Investigation of the effects of different flight parameters on the accuracy of DEM generated using UAV systems

Year 2022, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 22 - 29, 28.06.2022

Elif Bulut Ferruh Yılmaztürk

https://doi.org/10.48053/turkgeo.1114813

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), can be controlled automatically or with the help of a remote control system, provide high spatial and temporal resolution images in addition to its advantages in terms of cost and time. Due to these features, UAV’s have been widely used in studies such as map production, 3D modeling and volume calculation in recent years. In this study, it is aimed to investigate the effects of different flight parameters on the accuracy of Orthomosaic and DEM produced with UAV Systems. In addition, the rolling shutter effect and the use of pre-calibrated and automatic camera calibration parameters were also tested. For this purpose, a total of seven UAV flights were carried out at different heights, overlap ratios, angles and grids at a mining area located within the borders of Aksaray province. Agisoft MetaShape and Pix4D Mapper, which are widely used commercial software, were used to process the UAV images. In this study, 27 points were established and 3D coordinates of these points were measured using GNSS technique. 15 of these points were used as reference points and the remaining 12 points were used as check points. Accuracy analysis was performed by comparing the produced Orthomosaics and DEMs with the check points in the study area. CloudCompare and ArcGIS software were used in the comparison of the products as a result of the evaluation of the images. It is concluded that the Orthomosaics produced using 450 angle and DEMs with 600 angle has higher accuracy than the others. Point clouds and DEMs’ produced using automatic and pre-calibrated camera calibration parameters show that the pre-calibrated images provide higher accuracy. Also, it is seen that when the rolling shutter effect is modeled, the horizontal and vertical accuracy is increased in all three flights with different flight parameters in this study.

Keywords

photogrammetry, UAV, ortophoto, DEM

References

• Ait-Aider, O., Andreff, N., Lavest, J.M., & Martinet, P. (2006). Simultaneous object pose and velocity computation using a single view from a rolling shutter camera. In European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• Akay S.S., & Ozcan O. (2017). Volumetric Comparison of Uav-Based Point Clouds Generated from Various Softwares. International Symposium on GIS Applications in Geography and Geosciences, Çanakkale, Turkey.
• Akay, S. S., Özcan, O., Şanlı, F. B., Bayram, B., & Görüm, T. (2019). İHA görüntülerinden üretilen verilerin doğruluk değerlendirmesi, 10. Türkiye Ulusal Fotogrametri ve Uzaktan Algılama Birliği Teknik Sempozyumu, TUFUAB 2019, 106-110.
• Akay, S.S., Ozcan, O., Şanlı, F.B., Bayram, B., & Görüm, T. (2021). Assessing the spatial accuracy of UAV-derived products based on variation of flight altitudes. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 5(1), 35-40.
• Atak, H. (2018). Producing orthophoto maps using unmanned air vehicles and accuracy analysis (MSc thesis). Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Turkey (in Turkish).
• Çömert, R., Avdan, U., & Şenkal, E. (2012). İnsansız Hava Araçlarının Kullanım Alanları ve Gelecekteki Beklentileri. IV. Uzaktan Algılama ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Sempozyumu, Zonguldak.
• Coşkun, E. (2020). Mapping production using unmanned aerial vehicles: Case of Altinordu district of Ordu (MSc thesis). Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey (in Turkish).
• Döner, F., Özdemir, S., & Ceylan, M. (2014). İnsansız Hava Aracı Sistemlerinin Veri Toplama Ve Haritalama Çalışmalarında Kullanımı. Uzaktan Algılama–Cbs Sempozyumu, 14-17.
• Eltner, A., Kaiser, A., Abellan, A., & Schindewolf, M. (2017). Time Lapse Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry for Continuous Geomorphic Monitoring. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(14), 2240–2253.
• Erdoğan, M., & Toz, G. (2009). Sayısal Yükseklik Modeli (Sym) Doğruluk ve Üretim Maliyetleri. Türkiye Ulusal Fotogrametri ve Uzaktan Algılama Birliği Sempozyumu TUFUAB 2009.
• Gündoğdu, K.S. (2003). Sayısal Yükseklik Modellerinin Arazi Boy Kesitlerinin Çıkarılmasında Kullanımı, Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 149-157.
• Karabörk, H., Makineci, H.B., Orhan, O. & Karakus, P. (2021). Accuracy assessment of DEMs derived from multiple SAR data using the InSAR technique. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46(6), 5755-5765.
• Kılınç-Kazar, G., Karabörk, H., & Makineci, H.B. (2022). Evaluation of Test Field-based Calibration and Self-calibration Models of UAV Integrated Compact Cameras. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 50(1), 13-23.
• Makineci H.B., & Karasaka L. (2021). Investigation of 3D models acquired with UAV oblique images. Turkish Journal of Geosciences, 2(2), 13-20.
• Makineci, H.B., & Karabörk, H. (2016). Evaluation digital elevation model generated by synthetic aperture radar data. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 1, 57-62.
• Makineci, H.B., Karabörk, H., & Durdu, A. (2020a). The Performance Evaluation of Image Matching Techniques within UAV Images. Turkish Journal of Geosciences, 1(1), 8-14.
• Makineci, H.B., Karabörk, H., & Durdu, A. (2021). ANN estimation model for photogrammetry-based UAV flight planning optimisation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1-23.
• Makineci, H.B., Karasaka, L., & Şahin, D. (2020b). Fotogrametrik Amaçlı Kamera Kalibrasyonu Yazılımlarının Kullanımı Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 2(1), 14-21.
• Mesas-Carrascosa, F.J., Notario García, M.D., Meroño de Larriva, J.E., & García-Ferrer, A. (2016). An analysis of the influence of flight parameters in the generation of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) orthomosaicks to survey archaeological areas. Sensors, 16(11), 1838.
• Moore, I.D., Gessler, P.E., Nielsen, G.A.E., & Peterson, G.A. (1993). Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil science society of america journal, 57(2), 443-452.
• Moore, I.D., Grayson, & R.B., Ladson, A.R. (1991). Digital Terrain Modeling: a Review of Hydrological, Geomorphological and Biological Applications, Hydrological Processes, 5 (1), 3-30.
• Ozcan, O., & Akay, S.S. (2018). Modeling Morphodynamic Processes in Meandering Rivers with UAV-Based Measurements. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Valencia, Spain. Özdemir, E., & Duran, Z. (2017). Sık Kullanılan Kamera Kalibrasyonu Yazılımlarının Karşılaştırılması. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(4), 1-11.
• Öztürk, O., Bilgilioğlu, B. B., Çelik, M. F., Bilgilioğlu, S. S., & Uluğ, R., (2017). İnsanız Hava Aracı (İHA) Görüntüleri İle Ortofoto Üretiminde Yükseklik Ve Kamera Açısının Doğruluğa Etkisinin Araştırılması. Geomatik, 2(3), 135-142.
• Psirofonia, P., Samaritakis, V., Eliopoulos, P., & Potamitis, I. (2017). Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Agricultural Applications with Emphasis on Crop Protection: Three Novel Case-studies. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 5(1), 30-39.
• Raczynski, R.J. (2017). Accuracy analysis of products obtained from UAV-borne photogrammetry influenced by various flight parameters (MSc thesis, NTNU).
• Rusnák, M., Sládek, J., Kidová, A., & Lehotský, M. (2018). Template for high-resolution river landscape mapping using UAV technology. Measurement, 115, 139-151.
• Sağdıç, Z. S., Makineci, H.B., & Karabörk, H. (2022). Defining The Relationship Between The Diameters of The Points Used in 2D Test Platforms and The Parameters Obtained from Camera Calibration. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 9(3), 108-117.
• Şasi, A., & Yakar, M. (2018). Photogrammetric modelling of Hasbey Dar'ülhuffaz (Masjid) using an unmanned aerial vehicle. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(1), 006-011.
• Şenkal, E. (2018). Accucary analysis of the orthophotos and digital surface models which are produced from images obtained by unmanned aerial vehicle (PhD thesis). Eskişehir Technical University, Eskişehir, Turkey (in Turkish).
• SHT-FCL, 2019. http://web.shgm.gov.tr/documents/sivilhavacilik/files/mevzuat/sektorel/talimatlar/2019/SHT-FCL_rev02.pdf
• Snavely, N., Seitz, S.M., & Szeliski, R. (2008). Modeling the world from internet photo collections. International journal of computer vision, 80(2), 189-210.
• Thompson, J.A., Bell, J.C., & Butler, C.A. (2001). Digital elevation model resolution: effects on terrain attribute calculation and quantitative soil-landscape modeling. Geoderma, 100(1-2), 67-89.
• Ulvi, A., & Toprak, A.S. (2016). Investigation of ThreeDimensional Modelling Availability Taken Photograph of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle; Sample of Kanlidivane Church. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 1(1), 1-7.
• Vautherin, J., Rutishauser, S., Schneider-Zapp, K., Choi, H. F., Chovancova, V., Glass, A., & Strecha, C. (2016). Photogrammetric accuracy and modeling of rolling shutter cameras. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 3(3).