EN
TR
Russian operational art for attrition in Ukraine
Abstract
Originally intended as a swift regime-change operation by the Russian leadership, the Russo-Ukrainian War has evolved into a prolonged war of attrition. In that sense, this paper reassesses the transformation of the Russian way of warfare during the war through a focus on the battles of Severodonetsk-Lysychansk, Kharkiv, Kherson, Bakhmut, Avdiivka, and the Ukrainian Summer Offensive. Accordingly, the theoretical underpinnings of Russian strategy, particularly the enduring influence of Soviet-era legacy, are highlighted in the first part. In the second part, this research offers insights into the Russian military praxis during the war by drawing on various sources, including Telegram channels. It is shown that the Russian army has focused on the combined employment of a new reconnaissance-fire system (ROS), reconnaissance-strike system (RUS), infantry assaults, and umbrella of integrated air defence and electronic warfare systems for force protection and attrition during costly offensives like Bakhmut and Avdiivka. Consequently, this paper asserts that the Russian war machine effectively responded to the necessities of attrition warfare by updating its operational art, drawing on the Soviet legacy.
Keywords
References
- Adamsky, Dima. The Culture of Military Innovation: The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Revolution in Military
- Affairs in Russia, the US, and Israel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010.
- Africk, Brady. “Russian Field Fortifications in Ukraine.” Brady Africk’s Newsletter. March 3, 2024. https://read.bradyafrick.com/p/russian-field-fortifications-in-ukraine.
- Armstrong, Richard N. Soviet Operational Deception: The Red Cloak. Fort Leavenworth, KS: United States Army Command and General Staff College, Combat Studies Institute, 1989.
- Beehner, Lionel, Liam Collins, Steve Ferenzi, Robert Person, Aaron Brantly. Analysing the Russian Way of War: Evidence from the 2008 Conflict with Georgia. Modern War Institute, March 2018.
- Bērziņš, Jānis. “The Theory and Practice of New Generation Warfare: The Case of Ukraine and Syria.” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 33, no. 3 (December, 2020): 355-380.
- Blythe Jr, Wilson C. “A History of Operational Art.” Military Review 98, no. 6 (December 2018): 37-49.
- Boesche, Roger. “Moderate Machiavelli? Contrasting The Prince with the Arthashastra of Kautilya,” Critical Horizons 3, no. 2 (February, 2002): 253–76.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
War Studies
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Early Pub Date
April 30, 2024
Publication Date
April 30, 2024
Submission Date
April 11, 2024
Acceptance Date
April 23, 2024
Published in Issue
Year 2024 Volume: 5 Number: 1
APA
Çakıroğlu, A. C. (2024). Russian operational art for attrition in Ukraine. Türk Savaş Çalışmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 90-128. https://doi.org/10.52792/tws.1467513
AMA
1.Çakıroğlu AC. Russian operational art for attrition in Ukraine. TJWS. 2024;5(1):90-128. doi:10.52792/tws.1467513
Chicago
Çakıroğlu, Ali Cenk. 2024. “Russian Operational Art for Attrition in Ukraine”. Türk Savaş Çalışmaları Dergisi 5 (1): 90-128. https://doi.org/10.52792/tws.1467513.
EndNote
Çakıroğlu AC (April 1, 2024) Russian operational art for attrition in Ukraine. Türk Savaş Çalışmaları Dergisi 5 1 90–128.
IEEE
[1]A. C. Çakıroğlu, “Russian operational art for attrition in Ukraine”, TJWS, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90–128, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.52792/tws.1467513.
ISNAD
Çakıroğlu, Ali Cenk. “Russian Operational Art for Attrition in Ukraine”. Türk Savaş Çalışmaları Dergisi 5/1 (April 1, 2024): 90-128. https://doi.org/10.52792/tws.1467513.
JAMA
1.Çakıroğlu AC. Russian operational art for attrition in Ukraine. TJWS. 2024;5:90–128.
MLA
Çakıroğlu, Ali Cenk. “Russian Operational Art for Attrition in Ukraine”. Türk Savaş Çalışmaları Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 1, Apr. 2024, pp. 90-128, doi:10.52792/tws.1467513.
Vancouver
1.Ali Cenk Çakıroğlu. Russian operational art for attrition in Ukraine. TJWS. 2024 Apr. 1;5(1):90-128. doi:10.52792/tws.1467513
