Dikey sıçrama performansının belirlenmesinde akıllı telefon uygulaması kullanılabilir mi?

Year 2018, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 79 - 83, 25.07.2018

Ayşenur Turgut , Gülşah Özkurt Çoban Ertuğrul Gelen

https://doi.org/10.18826/useeabd.437153

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Amaç:Bu araştırma, dikey sıçrama yüksekliğini ölçmek için özel olarak tasarlanmış olan MyJumpakıllı telefon uygulamasının dikey sıçrama için kullanılabilirliğini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır.

Materyal ve Yöntem: Bu araştırmanın katılımcılarını, çalışmalara gönüllü olarak katılan Spor Bilimleri Fakültesinde öğrenim gören ve dikey sıçrama tecrübesine sahip 86 sağlıklı erkek öğrenci (yaş 22,3±1,7yıl, boy 173,3±13,8cm ve beden ağırlığı 71,7±13,8 kg) oluşturmuştur. Katılımcılar ısınmanın ardından 500 Hz örnekleme hızında kuvvet platformu üzerinde beş aktif dikey sıçrama testini gerçekleştirdi. Katılımcılar her bir sıçramadan sonra 2 dakika pasif olarak dinlendi. Tüm sıçramalar eşzamanlı olarak iPhone 6S akıllı telefonunun 240 Hz yüksek hızlı video çekim özelliği ile kaydedildi ve MyJump akıllı telefon uygulamasıyla analiz edildi. Dikey sıçrama esnasında kuvvet platformu yöntemi ile MyJump akıllı telefon uygulaması yöntemlerinden elde edilen verilerin analizinde Pearson korelasyon analizi ve Bland- Altman grafik yöntemleri kullanıldı. 

Bulgular:Dikey sıçrama için kullanılan kuvvet platformu yöntemi ile MyJump akıllı telefon uygulaması yöntemleri arasında pozitif yönde oldukça yüksek ilişki bulunmuştur (r=0,993, p<0,01). Ayrıca Bland - Altman grafiği incelendiğinde iki yöntem verilerinin çok büyük oranda hesaplanan sınırlı alan içinde olduğu gözlenmiştir. 

Sonuçlar: Bu sonuçlara göre, dikey sıçrama esnasında havada kalınan süreyi ve hesaplanan dikey sıçrama yüksekliğinin belirlemesinde kullanılan MyJump telefon uygulaması yönteminin, altın standart olarak kabul edilen kuvvet platformu yöntemi ile %99,3 oranında benzer olduğu belirlenmiştir. 

Keywords

Dikey Sıçrama, Fiziksel Performans, Kuvvet Platformu, Akıllı Telefon Uygulamaları

Can IPhone application be used to determine vertical jump performance?

Abstract

Aim: This research was conducted to examine the availability of My Jumpapp which was specially designed to measure vertical jumping height.

Methods: The participants of this study consisted of 86 healthy male (age 22.3 ±1.7-year, height 173.3 ± 13.8 cm and weight 71.7 ± 13.8 kg) students studying at the Faculty of Sports Sciences voluntarily participating in the work and with a vertical jump experience. The participants performed five active vertical jump tests on the force platform at a sampling rate of 500 Hz after warming up. Participants rested passively for 2 minutes after each jump. All jumps were simultaneously recorded with the 240 Hz high-speed video capture of the iPhone 6S smartphone and analyzed with the MyJump smartphone application. Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman graphical methods were used in the analysis of data obtained from force platform and MyJump smartphone application methods during the vertical jump.  

Results: There was a high positive correlation between the force platform method used for vertical jump and the method of MyJump smartphone application (r=0.993, p<0.01). Furthermore, when the Bland - Altman graph was examined, it was observed that the data of the two methods were in the calculated limited area.

Conclusion: According to these results, it was determined that the method of MyJump telephone application, used to determine the height of the airborne staff and the calculated vertical jumping height during the vertical jump, was 99.3% similar to the force platform method accepted as the gold standard.

Keywords

Vertical Jump, Physical Performance, Force Platform, Smartphone Applications

References

• Balsalobre-Fernández, C., Glaister, M. & Lockey, R. A. (2015). The validity and reliability of an iPhone app for measuring vertical jump performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(15), 1574–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.996184
• Bosco, C., Luhtanen, P. & Komi, P. V. (1983). A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 50(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422166
• Buchheit M, Spencer M, A. S. (2010). Reliability, usefulness, and validity of a repeated sprint and jump ability test. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 5(1), 3-17.
• Casartelli N, Müller R, M. N. (2010). Validity and reliability of the Myotest accelerometric system for the assessment of vertical jump height. J Strength Cond Res, 24(11), 3186-93.
• Gallardo-Fuentes F, et al. (2016). Inter and intra-session reliability and validity of the My Jump app for measuring different jump actions in trained male and female athletes. J Strength Cond Res, 30(7).
• Gathercole, R., Sporer, B., Stellingwerff, T. & Sleivert, G. (2015). Alternative countermovement-jump analysis to quantify acute neuromuscular fatigue. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 10(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2013-0413
• Glatthorn JF, Gouge S, Nussbaumer S, Stauffacher S, Impellizzeri FM, M. N. (2011). Validity and reliability of Optojump photoelectric cells for estimating vertical jump height. J Strength Cond Res., 25(2), 556–560.
• Haekkinen, K. & Komi, P. V. (1985). Effect of explosive type strength training on electromyographic and force production characteristics of leg extensor muscles during concentric and various stretch-shortening cycle exercises. Scandinavian Journal of Sports Sciences, 7(2).
• Haynes, T., Bishop, C., Antrobus, M., & Brazier, J. (2018) “The validity and reliability of the my jump 2 app for measuring the reactive strength index and drop jump performance.”, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.
• Kibele, A. (1998). Possibilities and limitations in the biomechanical analysis of countermovement jumps: A methodological study. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 14(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.14.1.105
• Moir, G. L. (2008). Three different methods of calculating vertical jump height from force platform data in men and women. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 12(4), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10913670802349766
• Pueo, B., Lipinska, P., Jiménez-Olmedo, J. M., Zmijewski, P., & Hopkins, W. G. (2017) “Accuracy of jump-mat systems for measuring jump height.”, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12((7)).
• Requena, B., Requena, F., García, I., de Villarreal, E. S. S. & Pääsuke, M. (2012). Reliability and validity of a wireless microelectromechanicals based system (Keimove\texttrademark) for measuring vertical jumping performance. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 11(1), 115–122.
• Rodacki, A., Rodacki, L. F., Fowler, N. E. & Bennett, S. J. (2002). Vertical jump coordination : Fatigue effects Vertical jump coordination : fatigue effects. Medicine & Science in Sports and Exercise, (February), 34(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200201000-00017
• de Villarreal, E. S. S., Izquierdo, M. & Gonzalez-Badillo, J. J. (2011). Enhancing jump performance after combined vs. maximal power, heavy-resistance, and plyometric training alone. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 25(12), 3274-3281.
• Walsh, S., Reindl, R., Harvey, E., Berry, G., Beckman, L. & Steffen, T. (2006). Biomechanical comparison of a unique locking plate versus a standard plate for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in a cadaveric model. Clinical Biomechanics, 21(10), 1027-1031.
• Taipale, R. S., Mikkola, J., Vesterinen, V., Nummela, A. & Häkkinen, K. (2013). Neuromuscular adaptations during combined strength and endurance training in endurance runners: Maximal versus explosive strength training or a mix of both. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(2), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2440-7