Relations of the judge with mass media and society (Theoretical and Practical Review)

Abstract

At the earliest stage of the development of society, a person used various means of communication and communication. Man, as a social being, constantly sought to interact with other people. Today, communication represents, the transfer of information from person to person, from one system to another. Communication also means connection, message, news, interaction, exchange of information in society, creation, and dissemination of information, as well as a means of communication. In this case, judges are not the exception, they have the right to communication, and however they are limited in their actions, which are regulated by the Code of Judicial Ethics, In this case, it should be interpreted that the Code of Judicial Ethics represents an act of the judicial community, it establishes rules of conduct binding on each judge in the exercise of professional activities in the administration of justice and extrajudicial activities, based on high moral and ethical requirements, provisions of the law.

Keywords

• Judges
• Relations
• Judicial Ethics
• Media
• Courts

References

1. Blitsa, D., Papathanasiou, I., & Salmanli, M. (2015). Judges & social media: Managing the risks. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2634043
2. Constitutional Court of Georgia. (2019). The decision of the Constitutional Court about the "Media Development Fund" and "Information Freedom Development Institute" against the Parliament of Georgia.
3. Council of Europe. (2021). Evolution of Judicial Councils and their Role in Independent and Impartial Judicial Systems. https://rm.coe.int/opinion-no-24-2021-of-the-ccje-ge/1680a53db2
4. Council of Europe. (2002). Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE). https://rm.coe.int/168070098d
5. Council of Europe. (2009). [Kudeshkina v. Russia] (№ 29492/05).
6. Disciplinary Committee of Judges of Common Courts of Georgia. (n.d.) Norms of Judicial Ethics of Georgia. http://dcj.court.ge/eng/Legislation/Judicial_Ethics
7. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit. (2011). Bangalore Principles of Judging Conduct. http://lawlibrary.info/ge/books/giz2011-ru-commentary-to-the-bangalore-principles.pdf
8. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit. (2015). "Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct" and its Comments. Tbilisi: GIZ.

9. Drechsel, R. (1989). An alternative view of media-judiciary relations: What the non-legal evidence suggests about the fair trial-free press issue. Hofstra Law Review, 18(1), 1-37.
10. Egorova. A. (n.d.). Mass media and court: some aspects of ethical behavior. https://isfic.info/lapes/etic01.htm
11. Foundation ALPE. (2001). Comments on the Judicial Code of Ethics of Georgia. http://www.nplg.gov.ge/greenstone3/library/collection/samartal/document/HASH018d1234a710d020c0619af5;jsessionid=1615CD733102FAE18AB9929FFE14618D?ed=1
12. Georgian Charter of Journalistic Ethics. (2017). Code of Conduct of Journalistic Ethics Charter of Georgia. https://www.qartia.ge/ka/dokumentebi/article/36725-saqarthvelos-zhurnalisturi-ethikis-qartiis-qcevis-kodeqsi
13. Groves, M. (2021). Judges and the media. In Appleby, G. & Lynch, A. Individual, Collegial and Institutional Judicial Dynamics in Australia, pp. 259-282.
14. Kochikian. A. (2016). Comparative Analysis of Judicial Ethics and Comments on Georgian Judicial Ethics Norms. https://dis.court.ge/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/d6a6b8c2e88b47efba0b4e4067ff4779.pdf
15. Kakhidze, T., Jimsheleishvili, M., Chitashvili, I. (2021). Scope of judges' freedom of expression. Tbilisi: Transparency International Georgia.
16. Korkelia, K., Kurdadze, I. (2004). International human rights law according to the European Convention on Human Rights. Strasburg: Council of Europe.
17. Lim, C. S. H., Snyder, J. M., & Strömberg, D. (2015). The Judge, the Politician, and the Press: Newspaper coverage and criminal sentencing across electoral systems. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(4), 103–135.
18. Parliament of the Republic of Georgia. (1995). Constitutional Law of the Republic of Georgia. Article 63. Clause 1.
19. Supreme Court of Georgia. (2002). Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct. https://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/aqtebi15.pdf
20. Transparency International Georgia. (2021). Limits of Freedom of Expression of Judges. https://transparency.ge/en/post/limits-freedom-expression-judges
21. Trochev, A., & Ellett, R. (2014). Judges and their allies: Rethinking judicial autonomy through the prism of off-bench resistance. Journal of Law and Courts, 2(1), 67–91.
22. The National Judicial College. (2015). Top ten tips for establishing relations with the media. https://www.judges.org/news-and-info/top-ten-tips-for-establishing-relationships-with-the-media/
23. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). Ethical Standards of Judges’ Conduct. Vienna: UN. https://www.unodc.org/documents/ji/training/19-09534_interactive_ebook_rus.pdf