Türkçe Konuşan Bireyler İçin İşitsel Zamansal İşleme Testlerinin Normatif Verileri

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 920 - 927, 23.12.2024

Emre Söylemez , Mehmet Garan , Nihat Yılmaz

Öz

Amaç: Frekans patern testi (FPT), Süre patern testi (SPT) ve Gap-in-Noise (GIN) testi sözel olmayan yapıları nedeniyle dilden bağımsız olarak farklı toplumlara kolaylıkla uygulanabilmektedir. Ancak, bu testler sözel olmasa da toplumların dil özelliklerinden etkilenebilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkçe konuşan ve normal işiten bireylerde SPT, FPT ve GIN'in referans değer aralığını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: İşitme engellilik ölçeğine göre normal işitmeye sahip 61 birey çalışmaya dahil edildi. Dahil edilme kriterlerini karşılayan bireylere FPT, SPT ve GIN subraaural kulaklık ile monoaural olarak her iki kulağa da uygulandı. Bulgular: Katılımcıların 42’i kadın, 19 si erkekti. Cinsiyetler arasında yaş, FPT, SPT ve GIN açısından bir fark yoktu (p>0.05). Katılımcıların ortalama FRT skoru %75.22, ortalama DPT skoru %91.25 ve ortalama GIN skoru %67.96 idi. Ortalama GIN eşiği 5.52 msn idi. Yaş ile FPT, SPT ve GIN arasında bir ilişki yoktu (p>0.05). Sonuç: FPT, SPT ve GIN Türkçe konuşan bireylere rahatlıkla uygulanabilmektedir. Çalışmamızda sunduğumuz veriler Türkçe konuşan bireylerde bu testlerin daha doğru biçimde yorumlanmasında kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İşitsel İşlemleme, Odyoloji, Frekans Patern, Süre Patern, Gap-in-noise

Normative Data of Auditory Temporal Processing Tests For Turkish-Speaking Individuals

Öz

Aim: Frequency pattern test (FPT), Duration pattern test (DPT) and Gap-in-Noise (GIN) test can be easily applied to different societies, regardless of language, due to their non-verbal structures. However, although these tests are non-verbal, they can be affected by the linguistic characteristics of cultures. This study aims to evaluate the normative value range of DPT, FPT and GIN in Turkish-speaking individuals with normal hearing. Methods: Sixty-one individuals with normal hearing, according to the hearing handicap inventory, were included in the study. For individuals who met the inclusion criteria, FPT, DPT and GIN were applied monoaurally to both ears with subaural headphones. Results: Forty-two of the participants were women, and 19 were men. There was no difference between genders in terms of age, FPT, DPT and GIN (p>0.05). Participants' average FRT score was 75.22%, average DPT score was 91.25%, and average GIN score was 67.96%. The average GIN threshold was 5.52 msec. There was no relationship between age and FPT, DPT and GIN (p>0.05). Conclusion: FPT, DPT and GIN can be easily applied to Turkish-speaking individuals. Our study's datas can be used to interpret these tests more accurately in Turkish-speaking individuals.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Auditory Processing, Audiology, Frequency Pattern, Duration Pattern, Gap-in-noise

Etik Beyan

Ethical permission was received for the study from Karabuk University Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee (2023/02 desicion no:16).

Kaynakça

• Bamiou, D E., & Murphy, C.F.B. (2018). Auditory processing disorders across the age span. Ed. Watkinson, J.C., Clarke, R.W., Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery. Paediatrics The Ear Skull Base, edition: 8, 901.
• Chowsilpa, S., Bamiou, D.E., & Koohi, N. (2021). Effectiveness of the Auditory Temporal Ordering and Resolution Tests to Detect Central Auditory Processing Disorder in Adults With Evidence of Brain Pathology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol, 2, 12, 656117. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.656117
• Emanuel, D.C. (2002). The auditory processing battery: Survey of common practices. J Am Acad Audiol, 13(2): 93–117. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11895011/
• Frederigue-Lopes, N.B., Bevilacqua, M.C., Sameshima, K., & Costa, O.A. (2010). Performance of typical children in free field auditory temporal tests. Pro-fono, 22(2), 83-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-56872010000200003
• Helfer, K.S., & Vargo, M. (2009). Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. J Am Acad Audiol, 20(4),264–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.20.4.6
• Majak, J., Zamysłowska-Szmytke, E., Rajkowska, E., & Śliwińska-Kowalska, M. (2015). Audıtory temporal processing tests - normative data for polish-speaking adults. Medycyna Pracy, 66(2), 145-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.00041
• Marshall, E.K., & Jones, A.L. (2017). Evaluating test data for the duration pattern testand pitch pattern test. Speech Language and Hearing, 20,241–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2016.1275098
• Musiek, F.E. (1994). Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol, 5(4), 265–8. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7949300
• Musiek, F.E. (2015) Some Random Thoughts on Frequency (Pitch) and Duration Patterns. Hearing Health & Technology Matters, Retrieved from https://hearinghealthmatters.org/pathways-society/2015/some-random-thoughts-on-frequency-pitch-and-duration-patterns/ HHTM (2015).
• Musiek, F.E., Baran, J.A., & Pinheiro, M.L. (1990). Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Int J Audiol, 29(6), 304–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00206099009072861
• Musiek, F.E., & Pinheiro, M.L. (1987). Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. Audiology, 26, 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00206098709078409
• Musiek, F.E., Shinn, J.B., Jirsa, R., Bamiou, D-E., Baran, J.A., & Zaida, E. (2005). GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear, 26,608–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000188069.80699.41
• Neijenhuis, K.A.M., Stollman, M.H.P., Snik Ad, F.M., & van der Broek, P. (2001). Development of a central auditory test battery for adults. Int J Audiol, 40(2), 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00206090109073102.
• Paulovicks, J., & Musiek, F.E. (2008). The Gaps-in-Noise (GIN) Test and its diagnostic significance. The Hearing Journal, 61(3), 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000314723.80439.72
• Pinheiro, M.L., & Ptacek, P.H. (1971). Reversals in the perception of noise and tone patterns. J Acoust Soc Am, 49(6),1778– 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1912581
• Shinn, J.B. (2014). Temporal processing tests. Ed. Musiek, F.E., Chermak, G.D., Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder, edition 2, 405–34.
• Yeral, C., Çankaya, E.N., Kaplan, G., Yatmaz, C., & Şerbetçioğlu, B. (2021). Normal İşiten Bireylerde Temporal İşlemleme Becerilerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Türk Odyoloji ve İşitme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(3), 69-77. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjaudiologyandhear/issue/67337/1035054
• Zhang, G. W., Sun, W. J., Zingg, B., Shen, L., He, J., Xiong, Y., … Zhang, L. I. (2018). A Non-canonical Reticular-Limbic Central Auditory Pathway via Medial Septum Contributes to Fear Conditioning. Neuron, 97(2), 406–417.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.010