Farmers' Participation in Watershed Management in Sodo Zuria District of Southern Ethiopia

Year 2022, , 51 - 63, 30.06.2022

Danıel Balta , Senapathy Marisennayya , Pandikumar M Marısennayya , Chinaza Godswill Awuchi

https://doi.org/10.46592/turkager.792744

Abstract

This examination aimed to survey the farmers' participation in watershed management and distinguish significant factors deciding the farmers' participation and cooperation in watershed management practices in the investigation territory. Descriptive statistics and econometric models were utilized for investigation purposes to meet the expressed targets. The sampled farmer families were classified low, medium, and highly dependent on their support score esteems the 4-8, 9-12, and 13-16 participation run separately. The farmers' participation in problem identification and decision making, planning and monitoring and evaluation is shallow in contrast with their participation in the execution level. The Ordered Logit Model outcome uncovered that among the 17 variables estimated to influence the farmers' participation in watershed management, 8 variables were measurably noteworthy with the speculated sign as determinants of farmers' participation in the watershed the executives. Consequently, the family size is positive and significantly influence the farmers' participation; dependency ratio negatively and significantly influences the farmers' participation; more dependency ratio diminishes time, work, and enthusiasm to partake in watershed management practices, education positive and fundamentally influence the farmers' participation, farm size is positive and significantly affect the farmers' participation, the distance of parcel of land from residence positive and altogether influence the farmers' participation, soil fertility positive and altogether influence the farmers' participation, extension contact positive and altogether influence the farmers' participation, farmers households who approach credit were found to have negative and fundamentally influence the farmers' participation.

Keywords

Farmers participation, Ordered Logit Model, Participation index, Slope of land, Soil erosion, Watersehed management

References

• Ashyby, J. (1996). What do we mean by Participatory Research in Agriculture: Participatory research and Gender analysis for technology development? CIAT Publication No. 294, Cali, Colombia.
• Azene B and Gathriu, K. (2006). Participatory Watershed Management: Lessons from RELMA's work with farmers in Eastern Africa. ICRAF Working Paper No.22, World Agro Forestry Center, Nairobi.
• Bekele Tesemma A. (2007) Profitable Agro-forestry innovations for Eastern Africa experience from Agro-climatic zones of Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRF), East Africa.
• Bekele, S. (1998). Peasant Agriculture and Sustainable land use in Ethiopia Economic Analysis of Constraints and Incentives for Soil Conservation. The Agricultural University of Norway. Dissertation No. 1998:1.
• Belay, T. (1992). Farmers' Perception of erosion hazards and Attitudes towards Soil Conservation in Gunono, Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Development Research, 14 (2): 31-58.
• Benin, S. (2002). Policies affecting Land Management, impute use and productivity: land redistribution and tenure in the highlands of Amhara Region, Ethiopia. In Benin, Pendur and Ehui (eds). Policies for Sustainable Land Management in the East African Highlands: Summary of Papers and Proceedings of Conference held at the UNECA. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 24-26 April 2002.
• Campbell, J. (1991). Land or peasants? The dilemma was confronting Ethiopian resource conservation. African Affairs, 90 (358): 5-21.
• Carney D and Farrington, J. (1998). Natural Resources Management and Institutional Change, Routledge, London.
• FAO (2000). Rural poverty, risk and development by M. Fafchampus, FAO economic and social development paper No.144.Rome.
• Greene WH. (2008). Econometric analysis. Th ed., New Jersey Prentice-hall Inc, Upper Saddle River.
• Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1995). Concepts and issues in Watershed Management, IDB, Washington, D.C. Jeffery, R and Vira B. (2001). Conflict and cooperation in participatory natural resource management, Palgrave, cited in Dube, D., Swatuk, L. (2002). Stakeholder Participation in the new Watershed Management Approach: A Case study of the Save catchment, Zimbabwe, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Vol. 27, 867-874.
• Johnson Ravnborg HM Westerman and Probst. (2001) User Participation in Watershed Management and Research, Working Paper No.19, CAPR, IFPRI, Washington, D.C.
• Kerr JM, Sanghi NK and Sriramappa G. (1996). Subsidies in Watershed Development Projects in India: Distortions and Opportunities, Gatekeepers Series, No.61. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
• Kessler C. A. (2006). Decisive Key-factors farm households' Soil and Water Conservation Investment.
• Kishor V (2000). Problems and Prospects of Watershed Development in India, Occasional Paper No.12. Mumbai, NABARD.
• Liao T.F. (1994). Interpreting probability models. Logit, Probit and Other Generalized Linear Models. Stage University Paper serious on Qualitative Applications in the Social Sciences. U.S.
• Long L. (2003). Conservation Practices Adoption by Agricultural Land Owners. PhD. Dissertation. Northern Illinois University, Delealb, Illinois.
• MOARD (2005). Guideline for Integrated Watershed Management, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
• Osgood B (1992). Public Awareness in Soil and Water Conservation Programs. In. S.Arsyad, I. Amien Sheng and W. Molden Hover (eds). Conservation Policies for Sustainable Hill Slope Farming. Soil and Water Conservation Society of America, 255-260 Pp.
• Pretty J and Shah P (1999). Soil and water conservation: A brief history of coercion and control. In Fertile Ground: The Impacts of Participatory Watershed Management, F.Hinchcliffe, Thompson, N.Pretty, i. Guijt and P.Shah. London, UK intermediate Technology Publications Ltd., 1-12.
• Pretty J and Ward H (2001). Social capital and the environment, World Development, 29 (2), 209-227.
• Rhoades, R.E. (1998). Participatory Watershed research and Management: Where and shadow falls, Gatekeeper Series No.81. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
• Roman H. (2010). Determinants of rural women empowerment: The case of self-help development credit services in Haramaya District. East Hararge Zone, Ethiopia, M.Sc. Thesis, Haramaya University 101 p. (Unpublished).
• Swallow BD, Garrity MV and Noordwijk MV. (2001). The effects of scales flow and filters on property rights and collective action in catchment management. CAPRI Working Paper, No.18. Washington, D.C: International Food Policy Research Institute.
• Temesgen Z. (2012). Factors influencing land degradation in the Bilatte Watershed: The Case of Dimtu and Shelo sub-watersheds, Southern Ethiopia. A Thesis Submitted to School of Graduate Studies, Institute of Technology, Department of Biosystem and Environmental Engineering. Hawassa University, Ethiopia.
• Tilahun, S. (2008). Access to and Utilization of Family Planning Information among Rural Women In Adama District, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia, M.Sc. Thesis, Haramaya University, 153p. (Unpublished).
• Valk, W and Graaff (1995). Social and Economic Aspects of Soil and Water Conservation. Lecture notes. Wageningen University (Unpublished).
• Wagayehu B and Lars D. (2003). Soil and Water Conservation Decision of Subsistence Farmers in the Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia: A Case study of the Hunde-Lafto.
• Woldeamlak, B. (2003). Land Degradation and Farmers' Acceptance and Adoption of Conservation Technologies in the Digil Watershed, Northern Highlands Ethiopia. Social Science Research Report Series – No. 29, OSSERA. Addis Ababa.
• Yamane, T. (1970). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. USA: New York.
• Yeraswork, A. (1998). Impact and Sustainable study of WFP Assisted Project ETH 2488/II Rehabilitation of Forest, Grazing and Agricultural Lands. Addis Ababa, WFP.
• Zavonia, R and Mcelvey W. (1975). A Statistical Model for the analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables Mathematical Sociology 18:103-120.