Volume: 13 Issue: 61

Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz aims to give coverage to articles and book reviews in English and Turkish, as a respected academic journal that does not compromise on scientific quality and innovation, with academics from different disciplines on its scientific advisory board and editorial board.

Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz prioritizes the determination of political, social, and economic policies, the development of existing policies by analyzing them in the light of scientific data, and the presentation of policy proposals for the solution of significant problems and it encourages interdisciplinary research within this framework.

Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz accepts objectivity, which is the first condition of being scientific, as one of the basic publication principles. Therefore, all manuscripts sent to our journal for publication are reviewed as quickly as possible by impartial referees, and if deemed appropriate, they are published in print and electronically.

Writing Rules

Manuscripts to be sent to the journal must be original in a way that will bring a new dimension to the subject and must not have been published in any journal before.

Articles should be between 5,000-10,000 words, including footnotes, and book reviews should be between 1500 and 2000 words.

If the manuscript is approved by the editorial board, the article is sent to two referees for consideration in a double-blind process. If one of the referee reports is positive and the other is negative, the manuscript will be sent to a third referee as a tie-breaker.

All copyrights of the articles in the journal are transferred to TASAV. Publishing the entire article in another publication is subject to TASAV's permission.

In the articles, the bibliography, footnotes, and other rules are subject to be prepared under the following spelling rules.

Spelling: Manuscripts must comply with the Turkish Language Association's Spelling Guide (including abbreviations). Turkish words should be used as much as possible.

Title: The title should be a maximum of 15 words, in all capital letters, bold, and in 12 points, in line with the content. Sub-headings, section titles, and sub-headings should be written with only the first letters capitalized, 11 points, and bold.

Abstract and keywords: Turkish and English keywords and abstracts should be added to the articles. Abstracts should not exceed 100 words, and keywords should be limited to five.

Main text: Manuscripts should be written in Times New Roman, 12-point, and 1.15 line spacing. Quotations should be given in italics and quotation marks; Quotations longer than five lines should be written one centimeter from the right and left of the line, in blocks, and with a single line spacing.

Page Number: Manuscripts should be numbered with plain numbers (1,2…) at the end of the page.

Citation: References in the text should be given in parentheses such as surname, year of publication, and page number when necessary: (Gayret, 2010), (Gayret, 2010: 83). If one of the author's works is published in the same year referred(Turhan 2010a Turhan 2010b). If more than one source is referenced, it should be stated as (Aksu, 2008; Yılmaz, 2009). More than one author's name should be written and the abbreviation "et al" should be used (Koçak et al., 2005). Footnotes should be used for explanations only and should be shown at the bottom of the page and numbered. About any internet address, these addresses should be given among the sources and the download date should be stated:

Bibliography: The references should be given in the "References" section at the end of the article, in alphabetical order, using APA 6.0 style, 10 points. For example:

Single-authored book:
Gökalp, Z. (1997). Türkçülüğün Esasları. İstanbul: İnkılap Kitapevi.

Translation book:
Hoy, W. K. ve Miskel, C. G. (2010). Eğitim Yönetimi. (çev. S. Turan), Ankara: Nobel.

Book with two authors:
Kıran, Z. ve Kıran E. (2001). Dil Bilimine Giriş. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.

Book with three authors:
Andıç, F., Andıç, S. ve Koçak, M. (2010). İbn Haldun: Hayatı ve Eserleri Üzerine Düşünceleri. Ankara: Kadim

Books with more than three authors:
Korkmaz, Zeynel vd. (2001), Türk Dili ve Kompozisyon Bilgileri. Ankara: Yargı Yayınları.

Book chapter:
Altan, S. (2013). “Osmanlı’ya Doğudan Bakmak: 20. Yüzyıl Dönümünde Çin’de Osmanlı Algısı ve Milliyetçilik”. Türkiye’de Çin’i Düşünmek. (Der.) S. Esenbel, İ. Togan ve A. Atlı. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 90-115.

Book with multiple editions:
Yusuf Has Hacib (2017). Kutadgu Bilig. (çev. A. Çakan), 3. Basım, İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.

Multi-Bound Book:
Ögel, B. (1971). Türk Kültürünün Gelişme Çağları (Cilt 2). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.

Single author article:
Sarıkaya, Y. (2014). Ağustos 2008 Savaşı Sonrasında Gürcistan Dış Politikası. Karadeniz Araştırmaları, 31 (31): 1-16.

Unpublished Thesis:
Aydın, G. (2008). Orhan Türkdoğan’ın Devlet Anlayışı. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

Electronic Source:
Duman, B. (2017). ABD Irak’ı İran’a kaptırmak istemiyor. Al Jazeere Türkiye, 9 Mart 2017, http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/gorus/abd-iraki-irana-kaptirmak-istemiyor (accessed: 10.04.2017).

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

PUBLICATION ETHICS

Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz has adopted the principles of the Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE), which aims to ensure the quality standard and continuity of peer-reviewed publications, to ensure the highest level of academic and ethical standards.

The journal is obliged to ensure that the submitted studies are evaluated impartially. This obligation means that the studies submitted to the journal will be evaluated only in the context of their contributions to the academic literature by going through the blind peer review process. The "double-blind referee" evaluation process is applied to the studies submitted to the journal. In case of conflicting or insufficient evaluations of the referees, the editors may send the manuscript to a third referee for evaluation.

Manuscripts that have been published in another journal before, or that are found to be submitted to more than one journal at the same time, that violate legal and academic criteria such as plagiarism will not be evaluated. If a violation is detected, the process is stopped.

Referees should waive the evaluation process by stating in the manuscript that they have a conflict of interest with the author or institution of the article they are evaluating. Referees should also make technical comments such as the contribution of the study to the academic literature, and whether academic methods are applied or not. Personal comments and polemics against authors should be avoided.

The Editorial Board of the Journal decides on the studies to be published by considering the referee reports. It is not possible to publish the articles rejected by the referees. The final decision of the articles evaluated positively by the referees is determined by the Journal Editorial Board. The journal is not obliged to provide justifications to the authors of unpublished studies.

All kinds of studies conducted with qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from the participants using survey, interview, focus group work, observation, experiment, interview techniques, and retrospective studies by the personal data protection law are within the scope of studies that require ethics committee approval.

Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz is an open-access journal and does not charge any fees from the authors.

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

- Submitted studies should not be previously published or under review in another journal.
-Authors should make their citations and citations within the framework of academic ethical principles.
- Publications produced from theses should include information on the institute and academic advisor where the study is ongoing or completed.
-During a study in the evaluation process, change requests are forwarded to the editor or assistant editor. However, it cannot be proposed to change responsibilities such as adding or removing authors.
-Authors are responsible for submitting similarity reports.

Editors' Ethical Responsibilities

- Evaluating the articles only to the extent of their contribution to the literature.
-To improve the contribution of the journal to the literature
- Maintaining the quality and originality of the studies published in the journal
-Continuing business processes without compromising intellectual property rights and ethical standards
-Determining the selection of referees according to their areas of expertise
- Responding to the authors' requests for correction and clarification

Ethical Responsibilities of Referees

-Being objective. To evaluate the article only in terms of its academic quality, methodology, and contribution to the literature.
-Refusing to review the study and informing the journal editor if situations that may face a conflict of interest or personal rivalry/friendship are anticipated.
-Making the evaluation in a constructive and guiding style, avoiding insulting, slanderous comments, and not personalizing the evaluations.
-To carry out the evaluation within the time determined by the editors.

Publisher's Ethical Responsibilities

-Editors are responsible for all processes of the works sent to Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz.
- Protects the copyright of every article published in the journal.

Price Policy

Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz dergisinde başvuru, inceleme, değerlendirme, okuma, yayınlama vb. adı altında herhangi bir ücret talep edilmez. Dergiye makale gönderilmesi ve değerlendirme sürecinde kabul gören makalelerin yayınlanması tamamen ücretsizdir.

Issue Files

Archive