia Oriaku

https://doi.org/10.46592/turkager.1053073

Abstract

The field study was carried out in Okigwe South-eastern Nigeria. Three profiles were sunk in soils of each of each parent material. Soil samples were subjected to routine and standard laboratory analysis for selected physic- chemical properties. The morphological and physic-chemical properties of the soils varied widely, sand size particles dominated other particle sizes with the mean values of 448, 538 and 648 g kg-1 on sandstone, while soils derived from Imo clay shale was 583 g kg-1 for Umuna. Clay in Imo Clay Shale and bulk density recorded highest values at NIHORT 1, 416 and 15 g kg-1 respectively. All pedons exhibited sandy clay loam on topsoil and relatively more clayey subsoil. Total nitrogen correlated positively and significantly (0.5) with organic matter in both soils. Clay correlated negatively with ECEC in sandstone and positively in clay shale, and both were not significant. The soils derived from false bedded sandstone (NIHORT 1, 2 and 3) were classified according to USDA soil Taxonomy as Inceptic Paleudults which translate to Dystric Nitisols in WRB system. Soils from Umuna were classified as Typic Hapludalf USDA and soils from NIHORT 1, 2 and 3 were classified as class II of the USDA capability classification system. Umuna was classified in class III. In conclusion the soils of these two parent materials sustain farm produce, if proper land use practices and special conservation for selected crop production are adopted.

Keywords

soil, False bedded sandstone, classification, characterization, Physiochemical properties, Imo clay shale

References

• Brady NC, Weil RR (1999). The nature and properties of soil. Abridge (ed) of the nature and properties of soils 13th ed.
• Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982). Total –Nitrogen In : methods of soil analysis part 2. AL page, RH Millar and DR Keeney editions. American society of agronomy Madison, W1 Pp 595 - 624
• Carter GF (1993). The humid soils process and time geography ReV. 46: 488 – 507
• Eshett ET (1985). Soil characterization and farming of Agronomy, University of Ibadan Nigeria
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1983). Guideline land evaluation for rain fed agriculture. Agriculture soils bulletin No.52 Rome.
• Gee GW, Or D (2002). Particle size analysis. In: JH Dane and GC Topp (eds). Methods of soil analysis, part 4. Physical methods soil science society of America(SSSA). Book series No.5 ASA and SSA Madison, W1, pp 255 – 293
• Grossman RB, Reinch TG (2002). Bulk density and liner extensibility .In : Methods of soil analysis part 4. Physical methods soil science society of America. Book series No.5 ASA and SSA Madison, W1, pp 201 – 228
• Igbokwe MC, Ene LSO, Nzewi (1982). A review of soil fertility investigations in the Eastern state of Nigeria 1923 – 1981. Federal Department of Agricluture Techincal Report No. 5, pp 83
• Igwe CA (2003). Shrink – swell potential of flood plain soils in Nigeria in relation to moisture content and mineralogy. International Agrophysic 17, pp47 – 55 Lekwa MU (1998). Soil survey and land evalution for irrigated rice paddy at Igwe river flood plain, Abia state. University of Nigeria Research Publications
• Maclean ED (1982). Methods of soil analysis part 11. Aluminum In: a black (eds). 1st edition American society of Agronomy Monography. Pp 86 – 994
• Nelson DW, Summers E (1982). Total C, organic matter. Miller RH and Keeny DR (eds) method of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties 3rd edition
• Nwosu LI, Nwankwo CN, Emujakpore G (2010). Determination of Dar- Zarouk parameters for the assessment of ground water resources potentials. Case study of Imo state , south eastern Nigeria. Journal of economics and sustainable development
• Obi ME (1990). Soil physics: A compendium of lectures. University of Nigeria Nsukka, south eastern Nigeria publication pp 103
• Olsen RS, Sommer LE (1982). Phosphorus In: methods of soil analysis part 2. (edition page AL, Millar RH and Keeney DR). American society of agronomy Madison, Wisconsin pp 15 - 72
• Onyeagucha AC (1980). Petrography and depositional environment of the Benin formation. Journal of mining geology 17(2); 147 – 151
• Onweremadu EU (2007). Availability of selected soil nutrients in relation to land use and landscape position. International journal of soil science 2(2); 128 – 134
• Onweremadu EU, Anikwe MAN (2007). Soil wettability characteristics of a forested catena in relation to organic matter fractions. International journals of soil science 2(3); 211 – 207
• Papendick RI, Parr JF (1992). Soil quality: The key to sustainable agriculture. American journal of alternative agriculture 7: 2 - 3
• Salako FK (2003). Soil physical condition in Nigeria savanna and biomass production. A lecture given at the college on soil physics, Trieste on the 3 – 21 March 2003.
• Soil survey staff (2003). Keys to soil taxonomy. 9th edition. USDA natural resources conservation service, Washington DC. Pp 338.
• Thomas GW (1996). Soil pH and soil acidity. In: methods of soil analysis, part 3, chemical methods. LD Sparks edition. Soil science society America (SSSA) book series. No 5
• Ukaegbu EP, Akamigbo FOR (2004). Influence of physiography on the properties and land use of soils of the Cross River plains: A case study of a strip of land at Ishiagu, Ebonyi State. In: proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the soil science society of Nigeria held at University of Agriculture, Abeokuta. Pp 103 – 109
• USDA soil taxonomy (1979). Agriculture hand book No. 435. Washington DC; USDA soil conservation service.
• USDA- NCRS (1996). Soil quality information sheet soil quality indicators: aggregate stability. Prepared by the nation soil survey centre in conjuction with the sloil quality department of the Natural Resources Conservation Centre (NCRS) and national soil tilt laboratory of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
• Wilding LP (1985). Spatial variability, its documentation. Accommodation and implication to soil surveys. Pp 166 – 194. In: DR Nelson and J Bouma (editions) soil spatial variability produce Wageningen, Netherland.