Abstract
Developing a history of socialization to warfare, Ehrenreich reminds us of the possible roots that made humans turn from prey to predators. using the prehistorical sociopolitical developments initially from bands, tribes to chiefdoms and states, Ehrenreich tries to link the causes of war to these social mutations linked to symbolism and “blood rites” portraying it as a males’ activity. Although it seems that the approach is appealing as a constructivist or a social teleology with a feminist affinity, it fails however to grasp the causes of hegemonic wars. this paper addresses this dimension while defending the idea that the (neo)realist approach is still of relevance when approaching causation of modern warfare.
Keywords
References
- Bernstein, Alvin H. SAIS Review (1989-2003) 18, no. 1 (1998): 189–92. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45345772
- Chomsky, Noam. Hegemony or survival : America's quest for global dominance, New York: Metropolitan Books, 2003.
- Ehrenreich, Barbara. Blood Rites: Origins and History of the Passions of War. New York: Henry Holt & Co, 1997.
- Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
- Hirshleifer, Jack ‘’The Bioeconomic Causes of War’’. Managerial and Decision Economics 19:7 (1998): 457.
- Kohout, Franz. “Cyclical, Hegemonic, and Pluralistic Theories of International Relations: Some Comparative Reflections.” In Order and Justice in International Relations, edited by Rosemary Foot, John Lewis Gaddis, and Andrew Hurrell, Oxford University Press, 2003, 53–76.
- Lebow, Richard Ned, A Cultural Theory of International Relations, New Hampshire: Dartmouth College, 2008.
- Waite, Robert G. L. The Psychopathic God: Adolf Hitler, Cambridge: Da Capo Press, 1993.
Abstract
Sosyalleşmeden savaşa uzanan bir tarih geliştiren Ehrenreich, bize insanların avdan yırtıcı hayvanlara dönüşmesine neden olan olası kökleri hatırlatıyor. Başlangıçta çetelerden kabilelere, şefliklerden devletlere kadar uzanan tarih öncesi sosyo-politik gelişmeleri kullanan Ehrenreich, savaşın nedenlerini sembolizmle bağlantılı bu toplumsal mutasyonlara ve savaşı bir erkek faaliyeti olarak tasvir eden “kan ayinlerine” bağlamaya çalışıyor. Yaklaşım, yapılandırmacı veya feminist eğilime sahip toplumsal bir teleoloji olarak çekici görünse de, hegemonik savaşların nedenlerini kavramakta başarısız oluyor. Bu makale, modern savaşın nedenselliğine yaklaşırken (neo)realist yaklaşımın hala geçerli olduğu fikrini savunurken bu boyutu ele almaktadır.
Keywords
References
- Bernstein, Alvin H. SAIS Review (1989-2003) 18, no. 1 (1998): 189–92. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45345772
- Chomsky, Noam. Hegemony or survival : America's quest for global dominance, New York: Metropolitan Books, 2003.
- Ehrenreich, Barbara. Blood Rites: Origins and History of the Passions of War. New York: Henry Holt & Co, 1997.
- Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
- Hirshleifer, Jack ‘’The Bioeconomic Causes of War’’. Managerial and Decision Economics 19:7 (1998): 457.
- Kohout, Franz. “Cyclical, Hegemonic, and Pluralistic Theories of International Relations: Some Comparative Reflections.” In Order and Justice in International Relations, edited by Rosemary Foot, John Lewis Gaddis, and Andrew Hurrell, Oxford University Press, 2003, 53–76.
- Lebow, Richard Ned, A Cultural Theory of International Relations, New Hampshire: Dartmouth College, 2008.
- Waite, Robert G. L. The Psychopathic God: Adolf Hitler, Cambridge: Da Capo Press, 1993.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Military Sociology , War Studies |
| Journal Section | Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | November 1, 2024 |
| Submission Date | September 8, 2024 |
| Acceptance Date | October 29, 2024 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2024 |
Dizinler:
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.