BİLATERAL MEME REKONSTRÜKSİYONU

Year 2008, Volume: 16 Issue: 3, 134 - 139, 01.12.2008

Burçak TÜMERDEM Uluğ İsmail Kuran

Abstract

Sürekli takip gerektiren premalign lezyonların varlığında, aile anamnezinde ve genetik testlerle meme kanseri riski yüksek bulunanlarda, erken dönem meme kanseri saptananlarda deri koruyucu mastektomi gündeme gelmekte olup bilateral meme rekonstrüksiyonu endikasyonu gittikçe artmaktadır. Bu çalışmamızda 17 hasta değerlendirmeye alındı. Bilateral meme rekonstrüksiyonlarının kendine özgü zorluklarının aşılabilmesi için ameliyat öncesi planlamanın önemi, protez ile rekonstrüksiyonda pektoralis kas diseksiyonunun detayları ve protez seçiminde Cohesive III protezlerinin değeri sorgulandı. İki hastada tek tarafa transvers rektus abdominis kas-deri flebi ve diğer tarafa meme protezi, iki hastada tek tarafa latissimus dorsi (LD) kas-deri flebiyle birlikte protez ve diğer tarafa sadece protez, bir hastada iki tarafa LD kas-deri flebiyle birlikte protez uygulandı. Geri kalan tüm hastalarda iki taraflı meme protezi ile rekonstrüksiyon gerçekleştirildi. 17 hastanın %85'inde sonuçlar iyi olarak değerlendirildi. % 20 oranında minör revizyonlar gerekti. Bilateral meme rekonstrüksiyonu teknik zorluklar ve her iki memede simetri sağlanmasındaki güçlükler gibi dezavantajlarının yanısıra rekonstrükte meme ile simetri gerektirecek pitotik meme yokluğu gibi avantajları içerir. Yumuşak doku zarfının yeterli olduğu durumlarda hasta otojen doku ile rekonstrüksiyonu kabul etmiyorsa, daha kısa operasyon ve daha hızlı iyileşme süresi sağlayan protez ile rekonstrüksiyon ideal bir seçenektir.

Keywords

Bilateral mastektomi, meme rekonstrüksiyonu, protez

BILATERAL BREAST RECONSTRUCTION

Abstract

The increasing incidence of bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer and premalignant breast disease, with a significant improvement in methods available for mastectomy reconstruction has led to an increase in the indication for bilateral breast reconstruction. Seventeen patients who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction are evaluated in this study. The importance of preoperative planning to overcome the difficulties of bilateral breast reconstruction, the operation details of reconstruction with implant and the advantages of cohesive III implant are discussed. Two patients underwent reconstruction of one breast with transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap and the other breast with implant. Two patients underwent reconstruction of one breast with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and implant, the other breast only with implant. One patient had bilateral latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with implant reconstruction. Implants were used for bilateral breast reconstruction in the remaining. The results were evaluated in 85% as “good” and minor revisions were needed in 20%. Simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction presents unique challenges and technically, it is much more difficult than a unilateral reconstruction. However, one of its advantages is that there is not any ptotic contralateral breast which frequently causes difficulty to obtain symmetry with. If the patient does not accept breast reconstruction with autogenous tissue and had sufficient soft tissue coverage, bilateral breast reconstruction with implant is an ideal option with its shorter operation and healing time. Keywords: Bilateral mastectomy, breast

Keywords

Bilateral mastectomy, breast reconstruction, implant

References

• 1. Solomon JS, Brunicardi CF, Friedman JD. Evaluation and treatment of BRCA-positive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:714-719.
• 2. Spear SL, Pennanen M, Barter J, Burke JB. Prophylactic mastectomy, oophorectomy, hysterectomy, and immediate transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction in a BRCA- 2-positive patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:548-553.
• 3. Baldwin BJ, Schusterman MA, Miller MJ, Kroll SS, Wang BG. Bilateral breast reconstruction: conventional versus free TRAM. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93(7):1410-1416.
• 4. Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Weldon ME. Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap? Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90(2):255-261.
• 5. Hamdi M, Weiler-Mithoff EM, Webster MH. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103(1):86-95.
• 6. Kroll SS, Sharma S, Koutz C et al. Postoperative morphine requirements of free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107(2):338-341.
• 7. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110(2):466-475.
• 8. Ayhan S, Demirtaş Y, Sarı A, Yazıcı İ, Özmen S. Derin inferior epigastrik arter perforatör flebi ile meme rekonstrüksiyonu. Türk Plastik Cerrahi Dergisi 2004;12(3):158-169.
• 9. Petit JY, Rietjens M, Ferreira MA, Montrucoli D, Lifrange E, Martinelli P. Abdominal sequelae after pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99(3):723-729.
• 10. Blondeel PN, Arnstein M, Verstraete K et al. Venous congestion and blood flow in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106(6):1295-1299.
• 11. Kroll SS. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106(3):576-583.
• 12. Petit JY, Greco M; EUSOMA. Quality control in prophylactic mastectomy for women at high risk of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2002;38(1):23-26.
• 13. Allen RJ. The superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Clin Plast Surg 1998;25(2):293-302.
• 14. Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van Landuyt K, Tondu T, Monstrey S. Bilateral autogenous breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps: a single center’s experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114(1):83-89.
• 15. Nahabedian MY, Dooley W, Singh N, Manson PN. Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109(1):91-101.
• 16. Smith BK, Cohen BE, Biggs TM, Suber J. Simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps: a retrospective review of an institutional experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108(5):1174-1181.
• 17. Chang DW, Youssef A, Cha S, Reece GP. Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110(3):751-759.
• 18. Clough KB, Louis-Sylvestre C, Fitoussi A, Couturaud B, Nos C. Donor site sequelae after autologous breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109(6):1904-1911
• 19. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon’s 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(4):825-831.
• 20. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon’s 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(4): 832- 839.
• 21. Rosato RM, Dowden RV. Radiation therapy as a cause of capsular contracture. Ann Plast Surg 1994;32(4):342-345.
• 22. Schuster RH, Kuske RR, Young VL, Fineberg B. Breast reconstruction in women treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer: cosmesis, complications, and tumor control. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90(3):445-452.
• 23. Serel S, Şen Z, Kaya B, Emiroğlu M, Zeki C. İmplantlar ve doku genişleticiler ile meme rekonstrüksiyon. Ankara Üni. Tıp Fak. Mecmuası 2004;57(3):167-173.
• 24. Ramon Y, Ullmann Y, Moscona R et al. Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion: a follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99(3): 686- 691.
• 25. Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, Nos C, Falcou MC. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107(7):1702-1709.
• 26. Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90(3): 455- 462.
• 27. Mitchell B, Robert S, Samuel S. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116(3):768-779