Deconstruction of Engagements with Public Opinion in Foreign Policy Analysis: A Critical Essay from the Perspective of Vernacular Approach

Year 2025, Volume: 22 Issue: 87, 67 - 83, 18.09.2025

Metehan Tatli Nilay Tavli

https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1649440

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This research pursues the footprints of methodological limitations in the Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) literature, concerning how the literature engages with public opinion. It primarily hypothesizes that the FPA approaches the public through “someone else’s scripts” and “methodological elitism”, consequently poorly capturing “how ordinary individuals narrate” foreign policy issues and ignoring their genuine “voice and agency”. Accordingly, employing Vernacular Security Studies (VSS) empowered with Derrida’s deconstruction, this paper evaluates its hypothesis by examining empirical papers on public opinion in FPA. Ultimately, it propounds that certain FPA papers exhibit methodological deficiency, resulting from their approach to the public, conceptualization, and data collection process. By doing so, this paper expects to trigger a growing interest in developing more diverse, inclusive, and grassroots-oriented approaches in this domain. Such an approach might draw attention to diverse publics’ different voices and experiences and point out a new research agenda called “Vernacular Foreign Policy”.

Keywords

Vernacular Security , Derrida , Foreign Policy , Public Opinion , Methodology

References

• Aldrich, John H., John L. Sullivan, and Eugene Borgida. 1989. Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates “Waltz Before a Blind Audience? American Political Science Review 83, 1: 123–141.
• Allison, Graham T. 1969.Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. American Political Science Review 63, 3: 689–718.
• Allison, Graham T., and Philip Zelikow. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 327 Boston, Little, Brown: 1971
• Allison, Graham T., and Morton H. Halperin. 1972. Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications. World Politics 24, 1: 40–79.
• Almond, Gabriel A. 1950. The American People and Foreign Policy. Oxford, England: Harcourt, Brace.
• Aradau, Claudia, and Jef Huysmans. 2019. Assembling Credibility: Knowledge, Method and Critique in Times of “Post-Truth”. Security Dialogue 50, 1: 40–58.
• Baker, Bruce., and Manu Lekunze. 2019. The Character and Value of Vernacular Security: The Case of South West Cameroon. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 37, 2–3: 208–224.
• Balkin, Jack. 2004. Yapısöküm. Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 13, 1: 321-332.
• Banai, Ayelet., Fabio Votta, and Rosa Seitz. 2022. The Polls—Trends: Trends in Public Opinion toward Immigration among EU Member States. Public Opinion Quarterly 86, 1: 191–215.
• Bar-Tal, Danie.l, Dan Jacobson, and Tali Freund. 1995. Security Feelings among Jewish Settlers in The Occupied Territories: A Study of Communal and Personal Antecedents. Journal of Conflict Resolution 39, 2: 353–377.
• Benson, Brett V., and Emerson M. S. Niou. 2005. Public Opinion, Foreign Policy, and the Security Balance in the Taiwan Strait. Security Studies 14, 2: 274–289.
• Bloch-Elkon, Yaeli. 2007. The Polls—Trends: Preventing Terrorism After The 9/11 Attacks. Public Opinion Quarterly 71, 1: 142–163.
• Bloch-Elkon, Yaeli. 2011. The Polls—Trends: Public Perceptions and the Threat of International Terrorism after 9/11. Public Opinion Quarterly 75, 2: 366–392.
• Bogain, Ariane. 2020. Understanding Public Constructions of Counter-Terrorism: An Analysis of Online Comments during the State of Emergency in France (2015-2017). Critical Studies on Terrorism 13, 4: 591–615.
• Brechin, Steven R. 2003. Comparative Public Opinion and Knowledge on Global Climatic Change and the Kyoto Protocol: The US versus the World? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23, 10: 106–134.
• Browning, Christopher S., and Matt McDonald. 2013. The Future of Critical Security Studies: Ethics and the Politics of Security. European Journal of International Relations 19, 2: 235–255.
• Bubandt, Nils. 2005. Vernacular Security: The Politics of Feeling Safe in Global, National and Local Worlds. Security Dialogue 36, 3: 275–96.
• Canan-Sokullu, Ebru Ş. 2012. Türk Kamuoyunda NATO Algısı. Uluslararası İlişkiler 9, 34: 151–182.
• Çırakoğlu, Okan Cem., Kürşad Demirutku, and Oğuzcan Karakaya. 2021. The Mediating Role of Perceived Threat in the Relationship between Casual Contact and Attitudes towards Syrian Refugees in Turkey. Journal of Refugee Studies 34, 3: 2984–2999.
• Cohen-Louck, Keren. 2019. Perception of the Threat of Terrorism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 34, 5: 887–911.
• Cooper, Anthony., Chris Perkins, and Chris Rumford. 2014. The Vernacularization of Borders. Placing the Border in Everyday Life 1:15–32.
• Craft, Stephanie., and Wayne Wanta. 2004. U.S. Public Concerns in the Aftermath Of 9–11: A Test of Second Level Agenda-Setting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 16, 4: 456–463.
• Croft, Stuart., and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2016. Fit for Purpose? Fitting Ontological Security Studies “into” the Discipline of International Relations: Towards a Vernacular Turn. Cooperation and Conflict 52, 1: 12–30.
• Da Silva, Raquel., and Rhys Crilley. 2017. Talk about Terror in Our Back Gardens: An Analysis of Online Comments about British Foreign Fighters in Syria. Critical Studies on Terrorism 10, 1: 162–186.
• Davis, Darren W., and Brian D. Silver. 2004. Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science 48, 1: 28–46.
• De Graaf, Beatrice., George Dimitriu, and Jens Ringsmose. 2015. Strategic Narratives, Public Opinion and War: Winning Domestic Support for the Afghan War. New York, Routledge.
• Downing, Joseph. 2020. Memeing and Speaking Vernacular Security on Social Media: YouTube and Twitter Resistance to an ISIS Islamist Terror Threat to Marseille, France. Journal of Global Security Studies 6, 2: ogz081.
• Downing, Joseph., Sarah Gerwens, and Richard Dron. 2022. Tweeting Terrorism: Vernacular Conceptions of Muslims and Terror in the Wake of the Manchester Bombing on Twitter. Critical Studies on Terrorism 15, 2: 239–266.
• Dropp, Kyle., Joshua D. Kertzer, and Thomas Zeitzoff. 2014. The Less Americans Know about Ukraine’s Location, the More They Want U.S. to Intervene. Washington Post, 8 May 2014.
• Egan, Patrick J., David M Konisky, and Megan Mullin. 2022. Ascendant Public Opinion: The Rising Influence of Climate Change on Americans’Attitudes about the Environment. Public Opinion Quarterly 86, 1: 134–148.
• Eichenberg, Richard C. 2005. Victory Has Many Friends: US Public Opinion and the Use of Military Force, 1981–2005. International Security 30, 1: 140–177.
• Erdoğan, Emre. 2013. Dış Politikada Siyasallaşma: Türk Kamuoyunun “Davos Krizi” ve Etkileri Hakkındaki Değerlendirmeleri. Uluslararası İlişkiler 10, 37: 37–67.
• Erdoğan, M. Murat. 2020. “Securitization from Society” and “Social Acceptance”: Political Party-Based Approaches in Turkey to Syrian Refugees. Uluslararası İlişkiler 17, 68: 73–92.
• Fernández, Óscar., Marie Vandendriessche, Angel Saz-Carranza, Núria Agell, and Javier Franco. 2023. The Impact of Russia’s 2022 Invasion of Ukraine on Public Perceptions of EU Security and Defence Integration: A Big Data Analysis. Journal of European Integration 45, 3: 463–485.
• Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2010. The Politics of Threat: How Terrorism News Shapes Foreign Policy Attitudes. The Journal of Politics 72, 2: 469–483.
• George, Nicole. 2017. Policing “Conjugal Order”: Gender, Hybridity and Vernacular Security in Fiji. International Feminist Journal of Politics 19, 1: 55–70.
• Gillespie, Marie., and Ben O’Loughlin. 2009. News Media, Threats and Insecurities: An Ethnographic Approach. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22, 4: 667–685.
• Gordon, Carol., and Asher Arian. 2001. Threat and Decision Making. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45:196.
• Hainmueller, Jens., and Daniel J. Hopkins. 2015. The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants. American Journal of Political Science 59, 3: 529– 548.
• Hellwig, Timothy., and Abdulkader Sinno. 2017. Different Groups, Different Threats: Public Attitudes towards Immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43, 3: 339–358.
• Hetherington, Marc J., and Elizabeth Suhay. 2011. Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans Support for the War on Terror. American Journal of Political Science 55, 3: 546–560.
• Hoffman, Aaron M., and William Shelby. 2017. When the “Laws of Fear” Do Not Apply: Effective Counterterrorism and the Sense of Security from Terrorism. Political Research Quarterly 70, 3: 618–631.
• Holsti, Ole Rudolf. 2009. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. University of Michigan Press.
• Huddy, Leonie., Stanley Feldman, Charles Taber, and Gallya Lahav. 2005. Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Policies. American Journal of Political Science 49, 3: 593–608.
• Jackson, Richard., and Gareth Hall. 2016. Talking about Terrorism: A Study of Vernacular Discourse. Politics 36, 3: 1–16.
• Jarvis, Lee. 2018. Toward a Vernacular Security Studies: Origins, Interlocutors, Contributions, and Challenges. International Studies Review 21, 1: 1–20.
• Jarvis, Lee., and Michael Lister. 2012. Vernacular Securities and Their Study: A Qualitative Analysis and Research Agenda. International Relations 27, 2: 158–179.
• Jarvis, Lee., and Michael Lister. 2016. What Would You Do? Everyday Conceptions and Constructions of Counter-Terrorism. Politics 36, 3: 1–15.
• Kertzer, Joshua D. 2013. Making Sense of Isolationism: Foreign Policy Mood as a Multilevel Phenomenon. The Journal of Politics 75, 1: 225–240.
• Kertzer, Joshua D., and Thomas Zeitzoff. 2017. A Bottom-Up Theory of Public Opinion about Foreign Policy. American Journal of Political Science 61, 3: 543–558.
• Kilduff, Martin. 1993. ‘Deconstructing Organizations. Academy of Management Review 18, 1: 13–31.
• Ko, Jiyoung. 2019. Alliance and Public Preference for Nuclear Forbearance: Evidence from South Korea. Foreign Policy Analysis 15, 4: 509–529.
• Küçükalp, Kasım. 2015. Derrida ve Dekonstrüksiyon. Yirminci Yüzyıl Düşüncesi, edited by Bayram Ali Çetinkaya and Şamil Öçal. Doğu’dan Batı’ya Düşüncenin Serüveni 4. İnsan Yayınları.
• Lahav, Gallya., and Marie Courtemanche. 2012. The Ideological Effects of Framing Threat on Immigration and Civil Liberties. Political Behavior 34, 3: 477–505.
• Lawlor, Leonard. 2014. Deconstruction. In A Companion to Derrida, edited by Direk, Zeynep and Lawlor, Leonard, 122–131. Blackwell Companion to Philosophy.
• Lindholt, Marie Fly., Frederik Jørgensen, Alexander Bor, and Michael Bang Petersen. 2021. Support for Border Security during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence on Levels and Predictors from Eight Western Democracies in 2020. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 31: 1–14.
• Lippmann, Walter. 1955. Essays in the Public Philosophy. Transaction Publishers.
• Löfflmann, Georg., and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2018. Vernacular Imaginaries of European Border Security among Citizens: From Walls to Information Management. European Journal of International Security 3, 03: 382–400.
• Luckham, Robin. 2017. Whose Violence, Whose Security? Can Violence Reduction and Security Work for Poor, Excluded and Vulnerable People? Peacebuilding 5, 2: 99–117.
• Luckham, Robin., and Tom Kirk. 2013. Understanding Security in the Vernacular in Hybrid Political Contexts: A Critical Survey. Conflict, Security & Development 13, 3: 339–359.
• McQuillan, Martin. 2000. Introduction: Five Strategies For Deconstruction. In Deconstruction: A Reader, edited by Martin McQuillan, 1–43. Edinburgh University Press.
• Meyer, Christoph O. 2009. International Terrorism as a Force of Homogenization? A Constructivist Approach to Understanding Cross-National Threat Perceptions and Responses. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22, 4: 647–666.
• Mo, Jongryn. 1994. The Logic of Two-Level Games with Endogenous Domestic Coalitions. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38, 3: 402–422.
• Mondak, Jeffery J., and Jon Hurwitz. 2012. Examining the Terror Exception: Terrorism and Commitments to Civil Liberties. Public Opinion Quarterly 76, 2: 193–213.
• Murray, J. Alex, and Lawrence Leduc. 1976. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy Options in Canada. Public Opinion Quarterly 40,4: 488–496.
• Okyar, Onur., and İsmail Dinçer Güneş. 2016. Reel Politiği Sınırlandıran Kamuoyu: Nükleer İran Örneği. Uluslararası İlişkiler 13, 50: 77–100.
• Ollerenshaw, Trent., and Ashley Jardina. 2023. The Asymmetric Polarization of Immigration Opinion in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly 87, 4: 1038–1053.
• Oyawale, Akinyemi. 2022. The Impact of (Counter-)Terrorism on Public (in)Security in Nigeria: A Vernacular Analysis. Security Dialogue 53, 5: 420–437.
• Özen, H. Ege., Aysenur Dal, and Efe Tokdemi̇r. 2023. “Welcoming” Guests: The Role of Ideational and Contextual Factors in Public Perceptions About Refugees and Attitudes about Their Integration. Uluslararası İlişkiler 20, 80: 5–25.
• Page, Benjamin I., and Jason Barabas. 2000. Foreign Policy Gaps between Citizens and Leaders. International Studies Quarterly 44, 3: 339–364.
• Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42, 3: 427–460.
• Putnam, Robert D . 2009. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization. London, Routledge.
• Qi, Dan., and James C. Garand. 2024. Perceptions of Threat, American National Identity, and Americans Attitudes Toward Documented and Undocumented Immigrants. Political Research Quarterly 77, 3: 931–949.
• Radnitz, Scott. 2022. Perceived Threats and the Trade-off between Security and Human Rights. Journal of Peace Research 59, 3: 367–381.
• Rosenau, James N. 1961. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: An Operational Formulation. New York, Random House.
• Rudnick, Lisa., and David Boromisza-Habashi. 2017. The Emergence of a Local Strategies Approach to Human Security. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 12,4: 382–98.
• Rutli̇, Evren Erman. 2016. Derrida’nın Yapısökümü. Temaşa Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi 5: 49–68.
• Shandler, Ryan., Nadiya Kostyuk, and Harry Oppenheimer. 2023. Public Opinion and Cyberterrorism. Public Opinion Quarterly 87, 1: 92–119.
• Singer, J. David. 1960. International Conflict: Three Levels of Analysis. Edited by Kenneth N. Waltz. World Politics 12, 3: 453–461.
• Stevens, Daniel., and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2014. Citizens and Security Threats: Issues, Perceptions and Consequences Beyond the National Frame. British Journal of Political Science 46, 1: 149–175.
• Sumaktoyo, Nathanael Gratias., and Burhanuddin Muhtadi. 2022. China’s Foreign Policies and Attitudes toward Chinese Diaspora: A Direct Link? International Journal of Public Opinion Research 34,4: edac038.
• Tickner, J. Ann. 2005. What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions. International Studies Quarterly 49, 1: 1–21. Todorov, Alexander., and Anesu N. Mandisodza. 2004. Public Opinion on Foreign Policy: The Multilateral Public That Perceives Itself as Unilateral. The Public Opinion Quarterly 68, 3: 323–348.
• Tokdemir, Efe., Melike Metintaş, and Seçkin Köstem. 2024. A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Turkish Public Opinion towards the United States. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace August: 1–24.
• Tomz, Michael. 2007. Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach. International Organization 61, 4: 821–940.
• Tsfati, Yariv., Riva Tukachinsky, and Yoram Peri. 2009. Exposure to News, Political Comedy, and Entertainment Talk Shows: Concern about Security and Political Mistrust. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21, 4: 399–423.
• Van Assche, Jasper., and Kim Dierckx.2021. Attitudes Towards Outgroups Before and After Terror Attacks. Terrorism and Political Violence 33, 7: 1530–1545.
• Vaughan-Williams, Nick. 2021. Vernacular Border Security: Citizens’ Narratives of Europe’s ‘Migration Crisis’. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Vaughan-Williams, Nick., and Daniel Stevens. 2015. Vernacular Theories of Everyday (in)Security: The Disruptive Potential of Non-Elite Knowledge. Security Dialogue 47, 1: 1–19.
• Vrânceanu, Alina., and Romain Lachat. 2021. Do Parties Influence Public Opinion on Immigration? Evidence from Europe. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 31, 1: 1–21.
• Waltz, Kenneth N. 2001. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York, Columbia University Press.
• Wang, Chendi., and Alexandru D. Moise. 2023. A Unified Autonomous Europe? Public Opinion of the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 30,8: 1679–1698.
• Wu, Chung-li., and Alex Min-Wei Lin. 2024. Will the United States Come to Taiwan’s Defense? Analysis of Public Opinion in Taiwan and the United States. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 24, 1: 131–170.
• Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.