Evaluation of Oxygen Saturation By Pulse Oximetry on Newborn Infant Using Skin Protective Covering

Year 2017, , 5 - 12, 01.01.2017

Jagadish C Das Mohammod Shahidullah Sadiqa T Khanam Nibedita Paul

https://doi.org/10.5455/umj.20161110103707

Abstract

Background: Pulse oximetry is a convenient method of monitoring oxygen saturation SpO2 . Pulse oximeter probes have been reported to be associated with injuries in neonates. Objectives: This study was conducted with the objective of examining whether application of a protective covering influences values of SpO2. Method: A cross sectional study was carried out in the Neonatology, over a period of one year. Hospitalized 140 neonates within 28 postnatal days were included in the study. Neonates with major congenital malformation, heart disease, severe anemia, shock and deep jaundice were excluded. Readings of SpO2 were taken on right foot and right hand directly and through micropore by researcher himself when the saturation display was steadied. Results: The mean readings of SpO2 on foot directly and through micropore were 94.5±3.4% and 94.2±3.4% respectively. On right hand, the values were 94.3±3.3% and 94.5±3.3% respectively. For each of the 13 subgroups formed on the basis of gestational age, weight and postnatal age of the newborns, oximetry readings of two sites i.e. hand and foot were compared using T-test and 95% confidence interval. Thus there were in all 26 statistical comparisons. Of these, in 22 comparisons the differences in the reading with micropore and without micropore were found statistically not significant. In the remaining 4, differences in 2 cases were significant at 0.04 and 0.05 level. The paired mean differences between readings of SpO2 by pulse oximeter without micropore and with micropore on foot 0.25±1.11 and hand 0.22±1.12 were very similar to paired mean difference of SpO2 readings by direct method 0.15±1.22 on hand and foot and were within this limit. Conclusion: The work concluded that the micropore protective covering did not influence oxygen saturation readings,suggesting that covering can be satisfactorily used for protection of neonates from probe related injuries.

Keywords

Evaluation, oxygen saturation, pulse oximetry, protective covering, neonate.

References

• 1. Ravel C, Sola A, Saldeno YP & Favareto V. Clinical practices in neonatal oxygenation: where have we failed? What can we do? J Perinatol 2008; 28: S28-S34.
• 2. Martin R.J, Klaus MH. & Fanaroff AA. Respiratory problem. In. Klaus MH. & Fanaroff RA. editors. Care of the high-risk neonate; Philadelphia. EB Sanders; 1986:171-201.
• 3. Singh M. Care of the Newborn. 6th ed. New Delhi. Sagar publications 2004; 202-204.
• 4. Rennine JM. Robertson’s Text Book of Neonatology 4th ed. Philadelphia, USA. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005; 357- 359.
• 5. Askie LM. The use of oxygen in neonatal medicine. Neo Reviews 2003; 4(12):e340.
• 6. Thorkelsson T & Hoath SB. Accurate micromethod of neonatal blood sampling from peripheral arterial catheters. J Perinatol 2005; 15(1):43-46.
• 7. Gomella TL, Cunningham MD, Eyal FG & PharmD KEZ. Neonatology:Management, procedures, on-call problems, diseases and drugs 5thed. New York. McGraw Hill Companies 2004;44-53.
• 8. Cloherty JP, Eichewald EC & Stark AR. Management of Neonatal Care. 6thed. Philadelphia, USA. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2004; 343-345.
• 9. Kamat V. Pulse oximetry. Indian J Anaesth 2002;46(4): 261-268.
• 10. Neff TA. Routine oximetry. A fifth vital sign? Chest 1988; 94: 227a-227.
• 11. Lin CW, Wang HZ & Hsieh KS. Pulse oximeter-associated toe injuries in a premature neonate: a case report. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipai) 1999; 62(12):914-916.
• 12. Hess D, Kochansky M, Hassett L, Frick R, Rexrode WO: An evaluation of the Nellcor N-10 portable pulse oximeter. Respiratory Care 1986; 31:796-802.
• 13. Alexander C, Teller L, Gross J: Principles of Pulse Oximetry: Theo-retical and practical considerations. Anesth Analg 1989;68:368-376.
• 14. James J, Tawari L, Upadhyah P, Sreenivas V, Bhambhani V &Puliyel JM. Evaluation of pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation taken through skin protective covering. BMC Pediatrics 2006;6:14.