Avrupa Güvenliğine Yönelik Yeni ve Karmaşık Bir Tehdit: Çin

Abstract

Çin, küresel hegemonik bir güç olmayı hedefleyen bir dış politika izliyor ve artan nüfuzu ve etkisi dünyayı yeniden şekillendiriyor. Pekin, gelişen askeri, ekonomik ve teknolojik kabiliyetleriyle giderek daha aktif bir uluslararası aktör haline gelmektedir. Avrupa ve Çin arasındaki ilişkiler her zamankinden daha karmaşıktır. Çin, Avrupa'nın güvenliği için giderek artan bir tehdit haline gelmiş ve Pekin'in dış politika amaçları ile Avrupa'nın güvenliği arasında bir çatışma yaşanmıştır. Çin'in idealleri ve öncelikleri Avrupa'nınkilerle örtüşmemektedir ve bu nedenle Avrupa artık Çin'i olası sorumlu bir paydaş olarak değil, rakip bir değerler ve kurumlar dizisinin savunucusu olarak görmektedir. Çin ve Avrupa uyumsuz kimliklere sahiptir ve Pekin liberal uluslararası düzene alternatif bir bakış açısını teşvik etmektedir. Çin'in otokratik devlet-kapitalizmi modeli, demokratik, liberal, Batı liderliğindeki uluslararası düzen karşıtlarına ilham kaynağı olmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Çin'in Avrupa güvenliği için hem maddi hem de düşünsel bir tehdit oluşturduğunu savunmaktadır. Makalenin temel amacı, realizm ve konstrüktivizm teorilerinin açıklayıcı gücünü kullanarak Çin'in Avrupa güvenliğine yönelik tehdidinin maddi ve düşünsel boyutlarını ampirik kanıtlarla ortaya koymaktır. Makale, karmaşık olguları anlamak ve nitel verilere ve araştırmalara dayalı ayrıntılı açıklamalar ve analizler sunmak için vaka çalışması yöntemini benimsemektedir.

Keywords

• Avrupa
• Çin
• Güvenlik
• Tehdit

A New and Complicated Threat to European Security: China

Abstract

China has been pursuing a foreign policy aimed at becoming a global hegemonic power, and its rising penetration and sway are reshaping the globe. Beijing is a progressively active international actor with improving military, economic, and technological capabilities. Relations between Europe and China are more complex than ever before. China has increasingly been a threat to European security, and there has been a conflict between Beijing’s foreign policy purposes and European security. China’s ideals and priorities do not overlap with Europe’s own, and so Europe does not longer view China as a possible responsible stakeholder, but rather as the champion of a competing set of values and institutions. China and Europe have incompatible identities, and Beijing has been encouraging an alternative perspective on a liberal international order. China’s autocratic state-capitalism model presents inspiration to adversaries of a democratic, liberal, West-led international order. This study argues that China poses both a material and an ideational threat to European security. The main objective of the article is to demonstrate the material and ideational dimensions of China’s threat to European security through empirical evidence by utilizing the explanatory power of realism and constructivism theories. The article adopts the case-study method for understanding complex phenomena and providing detailed descriptions and analyses based on qualitative data and research.

Keywords

• Europe
• China
• Security
• Threat

References

1. Al Jazeera Media Network (2022), British PM Sunak says ‘golden era’ of UK-China relations is over, 28 November 2022, Available from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/11/28/british-prime-minister-sunak-golden-era-of-uk-china-is-over, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
2. Al Jazeera Media Network (2022), UK PM hopeful Sunak: China ‘number one threat’ to Britain, world, 25 July 2022, Available from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/25/uk-pm-hopeful-sunak-china-number-one-threat-to-britain-world, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
3. Al Jazeera Media Network (2022). Russia and China to Deepen Security Cooperation in Asia, Europe, Available from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/9/russia-and-china-to-deepen-security-cooperation-in-asia-europe, Accessed: 29.04.2024.
4. Al Jazeera Media Network (2022). Russia and China to Deepen Security Cooperation in Asia, Europe, Available from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/25/uk-pm-hopeful-sunak-china-number-one-threat-to-britain-world, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
5. Amaro, S. (2022). China Bought Most of Greece’s Main Port and Now İt Wants to Make İt The Biggest n Europe, CNBC, Available from: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/15/china-wants-to-turn-greece-piraeus-port-into-europe-biggest.html, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
6. Amaro, S. (2023). Canada is Aiming to Beat China in The Critical Race for Rare Earth Metals, CNBC, Available from: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/14/canada-is-aiming-to-beat-china-in-the-critical-race-for-rare-earth-metals-.html, Accessed: 08.11.2023.
7. Arghire, I. (2022). China’s Hacking of European Diplomats Aligns with Russia-Ukraine Conflict, SecurityWeek, Available from: https://www.securityweek.com/chinas-hacking-european-diplomats-aligns-russia-ukraine-conflict/, Accessed: 30.11.2023.
8. Atwood, K. (2024). China İs Giving Russia Significant Support to Expand Weapons Manufacturing as Ukraine War Continues, US Officials Say, Available from: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/12/politics/china-russia-support-weapons-manufacturing/index.html, Accessed: 29.04.2024.

9. Beckley, M. and Brands, H. (2022). China’s Threat to Global Democracy, December 2022, Available from: https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/chinas-threat-to-global-democracy/, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
10. Besch, S., Bond, L. & Schuette, L. (2020). Europe, The Us and China: A Love-Hate Triangle?, The Centre for European Reform, Available from: https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/pbrief_us_china_eu_SB_IB_LS.pdf, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
11. Bond, I., Godement, F., Maull, H. W., & Stanzel, V. (2022). Rebooting Europe's China Strategy. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Available from: https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/sonstiges/2022_Rebooting_Europes_China_Strategy.pdf, Accessed: 16.01.2024.
12. Borrell, J. (2023). My View on China and EU-China Relations, Available from: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/my-view-china-and-eu-china-relations_en, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
13. Chan, K. (2023). Associated Press, Here are the countries that have bans on TikTok, April 4, 2023, Available from: https://apnews.com/article/tiktok-ban-privacy-cybersecurity-bytedance-china-2dce297f0aed056efe53309bbcd44a04, Accessed: 10.11.2023.
14. Chatham House (2019). Power Shift: The Rise of Asia and the Decline of the West?. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16fIZ-nWm-4, Accessed: 03.11.2023.
15. Dempsey, J. (2023). Europe’s Dangerous Dependence on China, Carnegie Europe, Available from: https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/89448, Accessed: 30.11.2023.
16. Deni, J. R. (2021). China is a Present Danger to Europe. NATO’s Defense Plans Must Respond, the Atlantic Council, Available from: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/china-is-a-present-danger-to-europe-natos-defense-plans-must-respond/, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
17. Dumbaugh K. & Martin, M. F. (2009). Understanding China’s Political System, Congressional Research Service, Available from: http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4b73cd512.pdf, Access: 10.11.2023.
18. European Union Global Strategy (2016). ‘Shared Vision, Common Action: a Stronger Europe: a Global Strategy for The European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy’, European External Action Service, Available from: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_review_web_0.pdf, Accessed: 04.11.2023. p. 38.
19. French, H. W., Johnson, I., Jenne, J., Crossley, P. K., Kapp, R. A. & Meyer-Fong T. (2017). How China’s History Shapes, and Warps, Its Policies Today, Foreign Policy, Available from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/22/how-chinas-history-shapes-its-foreign-policy-empire-humiliation/, Accessed: 07.05.2024.
20. Ghiretti, F. (2023). From opportunity to risk: The changing economic security policies vis-à-vis China. Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS). Available from: https://merics.org/en/report/opportunity-risk-changing-economic-security-policies-vis-vis-china, Accessed: 30.10.2023.
21. Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 7.
22. Gilpin, R. (1988). The Theory of Hegemonic War, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 591–613.
23. Gramer, R. & Iyengar, R. (2022). Europe’s Great Catch-Up on China, Foreign Policy, Available from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/12/20/europes-great-catch-up-on-china/, Accessed: 29.11.2023.
24. Guillot, L. (2020). ‘Europe has been “naive” about China, says Josep Borrell’. Politico. Available from: https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-has-been-naive-about-china-josep-borrell/, Accessed: 03.11.2023.
25. Hickman, J. (2022). Preparing the West for the Coming China Crisis, Center for European Policy Analysis, Available from: https://cepa.org/article/preparing-the-west-for-the-coming-china-crisis/, Accessed: 10.11.2023.
26. Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1), p. 171–200.
27. Huang, Y. & Dali L. Yang, D. (2002). Bureaucratic Capacity and State-Society Relations in China, https://daliyang.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/bureaucratic-capacity-and-state-society-relations-in.pdf, Access: 10.11.2023.
28. Huntington, S. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, University of Oklahoma Press.
29. Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Cultural Norms and National Security, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30. Kaufman, A. A. (2011). The “Century of Humiliation” and China’s National Narratives, Available from: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/3.10.11Kaufman.pdf, Accessed: 06.05.2024.
31. Lau, S., Lynch, S. & Barigazzi, J. (2022). EU Rings Alarm Bell on China — But İsn’t Sure How to Respond. Politico, Available from: https://www.politico.eu/article/after-russia-debacle-eu-leaders-grow-wary-of-china-xi-jinping/, Accessed: 30.11.2023.
32. Maheshwari, S. and Holpuch, A. (2023). Why Countries Are Trying to Ban TikTok, The New York Times, Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/article/tiktok-ban.html, Accessed: 10.11.2023.
33. McDonald, M. (2008). Constructivism, in Security Studies: An Introduction, Ed. Paul D. Williams, Routledge.
34. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
35. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2005). “The Rise of China Will Not Be Peaceful at All”. The Australian, Available from: https://www.mearsheimer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/The-Australian-November-18-2005.pdf, Accessed: 02.11.2023.
36. NATO 2022 Strategic Concept (2022). Available from: https://www.nato.int/strategic-concept/, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
37. Nölke, A., Brink, T., Claar, S., & May, C. (2015). Domestic Structures, Foreign Economic Policies and Global Economic Order: Implications from The Rise of Large Emerging Economies. European Journal Of İnternational Relations, 21(3), 538-567. p. 538–567.
38. Pallanch, J. & Zhang A. Y. (2021). China, 5G, and NATO Security, German Marshall Fund, Available from: https://www.gmfus.org/news/china-5g-and-nato-security, Accessed: 08.11.2023.
39. Politi, A. (2023). The Paradigm-Shift In EU-China Relations and The Limits of The EU’s Current Strategy Towards China: A Relational Perspective, p. 687, 676.
40. Putten, F.P. V. D (2022). Chinese Economic İnfluence As A Potential Security Threat: The Dutch Response, Hybrid CoE Working Paper 20, Available from: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/publications/hybrid-coe-working-paper-20-chinese-economic-influence-as-a-potential-security-threat-the-dutch-response/, Accessed: 27.11.2023.
41. Reuters (2023). China ‘Greatest Threat’ to Dutch Economic Security, Dutch İntelligence Says, Available from: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/china-greatest-threat-dutch-economic-security-dutch-intelligence-says-2023-04-17/, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
42. Rubin, L. (2014). Islam in the balance: Ideational threats in Arab politics. Stanford University Press.
43. Schiavenza, M. (2013). How Humiliation Drove Modern Chinese History, Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/10/how-humiliation-drove-modern-chinese-history/280878/, Accessed: 06.05.2024.
44. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (2023). SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, Available from: https://milex.sipri.org/sipri, Accessed: 29.04.2024.
45. The BBC (2024). Blinken Says China Helping Fuel Russian Threat to Ukraine, Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-68905475, Accessed: 29.04.2024.
46. The Economist Intelligence Unit, Democracy Index 2023, Available from: https://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/Democracy-Index-2023-Final-report.pdf, Accessed: 29.04.2024.
47. The European External Action Service (EEAS). (2021). EU-Taiwan Political Relations and Cooperation: Speech on Behalf of High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell at the EP Plenary, Available from: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-taiwan-political-relations-and-cooperation-speech-behalf-high-representativevice-president_en, Accessed: 08.11.2023.
48. The European Parliament (2022). European Parliament Resolution of 9 June 2022 on the Human Rights Situation in Xinjiang, İncluding the Xinjiang Police Files (2022/2700(RSP)), Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0237_EN.html, Accessed: 18.01.2024.
49. The Group of the European People’s Party (EPP Group). EU-China Relations - Towards a Fair and Reciprocal Partnership, March 10, 2021, Available from: https://www.eppgroup.eu/newsroom/publications/eu-china-relations-towards-a-fair-and-reciprocal-partnership, Accessed: 08.11.2023.
50. The House Foreign Affairs Committee (2022). China Regional Snapshot: The European Union & the United Kingdom, Available from: https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/china-regional-snapshot-the-european-union-the-united-kingdom/, Accessed: 08.11.2023.
51. The House Foreign Affairs Committee, China Regional Snapshot: The European Union & the United Kingdom, Available from: https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/china-regional-snapshot-the-european-union-the-united-kingdom/, Accessed: 08.11.2023.
52. The Independent (2022). China is Biggest State-Based Threat to UK Economic Security, Available from: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/rishi-sunak-china-xi-jinping-prime-minister-taiwan-b2225249.html, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
53. The National People’s Congress (NPC) of the People’s Republic of China, Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, Available from: http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/Constitution/2007-11/15/content_1372963.htm, Accessed: 16.01.2024.
54. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (2023). Joint Declaration on EU-NATO Cooperation, Available from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_210549.htm, Accessed: 29.11.2023.
55. The World Bank Group. Military Expenditure (Current USD) – China, Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.CD?locations=CN, Accessed: 04.11.2023.
56. Walt, S. M. (1990). The origins of alliance. Cornell University Press.
57. Wendt, A. (1995). Constructing International Politics, International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1995, p. 73.
58. Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Wieringen, K. V. (2023). EU-China Relations in the Coming Decade: What Do European China Experts Think?, ChinaObservers, Available from: https://chinaobservers.eu/eu-china-relations-in-the-coming-decade-what-do-european-china-experts-think/, Accessed: 30.11.2023.
60. Williams, C. B. (2016). 110 Years of Humiliation from 1839 to 1949: China’s Grand Strategy, Master’s Thesis, Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1020379.pdf, Accessed: 06.05.2024.