The call for globalising International Relations (IR) is about students of IR coming to terms with
a globalising world and embracing a plurality of approaches reflective of multiple experiences and
interpretations of ‘the international’ around the world.
Acharya, Amitav (2014). “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 58,
No. 4, p. 647-659.
Acharya, Amitav, Pinar Bilgin and L.H.M. Ling (2016). “Global IR Special Issue”, International Studies Review, Vol. 18, No.
1, p. 4-146.
Agathangelou, Anna M. and L.H.M. Ling (2004). “The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism”,
International Studies Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 21-49.
Amin, Samir (1989). Eurocentrism. Translated by Russell Moore and James Membrez. 2009 ed., New York, Monthly Review
Press.
Barkawi, Tarak and Mark Laffey (2002). “Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations”, Millennium-Journal
of International Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1, p. 109-127.
Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2007). Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. New York, Palgrave.
Bilgin, Pinar (2016). “Do IR Scholars Engage with the Same World?”, Ken Booth and Toni Erskine (eds.), International
Relations Theory Today. Oxford, Polity, p. 97-109.
Bilgin, Pinar (2012). “Globalization and in/Security: Middle Eastern Encounters with International Society and the Case
of Turkey”, Stephan Stetter (ed.), The Middle East and Globalization: Encounters and Horizons. New York, Palgrave
Macmillian, p. 59-75.
Bilgin, Pinar (2016). The International in Security, Security in the International. London, Routledge.
Bilgin, Pinar (2021). “On the ‘Does Theory Travel?’Question: Traveling with Edward Said”, Zeynep Gülşah Çapan et al.
(eds.), The Politics of Translation in International Relations. London, Palgrave, p. 245-255.
Bilgin, Pinar (2020). “Opening up International Relations, Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love ‘Non-Western
IR’”, Steven Roach (ed.), Handbook of Critical International Relations. , London, Edward Elgar, p. 12-28.
Çapan, Zeynep Gülşah (2017). “Decolonising International Relations?”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 1, p. 1-15.
Çapan, Zeynep Gülşah (2016). Re-Writing International Relations: History and Theory Beyond Eurocentrism in Turkey.
London, Rowman & Littlefield.
Çapan, Zeynep Gülşah, and Ayşe Zarakol (2017). “Postcolonial Colonialism? The Case of Turkey”, Charlotte Epstein (ed.),
Against International Relations Norms. New York, Routledge, p. 193-210.
Chan, Stephen (1994). “Beyond North-West: Africa and the East”, A. J. R. Groom and Margot Light (eds.), Contemporary
International Relations: A Guide to Theory. London, Pinter, p. 237-54.
Chan, Stephen (2017). Plural International Relations in a Divided World. Cambridge, Polity.
Chan, Stephen, Peter G Mandaville and Ronald Bleiker (eds.) (2001). The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory from East
to West. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Crawford, Robert A. and Darryl S. Jarvis (eds.) (2001). International Relations - Still an American Social Science?: Toward
Diversity in International Thought. Albany, State University of New York Press.
Dhareshwar, Vivek (1990). “The Predicament of Theory”, Martin Kreiswirth and Mark Cheetham (eds.), Theory between the
Disciplines: Authority/Vision/Politics. Ann Arbor, Michigan University Press.
Fierke, Karin Marie and Vivenne Jabri (2019). “Global Conversations: Relationality, Embodiment and Power in the Move
Towards a Global IR”, Global Constitutionalism, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 506-535.
Gopal, Priyamvada (2019). Insurgent Empire: Anticolonial Resistance and British Dissent. London, Verso.
Grovogui, Siba N. (2006). Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International Order and Institutions. New York,
Palgrave Macmillan.
Grovogui, Siba N. (2002). “Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition”, European Journal of
International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 315-38.
Hagmann, Jonas and Thomas J. Biersteker (2014). “Beyond the Published Discipline: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of
International Studies”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 291-315.
Hobson, John M. (2009). “Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern Origins of Sovereignty”, International Politics, Vol. 46,
No. 6, p. 671-690.
Hobson, John M. (2004). The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Hoffmann, Stanley (1977). “An American Social Science: International Relations”, Daedalus, Vol. 106, No. 3, p. 41-60.
Holsti, Kalevi J. (1985). The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston, Allen & Unwin.
Jabri, Vivienne and Stephen Chan (1966). “The Ontologist Always Rings Twice: Two More Stones About Structure and
Agency in Reply to Hollis and Smith”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 22, No 1, p. 107-110.
Jones, Branwen Gruffydd (2006). “Introduction: International Relations, Eurocentrism, and Imperialism”, Branwen
Gruffydd Jones (ed.), Decolonizing International Relations. London, Rowman & Littlefield, p. 1-22.
Landry, Donna and Gerald M. MacLean (1996). The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. New York
and London, Routledge.
Levine, Daniel J. and David M. McCourt (2018). “Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from
Contemporary International Relations”, Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 92-109.
Muppidi, Himadeep (2004). The Politics of the Global, Borderlines. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Narayan, Uma (2000). “Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist Critique of Cultural Essentialism”, Uma
Narayan and Sandra Harding (eds.), Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial, and Feminist
World. , Bloomington, Indiana University Press, p. 80-100.
Quijano, Anibal (2000). “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America”, Neplanta, Vol. 1, No. 3, p. 533-580.
Rosenberg, Emily S. (2004). “Considering Borders”, Michael J. Hogan and Thomas G. Paterson (eds.), Explaining the History
of American Foreign Relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 176-193.
Sabaratnam, Meera (2011). “IR in Dialogue… but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for
the Study of World Politics”, Millennium, Vol. 39, No. 3, p. 781-803.
Shilliam, Robbie (2021). Decolonizing Politics: An Introduction. Cambridge, Polity.
Shohat, Ella and Robert Stam (2014). Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media. London, Routledge.
“Special Issue: Locating the ‘I’ in ‘IR’: Dislocating Euro-American Theories” (2003). Global Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, p. 107-221.
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (1997). “Connected Histories: Notes toward a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia”, Modern
Asian Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, p. 735-762.
Suzuki, Shogo, Yongjin Zhang and Joel Quirk (eds.) (2014). International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise
of the West. London, Routledge.
Tickner, Arlene B. and David Blaney (eds.) (2012). Thinking International Relations Differently. London, Routledge.
Vaughan-Williams, Nick (2005). “International Relations and the Problem of History”, Millennium, Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 115-136.
Waever, Ole (1998). “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in
International Relations”, International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, p. 687-727.
Wemheuer-Vogelaar et al. (2016). “The IR of the Beholder: Examining Global IR Using the 2014 TRIP Survey”, International
Studies Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, p. 16-32.
Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations
Year 2021,
Volume: 18 Issue: 70, 1 - 11, 13.08.2021
The call for globalising International Relations (IR) is about students of IR coming to terms with
a globalising world and embracing a plurality of approaches reflective of multiple experiences and
interpretations of ‘the international’ around the world.
Acharya, Amitav (2014). “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 58,
No. 4, p. 647-659.
Acharya, Amitav, Pinar Bilgin and L.H.M. Ling (2016). “Global IR Special Issue”, International Studies Review, Vol. 18, No.
1, p. 4-146.
Agathangelou, Anna M. and L.H.M. Ling (2004). “The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism”,
International Studies Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 21-49.
Amin, Samir (1989). Eurocentrism. Translated by Russell Moore and James Membrez. 2009 ed., New York, Monthly Review
Press.
Barkawi, Tarak and Mark Laffey (2002). “Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations”, Millennium-Journal
of International Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1, p. 109-127.
Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2007). Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. New York, Palgrave.
Bilgin, Pinar (2016). “Do IR Scholars Engage with the Same World?”, Ken Booth and Toni Erskine (eds.), International
Relations Theory Today. Oxford, Polity, p. 97-109.
Bilgin, Pinar (2012). “Globalization and in/Security: Middle Eastern Encounters with International Society and the Case
of Turkey”, Stephan Stetter (ed.), The Middle East and Globalization: Encounters and Horizons. New York, Palgrave
Macmillian, p. 59-75.
Bilgin, Pinar (2016). The International in Security, Security in the International. London, Routledge.
Bilgin, Pinar (2021). “On the ‘Does Theory Travel?’Question: Traveling with Edward Said”, Zeynep Gülşah Çapan et al.
(eds.), The Politics of Translation in International Relations. London, Palgrave, p. 245-255.
Bilgin, Pinar (2020). “Opening up International Relations, Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love ‘Non-Western
IR’”, Steven Roach (ed.), Handbook of Critical International Relations. , London, Edward Elgar, p. 12-28.
Çapan, Zeynep Gülşah (2017). “Decolonising International Relations?”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 1, p. 1-15.
Çapan, Zeynep Gülşah (2016). Re-Writing International Relations: History and Theory Beyond Eurocentrism in Turkey.
London, Rowman & Littlefield.
Çapan, Zeynep Gülşah, and Ayşe Zarakol (2017). “Postcolonial Colonialism? The Case of Turkey”, Charlotte Epstein (ed.),
Against International Relations Norms. New York, Routledge, p. 193-210.
Chan, Stephen (1994). “Beyond North-West: Africa and the East”, A. J. R. Groom and Margot Light (eds.), Contemporary
International Relations: A Guide to Theory. London, Pinter, p. 237-54.
Chan, Stephen (2017). Plural International Relations in a Divided World. Cambridge, Polity.
Chan, Stephen, Peter G Mandaville and Ronald Bleiker (eds.) (2001). The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory from East
to West. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Crawford, Robert A. and Darryl S. Jarvis (eds.) (2001). International Relations - Still an American Social Science?: Toward
Diversity in International Thought. Albany, State University of New York Press.
Dhareshwar, Vivek (1990). “The Predicament of Theory”, Martin Kreiswirth and Mark Cheetham (eds.), Theory between the
Disciplines: Authority/Vision/Politics. Ann Arbor, Michigan University Press.
Fierke, Karin Marie and Vivenne Jabri (2019). “Global Conversations: Relationality, Embodiment and Power in the Move
Towards a Global IR”, Global Constitutionalism, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 506-535.
Gopal, Priyamvada (2019). Insurgent Empire: Anticolonial Resistance and British Dissent. London, Verso.
Grovogui, Siba N. (2006). Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International Order and Institutions. New York,
Palgrave Macmillan.
Grovogui, Siba N. (2002). “Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition”, European Journal of
International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 315-38.
Hagmann, Jonas and Thomas J. Biersteker (2014). “Beyond the Published Discipline: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of
International Studies”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 291-315.
Hobson, John M. (2009). “Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern Origins of Sovereignty”, International Politics, Vol. 46,
No. 6, p. 671-690.
Hobson, John M. (2004). The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Hoffmann, Stanley (1977). “An American Social Science: International Relations”, Daedalus, Vol. 106, No. 3, p. 41-60.
Holsti, Kalevi J. (1985). The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston, Allen & Unwin.
Jabri, Vivienne and Stephen Chan (1966). “The Ontologist Always Rings Twice: Two More Stones About Structure and
Agency in Reply to Hollis and Smith”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 22, No 1, p. 107-110.
Jones, Branwen Gruffydd (2006). “Introduction: International Relations, Eurocentrism, and Imperialism”, Branwen
Gruffydd Jones (ed.), Decolonizing International Relations. London, Rowman & Littlefield, p. 1-22.
Landry, Donna and Gerald M. MacLean (1996). The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. New York
and London, Routledge.
Levine, Daniel J. and David M. McCourt (2018). “Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from
Contemporary International Relations”, Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 92-109.
Muppidi, Himadeep (2004). The Politics of the Global, Borderlines. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Narayan, Uma (2000). “Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist Critique of Cultural Essentialism”, Uma
Narayan and Sandra Harding (eds.), Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial, and Feminist
World. , Bloomington, Indiana University Press, p. 80-100.
Quijano, Anibal (2000). “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America”, Neplanta, Vol. 1, No. 3, p. 533-580.
Rosenberg, Emily S. (2004). “Considering Borders”, Michael J. Hogan and Thomas G. Paterson (eds.), Explaining the History
of American Foreign Relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 176-193.
Sabaratnam, Meera (2011). “IR in Dialogue… but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for
the Study of World Politics”, Millennium, Vol. 39, No. 3, p. 781-803.
Shilliam, Robbie (2021). Decolonizing Politics: An Introduction. Cambridge, Polity.
Shohat, Ella and Robert Stam (2014). Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media. London, Routledge.
“Special Issue: Locating the ‘I’ in ‘IR’: Dislocating Euro-American Theories” (2003). Global Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, p. 107-221.
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (1997). “Connected Histories: Notes toward a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia”, Modern
Asian Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, p. 735-762.
Suzuki, Shogo, Yongjin Zhang and Joel Quirk (eds.) (2014). International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise
of the West. London, Routledge.
Tickner, Arlene B. and David Blaney (eds.) (2012). Thinking International Relations Differently. London, Routledge.
Vaughan-Williams, Nick (2005). “International Relations and the Problem of History”, Millennium, Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 115-136.
Waever, Ole (1998). “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in
International Relations”, International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, p. 687-727.
Wemheuer-Vogelaar et al. (2016). “The IR of the Beholder: Examining Global IR Using the 2014 TRIP Survey”, International
Studies Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, p. 16-32.
Bilgin, P., & Çapan, Z. G. (2021). Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 18(70), 1-11.
AMA
Bilgin P, Çapan ZG. Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations. uidergisi. August 2021;18(70):1-11.
Chicago
Bilgin, Pınar, and Zeynep Gülşah Çapan. “Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18, no. 70 (August 2021): 1-11.
EndNote
Bilgin P, Çapan ZG (August 1, 2021) Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18 70 1–11.
IEEE
P. Bilgin and Z. G. Çapan, “Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations”, uidergisi, vol. 18, no. 70, pp. 1–11, 2021.
ISNAD
Bilgin, Pınar - Çapan, Zeynep Gülşah. “Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18/70 (August 2021), 1-11.
JAMA
Bilgin P, Çapan ZG. Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations. uidergisi. 2021;18:1–11.
MLA
Bilgin, Pınar and Zeynep Gülşah Çapan. “Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 70, 2021, pp. 1-11.
Vancouver
Bilgin P, Çapan ZG. Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations. uidergisi. 2021;18(70):1-11.