The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals

Mustafa Koray Uru; Erdem Dirimeşe

doi:10.52613/ujhc.1172698

EN TR

The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals

Abstract

When the studies on divorce are examined, it is understood that the act of divorce causes stigmatization of individuals. Studies show that divorced individuals are stigmatized with different stigmatizing concepts in different cultures. What makes this study different from other studies is that it reveals which concepts and how divorced individuals in Turkey are stigmatized. The research problem is about the lived experiences of individuals and requires in-depth knowledge about these lived experiences. For this reason, the qualitative research method was preferred as the research method. Phenomenology was used as the research design in this study carried out with the qualitative research method. Phenomenology focuses on the experiences which are the related phenomenon of individuals who have experienced phenomena that we have noticed but do not have a deep understanding of, and provides gaining in-depth knowledge of the phenomenon under research. Thematic qualitative data analysis was applied to the data collected in a city located in the northwest of Turkey, and stigmatizing concepts were revealed by reaching the themes from the codes. In this study, it was concluded that divorced men are stigmatized with 3 concepts and divorced women are stigmatized with 3 concepts that are different from the concepts that stigmatize men. It has been seen that these stigmatizing concepts are semantically opposite to the concepts that constitute male and female identities. In addition, it was concluded that this stigmatization process occurs with the thought that women and men fail to fulfill their gender roles.

Keywords

Culture, Divorce, Family, Marriage, Society, Stigma

Boşanan Bireylerin Damgalanması

Abstract

Boşanmayla ilgili yapılan çalışmalar incelendiğinde, boşanma eyleminin bireylerin damgalanmasına sebep olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Yapılan çalışmalar farklı kültürlerde, boşanan bireylerin farklı damgalayıcı kavramlarla damgalandığını göstermektedir. Bu çalışmayı diğer çalışmalardan farklı kılan Türkiye’de boşanan bireylerin hangi kavramlarla ve nasıl damgalandığını ortaya koymasıdır. Araştırma problemi bireylerin yaşanmış tecrübeleriyle ilgili olup, bu yaşanmış tecrübeler hakkında derinlemesine bilgi edinmeyi gerektirmektedir. Bu sebeple araştırma yöntemi olarak nitel araştırma yöntemi tercih edilmiştir. Nitel araştırma yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilen çalışmada araştırma deseni olarak fenomenoloji kullanılmıştır. Fenomenoloji, fark ettiğimiz fakat derinlemesine bir anlayışa sahip olmadığımız olguları tecrübe eden bireylerin, söz konusu olguyla ilgili tecrübelerine odaklanmakta ve araştırılan olguyla ilgili derinlemesine bilgi sahibi olmayı sağlamaktadır. Türkiye’nin kuzeybatısında yer alan bir şehirde toplanan verilere tematik nitel veri analizi uygulanmış ve kodlardan temalara ulaşılarak damgalayıcı kavramlar ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Çalışmada, boşanan erkeklerin 3 kavramla damgalandığı ve boşanan kadınların, erkekleri damgalayan kavramlardan farklı olan 3 kavramla damgalandığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Bu damgalayıcı kavramların erkek ve kadın kimliklerini oluşturan kavramların anlamca karşıtı oldukları görülmüştür. Ayrıca bu damgalama sürecinin, kadınların ve erkeklerin cinsiyet rollerini yerine getirmekte başarısız oldukları düşüncesiyle gerçekleştiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords

Aile, Boşanma, Damga, Evlilik, Kültür, Toplum

References

Akıcı, H. (2012). A study on religious and psycho-social reasons for divorce in Turkey, Marmara University, Istanbul.
Akoğlu, Ö . A., & KüçükkaragÖz, H. (2018). A research on the reasons of divorce and difficulties encountered following divorce: A case study in Izmir. Community and Social Work, 29(1), 153-172.
Aybey, S. (2015). Questions from family and religious guidance in the office women’s divorce causes of light (Examples of the Aegean region). Pamukkale University Faculty of Theology Journal, 104-126.
Bayyurt, Y., & Seggie, F. N. (Eds.). (2018). Qualitative research methods, techniques, analysis and approaches. Anı Publishing.
Burcu, E., et al. (2015). The fate of flowers: A qualitative study on early marriage of women in Turkey. Bilig, (73), 63-98.
Cin, H. (1988). Marriage in Islamic and ottoman law. Selcuk University Faculty of Law Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4 ed.). Pearson.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (S. B. Demir, M. Bütün, Trans.). Siyasal Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (S. B. Demir, Trans.). Eğiten Publishing.
Doğan, İ. (2009). Turkish family from past to present. Ataturk Cultural Center Publications.

Eyce, B. (2002). Divorce in Turkey by demographic characteristics. Journal of Selcuk Literature Faculty.
Gerstel, N. (1987). Divorce and stigma. Social problems, 34(2), 172-186.
Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2018). Essential concepts in sociology (A. Esgin, Trans.). Phoenix Publishing.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Prentice-Hall.
Guest, G., et al. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE Publications.
Gürkan, M. (2011). A right of divorce delegated to the wife in Islamic family law: Tafqˆız al-Talˆaq. Journal of Islamic Law Studies (18).
İlhan, Ü .D. (2020). The phenomenon of divorce that continues to be a stigmatization and social exclusion in working life in the 21st century: A qualitative analysis on working women. Izmir Journal of Economics, 35(3), 511-530.
Kara, B., & Doğan, S. (2018). Analysis of the causes for divorce in Turkey and alternative dispute methods. International Journal of Turkic World Studies, 1(2), 48-66.
Karakaya, H. (2018). Divorce and the divorce process in the context of gender: the Elazığ case. Kadem Journal of Women’s Studies, 4(2), 261-291.
Kaya, T. (2016). The divorce experiences of women and men in İstanbul. Journal of International Social Research, 9(46).
Kim, J.-Y., & Kim, H. (2002). Stigma in divorces and its deterrence effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 31(1), 31-44.
Konstam, V., et al. (2016). Stigma and divorce: A relevant lens for emerging and young adult women? Journal of Divorce, Remarriage, 57(3), 173-194.
Kucur, F., Kelebek, Ö . (2021). The stages of divorce and difficulties experienced by divorced women: An Esenler SHM example. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 80, 231-266. DOI: 10.26650/jspc.2021.80.000329
Kung, W. W., et al. (2004). How the socio-cultural context shapes women’s divorce experience in Hong Kong. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33-50.
Kurtoğlu, Y. (2019). Family in former central Asian Turkic States. Türk Tarih Kurumu.
Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method.
Mapp, T. (2008). Understanding phenomenology: The lived experience. British Journal of Midwifery, 16(5), 308-311.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Newton-Levinson, A., et al. (2014). ‘People insult her as a sexy woman’: Sexuality, stigma and vulnerability among widowed and divorced women in Oromiya, Ethiopia. Culture, Health, Sexuality, 16(8), 916-930.
Oruç, E. S., & Kurt, A. (2009). Causes of divorce request of women in the light of questions that were asked mufti of Erzurum and Bursa in 2005-2008. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Theology, 18(2), 299-325.
Özarslan, S. (2020). The age of marriage and its problems. Bartın University Journal of the Faculty of Islamic Sciences (14), 249-259.
Parker, L. (2016). The theory and context of the stigmatisation of widows and divorcees (janda) in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 44(128), 7-26.
Republic of Turkey ministry of family and social policies, D. o. F. a. S. P., general directorate of family and community services. (2015). Marriage Preferences in Turkey.
Schreier, M. (2018). Sampling and generalization. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. SAGE.
Schutz, A. (1973). On phenomenology and social relations: Selected writings. University of Chicago Press.
Tanveer, A. K., & Wasia, H. (2021). Lived experiences of divorced women in Kashmir: A phenomenological study. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(4), 379-394. Tezcan, S., & Coşkun, Y. (2004). Change in age at first marriage and contemporary marriage characteristics for women in the last quarter of the 20th century in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Population Studies, 26, 15-34.
Thomas, C., & Ryan, M. (2008). Women’s perception of the divorce experience: A qualitative study. Journal of Divorce, Remarriage, 49(3-4), 210-224.
Topuz, S. K., & Erkanlı, H. (2016). Metaphor analysis of meanings attributed to women and men in the context gender. Alternative Politics, 8(2), 300.
Walliman, N. (2006). Social research methods. SAGE.
Wertz, F. J., et al. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry.
Yıldırım, N. (2004). Divorce in Turkey and its reasons. Bilig (28), 59-81.
Yüksek, A. (2014). Divorce authority and divorcing of a woman in Islamic family law. Journal of International Social Research, 7(32).
Zare, S., et al. (2017). Perception of identity threat as the main disturbance of Iranian divorced women: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Divorce, Remarriage, 58(1), 1-15.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sociology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mustafa Koray Uru ^*
0000-0002-2828-6501
Türkiye

Erdem Dirimeşe
0000-0002-1873-6425
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 30, 2023

Submission Date

September 8, 2022

Acceptance Date

December 31, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 5 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.52613/ujhc.1172698

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA42KJ66AB

APA

Uru, M. K., & Dirimeşe, E. (2023). The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals. Universal Journal of History and Culture, 5(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.52613/ujhc.1172698

AMA

1.Uru MK, Dirimeşe E. The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals. Universal Journal of History and Culture. 2023;5(1):16-30. doi:10.52613/ujhc.1172698

Chicago

Uru, Mustafa Koray, and Erdem Dirimeşe. 2023. “The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals”. Universal Journal of History and Culture 5 (1): 16-30. https://doi.org/10.52613/ujhc.1172698.

EndNote

Uru MK, Dirimeşe E (April 1, 2023) The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals. Universal Journal of History and Culture 5 1 16–30.

IEEE

[1]M. K. Uru and E. Dirimeşe, “The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals”, Universal Journal of History and Culture, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–30, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.52613/ujhc.1172698.

ISNAD

Uru, Mustafa Koray - Dirimeşe, Erdem. “The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals”. Universal Journal of History and Culture 5/1 (April 1, 2023): 16-30. https://doi.org/10.52613/ujhc.1172698.

JAMA

1.Uru MK, Dirimeşe E. The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals. Universal Journal of History and Culture. 2023;5:16–30.

MLA

Uru, Mustafa Koray, and Erdem Dirimeşe. “The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals”. Universal Journal of History and Culture, vol. 5, no. 1, Apr. 2023, pp. 16-30, doi:10.52613/ujhc.1172698.

Vancouver

1.Mustafa Koray Uru, Erdem Dirimeşe. The Stigmatization of The Divorced Individuals. Universal Journal of History and Culture. 2023 Apr. 1;5(1):16-30. doi:10.52613/ujhc.1172698