Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Drone Rearing and its Importance for Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Colonies

Year 2008, Volume: 08 Issue: 3, 106 - 111, 28.08.2008

Abstract

In this study the rearing of drones and its importance for honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies were discussed. The effects of drones and queen on the physiological, behavioral and task specialization of bee colonies are genetically equivalent. For this reason the rearing of drones is of high importance in queen production. During the mating each queen has to mate with 8 or 10 drones. Under certain circumstances such insufficiently mated queens may lead to unproductive colonies due to insufficient worker population. Drones have to be reared from the colonies with known and preferred performances. Drone mother colonies need special care and maintenance. They should be fed throughout the time drones are being reared. Also they should be supported by addition of sealed brood combs each week. The time needed for sexual maturation of the drone and the queen are different. The drone comb is given to each drone mother colony about 40 days before the time the drones are needed, typicallyin the autumn. The drone may be permitted to mature in the feeding colonies. A carefully maintained drone mother colony can produce about 3200 to 4000 cm2 drone brood area, which is sufficient for securing matings of 140 to 150 queens. Queen breeders should take into consideration the genetic quality of the drone mother colonies just like the queen source colonies.

References

  • Cobey, S, 1983. Drone rearing for instrumental insemination. Part III of a Four-part Series. American Bee Journal, 123 (3): 185–186.
  • Cobey, S, 2004. Instrumental insemination and honey bee breeding. Short Course, June/July. The Ohio State University Rothenbuhler Honeybee Laboratory Colombus, Ohio.
  • Cobey, S, 2007. Comparison studies of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated honey bee queens and factors affecting their performance. Apidologie 38: 390–410. Collıns, A M., 1986. Quantitative Genetics. Edit. Rinderer, T.E., in Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Pres, Inc. London., S.: 283-304.
  • Cornuet, J M., 1986. Population Genetics. Edit. Rinderer, T.E., in Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Press, Inc. (London) Ltd., S.: 235-254.
  • Genç, F, 1990. Balarılarında koloni performansını etkileyen faktörler. Teknik Arıcılık. 27: 18–26.
  • Güler, A, (2006). Bal Arısı (Apis mellifera L.). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı NO: 55, 574 s, Samsun
  • Güler, A; Alpay, H., 2005. Reproductive characteristics of some honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) genotypes. J. Animal Science and Veterinary Advances 4(10): 864–870.
  • İnci, A., 1999. Ana Arı Üretimi. Önder Matbaacılık. İzmir Cad. 34/2–3 Kızılay-Ankara.
  • Kaftanoğlu, O, Peng, Y S, 1982. Effects of insemination on the initiation of oviposition in the queen honeybee. J. of Apic. Research, 21 (1):3–6.
  • Kaftanoğlu, O, 1987. Ana arı yetiştiriciliğinin önemi. Marmara Bölgesi I. Arıcılık Semineri. U.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümü, Bursa, 67–75.
  • aftanoğlu, O; Kumova, U; Yeninar, H, 1992. Ana arı yetiştiriciliğinin önemi ve ana arının kalitesini etkileyen faktörler. DAB I. Arıcılık Semineri. 48–60, Erzurum.
  • Keryn, L; Lapıdge, B. P. O; Spıvak, M, 2002. Seven suggestive quantitative trait loci influence hygienic behavior of honey bees. Naturwissenschaften (2002) 89: 565–568.
  • Krıvtzov, N I, 1976. Heritability and Repeatability of Certain Economical Characters in Central Russian Bees. Genetics, Selection and Reproduction of the Honey Bee Symposium on Bee Biology, Moscow, Agust 1976. 134– 142.
  • Laıdlaw, H H, 1979. Contemporary queen rearing, Dadant and Sons Inc., Journal Printing Co., Carthaga, Illinois, USA.
  • Mackensen, O, 1955. Experiment in the technique of artificial insemination of queen honey bees. J. Econ. Entomol., 48: 418-421.
  • Mackensen, O, Nye, W P, 1966. Selecting and breeding honeybee for collecting alfalfa. Journal of Apicultural Research, 5: 322–323.
  • Nguyen, N V, 1999. Effects of protein nutrition and pollen supplementation of honey bee Apis mellifera colonies on characteristics of drones with particular reference to sexual maturity. The Australasian Beekeeper, 100(9): 374–376.
  • Page R, E, E H Ericson, H H Laidlaw, 1982. Closed population honey bee breeding 1. Population genetics of sex determination. 2. Comparative methods of stock maintenance and selective breeding. Journal of Apicultural Research 21 (1): 30–37, 38–44.
  • Rhodes, J 2002. Drone honey bees rearing and maintenance. Agnote NSW Agriculture Livestock Officer, Apiary Products ISS 1034– 6848.
  • Rhodes, J 1999. Drone mother stock selection and drone quality. Agnote NSW Agriculture Livestock Officer, Apiary Products ISS 1034– 6848.
  • Rınderer, E T, 1986. Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Press, Inc. Ltd. 24–28 Oval Road. London NW1 7DX. London. 425 pp.
  • Rothenbuhler, W C, Kulıncevic, J M, 1979. Successful selection of honeybees for fast and slow hoarding of sugar syrup in the laboratory. Journal of Apicultural Research, 18(4): 272–278.
  • Ruttner, F, 1972. Controlled mating and selection of the honey bee. APIMONDIA, 1972, Lunz Am See, Austria.
  • Ruttner, F, 1988. Breeding Techniques and Selection for Breeding of the Honeybee. The British Isles Bee Breeders Association. Verlag, Munich. 152 pp.
  • Seeley, T D, 2002. The effect of drone comb on a honey bee colony‘s production of honey. Apidologie 33: 75–86
  • Woyke, J, Jasınskı, 1978. Influence of age of drones on the results of instrumental insemination of honey bee queen. Apidologie, 9(3): 203–211.
  • Woyke, J, 1967. Rearing conditions and the number of sperms reaching the spermatheca. XXIth International Apicultural Congress of Apimondia, 232–234. Bucharest, Romania.

Erkek Arı Yetiştiriciliği ve Balarısı (Apis mellifera L.) Kolonileri İçin Önemi

Year 2008, Volume: 08 Issue: 3, 106 - 111, 28.08.2008

Abstract

Bu çalışmada erkek arıların koloni verimliliğindeki önemi ve yetiştiriciliği değerlendirilmiştir. Koloni verimliliğinde erkek arı ile ana arının etkileri eşittir. Bu nedenle erkek arı yetiştiriciliği ana arı yeniştiriciliği kadar önemlidir. Yeterli sayıda erkek arı ile çiftleşemeyen ana arı bir arıcılık sezonunu verimli bir şekilde çıkaramaz. Çiftleşme yetersizliği olan bu ana arıların olduu koloniler yeterli işçi arı yetitiremediklerinden verimleri de düşük olur. Erkek arı, verim ve davranışları bilinen kolonilerden yetitirilir. Erkek arı anası olacak koloniye sonbaharda erkek arı gözlü petek verilir. Ana arının erken baharda bu peteklere yumurtlaması sağlanır. Daha sonra bu yumurtalar larvaya dönüştükten sonra besleyici koloniye aktarılır. Koloni besleme programına alınır ve belirli aralıklarla kapalı yavru takviyesi yapılır. İyi yönetilen ve yönlendirilen bir erkek arı anası koloni bir sezonda yaklaşık 140–150 adet ana arının döllenmesini sağlayacak kadar erkek arı üretir

References

  • Cobey, S, 1983. Drone rearing for instrumental insemination. Part III of a Four-part Series. American Bee Journal, 123 (3): 185–186.
  • Cobey, S, 2004. Instrumental insemination and honey bee breeding. Short Course, June/July. The Ohio State University Rothenbuhler Honeybee Laboratory Colombus, Ohio.
  • Cobey, S, 2007. Comparison studies of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated honey bee queens and factors affecting their performance. Apidologie 38: 390–410. Collıns, A M., 1986. Quantitative Genetics. Edit. Rinderer, T.E., in Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Pres, Inc. London., S.: 283-304.
  • Cornuet, J M., 1986. Population Genetics. Edit. Rinderer, T.E., in Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Press, Inc. (London) Ltd., S.: 235-254.
  • Genç, F, 1990. Balarılarında koloni performansını etkileyen faktörler. Teknik Arıcılık. 27: 18–26.
  • Güler, A, (2006). Bal Arısı (Apis mellifera L.). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı NO: 55, 574 s, Samsun
  • Güler, A; Alpay, H., 2005. Reproductive characteristics of some honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) genotypes. J. Animal Science and Veterinary Advances 4(10): 864–870.
  • İnci, A., 1999. Ana Arı Üretimi. Önder Matbaacılık. İzmir Cad. 34/2–3 Kızılay-Ankara.
  • Kaftanoğlu, O, Peng, Y S, 1982. Effects of insemination on the initiation of oviposition in the queen honeybee. J. of Apic. Research, 21 (1):3–6.
  • Kaftanoğlu, O, 1987. Ana arı yetiştiriciliğinin önemi. Marmara Bölgesi I. Arıcılık Semineri. U.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümü, Bursa, 67–75.
  • aftanoğlu, O; Kumova, U; Yeninar, H, 1992. Ana arı yetiştiriciliğinin önemi ve ana arının kalitesini etkileyen faktörler. DAB I. Arıcılık Semineri. 48–60, Erzurum.
  • Keryn, L; Lapıdge, B. P. O; Spıvak, M, 2002. Seven suggestive quantitative trait loci influence hygienic behavior of honey bees. Naturwissenschaften (2002) 89: 565–568.
  • Krıvtzov, N I, 1976. Heritability and Repeatability of Certain Economical Characters in Central Russian Bees. Genetics, Selection and Reproduction of the Honey Bee Symposium on Bee Biology, Moscow, Agust 1976. 134– 142.
  • Laıdlaw, H H, 1979. Contemporary queen rearing, Dadant and Sons Inc., Journal Printing Co., Carthaga, Illinois, USA.
  • Mackensen, O, 1955. Experiment in the technique of artificial insemination of queen honey bees. J. Econ. Entomol., 48: 418-421.
  • Mackensen, O, Nye, W P, 1966. Selecting and breeding honeybee for collecting alfalfa. Journal of Apicultural Research, 5: 322–323.
  • Nguyen, N V, 1999. Effects of protein nutrition and pollen supplementation of honey bee Apis mellifera colonies on characteristics of drones with particular reference to sexual maturity. The Australasian Beekeeper, 100(9): 374–376.
  • Page R, E, E H Ericson, H H Laidlaw, 1982. Closed population honey bee breeding 1. Population genetics of sex determination. 2. Comparative methods of stock maintenance and selective breeding. Journal of Apicultural Research 21 (1): 30–37, 38–44.
  • Rhodes, J 2002. Drone honey bees rearing and maintenance. Agnote NSW Agriculture Livestock Officer, Apiary Products ISS 1034– 6848.
  • Rhodes, J 1999. Drone mother stock selection and drone quality. Agnote NSW Agriculture Livestock Officer, Apiary Products ISS 1034– 6848.
  • Rınderer, E T, 1986. Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Press, Inc. Ltd. 24–28 Oval Road. London NW1 7DX. London. 425 pp.
  • Rothenbuhler, W C, Kulıncevic, J M, 1979. Successful selection of honeybees for fast and slow hoarding of sugar syrup in the laboratory. Journal of Apicultural Research, 18(4): 272–278.
  • Ruttner, F, 1972. Controlled mating and selection of the honey bee. APIMONDIA, 1972, Lunz Am See, Austria.
  • Ruttner, F, 1988. Breeding Techniques and Selection for Breeding of the Honeybee. The British Isles Bee Breeders Association. Verlag, Munich. 152 pp.
  • Seeley, T D, 2002. The effect of drone comb on a honey bee colony‘s production of honey. Apidologie 33: 75–86
  • Woyke, J, Jasınskı, 1978. Influence of age of drones on the results of instrumental insemination of honey bee queen. Apidologie, 9(3): 203–211.
  • Woyke, J, 1967. Rearing conditions and the number of sperms reaching the spermatheca. XXIth International Apicultural Congress of Apimondia, 232–234. Bucharest, Romania.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Structural Biology
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Ahmet Güler This is me

Publication Date August 28, 2008
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 08 Issue: 3

Cite

Vancouver Güler A. Erkek Arı Yetiştiriciliği ve Balarısı (Apis mellifera L.) Kolonileri İçin Önemi. U. Arı. D.-U. Bee J. 2008;08(3):106-11.

Important Note: Since the author-referee information is kept confidential on both sides in our journal, both the author and the referees must upload the document to the system after removing their personal information in the review document section.

Note: Authors can also use homepage of our Journal.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

download
 

This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.