A Different Approach on Analyzing Countries’ Grand Strategies: China and the United States

Year 2025, Volume: 22 Issue: 87, 43 - 65, 18.09.2025

Cagla Kilic

https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1734741

Cited By: 2

Abstract

This article aims to examine the grand strategies of two leaders in a more rigorous manner by using a comprehensive and well-established role theoretic framework. It is argued that role theory offers a theoretical foundation for comprehending the structure of grand strategy through the lens of roles, enabling the measurement of changes in its composition over time. This framework provides a comprehensive response to the persistent problems and challenges highlighted by scholars in the field of grand strategy, as well as the enduring issues present within the existing literature. The absence of role contestation within the inner circle of government lends grand strategies their characteristic longevity. This article contends that this framework can also serve as a robust metric for understanding grand strategies in the most rigorous manner possible. Consequently, roles facilitate the differentiation of long-term policies from short-term policies by deciphering the horizontal role contestation process. This approach thus resolves outstanding theoretical and measurement issues within the field of grand strategy analysis. This study will employ a sample of two countries—China, and the United States—chosen for their distinct regime types and extensive scholarly attention in the field of grand strategy.

Keywords

Security , Foreign Policy Behavior , Role Theory , Elite Discourse , Strategic Culture

References

• Altıparmak, Süleyman O. and Cameron G. Thies, 2024. Role Strain in Foreign Policy: Analyzing the Carter Doctrine. Uluslararası İlişkiler Advanced Online Publication: 1-17.
• Araya, Daniel. 2019 China’s Grand Strategy, Forbes Accessed January 14.
• Balzacq, Thierry, Peter Dombrowski, and Simon Reich. 2019a. Comparative Grand Strategy: A Framework and Cases. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Balzacq, Thierry, Peter Dombrowski, and Simon Reich. 2019b. Is Grand Strategy a Research Program? A Review Essay. Security Studies 28, 1: 58–86.
• Balzacq, Thierry, and Ronald R. Krebs. 2021. The Oxford Handbook of Grand Strategy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Biddle, Bruce J. and Thomas, Edwin J.1966. Role Theory: Concepts and Research. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
• Brands, Hal. 2014. What Good is Grand Strategy?: Power and Purpose in American Statecraft from Harry S. Truman to George W. Bush. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
• Breuning, Marijke. 2017. Role Theory in Foreign Policy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford, Oxford University Press
• Breuning, Marijke, and Pechenina, Anna. 2020. Role Dissonance In Foreign Policy: Russia, Power, and Intercountry Adoption. Foreign Policy Analysis 16, 1: 21–40.
• Breuning, Marijke. 2011. Role Theory Research in International Relations: State Of The Art And Blind Spots. In Role Theory in International Relations ed. by Sebastian Harnisch, Cornelia Frank and Hanns W. Maull. London, Routledge: 16–35.
• Breuning, Marijke. 2003. The Role of Analogies and Abstract Reasoning in Decision-making: Evidence from the Debate over Truman’s Proposal for Development Assistance. International Studies Quarterly 47, 2: 229–245.
• Brooks, Stephen G.and Wohlforth, William C. 2015. American Primacy in Perspective. In Paradoxes of Power. New York, Routledge: 29–38
• Brummer, Klaus and Thies, Cameron G. 2015. The Contested Selection of National Role Conceptions. Foreign Policy Analysis 11, 3: 273–293.
• Cantir, Cristian and Kaarbo, Juliet. 2012. Contested Roles and Domestic Politics: Reflections on Role Theory in Foreign Policy Analysis and IR Theory. Foreign Policy Analysis 8, 1: 5–24.
• Chafetz, Glenn, Abramson, Hillel, and Grillot, Suzette. 1996. Role Theory and Foreign Policy: Belarusian and Ukrainian Compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. Political Psychology 17, 4: 727–757.
• Chaudoin, Stephen, Milner, Helen V., and Tingley, Dustin. 2010. The Center Still Holds: Liberal Internationalism Survives. International Security 35, 1: 75–94.
• Chen, Dingding. 2017. China has a New Grand Strategy, and the West Should be Ready. The Diplomat. Retrieved October 31, 2019.
• Danner, Lukas K. 2018. China’s Grand Strategy: Contradictory Foreign Policy? Cham, Springer.
• Demirduzen, Cagla, and Thies, Cameron G. 2022. A role theory approach to grand strategy: Horizontal role contestation and consensus in the case of China. Journal of Global Security Studies, 7, 1.
• Di, Dongfang. 2007. Continuity and Changes: A Comparative Study on China’s new Grand Strategy. Historia Actual Online 12: 7–18.
• Elgström, Ole, and Smith, Michael. 2006. The European Union’s Roles in International Politics. London, Taylor and Francis Limited.
• Feiteng, Zhong. 2018. China's Grand Strategy in a New Era. East Asia Forum.
• Friedrichs, Gordon. 2021. U.S. Global Leadership Role and Domestic Polarization: A Role Theory Approach. London, Routledge.
• Gaddis, John Lewis. 1982. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of Postwar American National Security Policy. Oxford University Press.
• Gafarlı, Orhan and Julia Roknıfard. 2023. Relations with Russia in The Context of Turkey’s Policy in Constructing its ‘Strategic Autonomy’. Uluslararası İlişkiler 20, 79: 33-50.
• Harnisch, Sebastian. 2011. Role Theory: Operationalization of Key Concepts. In Role theory in International Relations London, Routledge: 7–15.
• Harnisch, Sebastian. 2012. Conceptualizing in the Minefield: Role theory and Foreign Policy Learning. Foreign Policy Analysis 8, 1: 47–69.
• Hart, Basil Liddell. 1991. The Theory of Strategy. In The Classic Book on Military Strategy London: Meridian Book: 319-333.
• He, Kai, and Walker, Steve. 2015. Role Bargaining Strategies for China’s Peaceful Rise. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 8, 4: 371–388.
• Holsti, Kalevi J. 1970. National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly 14, 3: 233-309.
• Houghton, David Patrick. 2007. Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach. Foreign Policy Analysis 3, 1: 24–45.
• Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton University Press.
• Jones, Evan. 2017. Sellout Ministries and Jingoes: China’s Bureaucratic Institutions and the Evolution of Contested National Role Conceptions in the South China Sea. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13, 2: 361– 379.
• Kennedy, Paul M. 1991. Grand Strategies in War and Peace New Haven, Yale University Press.
• Layton, Peter. 2012. The Idea of Grand Strategy. The RUSI Journal 157, 4: 56–61.
• Layne, Christopher. 1997. “From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy.” International Security 22, 1: 86–124.
• Le Prestre, Philippe. 1997. Role Quests in the Post-Cold War Era: Foreign Policies in Transition. Montreal, McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.
• Li. Shi-Yuan. 2019. China's Belt and Road Initiative. In The Green Belt and Road Initiative Center.
• Lord, Winston and Kissinger, Henry. 2019. Kissinger on Kissinger: Reflections on Diplomacy, Grand Strategy, and Leadership. New York, All Points Books.
• Marfleet, B. Gregory, and Walker, Stephen G. 2021. Binary Role Theory and the Operational Code Analysis of Grand Strategies: Can Balancing Work?. In Operational Code Analysis and Foreign Policy Roles. London, Routledge: 270-299
• Mearsheimer, John J. and Walt, Stephen M. 2016. The Case for Offshore Balancing: A Superior U.S. Grand Strategy. Foreign Affairs, 95, 4: 70-83.
• McCourt, David M. 2020. Domestic Contestation over Foreign Policy, Role-Based and Otherwise: Three Cautionary Cases. Politics, 41, 2: 173–88.
• Michalski, Anna and Nilsson, Niklas. 2019. Resistant to Change? The EU as a Normative Power and Its Troubled Relations with Russia and China. Foreign Policy Analysis, 15, 3: 432–449.
• Murray, Williamson, Sinnreich, Richard H. and Lacey, James. 2011. The Shaping of Grand Strategy: Policy, Diplomacy, and War. Cambridge University Press.
• Northrup, Terrell A. 1989. The Dynamic of Identity in Personal and Social Conflict. In Intractable Conflicts and Their Transformation: 55–82.
• Norton, Simon. 2015. China’s Grand Strategy: An Analysis of the Belt and Road Initiative and Its Strategic Underpinnings. Master’s Thesis, University of Sydney.
• Nye, Joseph S., Jr. 2010. The Future of Power. PublicAffairs.
• Ozdamar, Ozgur. 2016. Domestic Sources of Changing Turkish Foreign Policy toward the MENA during the 2010s: A Role Theoretic Approach. In Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations, New York, Routledge: 89–104.
• Pape, Robert A. 2005. Soft Balancing against the United States. International security, 30,1: 7-45.
• Posen, Barry R. 2003. “Command of the Commons: The Military Foundation of U.S. Hegemony.” International Security 28, 1: 5–46.
• Posen, Barry R. & Ross, Andrew L. 1996. Competing Visions for US Grand Strategy. International Security 21, 3: 5–53.
• Rosecrance, Richard N., and Stein, Arthur A. 1993. The domestic Bases of Grand Strategy. New York, Cornell University Press.
• Rosenau, James N. 2018. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
• Sargeaunt, Henry. and West, George. 1942. Grand Strategy. London, Jonathan Cape.
• Schafer, Mark, and Walker, Stephen G. 2021. Operational Code Analysis and Foreign Policy Roles: Crossing Simon’s Bridge. London, Routledge.
• Silove, Nina. 2018. Beyond the Buzzword: The Three Meanings of ‘Grand Strategy’. Security Studies, 27,1: 27–57.
• Stryker, Sheldon and Statham, Anne. 1985. Symbolic Interaction and Role Theory. In The Handbook of Social Psychology. Lindzey G., Aronson E New York: Random House.:931.
• Summers, Harry G. 1982. On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War. Novato, CA: Presidio Press.
• Sun Tzu. 1963. The Art of War (L. Giles, Trans.). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Thies, Cameron G. 2012. International Socialization Processes vs. Israeli National Role Conceptions: Can Role Theory Integrate IR Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis? Foreign Policy Analysis, 8, 1: 25–46.
• Thies, Cameron. 2010. Role Theory and Foreign Policy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies.
• Thies, Cameron G., and Breuning, Marijke. 2012. Integrating Foreign Policy Analysis and International Relations through Role Theory. Foreign Policy Analysis, 8,1: 1–4
• Thiers, Consuelo. 2025. Political Leaders’ Role in Latin American Foreign Policy: A Systematic Review. Uluslararası İlişkiler Advanced Online Publication: 1–17.
• Von Pfaler, Lauri, and Teschke, Benno. 2024. Quo Vadis, Historical International Relations? Geopolitical Marxism and the Promise of Radical Historicism. Uluslararası İlişkiler 21, 82: 21-40.
• Walker, Stephen G., Schafer, Mark, and Beieler, John. 2016. Belief Systems and Foreign Policy Roles: Role Contestation in US Foreign Policy Decisions. In Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations. ed. by Christian Cantir and Juliet Kaarbo, London, Routledge: 122-139.
• Walker, Stephen G. 2013. Role Theory and the Cognitive Architecture of British Appeasement Decisions: Symbolic and Strategic Interaction in World Politics. London, Routledge.
• Walker, Stephen G. 1987. Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis, Durham, Duke University Press
• Walker, Stephen, Malici, Akan and Schafer, Mark. 2010. Rethinking Foreign Policy Analysis: States, Leaders, and the Microfoundations of Behavioral International Relations. London, Routledge.
• Wang, Yong. 2016. Offensive for Defensive: the Belt and Road Initiative and China’s New Grand Strategy. The Pacific Review 29, 3: 455–463.
• Wang, Yuan-Kang. 2006. “China’s Grand Strategy and U.S. Primacy: Is China Balancing American Power?” Brookings Institution, Policy Brief 160
• Wehner, Leslie E. and Thies, Cameron. 2021. Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. Journal of Politics and Global Studies 34, 2: 123-145.
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Wohlforth, William C. 1999. The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security 24, 1: 5-41.
• Yıldız, Adil. 2023. The Rise of China and its Interplay with the Russian and Turkish Regimes. Uluslararası İlişkiler 20, 79: 51-66.