Mali Yerelleşmenin İnsani Gelişme Endeksi ve Bileşenleri Üzerindeki Etkisi: Panel Veri Çalışması

Year 2021, , 357 - 373, 20.10.2021

Muhammed Tümay

https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.954645

Abstract

Son yıllarda dünya çapındaki çoğu ülke, özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkeler ve geçiş ülkeleri, yönetim yapılarında ademi merkeziyetçiliği (yerelleşme) uygulamışlardır. Yerelleşmenin temel amacı, yerel yönetimin yerel ihtiyaçları ve tercihleri topluluklarına daha doğru bir şekilde sunabileceği fikridir. Bununla birlikte, bazı araştırmacılar ademi merkeziyetçiliğin sınırlamaları olduğunu iddia etmekte ve optimal bir mali yerelleşmenin boyutuna işaret etmektedir. Bu makale, mali yerelleşmenin insani gelişme endeksi ve bileşenleri üzerindeki etkisini 2000-2010 dönemi arasında 49 ülkeden panel verileri kullanarak incelemektedir. Sağlam En Küçük Kareler ve Sabit Etki yöntemlerini kullanan sonuçlar, mali yerelleşmenin gelir ölçüsünün insani gelişme endeksi üzerinde önemli ve olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca sonuçlar, mali yerelleşme derecesi bir eşiği aştığında bu etkinin doğrusal olmadığını ve olumsuz etkilerin olduğunu göstermektedir.

Keywords

Mali Yerelleşme, İnsani Gelişme, Panel Veri Modelleri

The Effect of Fiscal Decentralization on The Human Development Index and Its Components: A Panel Data Study

Abstract

Most countries worldwide in recent decades, particularly developing and transition countries, have implemented decentralization in their governance structures. The main purpose of decentralization is the idea that local government can deliver local needs and preferences to their communities more accurately. However, some researchers argue that decentralization has its limitations and point out an optimal fiscal decentralization size. This paper investigates the effect of fiscal decentralization on the human development index and its components by using panel data between the period 2000 to 2010 from 49 countries. Using robust OLS and Fixed Effect methods, results suggest that the revenue measure of fiscal decentralization has a significant and positive effect on the human development index. Furthermore, results show that this effect is non-linear may diminish once the degree of fiscal decentralization crosses a threshold.

Keywords

Fiscal Decentralization, Human Development, Panel Data Models

References

• Bahl, R. W., & Linn, J. F. (1992). Urban public finance in developing countries. The World Bank.
• Davoodi, H., & Zou, H. F. (1998). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study. Journal of Urban economics, 43(2), 244-257.
• Cantarero, D., & Pascual, M. (2008). Analysing the impact of fiscal decentralization on health outcomes: empirical evidence from Spain. Applied Economics Letters, 15(2), 109-111.
• Enikolopov, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of public economics, 91(11-12), 2261-2290.
• Javed, Z. H., & Qaderi, S. (2013). Does Fiscal Decentralization Nexus with Life Expectancy? Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 115-122.
• Jumadi, M. P., Ghozali, M., & Khusaini, M. (2013). The impact of fiscal decentralization on local economic development in East Java. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 13(1), 01-07.
• Kohler, U., & Kreuter, F. (2005). Data analysis using Stata. Stata press.
• Limi, A. (2005). Decentralization and economic growth revisited: an empirical note. Journal of Urban economics, 57(3), 449-461.
• Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World development, 31(9), 1597-1616.
• Oates, W. E. (1993). Fiscal decentralization and economic development. National tax journal, 46(2), 237-243.
• Oates, W. E. (1995). Comment on ‘conflicts and dilemmas of decentralization’by Rudolf Hommes. In Annual World Bank conference on development economics (pp. 351-353). Washington, DC: World Bank.
• Ranis, G., Stewart, F., & Ramirez, A. (2000). Economic growth and human development. World development, 28(2), 197-219.
• Sepulveda, C. F., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2011). The consequences of fiscal decentralization on poverty and income equality. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(2), 321-343.
• Thiessen, U. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in high‐income OECD Countries. Fiscal studies, 24(3), 237-274.
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of political economy, 64(5), 416-424.
• Yilmaz, S. (1999, January). The impact of fiscal decentralization on macroeconomic performance. In Proceedings. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association (Vol. 92, pp. 251-260). National Tax Association.
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Econometrics: Panel Data Methods.