KIRILGAN BEŞLİ ÜLKELERİNİN BÜYÜME ANALİZİ: 1971-2021 DÖNEMİ FOURİER ANALİZİ

Year 2024, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 22 - 37, 30.06.2024

Müşerref Arık Melike Buse Akcan

Abstract

Ülkelerin ekonomik olarak sahip oldukları güç ve rekabet edebilirliği, ekonomik büyüme ile ölçümlenmekte ve literatürde ekonomik büyümeyi ele alan çalışmalara sıklıkla rastlanılmaktadır. Ekonomik büyümenin kırılgan 5’li ülkelerinde sürdürülebilirliği ve sürdürülebilirlik noktasında sektörel etkilerin incelenmesi için analize tabii tutulan değişkenler Hindistan, Brezilya, Endonezya, Türkiye ve Güney Afrika ülkeleri için genel büyüme, tarım sektöründeki büyüme, endüstriyel büyüme ve hizmet büyümesi olup, 1971-2021 arasındaki yıllık veriler ele alınarak inceleme gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada yeni nesil birim kök testi olarak tanımlanan Fourier ADF birim kök testinden yararlanılmıştır. Çalışmada ele alınan ülkelerde genel büyüme ile tarım, endüstri ve hizmet sektörleri büyümesinin sürdürülebilirliği incelenmiştir. İnceleme sonucunda ülke ve sektör bazında analiz sonuçlarının değişiklik gösterdiği görülmüştür. Sürdürülebilirlik değerlendirildiğinde Brezilya’da tarım sektöründe, Hindistan için genel bazda, Endonezya, Güney Afrika ve Türkiye için ise; tüm sektörlerde ekonomik büyümenin sürdürülebilir olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ulaşılan ampirik sonuçlar doğrultusunda sektörel gelişimi teşvik eden ekonomi politik düzenlemelere gidilerek ekonomik büyümede sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanması yönünde öneride bulunulabilecektir.

Keywords

Fourier ADF, Ekonomik Büyüme, Sürdürülebilirlik, Kırılgan 5’li Ülkeleri

GROWTH ANALYSIS OF THE FRAGILE FIVE COUNTRIES: FOURIER ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD 1971-2021

Abstract

The economic strength and competitiveness of countries are measured by economic growth, and studies on economic growth are frequently encountered in the literature. The variables analyzed to examine the sustainability of economic growth in the fragile 5 countries and the sectoral effects at the point of sustainability are general growth, growth in the agricultural sector, industrial growth and service growth for India, Brazil, Indonesia, Turkey and South Africa countries, and the analysis was carried out by considering the annual data between 1971-2021. Fourier ADF unit root test, which is defined as a new generation unit root test, was utilized in the study. The study analyses the sustainability of overall growth and growth in agriculture, industry and services sectors in the countries considered in the study. As a result of the analysis, it is seen that the results of the analyses vary on country and sector basis. When sustainability is evaluated, it is concluded that economic growth is sustainable in the agricultural sector in Brazil, in general for India, and in all sectors for Indonesia, South Africa and Turkey. In line with the empirical results, it can be suggested to ensure sustainability in economic growth by making economic policy arrangements that encourage sectoral development.

Keywords

Fourier ADF, Economic Growth, Sustainability, Fragile 5 Countries

References

• Ahmad, F., Draz, M. U., Chandio, A. A., Su, L. J., Ahmad, M., & İrfan, M. (2021). Investigating The Myth of Smokeless Industry: Environmental Sustainability in the ASEAN Countries And The Role Of Service Sector And Renewable Energy, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(39). 55344-55361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14641-8
• Ahmed, N., Mahboob, F., Hamid, Z., Sheikh, A.A., Ali, M.S.E., Glabiszewski, W., Wysoki´nska-Senkus, A., Senkus, P., & Cyfert, S. (2022). Nexus between Nuclear Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint in Asia Pacific Region: Policy Toward Environmental Sustainability. Energies (15), 6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15196956
• Akcan, A. T., Yıldırım, B., Karataş, A. R., & Yılmaz, M. (2023). Teachers’ Views on the Effect of STEM Education on the Labor Market. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1184730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184730
• Alper, A. E., Oransay, G., Alper, F. Ö. (2015). Beşeri Sermayenin Belirleyicileri: Üst Orta Gelirli Ülkeler Grubu ile OECD Karşılaştırmalı Analizi, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(9). 565-578. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.514
• Amin, N., Song, H. M., & Shabbir, M. S. (2022). What Factors Contribute to Environmental Degradation in G11 Economies? Emphasizing The İmportance of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Sources, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 29(5). 472-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2059720 Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2023). The Impact of CO2 Emissions and Energy Consumption on Economic Growth: A Panel Data Analysis, Energies, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031342
• Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2014). The Causal Dynamics Between Renewable Energy, Real GDP, Emissions and Oil Prices: Evidence From OECD Countries, Applied Economics, 46(36). 4519-4525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.964834
• Aratuo, D. N., & Etienne, X. L. (2018). Industry Level Analysis of Tourism-Economic Growth in the United States, Tourism Management, (70). 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.004
• Ayompe, L. M., Davis, S. J. & Egoh, B. N. (2020). Trends and drivers of African fossil fuel CO2 Emissions 1990-2017, Environmental Research Letters, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc64f
• Boluk, G., & Kaplan, R., (2021). Effectiveness of Renewable Energy Incentives on Sustainability: Evidence From Dynamic Panel Data Analysis for the EU Countries and Turkey, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(18). 26613-26630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17801-y
• Bozoklu, S. & V. Yılancı & M.S. Görüş (2020), Persistence in Per Capita Energy Consumption: A Fractional Integration Approach with A Fourier Function, Energy Economics, (91). 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104926
• Busu, M., & Trica, C. L. (2019). Sustainability of Circular Economy Indicators and Their Impact on Economic Growth of the European Union, Sustainability, 11(19). 5481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195481
• Ceylan, R., & Ceviş, İ. (2012). Enflasyon Hedeflemesi Rejimi Öncesi ve Sonrasında Türkiye’de Cari Açıkların Sürdürülebilirliği, NWSA-Social Science, 7(4). 259-276.
• Charfeddine, L., Al-Malk, A. Y., & Al Korbi, K. (2018). Is it Possible to Improve Environmental Quality Without Reducing Economic Growth: Evidence From the Qatar Economy, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, (82). 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.001
• Chebbi, E. H. (2010). Agriculture and economic growth in Tunisia. China Agricultural Economic Review, 2(1). 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561371011017504
• Chen, Y., Lee, C. C. & Chen, M. (2022). Ecological Footprint, Human Capital, and Urbanization, Energy & Environment, 33(3). 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211008610
• Chortareas, G., Kapetanios, G. & Ucum, M. (2008). Nonlinear Alternatives to Unit Root Tests and Public Finances Sustainability: Some Evidencef rom Latin American and Caribbean Countries, Oxford Bulletin of Economics And Statistics, (70)5. 645-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00511.
• Demir, M. A. (2021). External Debt Sustainability in The Transition Economies of Southeast Europe: an Application by Wavelet-Based Unit Root Tests, Eastern Journal of European Studies, 12(1). 173-190. Dickey, D.A., & Fuller, W. (1979), Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, (74), 427–431
• Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517
• Eddine Chebbi, H. (2010). Agriculture and Economic Growth in Tunisia. China Agricultural Economic Review, 2(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561371011017504
• Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). The Flexible Fourier and Dickey Fuller Type Unit Root Tests, Economics Letters, (117), 196-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081
• Ehigiamusoe, K. U., & Lean, H. H., & Somasundram, S. (2023). Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of the Agricultural, Industrial, and Financial sectors in Malaysia, Energy & Environment, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231152480
• Hassan, T., Song, H. M., Khan, Y., & Kırıkkaleli, D. (2022). Energy Efficiency a Source of Low Carbon Energy Sources? Evidence From 16 High-Income OECD Economies, Energy, (243). 123063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.123063
• Hsu, T. K. (2021). The Effect of Renewable Energy on Carbon Dioxide Emission in Taiwan: Quantile Mediation Analysis, Science Progress, 104(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504211058557
• Jin, T., & Kim, J. (2018). What is Better for Mitigating Carbon Emissions - Renewable Energy or Nuclear Energy? A Panel Data Analysis, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, (91). 464-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.022
• Karataş, A. R. (2022). Türkiye’de Finansal Gelişmenin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi Üzerine Ampirik Bir Değerlendirme. Y. Telli Üçler (Ed.), Ekonomik Büyüme Alanında Güncel Çalışmalar içinde (s. 131-152). Eğitim Yayınevi.
• Karataş, A. R. & Ergül, M. (2023). Türkiye’de Ekonomik Büyüme, Finansal Gelişme ve Ticari Açıklık: Genişletilmiş ARDL ile Kanıtlar, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(Özel Sayı), 222-236. https://doi.org/10.51124/jneusbf.2023.58
• Long, X. L., Naminse, E. Y., Du, J. G., & Zhuang, J. C. (2015). Nonrenewable Energy, Renewable Energy, Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Economic Growth in China From 1952 to 2012, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, (52). 680-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.176
• Matuka, A., & Asafo, S. S. (2021). Effects of Services on Economic Growth in Albania: An ARDL Approach. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(6), 856–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2021.1910723
• Mert, N., & Abdioğlu, Z. (2021). Türkiye’de Tarım, Sanayi ve Hizmet Sektörleri Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisinin Analizi, Sosyoekonomi, 29(50). 317-336. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2021.04.15
• Mulungu, K., & Ng’ombe, J. (2017). Sources of Economic Growth in Zambia, 1970–2013: A Growth Accounting Approach, Economies, 5(2). 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies5020015
• Ogunniyi, O. R., Okunlola, A. F., Alatise, M. A., & Aregbeshola, R. A. (2023). Socio-economic Inclusion and Sustainable Economic Growth: Empirical Analysis of Nigeria and South Africa, Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2163077
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to The Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
• Peseran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1995). An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis”, RePEc, https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521633230.011
• Phiri, J., Malec, K., Majune, S. K., Appiah-Kubi , S. N. K., Gebeltova, Z., Maitah, M., Maitah, K., & Abdullahi, K. T. (2020). Agriculture as a Determinant of Zambian Economic Sustainability, Sustainability, 12(11). 4559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114559
• Ramakrishnan, S., Hishan, S. S., Nabi, A. A., Arshad, Z. Kanjanapathy, M., Zaman, K., & Khan, F. (2016). An Interactive Environmental Model for economic growth: evidence from a Panel of Countries, Environmental Science, and Pollution Research, 23(14). 14567-14579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6647-8
• Rees, W. E. (1990). Revisiting Carrying Capacity: Area-Based Indicators of Sustainability, Population and Environment, 17(3). 195-215
• Sadiq, M., Wen, F. H., Bashir, M. F., & Amin, A. (2022). Does Nuclear Energy Consumption Contribute to Human Development? Modeling the Effects of Public Debt and Trade Globalization in an OECD Heterogeneous Panel, Journal of Cleaner Production, (375). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133965
• Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q. M. A., Tiwari, A. K., & Leitao, N. C. (2013). Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Financial Development, İnternational Trade and CO2 Emissions in Indonesia, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, (25). 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.009
• Sriyana, J. (2020). What Drives Economic Growth Sustainability? Evidence From Indonesia, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2). 906-918. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(8)
• Streimikiene, D., & Kasperowicz, R. (2016). Review of Economic Growth And Energy Consumption: A Panel Cointegration Analysis for EU Countries, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, (59). 1545-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.041
• Sun, Y., Du, M. N., Wu, L. Y., Li, C. Z., & Chen, Y. L. (2022). Evaluating the Effects of Renewable Energy Consumption on Carbon Emissions of China's Provinces: Based on Spatial Durbin Model, Land, 11(8). 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081316
• Wackernagel, M. (1994). (Doctoral Thesis). Ecological Footprint and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: A Tool for Planning Toward Sustainability, The University of British Columbia
• Yu, Y., & Qayyum, m. (2022). Dynamics Between Carbon Emission, Imported Cultural Goods, Human Capital, Income, and Energy Consumption: Renewed Evidence From Panel VAR Approach, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (29). 58360-58377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19862-z