Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 46 - 56, 31.12.2020

Abstract

References

  • Anonymous, 2020.http://www.ipni.net/publication/nss.nsf/0/5FE74632D6D80872852579AF00706626/$FILE/NSS-01%20Urea.pdf.
  • Ateş E, Tekeli AS., 2017. The effect of different base fertilizer applications on forage yield and quality of forage pea (Pisum arvense l.). KSÜ Nature Know. Journal, 20 (Special Issue): 13-16.
  • Bağcı M., 2010. Effects of row spacing and seed amount on grass yield in Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica crantz. Cv. Tarmbeyazı-98) in Central Anatolia conditions. Çukurova University, Institute of Science, Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Adana.Çiftçi V, Ülker M., 2005. Effect of mixed cropping lentil with wheat and barley at different seeding ratios. – Journal of Agronomy.;4(1):1-4.
  • Barsila SR., 2018. The fodder oat (Avena sativa) mixed legume forages farming: nutritional and ecological benefits. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 1(1):206-222.
  • Capstaff NM, Miller AJ., 2018. Improving the yield and nutritional quality of forage crops. Front. Plant Sci. 9:535. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00535. Çalışkan M, Koç A., 2019. Morphological characterization of local oat genotypes belonging to the western Mediterranean region. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 28 (1): 7−18.
  • Çeri S., 2019. Investigation of grass yield, yield components and some quality characteristics of some oat varieties and lines in Konya watery conditions. Selcuk Unv. Science Inst., Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Konya.
  • Doğan Bİ., 2013. Determination of yield components and forage values of forage pea (Pisum Arvense L.) - wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) mixtures. Namık Kemal University, Institute of Science, Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Tekirdağ.
  • Ghosh PK., 2004. Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. – Field Crops Research 88:227-237.
  • Gürsoy E, Macit M., 2020. The effect of harvest time on the chemical composition and quality of coarse feed. Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Engineering, Natural & Medical Sciences International Indexed & Refereed, www.euroasiajournal.org, 8(9):168-177.
  • İşler N, Kılınç M., 2016. Field agriculture. Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Agriculture, Textbook, Hatay, (184).
  • Kandış T., 2019. Determination of grass yield and quality of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica) and Italian turf (Lolium italicum) planted at different planting rates. Ordu Unv. Know Science. Inst., Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Ordu.
  • Kara R, Dumlupınar Z, Akkaya A, Dokuyucu T., 2008. Evaluation of some durum wheat genotypes in terms of phenological periods, some plant characteristics and grain yield in Kahramanmaraş conditions. KSU Journal of Science, 11(1):104-111.
  • Kara S., 2013. Effect of post-flowering ethephon applications on grain yield, yield components and grain protein in triticale. Ankara University, Institute of Science, Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Ankara.
  • Kara E., 2016. Determination of yield and quality characteristics of some annual legume and poaceae forage crops to be grown as winter intermediate crops in Aydın conditions. Adnan Menderes Unv., Know Science. Inst., Forage Crops Department, Master Thesis, Aydın.
  • Kaya, M., 2012. Msthesıs Specifying The Organic Matter Efficiency Features of Some Cereal-Pulse Mixtures to The Soil, The Graduate School of Natural and Applıed Scıence of Selçuk Unıversıty The Degree of Master of Scıence / Doctor of Phılosophy, Master Thesıs, Konya.
  • Lithourgidis AS. Vasilakoglou IB, Dhima KV, Dordas CA, Yiakoulaki MD., 2006. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Res. 99:106-113.
  • Orak A, Ateş E, Varol F., 2004. Nutrient content relationships with some morphological and agricultural characteristics of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) In different development periods. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(4): 410-415.
  • Ömeroğlu E. 2016. Determination of grass and seed yields and some yield components of some forage pea (Pisum Arvense L.) varieties in Isparta conditions. Süleyman Demirel Unv. Institute of Science, Field Crops Department, Master's Thesis, Isparta.
  • Özköse A., 2017. The effects of different sowing depths on yield and some yield characteristics of feed peas. Sakarya University Journal of Science and Technology, 21(6):1188-1200.
  • Öztürk M., 2009. Effects of zinc fertilization on yield and quality in some winter fodder crops. Adnan Menderes Unv. Institute of Science, Field Crops Department, Master's Thesis, Aydın.
  • Özyiğit Y, Bilgen M., 2006. The effect of different shape periods on some quality factors in some legume forage crops. Akdeniz University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 19:29-34.
  • Ramos ME, Altieri MA, Garcia PA, Robles AB., 2011. Oat and oat-vetch as rainfed fodder cover crops in semiarid environments: Effects of fertilization and harvest time on forage yield and quality. – Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 35:726-744.
  • Ross SM, King JR, O'Donovan JT, Spaner D., 2004. Forage potential on intercropping berseem clover with barley, oat, or triticale. Agronomy J., 96(4):1013-1021. Sabancı CO., 1996. A research on the evaluation of vetches (Vicia sativa L.) collected from different regions in terms of some characters. Turkey 3 and Meadow Forage Crops Congress, Erzurum. June 17-19.
  • Sevim T., 2013. Determination of the effective characters on yield and yield in different grain-feed pea (Pisum arvense L.) mixtures. Namık Kemal Unv., Know Science. Inst., Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Tekirdağ.
  • Şimşek S., 2015. Determination of the effects of different Hungarian vetch (Vicia Pannonica Crantz) + Italian grass (Lolium Multiflorum Lam.) Mixing ratios on yield and quality in Kırşehir conditions. Ah Evran Unv. Know Science. Inst., Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Kırşehir.
  • Tekeli AS. Ateş E., 2006. Legume forage crops. Trakya University Tekirdağ Faculty of Agriculture. Publication No. 293, Textbook, Tekirdağ. No.42, 153. Tükel TK, Hatipoğlu R., 1987. A study on the feed production potential of some annual legume + cereal mixtures in Çukurova basement lands at different times. Doğa Tübitak Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2(3):558-566.
  • Tükel T, Anlarsal AE, Tansı V, Sağlamtimur T, Gülcan T., 1991. The possibilities of growing forage crops as winter intermediate crops in Çukurova. 2. Forage Crops Congress of Turkey Pastureland Bornova/İzmir. (28-31 Mayıs 1991), 302-310.
  • Yavuz, T., Karadağ, Y., 2016. Performances of Some Forage Grasses, Legumes and Their Mixtures Under Dry Pasture Conditions, Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 33(2), 63-71.
  • Yolcu H, Daşçı M, Tan M., 2009. Determination of yield and some characteristics of feed pea + grain mixtures planted in different proportions. Turkey VIII. Field Crops Congress (19-22 October), Volume I, Poster Presentations, Hatay. 846-849.
  • Yurtman N., 1969. Plot trial method guide for meadow, pasture and forage crops. Ankara Meadow-Pasture and Forage Crops Animal Science Research. Ens. Arrow. No:4, 33s.
  • Yücel N., 2019. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield and yield components in some annual legume forage crops. Harran University, Know Science. Inst., Field Crops Major. Department., Master's thesis, Şanlıurfa.

The Effect of Harvest Time and Urea on Morphological Characteristics of Different Grain-Legume Forage Crops

Year 2020, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 46 - 56, 31.12.2020

Abstract

This study was carried out by applying different amounts of urea (0, 10 DAP 15 Urea, 10, 20 kg/da) to 5 feed mixture (Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.), Field pea (Pisum arvense L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), Triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack), Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)) and harvesting in three different periods. It was made to determine the effect of some plant characteristics and forage yield the plants. It was carried out in 4 fields in the towns and villages of Erzincan Province during the 2019-2020 season. In the study, delaying the harvest time caused a decrease in plant characteristics and an increase in hay yield, although the effect of different applications on these properties is important, the difference in herbage yield (3712 kg/da) compared to other applications was significant (P <0.05) in the field where 10 DAP 15 Urea kg/da was applied.

References

  • Anonymous, 2020.http://www.ipni.net/publication/nss.nsf/0/5FE74632D6D80872852579AF00706626/$FILE/NSS-01%20Urea.pdf.
  • Ateş E, Tekeli AS., 2017. The effect of different base fertilizer applications on forage yield and quality of forage pea (Pisum arvense l.). KSÜ Nature Know. Journal, 20 (Special Issue): 13-16.
  • Bağcı M., 2010. Effects of row spacing and seed amount on grass yield in Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica crantz. Cv. Tarmbeyazı-98) in Central Anatolia conditions. Çukurova University, Institute of Science, Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Adana.Çiftçi V, Ülker M., 2005. Effect of mixed cropping lentil with wheat and barley at different seeding ratios. – Journal of Agronomy.;4(1):1-4.
  • Barsila SR., 2018. The fodder oat (Avena sativa) mixed legume forages farming: nutritional and ecological benefits. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 1(1):206-222.
  • Capstaff NM, Miller AJ., 2018. Improving the yield and nutritional quality of forage crops. Front. Plant Sci. 9:535. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00535. Çalışkan M, Koç A., 2019. Morphological characterization of local oat genotypes belonging to the western Mediterranean region. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 28 (1): 7−18.
  • Çeri S., 2019. Investigation of grass yield, yield components and some quality characteristics of some oat varieties and lines in Konya watery conditions. Selcuk Unv. Science Inst., Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Konya.
  • Doğan Bİ., 2013. Determination of yield components and forage values of forage pea (Pisum Arvense L.) - wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) mixtures. Namık Kemal University, Institute of Science, Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Tekirdağ.
  • Ghosh PK., 2004. Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. – Field Crops Research 88:227-237.
  • Gürsoy E, Macit M., 2020. The effect of harvest time on the chemical composition and quality of coarse feed. Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Engineering, Natural & Medical Sciences International Indexed & Refereed, www.euroasiajournal.org, 8(9):168-177.
  • İşler N, Kılınç M., 2016. Field agriculture. Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Agriculture, Textbook, Hatay, (184).
  • Kandış T., 2019. Determination of grass yield and quality of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica) and Italian turf (Lolium italicum) planted at different planting rates. Ordu Unv. Know Science. Inst., Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Ordu.
  • Kara R, Dumlupınar Z, Akkaya A, Dokuyucu T., 2008. Evaluation of some durum wheat genotypes in terms of phenological periods, some plant characteristics and grain yield in Kahramanmaraş conditions. KSU Journal of Science, 11(1):104-111.
  • Kara S., 2013. Effect of post-flowering ethephon applications on grain yield, yield components and grain protein in triticale. Ankara University, Institute of Science, Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Ankara.
  • Kara E., 2016. Determination of yield and quality characteristics of some annual legume and poaceae forage crops to be grown as winter intermediate crops in Aydın conditions. Adnan Menderes Unv., Know Science. Inst., Forage Crops Department, Master Thesis, Aydın.
  • Kaya, M., 2012. Msthesıs Specifying The Organic Matter Efficiency Features of Some Cereal-Pulse Mixtures to The Soil, The Graduate School of Natural and Applıed Scıence of Selçuk Unıversıty The Degree of Master of Scıence / Doctor of Phılosophy, Master Thesıs, Konya.
  • Lithourgidis AS. Vasilakoglou IB, Dhima KV, Dordas CA, Yiakoulaki MD., 2006. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Res. 99:106-113.
  • Orak A, Ateş E, Varol F., 2004. Nutrient content relationships with some morphological and agricultural characteristics of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) In different development periods. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(4): 410-415.
  • Ömeroğlu E. 2016. Determination of grass and seed yields and some yield components of some forage pea (Pisum Arvense L.) varieties in Isparta conditions. Süleyman Demirel Unv. Institute of Science, Field Crops Department, Master's Thesis, Isparta.
  • Özköse A., 2017. The effects of different sowing depths on yield and some yield characteristics of feed peas. Sakarya University Journal of Science and Technology, 21(6):1188-1200.
  • Öztürk M., 2009. Effects of zinc fertilization on yield and quality in some winter fodder crops. Adnan Menderes Unv. Institute of Science, Field Crops Department, Master's Thesis, Aydın.
  • Özyiğit Y, Bilgen M., 2006. The effect of different shape periods on some quality factors in some legume forage crops. Akdeniz University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 19:29-34.
  • Ramos ME, Altieri MA, Garcia PA, Robles AB., 2011. Oat and oat-vetch as rainfed fodder cover crops in semiarid environments: Effects of fertilization and harvest time on forage yield and quality. – Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 35:726-744.
  • Ross SM, King JR, O'Donovan JT, Spaner D., 2004. Forage potential on intercropping berseem clover with barley, oat, or triticale. Agronomy J., 96(4):1013-1021. Sabancı CO., 1996. A research on the evaluation of vetches (Vicia sativa L.) collected from different regions in terms of some characters. Turkey 3 and Meadow Forage Crops Congress, Erzurum. June 17-19.
  • Sevim T., 2013. Determination of the effective characters on yield and yield in different grain-feed pea (Pisum arvense L.) mixtures. Namık Kemal Unv., Know Science. Inst., Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Tekirdağ.
  • Şimşek S., 2015. Determination of the effects of different Hungarian vetch (Vicia Pannonica Crantz) + Italian grass (Lolium Multiflorum Lam.) Mixing ratios on yield and quality in Kırşehir conditions. Ah Evran Unv. Know Science. Inst., Field Crops Department, Master Thesis, Kırşehir.
  • Tekeli AS. Ateş E., 2006. Legume forage crops. Trakya University Tekirdağ Faculty of Agriculture. Publication No. 293, Textbook, Tekirdağ. No.42, 153. Tükel TK, Hatipoğlu R., 1987. A study on the feed production potential of some annual legume + cereal mixtures in Çukurova basement lands at different times. Doğa Tübitak Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2(3):558-566.
  • Tükel T, Anlarsal AE, Tansı V, Sağlamtimur T, Gülcan T., 1991. The possibilities of growing forage crops as winter intermediate crops in Çukurova. 2. Forage Crops Congress of Turkey Pastureland Bornova/İzmir. (28-31 Mayıs 1991), 302-310.
  • Yavuz, T., Karadağ, Y., 2016. Performances of Some Forage Grasses, Legumes and Their Mixtures Under Dry Pasture Conditions, Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 33(2), 63-71.
  • Yolcu H, Daşçı M, Tan M., 2009. Determination of yield and some characteristics of feed pea + grain mixtures planted in different proportions. Turkey VIII. Field Crops Congress (19-22 October), Volume I, Poster Presentations, Hatay. 846-849.
  • Yurtman N., 1969. Plot trial method guide for meadow, pasture and forage crops. Ankara Meadow-Pasture and Forage Crops Animal Science Research. Ens. Arrow. No:4, 33s.
  • Yücel N., 2019. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield and yield components in some annual legume forage crops. Harran University, Know Science. Inst., Field Crops Major. Department., Master's thesis, Şanlıurfa.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Botany
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Esra Gürsoy 0000-0002-4697-7365

Publication Date December 31, 2020
Submission Date November 2, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 1 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Gürsoy, E. (2020). The Effect of Harvest Time and Urea on Morphological Characteristics of Different Grain-Legume Forage Crops. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 1(2), 46-56.
AMA Gürsoy E. The Effect of Harvest Time and Urea on Morphological Characteristics of Different Grain-Legume Forage Crops. Turk.J.R.For.Sci. December 2020;1(2):46-56.
Chicago Gürsoy, Esra. “The Effect of Harvest Time and Urea on Morphological Characteristics of Different Grain-Legume Forage Crops”. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science 1, no. 2 (December 2020): 46-56.
EndNote Gürsoy E (December 1, 2020) The Effect of Harvest Time and Urea on Morphological Characteristics of Different Grain-Legume Forage Crops. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science 1 2 46–56.
IEEE E. Gürsoy, “The Effect of Harvest Time and Urea on Morphological Characteristics of Different Grain-Legume Forage Crops”, Turk.J.R.For.Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 46–56, 2020.
ISNAD Gürsoy, Esra. “The Effect of Harvest Time and Urea on Morphological Characteristics of Different Grain-Legume Forage Crops”. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science 1/2 (December 2020), 46-56.
JAMA Gürsoy E. The Effect of Harvest Time and Urea on Morphological Characteristics of Different Grain-Legume Forage Crops. Turk.J.R.For.Sci. 2020;1:46–56.
MLA Gürsoy, Esra. “The Effect of Harvest Time and Urea on Morphological Characteristics of Different Grain-Legume Forage Crops”. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, vol. 1, no. 2, 2020, pp. 46-56.
Vancouver Gürsoy E. The Effect of Harvest Time and Urea on Morphological Characteristics of Different Grain-Legume Forage Crops. Turk.J.R.For.Sci. 2020;1(2):46-5.

     TR_Dizin_logo.png?version=1&modificationDate=1614345672000&api=v2  asos-index.png          logo.png     logo2.pngCrossref-Logo.jpeg


Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.