Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace vs Provision

Year 2025, , 1 - 22
https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1825369

Abstract

The aim of this study is to elucidate decision-making processes of Ukrainian forced migrants of diverse ethnic and religious backgrounds relocated in Turkey in the wake of the Russian-Ukrainian War since 2022. We examine trends in prospective plans, including return, settlement, migration to third countries, and identify key factors influencing social integration in Turkey. To this end, extensive field research was conducted in five provinces in Turkey – İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Eskişehir and Antalya – between 2022 and 2024. This study employed qualitative method consisting of in-depth interviews with a wide range of stakeholders, including Ukrainian diplomatic representatives, migrant organizations, Turkish provincial migration management officials, and post-2022 Ukrainian migrants who were residing in Turkey under various statuses. The findings indicated that decisions between permanence and transience were determined by the state’s migrant and asylum policies along the embrace and provision continuum. In addition, active involvement of ethnic organizations of Ukrainians in migration processes appear to act as a factor that either triggers or hinders social cohesion.

References

  • Adamson, F. 2016. The Growing Importance of Diaspora Politics. Current History 115, 784: 291-297.
  • Akçapar, S.K. 2010. Re-thinking Migrants’ Networks and Social Capital: A Case Study of Iranians in Turkey. International Migration 48, 2: 161-196.
  • Akçapar, S. K. 2023. 2022’de Uluslararası Göç ve Türkiye’ye Yansımaları. In Türkiye İnsani Çalışmaları Yıllığı. https://yillik.kizilayakademi.org.tr/2022de-uluslararasi-goc-ve-turkiyeye-yansimalari/.
  • Akgündoğdu, S., and C. Trissel. 2023. Turkey’s Growing Ukrainian and Russian Communities. Washington Institute for Near East Policy, June 28. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy- analysis/turkeys-growing-ukrainian-and-russian-communities.
  • Anatolian Agency. 2022a. Ukrayna’dan Tahliye Edilen İlk Kırım Tatar Türkleri Türkiye’ye Getirildi. March 1.
  • Anatolian Agency. 2022b. Türkiye’ye Getirilen Savaş Mağduru Ahıska Türkleri Türkiye’ye Minnettar. March 13.
  • Anatolian Agency. 2022c. Ukrayna’dan Tahliye Edilen Ahıska Türkleri Elazığ’a Geldi. May 10.
  • Anatolian Agency. 2022d. Türkiye, Kırım Tatar Türklerine Süresiz İkamet İzni Vermeye Başladı. August 11.
  • Aydın, F. T. 2021a. Émigré, Exile, Diaspora, and Transnational Movements of the Crimean Tatars. New York, Palgrave.
  • Aydın, F. T. 2021b. Crimean Tatar Diaspora: Who They Are and What They Mean for Ukraine. Ukrainian Policymaker 8, 8: 11-25.
  • Aydın, F. T., and F. K. Şahin. 2019. The Politics of Recognition of Crimean Tatar Collective Rights in the Post-Soviet Period: With Special Attention to the Russian Annexation of Crimea. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 52, 1: 39-50.
  • Aydıngün, A. 2002. Creating, Recreating and Redefining Ethnic Identity: Ahiska/Meskhetian Turks in Soviet and Post-Soviet Contexts. Central Asian Survey 21, 2: 185-197.
  • Aydıngün, A. 2022. Ahiska (Meskhetian) Turks: Source of Conflict in the Caucasus? The International Journal of Human Rights 6, 2: 49-64.
  • Aydıngün, İ., and A. Aydıngün. 2014. Ahıska Türkleri: Ulusötesi Bir Topluluk-Ulusötesi Aileler. Ankara, Hoca Ahmet Yesevi Uluslararası Türk-Kazak Üniversitesi İnceleme-Araştırma Dizisi.
  • Biletska, Y., and S. Gherghina. 2025. Politics, Identity and Civic Engagement: Comparing the Protest Participation of Ukrainian Migrants in the Home and Host Countries. Nationalities Papers 1–16.
  • Çelik, Ç. 2021. Why We Have Forgotten About Refugee Adaptation and Why Studying it in the Global South is Critical. Society 58, 3: 169-176.
  • Deniz, A., and E. M. Özgür. 2022. The Establishment of the Ukrainian Diaspora in Turkey through Migrant Associations: ‘We Feel as Part of the Diaspora From Now On.’ Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 22, 2: 243-261.
  • Duncan, H., 2020. Immigration policy as foreign policy. Uluslararası İlişkiler 17, 68: 5-20.
  • Erel, U. and L. Ryan. 2019. Migrant Capitals: Proposing A Multi-level Spatio-Temporal Analytical Framework. Sociology 53, 2: 246-263.
  • Faist, T., M. Fauser, and E. Reisenauer. 2013. Transnational Migration. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  • FitzGerald, D.S., and R. Arar (2018). The Sociology of Refugee Migration. Annual Review of Sociology 44: 387-406.
  • Gamlen, A., M.E. Cummings, P.M. Vaaler. 2019. Explaining the Rise of Diaspora Institutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45, 4: 492-516.
  • Ganiyeva, S. 2012. Ahıska Türklerinin Türkiye’ye Göç Etmesi ve Türk Vatandaşlığına alınması ile ilgili hukuki sorunlar. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 20, 1: 175-199.
  • Grzymala-Kazlowska, A., and J. Phillimore. 2018. Introduction: Rethinking Integration. New Perspectives on Adaptation and Settlement in the Era of Super-Diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44, 2: 179-196.
  • Gürsoy Erdenay, H. E. 2025. Pre- and Post-2022 Migration Dynamics of Ukrainian Nationals in Turkey. The World of the Orient 2: 121-134.
  • Hiemstra, N. 2010. Immigrant "Illegality" as Neoliberal Governmentality in Leadville, Colorado. Antipode 42,1: 74-102.
  • Hürriyet. 2022. Ukrayna’dan Tahliye Edilen Kırım Tatar Türkleri Eskişehir’e Getirildi. 18 March.
  • Kaya, A., and A-K. Nagel. 2021. Reception Policies, Practices and Responses. In RESPONDing to Migration: A Holistic Perspective on Migration Governance, ed. S. Barthoma and Ö. A. Çetrez. Uppsala, Uppsala University Publications: 227-256.
  • Kaytaz, E. S. 2016. Afghan Journeys to Turkey: Narratives of Immobility, Travel and Transformation. Geopolitics 21, 2: 284-302.
  • Kuschminder, K., and J. Waidler. 2020. At Europe’s Frontline: Factors Determining Migrants Decision-making for Onwards Nigration from Greece and Turkey. Migration and Development 9, 2: 188-208.
  • Küçük, M. N. 2021. Göç-Güvenlik Bağlantısını Yeniden Düşünmek: Eleştirel Güvenlik Yaklaşımları, Özgürleşme ve Türkiye’deki Suriyeli Mülteciler. Uluslararası İlişkiler 18, 69: 3-28.
  • Kymlicka, W. 2013. Neoliberal Multiculturalism?. In Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era, ed. P. Hall and M. Lamont. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 99-125.
  • Money, J. 2010. Comparative Immigration Policy. In The International Studies Encyclopedia 7, ed. R. A. Denemark and R. Marlin-Bennett. London, Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Penninx, R., and B. Garcés-Masceranas. 2016. The Concept of Integration as An Analytical Tool and as A Policy Concept. In Integration Processes and Policies in Europe: Contexts, Levels and Actors, ed. R. Penninx and B. Garcés-Masceranas. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, and London, Springer Cham: 11-31.
  • Phillimore, J. 2021. Refugee-Integration-Opportunity Structures: Shifting the Focus from Refugees to Context. Journal of Refugee Studies 34, 2: 1946–1966.
  • Ray, K. 2000. Repatriation and De-territorialization: Meskhetian Turks’ Conception of Home. Journal of Refugee Studies 13, 4: 391-414.
  • Qırım Haber Ajansı (QHA). 2022. Kırım Tatar Türklerine Uzun Dönem İkamet Başvuruları Başladı. August 11.
  • Saatçioğlu, O. C. 2021. Türk Soylu Yabancıların Çalışma Haklarına İlişkin Ayrıcalıklı Sisteme Yeniden Bakış: Amaç ve Konu Yönünden Değişim Sorunu. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 70, 4: 1083-1130.
  • T24. 2022. Resmi Gazete’de Yayımlandı: Bin Ahıska Türk Aile İskanlı Göçmen Olarak Türkiye’ye Kabul Edilecek. June 4.
  • Teke Lloyd, A. and I. Sirkeci. 2022. A Long-Term View of Refugee Flows from Ukraine: War, Insecurities, and Migration. Migration Letters 19, 4: 523-535.
  • TUIK. 2022. Türkiye in Statistics. https://www.tuik.gov.tr/media/announcements/istatistiklerle_turkiye.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 2024a. Factsheets and Dashboards - Türkiye Bilgi Notu. https://www.unhcr.org/tr/en/factsheets-and-dashboards.
  • UNHCR. 2024b. Global Trends Report 2023. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2023
  • Warner, W. L., and L. Srole. 1945. The Social Systems of American Ethnic Groups. New Haven,Yale University Press.
  • Wihtol de Wenden, C. 2023. Migration and International Relations. Cham, Springer.
  • Williams, B. G. 2021. The Crimean Tatars: The Diaspora Experience and the Forging of a Nation. Leiden, Brill.

Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace vs Provision

Year 2025, , 1 - 22
https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1825369

Abstract

The aim of this study is to elucidate decision-making processes of Ukrainian forced migrants of diverse ethnic and religious backgrounds relocated in Turkey in the wake of the Russian-Ukrainian War since 2022. We examine trends in prospective plans, including return, settlement, migration to third countries, and identify key factors influencing social integration in Turkey. To this end, extensive field research was conducted in five provinces in Turkey – İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Eskişehir and Antalya – between 2022 and 2024. This study employed qualitative method consisting of in-depth interviews with a wide range of stakeholders, including Ukrainian diplomatic representatives, migrant organizations, Turkish provincial migration management officials, and post-2022 Ukrainian migrants who were residing in Turkey under various statuses. The findings indicated that decisions between permanence and transience were determined by the state’s migrant and asylum policies along the embrace and provision continuum. In addition, active involvement of ethnic organizations of Ukrainians in migration processes appear to act as a factor that either triggers or hinders social cohesion.

References

  • Adamson, F. 2016. The Growing Importance of Diaspora Politics. Current History 115, 784: 291-297.
  • Akçapar, S.K. 2010. Re-thinking Migrants’ Networks and Social Capital: A Case Study of Iranians in Turkey. International Migration 48, 2: 161-196.
  • Akçapar, S. K. 2023. 2022’de Uluslararası Göç ve Türkiye’ye Yansımaları. In Türkiye İnsani Çalışmaları Yıllığı. https://yillik.kizilayakademi.org.tr/2022de-uluslararasi-goc-ve-turkiyeye-yansimalari/.
  • Akgündoğdu, S., and C. Trissel. 2023. Turkey’s Growing Ukrainian and Russian Communities. Washington Institute for Near East Policy, June 28. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy- analysis/turkeys-growing-ukrainian-and-russian-communities.
  • Anatolian Agency. 2022a. Ukrayna’dan Tahliye Edilen İlk Kırım Tatar Türkleri Türkiye’ye Getirildi. March 1.
  • Anatolian Agency. 2022b. Türkiye’ye Getirilen Savaş Mağduru Ahıska Türkleri Türkiye’ye Minnettar. March 13.
  • Anatolian Agency. 2022c. Ukrayna’dan Tahliye Edilen Ahıska Türkleri Elazığ’a Geldi. May 10.
  • Anatolian Agency. 2022d. Türkiye, Kırım Tatar Türklerine Süresiz İkamet İzni Vermeye Başladı. August 11.
  • Aydın, F. T. 2021a. Émigré, Exile, Diaspora, and Transnational Movements of the Crimean Tatars. New York, Palgrave.
  • Aydın, F. T. 2021b. Crimean Tatar Diaspora: Who They Are and What They Mean for Ukraine. Ukrainian Policymaker 8, 8: 11-25.
  • Aydın, F. T., and F. K. Şahin. 2019. The Politics of Recognition of Crimean Tatar Collective Rights in the Post-Soviet Period: With Special Attention to the Russian Annexation of Crimea. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 52, 1: 39-50.
  • Aydıngün, A. 2002. Creating, Recreating and Redefining Ethnic Identity: Ahiska/Meskhetian Turks in Soviet and Post-Soviet Contexts. Central Asian Survey 21, 2: 185-197.
  • Aydıngün, A. 2022. Ahiska (Meskhetian) Turks: Source of Conflict in the Caucasus? The International Journal of Human Rights 6, 2: 49-64.
  • Aydıngün, İ., and A. Aydıngün. 2014. Ahıska Türkleri: Ulusötesi Bir Topluluk-Ulusötesi Aileler. Ankara, Hoca Ahmet Yesevi Uluslararası Türk-Kazak Üniversitesi İnceleme-Araştırma Dizisi.
  • Biletska, Y., and S. Gherghina. 2025. Politics, Identity and Civic Engagement: Comparing the Protest Participation of Ukrainian Migrants in the Home and Host Countries. Nationalities Papers 1–16.
  • Çelik, Ç. 2021. Why We Have Forgotten About Refugee Adaptation and Why Studying it in the Global South is Critical. Society 58, 3: 169-176.
  • Deniz, A., and E. M. Özgür. 2022. The Establishment of the Ukrainian Diaspora in Turkey through Migrant Associations: ‘We Feel as Part of the Diaspora From Now On.’ Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 22, 2: 243-261.
  • Duncan, H., 2020. Immigration policy as foreign policy. Uluslararası İlişkiler 17, 68: 5-20.
  • Erel, U. and L. Ryan. 2019. Migrant Capitals: Proposing A Multi-level Spatio-Temporal Analytical Framework. Sociology 53, 2: 246-263.
  • Faist, T., M. Fauser, and E. Reisenauer. 2013. Transnational Migration. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  • FitzGerald, D.S., and R. Arar (2018). The Sociology of Refugee Migration. Annual Review of Sociology 44: 387-406.
  • Gamlen, A., M.E. Cummings, P.M. Vaaler. 2019. Explaining the Rise of Diaspora Institutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45, 4: 492-516.
  • Ganiyeva, S. 2012. Ahıska Türklerinin Türkiye’ye Göç Etmesi ve Türk Vatandaşlığına alınması ile ilgili hukuki sorunlar. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 20, 1: 175-199.
  • Grzymala-Kazlowska, A., and J. Phillimore. 2018. Introduction: Rethinking Integration. New Perspectives on Adaptation and Settlement in the Era of Super-Diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44, 2: 179-196.
  • Gürsoy Erdenay, H. E. 2025. Pre- and Post-2022 Migration Dynamics of Ukrainian Nationals in Turkey. The World of the Orient 2: 121-134.
  • Hiemstra, N. 2010. Immigrant "Illegality" as Neoliberal Governmentality in Leadville, Colorado. Antipode 42,1: 74-102.
  • Hürriyet. 2022. Ukrayna’dan Tahliye Edilen Kırım Tatar Türkleri Eskişehir’e Getirildi. 18 March.
  • Kaya, A., and A-K. Nagel. 2021. Reception Policies, Practices and Responses. In RESPONDing to Migration: A Holistic Perspective on Migration Governance, ed. S. Barthoma and Ö. A. Çetrez. Uppsala, Uppsala University Publications: 227-256.
  • Kaytaz, E. S. 2016. Afghan Journeys to Turkey: Narratives of Immobility, Travel and Transformation. Geopolitics 21, 2: 284-302.
  • Kuschminder, K., and J. Waidler. 2020. At Europe’s Frontline: Factors Determining Migrants Decision-making for Onwards Nigration from Greece and Turkey. Migration and Development 9, 2: 188-208.
  • Küçük, M. N. 2021. Göç-Güvenlik Bağlantısını Yeniden Düşünmek: Eleştirel Güvenlik Yaklaşımları, Özgürleşme ve Türkiye’deki Suriyeli Mülteciler. Uluslararası İlişkiler 18, 69: 3-28.
  • Kymlicka, W. 2013. Neoliberal Multiculturalism?. In Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era, ed. P. Hall and M. Lamont. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 99-125.
  • Money, J. 2010. Comparative Immigration Policy. In The International Studies Encyclopedia 7, ed. R. A. Denemark and R. Marlin-Bennett. London, Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Penninx, R., and B. Garcés-Masceranas. 2016. The Concept of Integration as An Analytical Tool and as A Policy Concept. In Integration Processes and Policies in Europe: Contexts, Levels and Actors, ed. R. Penninx and B. Garcés-Masceranas. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, and London, Springer Cham: 11-31.
  • Phillimore, J. 2021. Refugee-Integration-Opportunity Structures: Shifting the Focus from Refugees to Context. Journal of Refugee Studies 34, 2: 1946–1966.
  • Ray, K. 2000. Repatriation and De-territorialization: Meskhetian Turks’ Conception of Home. Journal of Refugee Studies 13, 4: 391-414.
  • Qırım Haber Ajansı (QHA). 2022. Kırım Tatar Türklerine Uzun Dönem İkamet Başvuruları Başladı. August 11.
  • Saatçioğlu, O. C. 2021. Türk Soylu Yabancıların Çalışma Haklarına İlişkin Ayrıcalıklı Sisteme Yeniden Bakış: Amaç ve Konu Yönünden Değişim Sorunu. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 70, 4: 1083-1130.
  • T24. 2022. Resmi Gazete’de Yayımlandı: Bin Ahıska Türk Aile İskanlı Göçmen Olarak Türkiye’ye Kabul Edilecek. June 4.
  • Teke Lloyd, A. and I. Sirkeci. 2022. A Long-Term View of Refugee Flows from Ukraine: War, Insecurities, and Migration. Migration Letters 19, 4: 523-535.
  • TUIK. 2022. Türkiye in Statistics. https://www.tuik.gov.tr/media/announcements/istatistiklerle_turkiye.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 2024a. Factsheets and Dashboards - Türkiye Bilgi Notu. https://www.unhcr.org/tr/en/factsheets-and-dashboards.
  • UNHCR. 2024b. Global Trends Report 2023. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2023
  • Warner, W. L., and L. Srole. 1945. The Social Systems of American Ethnic Groups. New Haven,Yale University Press.
  • Wihtol de Wenden, C. 2023. Migration and International Relations. Cham, Springer.
  • Williams, B. G. 2021. The Crimean Tatars: The Diaspora Experience and the Forging of a Nation. Leiden, Brill.
There are 46 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects International Migration
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Şebnem Akçapar 0000-0003-2168-8871

Tutku Aydın 0000-0002-0673-756X

Early Pub Date November 27, 2025
Publication Date December 11, 2025
Submission Date July 12, 2024
Acceptance Date November 17, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025

Cite

APA Akçapar, Ş., & Aydın, T. (2025). Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace vs Provision. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi1-22. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1825369
AMA Akçapar Ş, Aydın T. Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace vs Provision. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi. Published online November 1, 2025:1-22. doi:10.33458/uidergisi.1825369
Chicago Akçapar, Şebnem, and Tutku Aydın. “Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace Vs Provision”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, November (November 2025), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1825369.
EndNote Akçapar Ş, Aydın T (November 1, 2025) Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace vs Provision. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 1–22.
IEEE Ş. Akçapar and T. Aydın, “Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace vs Provision”, Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, pp. 1–22, November2025, doi: 10.33458/uidergisi.1825369.
ISNAD Akçapar, Şebnem - Aydın, Tutku. “Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace Vs Provision”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi. November2025. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1825369.
JAMA Akçapar Ş, Aydın T. Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace vs Provision. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi. 2025;:1–22.
MLA Akçapar, Şebnem and Tutku Aydın. “Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace Vs Provision”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 2025, pp. 1-22, doi:10.33458/uidergisi.1825369.
Vancouver Akçapar Ş, Aydın T. Impact of Migration Policies on Ukrainian Migrants in Turkey: Embrace vs Provision. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi. 2025:1-22.