Effects of Different Forage Pea and Rye Mixtures on Forage Yield and Quality

Year 2022, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 11 - 17, 26.06.2022

Hakan Kır

https://doi.org/10.51801/turkjrfs.1073958

Cited By: 3

Abstract

This study was carried out in the 2018-19 vegetation period to determine the appropriate mixture ratios of forage pea (Pisum sativum L.) and rye (Secale cereale L.) under rainfed conditions of Kırşehir province, Turkey. The layout of the experiment was randomized blocks with three replications and the treatments were pure rye, pure forage pea and four different mixtures of forage pea and mixtures (20% FP + 80% R, 40% FP + 60% P, 60% FP + 40% R, 80% FP + 20% R). The highest green forage yield (2395.1 kg da-1), dry matter yield (833.3 kg da-1) and crude protein yield (71.0 kg da-1) were obtained from pure rye sowings. The highest crude protein ratio (15.6%), the lowest ADF (31.1%) and NDF (39.3%) ratios were obtained from pure forage pea sowings. The increase in the rye ratio of the mixtures increased the yield, while the increase in the forage pea ratio caused an increase in the forage quality. The results revealed that a mixture of pure rye and 20% FP + 80% R can be recommended to obtain high dry matter yield, and 40% FP + 60% R mixture for yield and quality for under continental climate conditions as in Kirsehir province of Turkey.

Keywords

Mixture ratio, Pisum sativum ssp.arvense L, quality, Secale cereale L., yield

References

• Referans1 Acar, Z., E. Gulumser, O. O. Asci, U. Basaran, H. Mut, and I. Ayan, 2017, Effects of sowing ratio and harvest periods on hay yields, quality and competitive characteristics of Hungarian vetch – cereal mixtures. Legume Research 40:(4), 677-683.
• Referans2 Acar, Z., O. Önal A, I. Ayan, H. Mut, and U. Basaran, 2006, İntercropping systems for forage crops. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Ondokuz Mayıs University. 21:(3), 379-386.
• Referans3 Acıkgoz, E., and S. Cakmakci, 1986, Hay yield and its quality of common vetch + cereal mixtures in Bursa conditions Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University. 5 65-73.
• Referans4 Alaturk, F., C. Cinar, and A. Gokkus, 2021, Effects of different row spacings on yield and quality of some field pea cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences. 8:(1), 53-57.
• Referans5 Anonymous, Analytical Methods Fiber Analyzer A200. cited 18.02.2020, available from www.ankom.com/analytical-methods-support/fiber-analyzer-a200(Accessed November 10, 2021)
• Referans6 AOAC, 2005, Official methods of analysis of AOAC International AOAC International.
• Referans6 Ates, E., and S. A. Tekeli, 2017, The effect of different based fertilizer applications on herbage yield and quality of fodder pea (Pisum arvense L.). KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature. 20 13-16.
• Referans7 Aydın, A., 2009, Determination of agricultural characteristics of some released triticale (XTriticosecale Wittmack) cultivars under rainfed conditions in diyarbakır. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 19:(2), 61-70. Referans8 Baumann, D. T., L. Bastiaans, J. Goudriaan, H. H. van Laar, and M. J. Kropff, 2002, Analysing crop yield and plant quality in an intercropping system using an eco-physiological model for interplant competition. Agricultural Systems. 73:(2), 173-203.
• Referans9 Ceri, S., and R. Acar, 2019, Use of cool climate cereals as green and dry forage in animal feeding. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research. 8:(1), 178-194.
• Referans10 Cherney, J., J. Volenec, and W. Nyquist, 1985, Sequential Fiber Analysis of Forage as Influenced by Sample Weight 1. Crop Science. 25:(6), 1113-1115.
• Referans11 Dordas, C. A., D. N. Vlachostergios, and A. S. Lithourgidis, 2012, Growth dynamics and agronomic-economic benefits of pea-oat and pea-barley intercrops. Crop & Pasture Science. 63:(1), 45-52.
• Referans12 Francis, C., A., and M. Smith, E., 1985, Variety development for multiple cropping systems. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 3:(2), 133-168. Referans13 Gocmen, N., and A. Parlak, O, 2017, Determination of seeding raties of pea intercrops with oat, barley and triticale. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty. 5:(1), 119-124.
• Referans14 Guney, M., 2020, Comparison of nutrient contents and yield properties of wheat+rye mix forages harvested in different periods. International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Science. 6:(2), 365-370.
• Referans15 Gündüz, T. E. 2010. Research on determination of proper seed mixture ratio of Hungarian vetch and barley to be grown under conditions of Karaman. MSc. Thesis, University of Çukurova Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Field Crops, Adana.
• Referans16 Hatipoglu, R., A. Cil, and I. Gul, 1999, Research on the determination of hay yield and hay quality of vetch+ triticale mixtures to be grown under conditions of Diyarbakir. GAP I. Agriculture Congress 26-28.
• Referans17 Kabak, D., and M. Akcura, 2017, Evaluation of the interrelationship among grain yield traits of rye landraces population collected from Bingol province using biplot analysis. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences. 4:(2), 227-235.
• Referans18 Karatas, I., M. Aydin, S. Kodaz, and M. Tosun, 2020, Adaptation of some rye genotypes (Secale cereale L.) to Erzurum dry agricultural conditions. Journal of Erciyes Agriculture and Animal Science. 3:(2), 18-25.
• Referans19 Konuk, A., and A. Tamkoc, 2018, Effect on some agricultural features of winter and summer planting in forage peas. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research. 7:(1), 39-50.
• Referans20 Kose, O., D., E,, Z. Mut, and Y. Kardes, M,, 2019. The Effect of Different Sowing Frequencies on Yield and Quality in Rye (in Turkish). Hasat, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oezge-Erbas-Koese/publication/338698346_Farkli_Ekim_Sikliklarinin_Cavdarda_Ot_Verimi_Ve_Kalitesine_Etkisi/links/5e25bc45a6fdcc38d24cc61d/Farkli-Ekim-Sikliklarinin-Cavdarda-Ot-Verimi-Ve-Kalitesine-Etkisi.pdf (Accessed February 05, 2022).
• Referans21 Linn, J., and N. Martin, 1989, Forage quality tests and interpretation Minnesota Extension Service, University of Minnesota. Referans22 Lithourgidis, A. S., I. B. Vasilakoglou, K. V. Dhima, C. A. Dordas, and M. D. Yiakoulaki, 2006, Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research. 99:(2-3), 106-113.
• Referans23 Lithourgidis, A. S., D. N. Vlachostergios, C. A. Dordas, and C. A. Damalas, 2011, Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy. 34:(4), 287-294.
• Referans24 Mut, Z., I. Ayan, and H. Mut, 2006, Evaluation of forage yield and quality at two phenological stages of triticale genotypes and other cereals grown under rainfed conditions. Bangladesh Journal of Botany. 35:(1), 45-53.
• Referans25 Newell, M. A., and T. J. Butler, 2013, Forage rye improvement in the Southern United States: a review. Crop Science. 53:(1), 38-47.
• Referans26 Onal, A., O, and O. Egritas, 2017, Determination of forage yield, some quality properties and competition in common vetch-cereal mixtures. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 23:(2), 242-252.
• Referans27 Ozer, E., U. Karadavut, and S. Taner, 2005. Studies on yield and other chracters of some triticale varieties and lines grown in Konya pIain rainfed conditions. The Sixth Field Crop Congress of Turkey, 5-9 September 2005, Vol:2,1127-1131, Antalya.
• Referans28 Pozdisek, J., B. Henriksen, A. Ponizil, and A. Løes, 2011, Utilizing legume-cereal intercropping for increasing self-sufficiency on organic farms in feed for monogastric animals. Agronomy Research 9:(1-2), 343-356.
• Referans29 Seydosoglu, S., and G. Bengisu, 2019, Effects of different mixture ratios and harvest periods on grass quality of triticale (Xtriticosecale Wittmack) - forage pea (Pisum Sativum L.) intercrop. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 17:(6), 13263-13271.
• Referans30 Sleugh, B., K. J. Moore, J. R. George, and E. C. Brummer, 2000, Binary legume-grass mixtures improve forage yield, quality, and seasonal distribution. Agronomy Journal. 92:(1), 24-29.
• Referans31 Tan, M., and Ö. Mentese, 2003, Effects of anatomic structure and chemical composition on forage quality. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. 34:(1), 97-103.
• Referans32 Tas, N., 2011, The effect of optimum mixture type and rate, and cutting time on hay yield and yield components for vetch+wheat mixtures sown in spring and autumn under rainfed conditions. Anadolu Journal of The Aegean Agricultural Research Institute. 21:(1), 1-15.
• Referans33 Uzun, A., H. Gün, and E. Açıkgöz, 2012, Yield and quality characteristics of some pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties harvested at different growing stages. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University. 26:(1), 27-38.
• Referans34 Yavuz, T., 2017, The effects of different cutting stages on forage yield and quality in pea (Pisum sativum L.) and Oat (Avena sativa L.) mixtures. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute. 26:(1), 67-67.
• Referans35 Yolcu, H., M. Polat, and V. Aksakal, 2009, Morphologic, yield and quality parameters of some annual forages as sole crops and intercropping mixtures in dry conditions for livestock. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment. 7:(3-4), 594-599.
• Referans36 Yurtsever, N., 2011, Experimental statistical methods. Soil, Fertilizer and Water Research Institute, Ankara, Turkish: Technical Pub. 56 121.