Abstract
Nottingham Sağlık Profili ve Short Form 36 sağlıkla ilgili yaşam kalitealgısının değerlendirilmesinde sağlıklı veya hastalığa sahip çok çeşitligruplarda ve yaşlı bireylerde, güvenilir, geçerli, karşılaştırılabilir, kullanımıkolay yaklaşımlar olarak yaygınlaşmış ölçeklerdir. Bu çalışmanın amacıyaşlı bireylerde Nottingham Sağlık Profili ve Short Form 36 yaşam kalitesiölçeklerinin karşılaştırılabilir parametreleri arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmekve ölçüm performanslarını karşılaştırmaktı. Çalışmaya yaş ortalaması 68,04± 7, 83 olan 49 yaşlı birey alındı. Bireylere, Nottingham Sağlık Profili veShort Form 36 ölçeklerinin her ikisi uygulandı. Nottingham Sağlık Profilineverilen cevaplara göre Short Form 36’ya verilen cevapların, daha düşüktaban ve tavan etkisi gösterdiği ve daha homojen olduğu gözlendi. Her ikiölçeğin enerji ve fiziksel fonksiyon parametreleri arasındaki ilişki yüksek(p<0. 01), ağrı parametreleri arasında orta, sosyal fonksiyonlar (p<0. 05) vemental sağlık (p<0. 01) parametreleri arasındaki ilişki ise zayıf bulundu.Verilen cevapların homojenliği açısından Short Form 36 ölçeğinin yaşlıbireylerde Nottingham Sağlık Profiline göre daha çok tercih edilmesigerekliliği sonucuna varıldı
References
- Matsuo M, Nagasawa J, Yoshino A, Hiramatsu K, Kurashiki K, Effects of Activity Participation of the Elderly on Quality of Life Yonago Acta Medica, 2003; 46: 17–24
- Di Maio M, Perrone F, Quality of Life in elderly patients with cancer, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2003, 1: 1-9
- Grootenhuis MA, De Boone J, Van der Kooi A. Living with muscular dystrophy: health related quality of life consequences for children and adults. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2007; 5: 31–39.
- Salter KL, Moses MB, Foley NC et al. Health –related quality of life after stroke: what we are measuring? Int J Rehabil Res. 2008; 31: 111–117.
- Boyer F, Morrone I, Laffont I et al. Health related quality of life in people with hereditary neuromuscular disease: an ınvestigation of test-retest agrrement with comparison between two generic qustionnaires, the nottingham health profile and short form-36 items. Neuromuscul Disord. 2006; 16: 99–106.
- Şenocak Ö, El Ö, Söylev ÖG ve diğerleri. İnme sonrasında yaşam kalitesini etkileyen faktörler. J Neurol Sci (Turkish). 2008; 25 (3); 15: 164–170. 7. Guyatt G, Feeny D, Patrick D, Issues in quality of life measurement in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials, 1991, 12 (81); 81-90
- Wiklund I, Karlberg J, Evaluation of quality of life in clinical trials: selecting quality-of-life measures. Controlled Clin Trials 1991, (12); 204-216
- Kutner NG, Ory MG, Baker D, Schechtman KB, Hornbrook MC, Mulrow CD, Measuring the Quality of Life of the Elderly in Health Promotion Intervention Clinical Trials Public Health Rports, September-October 1992, 107 (5), 530-539.
- Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH; et al. Relative responsiveness of condition spesific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, J Clin Epidemiol, 1995, 48, 1369-78
- Aksu S, Kurne A, Düger T, Oksüz Ç, Türk C, Gedızogu T, Kansu T. Are results of the SF-36 health survey and the Nottingham health profile similar in migraine patients? The Pain Clinic, 2004, 16 (2), 167–171
- Prieto L, Alanso J, Ferrer M, et al. , Are results of the SF-36 Health Survey and the
- Nottingham Health Pro. le Similar? A comparison in COPD patients, J Clin Epidemiol, 1997, 50 (4), 463–73
- Ware SE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form healthy survey (SF-36), Med Care 1992, 30 (6), 473-83
- Başaran S, Güzel R, Sarpel T, Yaşam Kalitesi ve Sağlık Sonuçlarını Değerlendirme Ölçütleri, Romatizma, Cilt: 20, Sayı: 1, 2005: 55-63
- Küçükdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, et al. The Development and Psyhometric assessment of the turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res 2000; 23 (1): 32-8
ARE RESULTS OF THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY AND THE NOTTINGHAM HEALTH PROFILE SIMILAR IN MIGRAINE PATIENTS?
Abstract
Nottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 are reliable, valid, easy to useapproaches in the assessment of quality of life perception related to healthin healthy and diseased population and geriatric individuals. The aim of thisstudy was to assess the relation between comparable parameters ofNottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 quality of life measures andto compare measure performances. 49 geriatric individuals whose meanage 68, 04± 7, 83 included in this study. Both of Nottingham Health Profileand Short Form 36 were applied to individuals. Responses to Short Form36 showed more decreased ceiling and floor effect and more homogeneitythan responses to Nottingham Health Profile. Energy and physical functionparameters were highly correlated (p<0. 01), pain parameters wereintermediate, social parameters (p<0. 05) and mental health (p<0. 01)parameters were low correlated in both of the measures. It is agreed thatShort Form 36 would better to use instead of Nottingham Health Profilewhen the responses of homogeneity considered in geriatric individuals
References
- Matsuo M, Nagasawa J, Yoshino A, Hiramatsu K, Kurashiki K, Effects of Activity Participation of the Elderly on Quality of Life Yonago Acta Medica, 2003; 46: 17–24
- Di Maio M, Perrone F, Quality of Life in elderly patients with cancer, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2003, 1: 1-9
- Grootenhuis MA, De Boone J, Van der Kooi A. Living with muscular dystrophy: health related quality of life consequences for children and adults. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2007; 5: 31–39.
- Salter KL, Moses MB, Foley NC et al. Health –related quality of life after stroke: what we are measuring? Int J Rehabil Res. 2008; 31: 111–117.
- Boyer F, Morrone I, Laffont I et al. Health related quality of life in people with hereditary neuromuscular disease: an ınvestigation of test-retest agrrement with comparison between two generic qustionnaires, the nottingham health profile and short form-36 items. Neuromuscul Disord. 2006; 16: 99–106.
- Şenocak Ö, El Ö, Söylev ÖG ve diğerleri. İnme sonrasında yaşam kalitesini etkileyen faktörler. J Neurol Sci (Turkish). 2008; 25 (3); 15: 164–170. 7. Guyatt G, Feeny D, Patrick D, Issues in quality of life measurement in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials, 1991, 12 (81); 81-90
- Wiklund I, Karlberg J, Evaluation of quality of life in clinical trials: selecting quality-of-life measures. Controlled Clin Trials 1991, (12); 204-216
- Kutner NG, Ory MG, Baker D, Schechtman KB, Hornbrook MC, Mulrow CD, Measuring the Quality of Life of the Elderly in Health Promotion Intervention Clinical Trials Public Health Rports, September-October 1992, 107 (5), 530-539.
- Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH; et al. Relative responsiveness of condition spesific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, J Clin Epidemiol, 1995, 48, 1369-78
- Aksu S, Kurne A, Düger T, Oksüz Ç, Türk C, Gedızogu T, Kansu T. Are results of the SF-36 health survey and the Nottingham health profile similar in migraine patients? The Pain Clinic, 2004, 16 (2), 167–171
- Prieto L, Alanso J, Ferrer M, et al. , Are results of the SF-36 Health Survey and the
- Nottingham Health Pro. le Similar? A comparison in COPD patients, J Clin Epidemiol, 1997, 50 (4), 463–73
- Ware SE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form healthy survey (SF-36), Med Care 1992, 30 (6), 473-83
- Başaran S, Güzel R, Sarpel T, Yaşam Kalitesi ve Sağlık Sonuçlarını Değerlendirme Ölçütleri, Romatizma, Cilt: 20, Sayı: 1, 2005: 55-63
- Küçükdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, et al. The Development and Psyhometric assessment of the turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res 2000; 23 (1): 32-8
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | May 1, 2009 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2009 Issue: 1 |
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.